[Bug fortran/64381] New: ICE with initialization of procedure pointer in type

2014-12-23 Thread valeryweber at hotmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64381 Bug ID: 64381 Summary: ICE with initialization of procedure pointer in type Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug go/64005] make check FAIL: sync

2014-12-23 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64005 --- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com --- Ian explained in an offline communication: It's more likely that with -O2 some dead pointers appears in a stack frame, and cause the garbage collector to think that the values are

[Bug fortran/64173] [F03] ICE involving procedure pointer component

2014-12-23 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64173 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- *** Bug 64381 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/64381] ICE with initialization of procedure pointer in type

2014-12-23 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64381 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug ipa/63851] [5 Regression] ipa-icf miscompiles gfortran.dg/assumed_rank_(8|9|10).f90 at -O2 and above

2014-12-23 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63851 --- Comment #14 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: marxin Date: Tue Dec 23 09:30:20 2014 New Revision: 219042 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219042root=gccview=rev Log: Fix for PR ipa/63851 and ipa/63852. PR

[Bug ipa/63852] [5 regression] acats failures on x86_64-apple-darwin14

2014-12-23 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63852 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: marxin Date: Tue Dec 23 09:30:20 2014 New Revision: 219042 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219042root=gccview=rev Log: Fix for PR ipa/63851 and ipa/63852. PR

[Bug ipa/63852] [5 regression] acats failures on x86_64-apple-darwin14

2014-12-23 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63852 Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug ipa/63851] [5 Regression] ipa-icf miscompiles gfortran.dg/assumed_rank_(8|9|10).f90 at -O2 and above

2014-12-23 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63851 Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/64379] VFP register restore in ARM epilogue can break indirect tailcalls

2014-12-23 Thread mikpelinux at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64379 --- Comment #5 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- I can reproduce the wrong-code with gcc-4.9.2 on armv7l-linux-gnueabi. Appears to need both -foptimize-sibling-calls and -mapcs-frame to trigger.

[Bug fortran/63640] move_alloc memory leak

2014-12-23 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63640 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug target/62231] [4.8/4.9 regression] Exception handling broken on powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe

2014-12-23 Thread manfred.rudigier at omicron dot at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62231 --- Comment #13 from manfred.rudigier at omicron dot at --- (In reply to Dan Wilder from comment #12) I have a backport of the patches referenced in comment 4, which I applied to the gcc-4.8.3 we are using for e500v2. If anybody would care to

[Bug fortran/64244] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] ICE at class.c:236 when using non_overridable

2014-12-23 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64244 --- Comment #16 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Tue Dec 23 10:51:32 2014 New Revision: 219043 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219043root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-12-23 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org Backport from

[Bug c++/64382] New: ICE due to use of `this` inside a lambda that captures everything by ref inside a member function of a class template

2014-12-23 Thread lh_mouse at 126 dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64382 Bug ID: 64382 Summary: ICE due to use of `this` inside a lambda that captures everything by ref inside a member function of a class template Product: gcc

[Bug c++/64383] New: missed warning for unused variable.

2014-12-23 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64383 Bug ID: 64383 Summary: missed warning for unused variable. Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug target/64384] New: mingw-w64: stdcall function returning an aggregate is incompatible with MS ABI

2014-12-23 Thread mity at morous dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64384 Bug ID: 64384 Summary: mingw-w64: stdcall function returning an aggregate is incompatible with MS ABI Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/64384] mingw-w64: stdcall function returning an aggregate is incompatible with MS ABI

2014-12-23 Thread jacek at codeweavers dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64384 Jacek Caban jacek at codeweavers dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jacek at

[Bug c++/64372] [DR1560] Gratuitous lvalue-to-rvalue conversion in conditional-expression with throw-expression operand

2014-12-23 Thread harald at gigawatt dot nl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64372 --- Comment #7 from Harald van Dijk harald at gigawatt dot nl --- (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #6) Even that is probably too much right now. :) I do hope to be able to make some bigger contributions in the future (in code too),

[Bug c++/64385] New: odd behaviour of std::is_move_constructible std::ostringstream

2014-12-23 Thread alan at birtles dot org.uk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64385 Bug ID: 64385 Summary: odd behaviour of std::is_move_constructible std::ostringstream Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/64384] mingw-w64: stdcall function returning an aggregate is incompatible with MS ABI

