[Bug rtl-optimization/57479] [ARM][NEON] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault in add_dependence_list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57479 --- Comment #3 from bccheng at android dot com --- Here is my configuration: --target=arm-linux-androideabi --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --build=x86_64-linux-gnu Please let me know if you need additional information. Thanks!

[Bug libstdc++/53477] pretty printer fails with: Python Exception type 'exceptions.IndexError' list index out of range

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53477 --- Comment #6 from asmwarrior asmwarrior at gmail dot com --- Hi, all, I create a simple c++ program to reproduce this bug: #include set #include map typedef std::setint IntSet; typedef std::mapint, IntSet IntToSetMap; int main() {

[Bug libstdc++/53477] pretty printer fails with: Python Exception type 'exceptions.IndexError' list index out of range

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53477 --- Comment #7 from asmwarrior asmwarrior at gmail dot com --- Ok, I found another issue on the line return 0, see the GDB log: [debug] p m [debug]$2 = std::map with 1 elements = {[3] = std::set with 2 elements = {[0] = 5, [1] = 6}}

[Bug sanitizer/56393] SIGSEGV when -fsanitize=address and dynamic lib with global objects

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56393 --- Comment #26 from Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to David Abdurachmanov from comment #25) I downloaded GCC 4.8.1 (final) and binutils 2.23.1 (default ld.gold). The problem is that boost and a lot other C/C++ packages

[Bug target/12081] Gcc can't be compiled with -mregparm=3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12081 --- Comment #22 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se --- FWIW, the updated patch for gcc 4.9 bootstraps and regtests cleanly on several hosts (x86_64, sparc64, powerpc64, armv5tel, m68k).

[Bug regression/57473] FAIL: gcc.dg/tls/emutls-2.c (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57473 --- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #4) Seems to have been fixed with the Symtab cleanups 2/17 - merge alias code fix (r199577) or possibly with the same fix as for PR57467 (r199582).

[Bug middle-end/55030] [4.8 Regression]: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/memcpy-chk.c execution, -Os (et al)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55030 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot

[Bug tree-optimization/57488] [4.9 regression] loop terminates early at -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57488 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug bootstrap/57486] bootstrap fails on 4.8 and google/4.8 branch on RHEL6.1 platform

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57486 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug middle-end/57503] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Expand uses wrong multiply routine

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57503 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.4

[Bug middle-end/57500] [4.9 Regression] Segfault in ipa_record_reference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57500 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug middle-end/57499] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE when noreturn destructor returns after throw with -O

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57499 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug rtl-optimization/57497] [4.9 Regression] ICE in lra_create_new_reg_with_unique_value, at lra.c:155

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57497 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-*

[Bug bootstrap/57494] [4.9 regression] bootstrap comparison failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57494 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/56014] [C++1y] ICE using return type deduction for member functions with -g enabled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56014 --- Comment #1 from Johannes Goller jogojapan at gmail dot com --- I've just confirmed that the problem also exists in GCC 4.9 20130602 snapshot.

[Bug c++/56014] [C++1y] ICE using return type deduction for member functions with -g enabled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56014 --- Comment #2 from Johannes Goller jogojapan at gmail dot com --- It also exists in 4.8.1.

[Bug sanitizer/57507] New: gcc 4.8: thread sanitizer: std::thread false(?) positive

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57507 Bug ID: 57507 Summary: gcc 4.8: thread sanitizer: std::thread false(?) positive Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug sanitizer/57507] gcc 4.8: thread sanitizer: std::thread false(?) positive

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57507 --- Comment #1 from Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org --- FTR: we don't yet officially support C++11 treads, so this is quite expected. Patches and tests (to the upstream repo) are welcome

[Bug fortran/57508] New: [OOP] Intrinsic assignment+defined-assignment for comps: ROCEDURE attribute of '_F.DA0' conflicts with VARIABLE attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57508 Bug ID: 57508 Summary: [OOP] Intrinsic assignment+defined-assignment for comps: ROCEDURE attribute of '_F.DA0' conflicts with VARIABLE attribute Product: gcc

[Bug middle-end/57366] gcc.dg/lto/attr-weakref-1 FAILs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57366 --- Comment #16 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- Works fine on i386-pc-solaris2.10 with Sun as. Thanks. Rainer

[Bug c++/57484] 'std::numeric_limits T ::signaling_NaN()' signaling-bit is incorrect for x86 32-bit.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57484 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com --- Just to clarify that this is neither a library neither a C++ front-end issue: limits just uses the various __builtin_nans*

[Bug fortran/57496] I/O: WRITE(*,*) HUGE(0_16) [REAL(10)+REAL(16)]: Gives SIGFPE with -ffpe-trap=overflow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57496 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: burnus Date: Mon Jun 3 09:20:46 2013 New Revision: 199598 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=199598root=gccview=rev Log: 2013-06-01 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de

[Bug fortran/57496] I/O: WRITE(*,*) HUGE(0._10) gives SIGFPE with -ffpe-trap=overflow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57496 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|I/O: WRITE(*,*) HUGE(0_16) |I/O: WRITE(*,*)

[Bug target/57329] ICE with -O2 and -mthumb

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57329 Terry Guo terry.guo at arm dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||terry.guo at arm dot

[Bug sanitizer/57507] gcc 4.8: thread sanitizer: std::thread false(?) positive

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57507 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Would supporting std::shared_ptr solve the problem? The problem seems to be due to not understanding that the atomic ops used by shared_ptr are atomic.

[Bug middle-end/57393] [4.9 Regression] error: definition in block 4 follows the use / internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57393 --- Comment #6 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch --- Simplified testcase that fails with 'gfortran -c -g -O2 -ffast-math bug.f90' cat bug.f90 SUBROUTINE xb88_lr_adiabatic_lda_calc(npoints,e,g,sx) IMPLICIT

[Bug fortran/57508] [4.8/4.9 Regression] [OOP] Intrinsic assignment+defined-assignment for comps: PROCEDURE attribute of '_F.DA0' conflicts with VARIABLE attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57508 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug c++/57509] New: Segmentation fault when using __builtin_shuffle in templated class.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57509 Bug ID: 57509 Summary: Segmentation fault when using __builtin_shuffle in templated class. Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/57508] [4.8/4.9 Regression] [OOP] Intrinsic assignment+defined-assignment for comps: PROCEDURE attribute of '_F.DA0' conflicts with VARIABLE attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57508 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- I believe that it is not a true regression. In GCC 4.7, the intrinsic assignment create_arbitrary = from_struct() did also an intrinsic assignment of the counter component.

[Bug c++/57510] New: initializer_list memory leak

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57510 Bug ID: 57510 Summary: initializer_list memory leak Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug regression/57473] FAIL: gcc.dg/tls/emutls-2.c (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57473 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|arm-none-eabi |arm-none-eabi

[Bug rtl-optimization/57497] [4.9 Regression] ICE in lra_create_new_reg_with_unique_value, at lra.c:155

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57497 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at

[Bug tree-optimization/57511] New: [4.8/4.9 Regression] Missing SCEV final value replacement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57511 Bug ID: 57511 Summary: [4.8/4.9 Regression] Missing SCEV final value replacement Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/56341] GCC produces unaligned data access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56341 --- Comment #11 from Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de --- Created attachment 30248 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30248action=edit another example of the alignment faults Hello Sandra, good that you continue to

[Bug c++/57510] initializer_list memory leak

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57510 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug sanitizer/57507] gcc 4.8: thread sanitizer: std::thread false(?) positive

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57507 Dmitry Vyukov dvyukov at google dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dvyukov at

[Bug sanitizer/55561] TSAN: provide a TSAN instrumented libgomp

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55561 --- Comment #41 from Dmitry Vyukov dvyukov at google dot com --- Similar problem with libstdc++ http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57507

[Bug tree-optimization/57511] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Missing SCEV final value replacement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57511 --- Comment #1 from Alexander Monakov amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org --- The loop invokes signed integer overflow, but changing 1 to 10 still keeps the missed optimization there.

[Bug tree-optimization/57512] New: Vectorizer: cannot handle accumulation loop of signed char type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57512 Bug ID: 57512 Summary: Vectorizer: cannot handle accumulation loop of signed char type Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/57512] Vectorizer: cannot handle accumulation loop of signed char type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57512 --- Comment #1 from Bingfeng Mei bmei at broadcom dot com --- Created attachment 30250 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30250action=edit Vectorized assembly code with unsigned char type

[Bug libstdc++/57513] New: std::regex_token_iterator fails to link

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57513 Bug ID: 57513 Summary: std::regex_token_iterator fails to link Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug c++/57484] 'std::numeric_limits T ::signaling_NaN()' signaling-bit is incorrect for x86 32-bit.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57484 --- Comment #6 from Charles L. Wilcox zxClhzAApX1EdJwQANqrjLERmFeURQVy at cynd dot net --- (In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #5) Just to clarify that this is neither a library neither a C++ front-end issue: limits just uses the various

[Bug c++/57510] initializer_list memory leak

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57510 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug c++/52377] C++11 non-static initializers in unions are not used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52377 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com --- Thanks!

[Bug libstdc++/57513] std::regex_token_iterator fails to link

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57513 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] regex is unimplemented

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andy at

[Bug c++/57208] Latest chromium compilation fails with enabled LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57208 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška marxin.liska at gmail dot com --- I had a problem with linker, looks like chrome build system uses both linkers. I hacked build system to use just ld.bfd. gcc revision: 197652. I know it's about 2 months old, same

[Bug middle-end/57503] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Expand uses wrong multiply routine

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57503 --- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 30252 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30252action=edit .165r.expand: dump file with -Os -mmcu=atmega168 -fno-expensive-optimizations The

[Bug c++/57208] Latest chromium compilation fails with enabled LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57208 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška marxin.liska at gmail dot com --- gcc --version: HEAD (June 3rd, 2013) Failure: g++ -Wl,-z,now -Wl,-z,relro -pthread -Wl,-z,noexecstack -fPIC -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed -flto -fno-fat-lto-objects -o protoc

[Bug middle-end/57484] 'std::numeric_limits T ::signaling_NaN()' signaling-bit is incorrect for x86 32-bit.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57484 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at

[Bug target/57357] Error with '-mno-sse' and include wchar.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57357 --- Comment #5 from thutt at vmware dot com --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) (In reply to thutt from comment #2) Can you please explain why it's invalid to return a double if SSE is disabled? SSE is an x86-specific hardware

[Bug target/57357] Error with '-mno-sse' and include wchar.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57357 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to thutt from comment #5) Is there simple explanation for the difference in behavior? Is the preprocessed source the same? I bet glibc enables some inline function at

[Bug middle-end/57500] [4.9 Regression] Segfault in ipa_record_reference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57500 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/57514] New: -fno-align-functions doesn't work on member functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57514 Bug ID: 57514 Summary: -fno-align-functions doesn't work on member functions Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libstdc++/57515] New: implement begin() and end() for fixed size arrays

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57515 Bug ID: 57515 Summary: implement begin() and end() for fixed size arrays Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3

[Bug libstdc++/57515] implement begin() and end() for fixed size arrays

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57515 --- Comment #1 from jos at vandenoever dot info --- The first line of the code snippet was missing: int some_list[]={ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }; int total = 0; std::for_each(begin(some_list), end(some_list), [total](int x) { total += x;

[Bug c++/57514] -fno-align-functions doesn't work on member functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57514 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/57514] -fno-align-functions doesn't work on member functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57514 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Last

[Bug target/57516] New: [avr] Incorrect fixed-point rounding result in the overflow case

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57516 Bug ID: 57516 Summary: [avr] Incorrect fixed-point rounding result in the overflow case Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code

[Bug target/57516] [avr] Incorrect fixed-point rounding result in the overflow case

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57516 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5

[Bug c++/57514] -fno-align-functions doesn't work on member functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57514 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/57515] implement begin() and end() for fixed size arrays

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57515 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/57500] [4.9 Regression] Segfault in ipa_record_reference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57500 --- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- OK, the problem here is that the symbol is not created yet, but decl exists. Why it happens with -g only is bit strange. The following should fix it however Index: cgraphunit.c

[Bug tree-optimization/57517] New: internal compiler error: in eliminate_temp_copies, at tree-predcom.c:1913

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57517 Bug ID: 57517 Summary: internal compiler error: in eliminate_temp_copies, at tree-predcom.c:1913 Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug libstdc++/57515] implement begin() and end() for fixed size arrays

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57515 jos at vandenoever dot info changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |WORKSFORME --- Comment #3

[Bug rtl-optimization/57359] wrong code for union access at -O3 on x86_64-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57359 Dara Hazeghi dhazeghi at yahoo dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/57438] bootstrap fails on x86_64 darwin in stage2 linking cc1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57438 --- Comment #16 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Yes please. If you can run: dwarfdump --eh-frame --verify file.o on all the .o files and see if there are any more lurking in there. Any that fail verification will need

[Bug target/47333] [4.8/4.9 regression] g++.dg/lto/20091219 FAILs on Solaris 2 with SUN as

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47333 --- Comment #35 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- I am having problem to reproduce it on a cross compiler. I assume you have non-plugin-enable LD setup, right?

[Bug target/47333] [4.8/4.9 regression] g++.dg/lto/20091219 FAILs on Solaris 2 with SUN as

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47333 --- Comment #36 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- I am having problem to reproduce it on a cross compiler. I assume you have non-plugin-enable LD setup, right? There is problem with chained weakrefs that ought to be fixed by the

[Bug c++/57419] Access control doesn't stop referring to a deleted function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57419 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/57518] New: Redundent insn generated in LRA

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57518 Bug ID: 57518 Summary: Redundent insn generated in LRA Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization

[Bug fortran/57508] [4.8/4.9 Regression] [OOP] Intrinsic assignment+defined-assignment for comps: PROCEDURE attribute of '_F.DA0' conflicts with VARIABLE attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57508 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Patch, pending review: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-06/msg00027.html

[Bug debug/57519] New: DW_TAG_imported_declaration put in wrong class (base class instead of derived class)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57519 Bug ID: 57519 Summary: DW_TAG_imported_declaration put in wrong class (base class instead of derived class) Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/57462] ira-costs considers only a single register at a time

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57462 --- Comment #2 from Joshua Conner josh.m.conner at gmail dot com --- No problem - I appreciate you taking the time to respond. This has a noticeable impact on codegen for ARM because of the redundancy in the CPU/FPU functionality and cost of

[Bug bootstrap/57438] bootstrap fails on x86_64 darwin in stage2 linking cc1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57438 --- Comment #17 from Dara Hazeghi dhazeghi at yahoo dot com --- (In reply to m...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #16) Yes please. If you can run: dwarfdump --eh-frame --verify file.o on all the .o files and see if there are any more lurking in

[Bug c++/57520] New: alias template substitution/deduction failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57520 Bug ID: 57520 Summary: alias template substitution/deduction failure Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug middle-end/55030] [4.8 Regression]: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/memcpy-chk.c execution, -Os (et al)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55030 --- Comment #17 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #16) FWIW, I've bootstrapped and regtested gcc 4.9 with r192676 reapplied and the dse.c and cselib.c hunks of r193802 reverted on

[Bug c++/57471] [4.9 Regression] Bizarre error for template parameter pack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57471 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug c++/57443] Captured variable hide the parameter if they have the same name in Lambdas

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57443 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug bootstrap/57438] bootstrap fails on x86_64 darwin in stage2 linking cc1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57438 --- Comment #18 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu --- Do we have any idea why this problem is latent with --checking=release and --checking=yes but is triggered by --disable-checking?

[Bug c++/57444] ICE in instantiate_type for invalid use of member with using-declaration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57444 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug c++/57471] [4.9 Regression] Bizarre error for template parameter pack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57471 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at

[Bug tree-optimization/57521] New: wrong code for expressions in loop at -O3

place. This also fails on 4.7 and 4.8 and is a regression from gcc 4.6. $ gcc-trunk -v gcc version 4.9.0 20130603 (experimental) [trunk revision 199601] (GCC) $ gcc-trunk -O2 wrong.c $ ./a.out 1 $ gcc-4.6 -O3 wrong.c $ ./a.out 1 $ gcc-trunk -O3 wrong.c $ ./a.out 0

[Bug bootstrap/57438] bootstrap fails on x86_64 darwin in stage2 linking cc1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57438 --- Comment #19 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- I'll build my own tree, thanks. I was hoping that it was a singular issue and we'd be done with it.

[Bug middle-end/57500] [4.9 Regression] Segfault in ipa_record_reference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57500 David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/57419] Access control doesn't stop referring to a deleted function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57419 --- Comment #5 from David Krauss potswa at mac dot com --- Does this also fix #57429?

[Bug c++/57429] Dependent function call with one visible declaration, deleted

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57429 --- Comment #1 from David Krauss potswa at mac dot com --- To clarify the example, it's failing at definition time. There are two separate failures illustrated, a function template and a class template.

[Bug tree-optimization/57521] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code for expressions in loop at -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57521 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last