[Bug libstdc++/64147] New: vector resize() fails for non-copyable type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64147 Bug ID: 64147 Summary: vector resize() fails for non-copyable type Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/64137] Fortran FE builds invalid GENERIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64137 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Dec 2 08:50:57 2014 New Revision: 218259 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218259root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-12-02 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de

[Bug fortran/64137] Fortran FE builds invalid GENERIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64137 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/64126] [5.0 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr37289.c scan-tree-dump original -\\(long unsigned int\\) x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64126 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/64111] [5.0 regression] ICE: conversion of register to a different size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64111 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug boehm-gc/64042] FAIL: boehm-gc.c/gctest.c -O2 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64042 --- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- An easy way to reproduce, is to add this patch: ... diff -u /home/vries/gcc_versions/data/ref-master-14-12-02/src/boehm-gc/testsuite/boehm-gc.c/c.exp ./c.exp ---

[Bug middle-end/64122] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl common' structure, have 'ssa_name' in prepare_gimple_addressable, at gimplify.c:3228 with -fgnu-tm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64122 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug debug/60643] ICE with -O1 and -g on mips (internal compiler error: in dwarf2out_var_location, at dwarf2out.c:20810)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60643 hongxu jia hongxu.jia at windriver dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug ipa/64146] [5 Regression] ipa-icf breaks gold dynamic_test_2 test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64146 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug target/63321] [SH] Unused T bit result of shll / shlr insns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63321 Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug target/63321] [SH] Unused T bit result of shll / shlr insns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63321 --- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #1) void test2_1 (unsigned int x, unsigned int* y) { y[0] = x 1; y[1] = x 1; } will compile to the desired sequence: shlr

[Bug target/63321] [SH] Unused T bit result of shll / shlr insns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63321 --- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org --- A more advanced example: void test4 (unsigned int x, unsigned int* y) { y[0] = (x 0) 1; y[1] = (x 1) 1; y[2] = x 2; } currently compiles to: mov r4,r0

[Bug target/63321] [SH] Unused T bit result of shll / shlr insns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63321 --- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #1) Combine recently received some updates which improve handling of multiple-set parallel insns. Applying the following: Index:

[Bug gcov-profile/64123] [5 Regression] Instrumented Firefox segfaults on start

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64123 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug target/63321] [SH] Unused T bit result of shll / shlr insns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63321 --- Comment #5 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #3) A more advanced example: void test4 (unsigned int x, unsigned int* y) { y[0] = (x 0) 1; y[1] = (x 1) 1; y[2] = x 2; } Which

[Bug target/64113] Gcc on Alpha: Error: No lda !gpdisp!282 was found

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64113 --- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Tue Dec 2 10:04:14 2014 New Revision: 218264 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218264root=gccview=rev Log: PR target/64113 * config/alpha/alpha.md

[Bug ipa/63814] [5 Regression] g++.dg/ipa/pr61160-1.C fails with -m32 -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63814 --- Comment #28 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jamborm Date: Tue Dec 2 10:12:27 2014 New Revision: 218265 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218265root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-12-02 Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz

[Bug ipa/63814] [5 Regression] g++.dg/ipa/pr61160-1.C fails with -m32 -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63814 Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug ipa/64146] [5 Regression] ipa-icf breaks gold dynamic_test_2 test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64146 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug ipa/63814] [5 Regression] g++.dg/ipa/pr61160-1.C fails with -m32 -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63814 --- Comment #30 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #29) Fixed (and as I wrote in comment #25, feel free to add testcases if you know how and have environment in which you can

[Bug ipa/64139] [5 Regression] ice in possible_polymorphic_call_targets, at ipa-devirt.c:2410

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64139 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug libstdc++/64147] vector resize() fails for non-copyable type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64147 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/14541] [tree-ssa] built-in math functions are not fully optimized at tree level

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14541 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/64058] [5 Regression] Performance degradation after r216304

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64058 --- Comment #5 from Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com --- But at the same time difference in good and bad .optimized dumps seems to me insignificant (only some postfix numbers of variables).

[Bug fortran/53379] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] No backtrace generated for array bounds violation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53379 Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2013-12-29 00:00:00

[Bug tree-optimization/64148] New: [5.0 Regression][ARM][Aarch64] internal compiler error: in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:939

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64148 Bug ID: 64148 Summary: [5.0 Regression][ARM][Aarch64] internal compiler error: in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:939 Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/64148] [5.0 Regression][ARM][Aarch64] internal compiler error: in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:939

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64148 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.9.2 Target

[Bug c++/64129] [5.0 regression] ICE on invalid: in grokfndecl, at cp/decl.c:7658

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64129 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last

[Bug tree-optimization/64148] [5.0 Regression][ARM][Aarch64] internal compiler error: in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:939

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64148 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #34160|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/64149] New: -mno-lra bitrots, suggest to remove for GCC 5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64149 Bug ID: 64149 Summary: -mno-lra bitrots, suggest to remove for GCC 5 Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug c++/64150] New: Missed optimisation opportunity with moved-from pimpl classes and a nullptr d-pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64150 Bug ID: 64150 Summary: Missed optimisation opportunity with moved-from pimpl classes and a nullptr d-pointer Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/64150] Missed optimisation opportunity with moved-from pimpl classes and a nullptr d-pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64150 --- Comment #1 from marc at kdab dot com --- (compiled with g++ -fverbose-asm -std=c++14 -g -O3 -S -o test-moved-from-dtor.{s,cpp})

[Bug ipa/63814] [5 Regression] g++.dg/ipa/pr61160-1.C fails with -m32 -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63814 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug c++/64150] Missed optimisation opportunity with moved-from pimpl classes and a nullptr d-pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64150 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug ipa/63814] [5 Regression] g++.dg/ipa/pr61160-1.C fails with -m32 -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63814 --- Comment #32 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Tue Dec 2 12:47:29 2014 New Revision: 218268 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218268root=gccview=rev Log: Add a test for PR ipa/63814 PR ipa/63814

[Bug ipa/63814] [5 Regression] g++.dg/ipa/pr61160-1.C fails with -m32 -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63814 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug ipa/64146] [5 Regression] ipa-icf breaks gold dynamic_test_2 test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64146 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail

[Bug testsuite/64145] [5 Regression] gcc.dg/graphite/isl-codegen-loop-dumping.c UNRESOLVED after r217315.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64145 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/64148] [5.0 Regression][ARM][Aarch64] internal compiler error: in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:939

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64148 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug ipa/63569] [5.0 Regression] Wrong code with volatile and ICF

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63569 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at

[Bug target/64149] -mno-lra bitrots, suggest to remove for GCC 5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64149 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc

[Bug c++/64129] [5.0 regression] ICE on invalid: in grokfndecl, at cp/decl.c:7658

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64129 --- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. Please include the complete backtrace with any bug

[Bug libstdc++/64096] std::list, set and map violate a rule about allocator::construct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64096 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- For completeness, the error for std::list now shows: a.cc: In instantiation of ‘void my_allocatorT::construct(U*, Args ...) [with U = int; Args = {int}; T = std::_Rb_tree_nodeint]’:

[Bug rtl-optimization/63718] [5 Regression] ARM Thumb1 bootstrap fail after fuse-caller-save info in cprop-hardreg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63718 --- Comment #16 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vries Date: Tue Dec 2 13:35:10 2014 New Revision: 218271 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218271root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-12-02 Tom de Vries t...@codesourcery.com PR

[Bug rtl-optimization/64151] New: [5 Regression] r2182676caused many regressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64151 Bug ID: 64151 Summary: [5 Regression] r2182676caused many regressions Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/64129] [5.0 regression] ICE on invalid: in grokfndecl, at cp/decl.c:7658

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64129 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug target/64108] ICE: SIGSEGV in decide_alg() with -mmemset-strategy=libcall:-1:align -minline-all-stringops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64108 --- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Tue Dec 2 14:10:23 2014 New Revision: 218272 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218272root=gccview=rev Log: Stop only if there aren't any usable

[Bug target/64152] New: internal compiler error: in gen_add2_insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64152 Bug ID: 64152 Summary: internal compiler error: in gen_add2_insn Product: gcc Version: 4.9.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ra Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug rtl-optimization/63718] [5 Regression] ARM Thumb1 bootstrap fail after fuse-caller-save info in cprop-hardreg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63718 Joey Ye joey.ye at arm dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/64151] [5 Regression] r218266 caused many regressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64151 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug target/64152] internal compiler error: in gen_add2_insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64152 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Compile with cc1plus, it's a C++ testcase.

[Bug target/64115] [4.9/5 Regression] ICE: : in rs6000_delegitimize_address, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:7051

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64115 --- Comment #6 from Ulrich Weigand uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uweigand Date: Tue Dec 2 14:27:46 2014 New Revision: 218273 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218273root=gccview=rev Log: PR target/64115 *

[Bug target/64115] [4.9/5 Regression] ICE: : in rs6000_delegitimize_address, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:7051

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64115 --- Comment #7 from Ulrich Weigand uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uweigand Date: Tue Dec 2 14:30:47 2014 New Revision: 218274 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218274root=gccview=rev Log: PR target/64115 *

[Bug target/64115] [4.9/5 Regression] ICE: : in rs6000_delegitimize_address, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:7051

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64115 --- Comment #8 from Ulrich Weigand uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uweigand Date: Tue Dec 2 14:33:00 2014 New Revision: 218275 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218275root=gccview=rev Log: PR target/64115 *

[Bug target/64115] [4.9/5 Regression] ICE: : in rs6000_delegitimize_address, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:7051

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64115 Ulrich Weigand uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/64151] [5 Regression] r218266 caused many regressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64151 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug ipa/64153] [5.0 regression] r218205 miscompiles libgomp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64153 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0

[Bug ipa/64153] New: [5.0 regression] r218205 miscompiles libgomp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64153 Bug ID: 64153 Summary: [5.0 regression] r218205 miscompiles libgomp Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal

[Bug ipa/64153] [5.0 regression] r218205 miscompiles libgomp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64153 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug target/64152] internal compiler error: in gen_add2_insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64152 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/64152] internal compiler error: in gen_add2_insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64152 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2014-12-2

[Bug fortran/64138] gfortran interface issue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64138 --- Comment #5 from david wong.david-c at epa dot gov --- Hi, What is your fix? In the original code, c_sub_cr and c_sub_rc are distinct because the sequence of argument type are different. Other compilers have no problem to distinguish

[Bug target/64003] valgrind complains about get_attr_length_nobnd in insn-attrtab.c from i386.md

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64003 --- Comment #8 from dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 34165 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34165action=edit Patch to add instrumentation to final.c to track the reads/writes of insn_lengths The attached

[Bug target/64003] valgrind complains about get_attr_length_nobnd in insn-attrtab.c from i386.md

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64003 --- Comment #9 from dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 34166 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34166action=edit Dump of RTL from the reproducer

[Bug target/64003] valgrind complains about get_attr_length_nobnd in insn-attrtab.c from i386.md

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64003 --- Comment #10 from dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 34167 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34167action=edit Log from gdb session, with a conditional breakpoint to trap uninitialized reads This is a log of a

[Bug fortran/64138] gfortran interface issue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64138 --- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 03:37:19PM +, wong.david-c at epa dot gov wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64138 What is your fix? I meant I

[Bug target/64003] valgrind complains about get_attr_length_nobnd in insn-attrtab.c from i386.md

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64003 --- Comment #11 from dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Investigating the backtrace at the point of the uninit read shows that the issue occurs in shorten_branches here: #5 0x006f3263 in shorten_branches (first=0x71687700) at

[Bug rtl-optimization/64010] [msp430-elf] struct function dereference clobbers parameter passed to function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64010 Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat

[Bug target/64003] valgrind complains about get_attr_length_nobnd in insn-attrtab.c from i386.md

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64003 --- Comment #12 from dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to dmalcolm from comment #11) Running valgrind with vgdb to get the precise location of its warnings indicates they are here within get_attr_length_nobnd in insn-attrtab.c:19152:

[Bug libstdc++/64103] conflicting definitions in parallel/algo.h and algorithmfwd.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64103 --- Comment #3 from Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: doko Date: Tue Dec 2 16:32:24 2014 New Revision: 218278 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218278root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-12-02 Matthias Klose d...@ubuntu.com

[Bug rtl-optimization/64010] [msp430-elf] struct function dereference clobbers parameter passed to function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64010 --- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com --- Hi Alex, This appears to be a reload bug. Before reload we have: (call_insn 12 (call:HI (mem:HI (mem:HI (plus:HI (reg:HI R14)

[Bug libstdc++/64103] conflicting definitions in parallel/algo.h and algorithmfwd.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64103 Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/64103] conflicting definitions in parallel/algo.h and algorithmfwd.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64103 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.3

[Bug fortran/64138] gfortran interface issue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64138 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- I was sure to have seen discussions about such issues: pr33997 and https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/comp.lang.fortran/GIcxE7GM1ek/aP7eJpQ-T7QJ AFAIU the discussions,

[Bug target/64154] New: enable fuse-caller-save for Thumb1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64154 Bug ID: 64154 Summary: enable fuse-caller-save for Thumb1 Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug rtl-optimization/63718] [5 Regression] ARM Thumb1 bootstrap fail after fuse-caller-save info in cprop-hardreg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63718 --- Comment #18 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Joey Ye from comment #17) A new PR is expected to open for a complete solution. PR 64154 - enable fuse-caller-save for Thumb1

[Bug fortran/64138] gfortran interface issue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64138 --- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 05:13:09PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: To conclude I think this PR should be closed as INVALID. That's the conclusion that I'm

[Bug fortran/64138] gfortran interface issue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64138 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- That's the conclusion that I'm leaning towards. Reading section 16 of the standard always makes my head hurt, so I'm being caution while looking for some subtle point

[Bug middle-end/64155] New: [5 Regression] ICE in remove_unreachable_nodes, at ipa.c:546

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64155 Bug ID: 64155 Summary: [5 Regression] ICE in remove_unreachable_nodes, at ipa.c:546 Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code

[Bug middle-end/64155] [5 Regression] ICE in remove_unreachable_nodes, at ipa.c:546

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64155 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug ipa/64068] [5 Regression] ICE: in remove_unreachable_nodes, at ipa.c:546

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64068 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc

[Bug rtl-optimization/64010] [msp430-elf] struct function dereference clobbers parameter passed to function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64010 Ulrich Weigand uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||uweigand at

[Bug rtl-optimization/64010] [msp430-elf] struct function dereference clobbers parameter passed to function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64010 --- Comment #5 from Ulrich Weigand uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 34170 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34170action=edit Do not clobber function argument registers

[Bug ipa/64153] [5.0 regression] r218205 miscompiles libgomp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64153 Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug ipa/64153] [5.0 regression] r218205 miscompiles libgomp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64153 --- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 34171 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34171action=edit Untested fix I'm testing this fix - but on a x86_64-linux, together with other stuff,

[Bug rtl-optimization/64156] New: Subversion id 218266 breaks the big-endian 64-bit PowerPC build (wilco.dijks...@arm.com's mod to ira-costs.c)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64156 Bug ID: 64156 Summary: Subversion id 218266 breaks the big-endian 64-bit PowerPC build (wilco.dijkstra at arm dot com's mod to ira-costs.c) Product: gcc Version:

[Bug rtl-optimization/64156] Subversion id 218266 breaks the big-endian 64-bit PowerPC build (wilco.dijks...@arm.com's mod to ira-costs.c)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64156 Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug rtl-optimization/64156] Subversion id 218266 breaks the big-endian 64-bit PowerPC build (wilco.dijks...@arm.com's mod to ira-costs.c)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64156 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug target/64113] Gcc on Alpha: Error: No lda !gpdisp!282 was found

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64113 --- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Tue Dec 2 19:29:28 2014 New Revision: 218282 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218282root=gccview=rev Log: PR target/64113 * config/alpha/alpha.md

[Bug target/64113] Gcc on Alpha: Error: No lda !gpdisp!282 was found

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64113 Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/64156] Subversion id 218266 breaks the big-endian 64-bit PowerPC build (wilco.dijks...@arm.com's mod to ira-costs.c)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64156 --- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org --- Note, the fix proposed in PR64151 DOES NOT work on the PowerPC, so it may be a dup in terms of what change broke the build, but the potential fix needs more analysis.

[Bug rtl-optimization/64156] Subversion id 218266 breaks the big-endian 64-bit PowerPC build (wilco.dijks...@arm.com's mod to ira-costs.c)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64156 Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0

[Bug ipa/64153] [5.0 regression] r218205 miscompiles libgomp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64153 --- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org --- I've posted the patch to the mailing list: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-12/msg00205.html

[Bug lto/64043] [5 Regression] ICE (segfault) with LTO: in tree_check/tree.h:2758 get_binfo_at_offset/tree.c:11914

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64043 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at redhat

[Bug lto/64043] [5 Regression] ICE (segfault) with LTO: in tree_check/tree.h:2758 get_binfo_at_offset/tree.c:11914

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64043 --- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Actually my tree has flag_devirtualize marked as Optimization, as a separate problem I need to figure out how it happens to be true.

[Bug lto/64043] [5 Regression] ICE (segfault) with LTO: in tree_check/tree.h:2758 get_binfo_at_offset/tree.c:11914

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64043 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot

[Bug rtl-optimization/64151] [5 Regression] r218266 caused many regressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64151 --- Comment #2 from Wilco wdijkstr at arm dot com --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1) Revert the reg_class change: diff --git a/gcc/ira-costs.c b/gcc/ira-costs.c index 72c00cc..16fd6e8 100644 --- a/gcc/ira-costs.c +++

[Bug rtl-optimization/64151] [5 Regression] r218266 caused many regressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64151 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/60978] -Wenum-compare warns too eagerly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60978 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot

[Bug c++/60978] -Wenum-compare warns too eagerly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60978 --- Comment #9 from Paul Pluzhnikov ppluzhnikov at google dot com --- (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #8) You shouldn't get the warning about IPPROTO_ICMP vs IPPROTO_ICMPV66, as they are members of the same anonymous enum. They are?

  1   2   >