2014-12-23 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64384 Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktietz at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/35423] Implement OpenMP workshare

2014-12-23 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35423 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING

[Bug fortran/63640] move_alloc memory leak

2014-12-23 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63640 Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael at gcc

[Bug fortran/56408] Fix dependency handling of testsuite/gfortran.dg

2014-12-23 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56408 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING

[Bug target/64379] VFP register restore in ARM epilogue can break indirect tailcalls

2014-12-23 Thread mikpelinux at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64379 Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug target/64379] VFP register restore in ARM epilogue can break indirect tailcalls

2014-12-23 Thread donn.seeley at windriver dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64379 --- Comment #7 from Donn Seeley donn.seeley at windriver dot com --- Re -mapcs-frame: Yes, the failure is due to code in arm_expand_epilogue_apcs_frame() that explicitly requires / stomps on IP in order to restore VFP/NEON registers. Sorry, I

[Bug target/64386] New: ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2327 (unrecognizable insn) with -mavx512bw

2014-12-23 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64386 Bug ID: 64386 Summary: ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2327 (unrecognizable insn) with -mavx512bw Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug bootstrap/25508] MULTILIB_OSDIRNAMES undocumented

2014-12-23 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25508 --- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com --- The point isn't documenting the rationale for particular choices, it's documenting (in fragments.texi) the general semantics, including for the A=B and A=!B

[Bug target/64387] New: ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2327 (unrecognizable insn) with -ffloat-store -mavx512er

2014-12-23 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64387 Bug ID: 64387 Summary: ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2327 (unrecognizable insn) with -ffloat-store -mavx512er Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/64388] New: [5 Regression] r219037 caused FAIL: gcc.dg/pr44194-1.c

2014-12-23 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64388 Bug ID: 64388 Summary: [5 Regression] r219037 caused FAIL: gcc.dg/pr44194-1.c Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/64388] [5 Regression] r219037 caused FAIL: gcc.dg/pr44194-1.c

2014-12-23 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64388 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0

[Bug tree-optimization/64277] [4.9/5.0 Regression] Incorrect warning array subscript is above array bounds

2014-12-23 Thread izamyatin at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64277 Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||izamyatin at

[Bug middle-end/50865] Invalid code generation for INT64_MIN % 1 on x86_64

2014-12-23 Thread mikpelinux at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50865 Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug bootstrap/64389] New: duplicate symbols in libstdc++.6.dylib on darwin

2014-12-23 Thread howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64389 Bug ID: 64389 Summary: duplicate symbols in libstdc++.6.dylib on darwin Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug bootstrap/64389] duplicate symbols in libstdc++.6.dylib on darwin

2014-12-23 Thread howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu
Host||x86_64-apple-darwin14 Build||x86_64-apple-darwin14 --- Comment #1 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu --- Configured as... ../gcc-5-20141223/configure --prefix=/sw --prefix=/sw/lib/gcc5.0 --mandir=/sw/share

[Bug ipa/64390] New: -shared does not resolve symbols from lto generated archives

2014-12-23 Thread htl10 at users dot sourceforge.net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64390 Bug ID: 64390 Summary: -shared does not resolve symbols from lto generated archives Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/64391] New: ICE: SIGSEGV in get_attrs_for (trans-mem.c:179) with -fgnu-tm and #pragma GCC ivdep

2014-12-23 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64391 Bug ID: 64391 Summary: ICE: SIGSEGV in get_attrs_for (trans-mem.c:179) with -fgnu-tm and #pragma GCC ivdep Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ipa/64390] -shared does not resolve symbols from lto generated archives

2014-12-23 Thread htl10 at users dot sourceforge.net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64390 --- Comment #1 from Hin-Tak Leung htl10 at users dot sourceforge.net --- $ gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=/bin/gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.9.2/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-redhat-linux Configured with:

[Bug fortran/64244] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] ICE at class.c:236 when using non_overridable

2014-12-23 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64244 --- Comment #17 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Tue Dec 23 19:06:23 2014 New Revision: 219047 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219047root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-12-23 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org Backport from

[Bug bootstrap/64389] duplicate symbols in libstdc++.6.dylib on darwin

2014-12-23 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64389 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug middle-end/64392] New: ICE: in pdr_stride_in_loop, at graphite-interchange.c:261 (isl_val_gmp.c:47: expecting rational value) with -floop-interchange -floop-strip-mine --param=loop-block-tile-siz

2014-12-23 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64392 Bug ID: 64392 Summary: ICE: in pdr_stride_in_loop, at graphite-interchange.c:261 (isl_val_gmp.c:47: expecting rational value) with -floop-interchange

[Bug target/64393] New: ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2327 (unrecognizable insn) with -mavx512vbmi

2014-12-23 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64393 Bug ID: 64393 Summary: ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2327 (unrecognizable insn) with -mavx512vbmi Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/64244] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] ICE at class.c:236 when using non_overridable

2014-12-23 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64244 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/50865] Invalid code generation for INT64_MIN % 1 on x86_64

2014-12-23 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50865 Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug middle-end/64391] ICE: SIGSEGV in get_attrs_for (trans-mem.c:179) with -fgnu-tm and #pragma GCC ivdep

2014-12-23 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64391 --- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka zsojka at seznam dot cz --- Many gfortran testcases fail with the same backtrace when -fgnu-tm is used.

[Bug target/64386] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2327 (unrecognizable insn) with -mavx512bw

2014-12-23 Thread kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64386 Kirill Yukhin kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kyukhin at gcc

[Bug middle-end/64394] New: ICE: in build_linearized_memory_access, at graphite-interchange.c:121 (isl_constraint.c:558: expecting integer value) with -floop-interchange

2014-12-23 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64394 Bug ID: 64394 Summary: ICE: in build_linearized_memory_access, at graphite-interchange.c:121 (isl_constraint.c:558: expecting integer value) with -floop-interchange

[Bug c++/64395] New: void_t doesn't work as expected

2014-12-23 Thread benzejaa at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64395 Bug ID: 64395 Summary: void_t doesn't work as expected Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug tree-optimization/64277] [4.9/5.0 Regression] Incorrect warning array subscript is above array bounds

2014-12-23 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64277 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc

[Bug target/64393] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2327 (unrecognizable insn) with -mavx512vbmi

2014-12-23 Thread kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64393 Kirill Yukhin kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kyukhin at gcc

[Bug ipa/64390] -shared does not resolve symbols from lto generated archives

2014-12-23 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64390 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last

[Bug c/64396] New: Missed optimization in post-loop register handling

2014-12-23 Thread matt at godbolt dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64396 Bug ID: 64396 Summary: Missed optimization in post-loop register handling Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3

[Bug c++/64383] missed warning for unused variable.

2014-12-23 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64383 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug middle-end/64396] Missed optimization in post-loop register handling

2014-12-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64396 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- The reason is GCC tries to be smart of calculating s4 outside of the loop because the iv that might be selected is not related at all to s4. That is it might do: int limit =

[Bug tree-optimization/64277] [4.9/5.0 Regression] Incorrect warning array subscript is above array bounds

2014-12-23 Thread aivchenk at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64277 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Ivchenko aivchenk at gmail dot com --- You need to specify -mssse3 (not -msse3). Warning about array bounds is not correct, because gcc does not know how this function is being called.

[Bug c/38716] Undocumented __attribute__((optimize)) behaviour when the attribute specifies no optimisation level

2014-12-23 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38716 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc

[Bug fortran/64397] New: memory allocation failed with parenthesis

2014-12-23 Thread patnel97269-gfortran at yahoo dot fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64397 Bug ID: 64397 Summary: memory allocation failed with parenthesis Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug bootstrap/64389] duplicate symbols in libstdc++.6.dylib on darwin

2014-12-23 Thread howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64389 --- Comment #3 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #2) Patch: jwakely dominiq: this should fix it http://paste.fedoraproject.org/162240/19281414 Still not committed after almost 24 hours.

[Bug fortran/64397] [OOP] Runtime segfault with type-bound assignment and parenthesis

2014-12-23 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64397 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug fortran/64397] [OOP] Runtime segfault with type-bound assignment and parenthesis

2014-12-23 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64397 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- The difference in the dumps for program main use num type(my_integer) :: a, c a=my_integer([1]) c = a ! - end and program main use num

[Bug fortran/64397] [OOP] Runtime segfault with type-bound assignment and parenthesis

2014-12-23 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64397 --- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Actually one can reduce it even further: program main type :: my_integer real, allocatable :: x(:) end type type(my_integer) :: a a=my_integer([1]) write (*,*) A call ass(a)

[Bug c++/64398] New: decltype in different contexts with similar expressions triggers segfault in GCC

2014-12-23 Thread florian.we...@sfz-bw.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64398 Bug ID: 64398 Summary: decltype in different contexts with similar expressions triggers segfault in GCC Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/64397] [OOP] Runtime segfault with parenthesis expression passed to polymorphic dummy argument

2014-12-23 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64397 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[OOP] Runtime segfault with |[OOP] Runtime segfault with

[Bug fortran/64397] [OOP] Runtime segfault with parenthesis expression passed to polymorphic dummy argument

2014-12-23 Thread patnel97269-gfortran at yahoo dot fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64397 --- Comment #5 from patnel97269-gfortran at yahoo dot fr --- (In reply to janus from comment #3) Actually one can reduce it even further: program main type :: my_integer real, allocatable :: x(:) end type type(my_integer) ::

[Bug libstdc++/64399] New: g++ does not diagnose when upcasting owning pointer (e.g. unique_ptr) with non-virtual destructor

2014-12-23 Thread mw_triad at users dot sourceforge.net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64399 Bug ID: 64399 Summary: g++ does not diagnose when upcasting owning pointer (e.g. unique_ptr) with non-virtual destructor Product: gcc Version: 4.8.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/64397] [OOP] Runtime segfault with parenthesis expression passed to polymorphic dummy argument

2014-12-23 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64397 --- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to patnel97269-gfortran from comment #5) I agree that this example still trigger a bug, but I remember in my original (more complicated) code, the segfault appears when it tries to

[Bug fortran/64397] [OOP] Runtime segfault with parenthesis expression passed to polymorphic dummy argument

2014-12-23 Thread patnel97269-gfortran at yahoo dot fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64397 --- Comment #7 from patnel97269-gfortran at yahoo dot fr --- (In reply to janus from comment #6) (In reply to patnel97269-gfortran from comment #5) I agree that this example still trigger a bug, but I remember in my original (more

[Bug bootstrap/64389] duplicate symbols in libstdc++.6.dylib on darwin due to r219012

2014-12-23 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64389 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: redi Date: Tue Dec 23 23:30:33 2014 New Revision: 219050 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219050root=gccview=rev Log: Compile locale-inst.cc and wlocale-inst.cc as

[Bug bootstrap/64389] duplicate symbols in libstdc++.6.dylib on darwin due to r219012

2014-12-23 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64389 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- I committed a different fix, which gets rid of the TODO in string-inst.cc, let me know if it still doesn't bootstrap!

[Bug libstdc++/64399] g++ does not diagnose when upcasting owning pointer (e.g. unique_ptr) with non-virtual destructor

2014-12-23 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64399 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- PR 58876

[Bug c++/64395] void_t doesn't work as expected

2014-12-23 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64395 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Already fixed on trunk (I don't remember the commit that fixed it)

[Bug libstdc++/64399] g++ does not diagnose when upcasting owning pointer (e.g. unique_ptr) with non-virtual destructor

2014-12-23 Thread mw_triad at users dot sourceforge.net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64399 --- Comment #2 from Matthew Woehlke mw_triad at users dot sourceforge.net --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) PR 58876 *Almost*, except I am proposing that -Wnon-virtual-dtor should trip even if X does not otherwise have virtual

[Bug libstdc++/58876] No non-virtual-dtor warning in std::unique_ptr

2014-12-23 Thread mw_triad at users dot sourceforge.net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58876 Matthew Woehlke mw_triad at users dot sourceforge.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug fortran/60357] [F08] structure constructor with unspecified values for allocatable components

2014-12-23 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60357 --- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #4) program testerprog use testmod Type(A) :: Me allocate(Me%y) Me = A(X=1, y=2) print *, Me%y end program

[Bug c++/64395] void_t doesn't work as expected

2014-12-23 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64395 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Fixed by r217250

[Bug libstdc++/64399] g++ does not diagnose when upcasting owning pointer (e.g. unique_ptr) with non-virtual destructor

2014-12-23 Thread thiago at kde dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64399 Thiago Macieira thiago at kde dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thiago at kde dot

[Bug bootstrap/64389] duplicate symbols in libstdc++.6.dylib on darwin due to r219012

2014-12-23 Thread howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64389 howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED