http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58941
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Moschcau thomas.moschcau at web dot de ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
And 4.8.3.
Hello Richard,
will there also be a fix for gcc 4.6.x?
Kind Regards
Thomas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59308
Bug ID: 59308
Summary: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-ifcombine-ccmp-[1456] tests fail
on arm cortex-a5
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59303
--- Comment #3 from christophe.lyon at st dot com ---
I have filed PR 59308 about the ssa-ifcombine-ccmp* tests failing on cortex-a5.
Should I mark this bug report (59303) as a duplicate of 49498?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56706
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59187
--- Comment #5 from Alessio alessio211734 at yahoo dot it ---
Hello,
when you fix a mingw bug where can I download the new version of compiler?
I should wait a new release or I can get from trunk?!?! I get another internal
error.
Il Lunedì 25
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58941
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013, thomas.moschcau at web dot de wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58941
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Moschcau thomas.moschcau at web
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59288
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 27 08:50:15 2013
New Revision: 205434
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205434root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-11-27 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59288
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59308
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58746
--- Comment #1 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
---
Reduced :
MODULE mathlib
INTEGER, PARAMETER :: dp = 8
CONTAINS
FUNCTION expint(n,x)
REAL(dp) :: x, expint
nm1=n-1
DO i=1,MAXIT
IF(i.NE.nm1)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59305
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59303
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm, x86_64
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57645
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58746
--- Comment #2 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
---
this testcase gives the same error without LTO. Just -O2 is sufficient:
INTEGER, PARAMETER :: dp = 8
REAL(KIND=dp), VOLATILE :: r=0.1_dp
r = expint(1,r)
(emit_group_store): Don't write past the end of the structure.
(store_bit_field): Fix formatting.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20131127-1.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/expr.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
(emit_group_store): Don't write past the end of the structure.
(store_bit_field): Fix formatting.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_8-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20131127-1.c
- copied unchanged from r205436,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20131127-1.c
Modified:
branches/gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59138
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59289
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm |arm-*-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59037
--- Comment #7 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Wed Nov 27 10:00:30 2013
New Revision: 205438
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205438root=gccview=rev
Log:
Don't create out-of-bounds BIT_FIELD_REF.
2013-11-27 Tom de Vries
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59032
--- Comment #7 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Wed Nov 27 10:00:48 2013
New Revision: 205439
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205439root=gccview=rev
Log:
Handle vector increment/decrement in build_unary_op
2013-11-27
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58723
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
We fail to stream cfun-has_force_vect_loops.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58723
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #31299|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58723
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #31305|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58723
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #31306|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58723
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Eh.
make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS=--target_board=unix/-flto/-ffat-lto-objects
gomp.exp
FAIL: gcc.dg/gomp/declare-simd-1.c (internal compiler error)
FAIL:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58723
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #9)
We fail to stream cfun-has_force_vect_loops.
Note we don't necessarily have to stream that (and has_simduid_loops), the
alternative is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58723
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #13)
Eh.
make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS=--target_board=unix/-flto/-ffat-lto-objects
gomp.exp
FAIL: gcc.dg/gomp/declare-simd-1.c (internal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59306
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Nov 27 11:40:22 2013
New Revision: 205443
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205443root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/59306
* ubsan.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59306
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59259
cjanderson at yandex dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57189
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57189
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
Likely caused by r198611.
This is the patch that exposes the problem.
I have filled this PR due to the difference with IRA vs. reload, it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59136
--- Comment #10 from Alexey Samsonov samsonov at google dot com ---
Hi!
Jakub suggested to use libbacktrace in libsanitizer. I've committed his patch
to LLVM, and it will soon be merged into GCC, with many more changes. So, your
change will not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59259
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35763
Johannes Schaub schaub.johannes at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54742
jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jgreenhalgh at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35763
--- Comment #5 from Johannes Schaub schaub.johannes at googlemail dot com ---
We also have this bug and it took us several days to find the cause. Testcase
by my colleague attached.
Perhaps this should fire an assertion if it is hard to fix
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54742
jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19794
Bug 19794 depends on bug 54742, which changed state.
Bug 54742 Summary: Switch elimination in FSM loop
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54742
What|Removed |Added
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59259
cjanderson at yandex dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #6 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59309
Bug ID: 59309
Summary: FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/CK/spawnee_inline.c -g
-fcilkplus (test for excess errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59310
Bug ID: 59310
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/gomp/openmp-simd-1.c (test for excess
errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311
Bug ID: 59311
Summary: FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1y/vla-initlist1.C (test for excess
errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
==8030==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: global-buffer-overflow on address
0x0297d2e4 at pc 0xe64e63 bp 0x7fffe2f360f0 sp 0x7fffe2f360e8
READ of size 4 at 0x0297d2e4 thread T0
#0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
(gdb) f 0
#0 dwarf2out_frame_debug (insn=0x75980ca8) at
/export/gnu/import/git/gcc/gcc/dwarf2cfi.c:2000
2000 fde-vdrap_reg = dwf_regno (n);
(gdb) p n
$2 = (rtx_def *)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59309
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
Breakpoint 4, 0x007fb146 in gimplify_cilk_spawn (spawn_p=optimized
out, before=optimized out,
after=optimized out) at
/export/gnu/import/git/gcc/gcc/c-family/cilk.c:774
774
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59309
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bviyer at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47334
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
This issue now causes new failures on Solaris 9 with Sun as:
FAIL: gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-1.c -O2 -flto (test for excess errors)
Excess
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59310
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
Breakpoint 1, c_parser_omp_simd (loc=loc@entry=9494,
parser=parser@entry=0x7590f540,
p_name=0x7fffd6a0 I teams distribute simd teams distribute parallel
for,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59310
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at redhat dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59312
Bug ID: 59312
Summary: Incorrect warning defaulted move assignment for ...
calls a non-trivial move assignment operator for
virtual base ...
Product: gcc
Version:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at redhat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|FAIL: |[4.9 Regression]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59313
Bug ID: 59313
Summary: gfortran.dg/erf_3.F90 FAILs on Solaris/SPARC
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59312
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Which document are you looking at? That's not what 12.8/23 in the standard
says.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59014
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59014
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 31310
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31310action=edit
gcc49-pr59014-test.patch
Testcase that reproduces also on 4.8 and 4.7. I'll
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59314
Bug ID: 59314
Summary: [DR 1054] [C++11] access to volatile through reference
should cause load
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59310
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58723
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 27 15:18:23 2013
New Revision: 205447
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205447root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-11-27 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59315
Bug ID: 59315
Summary: [4.9 regression] g++.dg/warn/Wunused-3.C FAILs on
Solaris
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57410
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59316
Bug ID: 59316
Summary: gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-5.c FAILs on
Solaris/SPARC
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59316
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59316
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|sparc*-sun-solaris2.* |sparc*-sun-solaris2.*,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58723
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59237
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57904
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
We have:
bb 2:
ubound.0_3 = 0;
size.1_4 = ubound.0_3 + 1;
size.1_5 = MAX_EXPR size.1_4, 0;
_6 = size.1_5 * 4;
_7 = (character(kind=4)) _6;
_8 = MAX_EXPR _7, 1;
sizes_9 =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58647
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Nov 27 15:55:18 2013
New Revision: 205449
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205449root=gccview=rev
Log:
/cp
2013-11-27 Paolo Carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59305
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com ---
For powerpc see: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2013-11/msg00131.html - the
failures indicate the architecture maintainers have not yet added this
hook.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58647
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57904
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59316
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com ---
See: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2013-11/msg00131.html - the failures
indicate the architecture maintainers have not yet added this hook (for
either SPARC, or
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59317
Bug ID: 59317
Summary: [4.9 Regression] [LRA,MIPS] ICE: in check_rtl, at
lra.c (insn does not satisfy constraints)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59316
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57410
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Wed Nov 27 16:30:48 2013
New Revision: 205451
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205451root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-11-27 Vladimir Makarov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59316
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com ---
Feel free to add a comment mentioning the hook targets need to define for
this test to pass.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57410
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58125
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59014
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Nov 27 17:03:27 2013
New Revision: 205454
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205454root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/59014
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59014
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Nov 27 17:05:21 2013
New Revision: 205456
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205456root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2013-11-26 Jakub
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59014
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Nov 27 17:06:44 2013
New Revision: 205457
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205457root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/59014
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59131
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59131
--- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org ---
FWIW, also works on 4.8.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56788
--- Comment #15 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Wed Nov 27 18:07:22 2013
New Revision: 205458
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205458root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/56788
* gcc.target/i386/xop-frczX.c: New test.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59316
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59318
Bug ID: 59318
Summary: ICE on invalid C++ code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59319
Bug ID: 59319
Summary: gcc does not emit DW_AT_friend or DW_TAG_friend
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
A small testcase compiled with -std=c++1y -m32:
--
namespace std
{
typedef long unsigned int size_t;
}
namespace std
{
templateclass _E
class initializer_list
{
public:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59320
Bug ID: 59320
Summary: ftree-vrp breaks simple loops
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: regression
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
LRA calls
(gdb) bt
#0 elimination_costs_in_insn (insn=0x71a30ee8)
at /export/gnu/src/gcc/gcc/gcc/reload1.c:3694
#1 0x00d0419f in calculate_elim_costs_all_insns ()
at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59320
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
What is the size of fl ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59320
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
What is the size of fl ?
What I mean are you going past the bounds of the array fl?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
/* Terminate the search in check_eliminable_occurrences at
this point. */
*recog_data.operand_loc[i] = 0;
sets DEST to NULL.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59320
--- Comment #3 from David Kaufmann astra at ionic dot at ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
What is the size of fl ?
What I mean are you going past the bounds of the array fl?
yes, i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
remove_pseudos in lra-spills.c failed to handle
REG_CFA_SET_VDRAP note.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34740
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2009-03-29 08:22:06
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311
--- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 31313
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31313action=edit
A patch
I am testing this patch.
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo