https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67254
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Are you sure they are live at the same time? AFAIK when optimizing
their lifetime is disjunct. Does it work when replicating the printf
with 'reference' also before the one with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63336
--- Comment #3 from Marc barnabe.marc at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 36197
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36197action=edit
GCC 5.2 preprocessed ICE code
xz file, because .ii is 2 MB in size.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67250
--- Comment #9 from Jeff Hammond jeff.science at gmail dot com ---
First, you will not accept the fusion of cpp+gfortran behavior as a feature
request? Is there a reason other than you do not want to do it because you are
already busy?
Second,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28662
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67250
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63336
Marc barnabe.marc at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||barnabe.marc at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67224
--- Comment #13 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Eric from comment #12)
I'm glad to know people like Joseph are working on UTF-8 in gcc.
I think at the moment, neither Joseph nor anyone else is planning to work
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59104
Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2013-12-19 00:00:00
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67133
--- Comment #29 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #28)
I see, thinking about signature changes, I forgot about the situations
where we do not have the body of the callee in the first
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61441
--- Comment #8 from Sujoy ssaraswati at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #7)
With -fno-signaling-nans, signaling NaN representations are trap
representations - the compiler can assume that nothing ever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67238
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
Mainline works for me.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67250
--- Comment #11 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu ---
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 06:03:00AM +, jeff.science at gmail dot com wrote:
In short, it's not in the standard, therefore it's fine to break user
experience seems
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67250
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jeff Hammond from comment #9)
First, you will not accept the fusion of cpp+gfortran behavior as a feature
request? Is there a reason other than you do not want to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67253
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67257
Bug ID: 67257
Summary: Internal compiler error in retrieve_specialization
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67255
--- Comment #2 from Дилян Палаузов dilyan.palauzov at aegee dot org ---
git clone https://cgit.cyrus.foundation/cyrus-imapd
cd cyrus-imapd
libtoolize
autoreconf -i
CFLAGS=-Wpadded ./configure --with-sqlite
make 21 | grep righ | sort -u
prints:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67255
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67256
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
N.B. the functions happen to be declared in bits/mathcalls.h but they are
standard functions declared in math.h and so your code would already have
failed to compile in C++03 if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67258
Bug ID: 67258
Summary: invalid vptr false positive from ubsan for virtual
inheritance
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67255
Дилян Палаузов dilyan.palauzov at aegee dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67255
Bug ID: 67255
Summary: -Wpadded mixes apostrophes
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67255
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67236
Bug ID: 67236
Summary: Wrong Message of -Wvla for Standard ISO C90 However
Emitted with -std=c11
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: RESOLVED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67243
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 67237 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67237
Bug ID: 67237
Summary: Wrong Message of -Wvla for Standard ISO C90 However
Emitted with -std=c11
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: RESOLVED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67235
Bug ID: 67235
Summary: Wrong Message of -Wvla for Standard ISO C90 However
Emitted with -std=c11
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: RESOLVED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67256
Bug ID: 67256
Summary: [C++11] Global scope contaminated with symbols from
mathcalls.h
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67256
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67256
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67254
Segher Boessenkool segher at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67243
--- Comment #9 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 67231 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67234
Bug ID: 67234
Summary: Wrong Message of -Wvla for Standard ISO C90 However
Emitted with -std=c11
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: RESOLVED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67243
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 67236 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67243
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 67235 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67243
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 67234 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67230
Bug ID: 67230
Summary: Wrong Message of -Wvla on ISO C90 Emitted with
-std=c11
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: RESOLVED
Severity: normal
Priority:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67243
--- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 67232 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67231
Bug ID: 67231
Summary: Wrong Message of -Wvla on ISO C90 Emitted with
-std=c11
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: RESOLVED
Severity: normal
Priority:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67243
--- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 67233 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67233
Bug ID: 67233
Summary: Wrong Message of -Wvla on ISO C90 Emitted with
-std=c11
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: RESOLVED
Severity: normal
Priority:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67243
--- Comment #10 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 67230 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67232
Bug ID: 67232
Summary: Wrong Message of -Wvla on ISO C90 Emitted with
-std=c11
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: RESOLVED
Severity: normal
Priority:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67028
--- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool segher at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Aug 18 12:21:41 2015
New Revision: 226967
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226967root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/67028
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67255
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Yeah, I see nothing wrong in GCC source files.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67255
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
GCC uses consistent quotes, but depends on environment variables such as LANG.
Presumably one of the commands you are running sets LANG=C or similar, which
causes GCC to output ASCII
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67257
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67218
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67224
--- Comment #15 from Eric ejolson at unr dot edu ---
Created attachment 36206
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36206action=edit
Improved UTF-8 identifier patch
Improved patch to support UTF-8 identifiers. This version by
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66936
--- Comment #18 from Keith Marshall keith.marshall at mailinator dot com ---
(In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #17)
Given the history and reasons, I've committed the patch to restore build on
mingw32. Marking as fixed on trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67218
--- Comment #1 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Tue Aug 18 19:04:41 2015
New Revision: 226987
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226987root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67259
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67066
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67224
--- Comment #14 from Eric ejolson at unr dot edu ---
While there may not be current demand for gcc to accept UTF-8 identifiers, the
fact that clang and Visual Studio support this C99 feature means source code
using Greek and accented characters
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67104
--- Comment #14 from Moritz Klammler moritz at klammler dot eu ---
Thank you for taking care of this so quickly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67192
--- Comment #7 from Andreas Arnez arnez at linux dot vnet.ibm.com ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #3)
The issue seems to be in here in c_parser_for_statement:
warn_for_misleading_indentation (for_loc, body_loc,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67066
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Aug 18 18:04:32 2015
New Revision: 226984
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226984root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/67066
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67216
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Aug 18 18:04:48 2015
New Revision: 226986
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226986root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/67216
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36757
--- Comment #3 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Tue Aug 18 20:07:57 2015
New Revision: 226990
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226990root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/36757
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66936
--- Comment #20 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Tue Aug 18 19:58:15 2015
New Revision: 226989
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226989root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR libfortran/66936
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67224
--- Comment #17 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com ---
On Tue, 18 Aug 2015, ejolson at unr dot edu wrote:
As iconv was installed on every GNU/Linux system I've tried, I'm not sure what
is wrong with using the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66425
--- Comment #20 from Jan Engelhardt jengelh at inai dot de ---
Seems like the short route is to add a new attribute
((warn_unused_result_with_void_cancelling)) that exhibits the desired
behavior of (void) cancelling the warning, and then make
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66936
--- Comment #21 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Now backported to all active branches.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67192
Patrick Palka ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67192
--- Comment #10 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #8)
Does GCC work at all if input_location is saved and restored in
c_parser_peek_token? I guess not, it seems too much still
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66936
--- Comment #19 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Tue Aug 18 19:56:20 2015
New Revision: 226988
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226988root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR libfortran/66936
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66919
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Aug 18 21:29:07 2015
New Revision: 226993
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226993root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/66919
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67261
Bug ID: 67261
Summary: Demangler infinite recursion
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67250
--- Comment #13 from Jeff Hammond jeff.science at gmail dot com ---
This is all fair. I try very hard to fix my own bugs and submit patches, but
in this case I am wholly unqualified. I don't know the first thing about
implementing a production
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66479
Daniel Micay danielmicay at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danielmicay
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67266
Martin Sebor msebor at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67265
Daniel Micay danielmicay at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danielmicay
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67262
Mikhail Maltsev miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||miyuki at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67224
--- Comment #16 from Eric ejolson at unr dot edu ---
With my second patch the command line must now include the options
-finput-charset=UTF-8 -fextended-identifiers -fexec-charset=UTF-8
or otherwise C99 will also be used for the default
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36757
Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67262
Bug ID: 67262
Summary: Massive number of nested SWITCH statements with -O1
causes g++ internal error
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67160
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67254
Bug ID: 67254
Summary: On-stack memory regions with aligned attribute overlap
on ARM
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67261
Mikhail Maltsev miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||miyuki at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67224
--- Comment #19 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com ---
On Tue, 18 Aug 2015, ejolson at unr dot edu wrote:
which illustrates that g++ does not process trigraphs inside raw string
literals. Admittedly I'm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67264
Bug ID: 67264
Summary: Infinite recursion of demangler on fuzzed input
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67261
Mikhail Maltsev miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61321
Mikhail Maltsev miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67266
Bug ID: 67266
Summary: Use of cpp -P ... collapses multiple blank lines
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67265
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |target
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67264
--- Comment #2 from Mikhail Maltsev miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 36211
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36211action=edit
Script for testcase reduction
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67266
--- Comment #2 from W. Michael Petullo mike at flyn dot org ---
This does not seem to be the behavior of cpp without the -P flag:
$ cpp
x
x
outputs
# 1 stdin
# 1 built-in
# 1 command-line
# 1 /usr/include/stdc-predef.h 1 3 4
# 1 command-line
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67224
--- Comment #18 from Eric ejolson at unr dot edu ---
Thanks Joseph for the clarification about the two different versions of iconv.
I was admittedly confused about this until moments ago. Anyway, I just
discovered that libiconv doesn't support
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67264
--- Comment #1 from Mikhail Maltsev miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 36208
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36208action=edit
More testcases
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67265
Bug ID: 67265
Summary: [x86] 'asm' operand has impossible constraints with
-fstack-check
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67265
--- Comment #1 from Johannes Dewender gnu at JonnyJD dot net ---
Created attachment 36210
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36210action=edit
Makefile with failing, working and workaround flags
I found the bug using gcc 5.2.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67266
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
From
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-5.2.0/cpp/Preprocessor-Output.html#Preprocessor-Output
:
The output from the C preprocessor looks much like the input, except that all
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67267
Bug ID: 67267
Summary: demangler does not handle sr correctly
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67268
Bug ID: 67268
Summary: demangler does not elide empty argument pack in
operator()
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67160
Casey Carter Casey at Carter dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Casey at Carter
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67256
--- Comment #3 from Michał Fita michal.fita at gmail dot com ---
Contrary to my expectations #include cmath doesn't work either. I would
expect these not declared in global if standard says unspecified, as my logic
whisper that would be more C++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67160
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Aug 18 14:38:51 2015
New Revision: 226972
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226972root=gccview=rev
Log:
c-family/
2015-08-18 Paolo Carlini
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66957
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Aug 18 14:43:44 2015
New Revision: 226974
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226974root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/66957
* search.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58063
--- Comment #16 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Aug 18 14:43:38 2015
New Revision: 226973
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226973root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/58063
* tree.c (bot_manip):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67222
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Aug 18 13:41:27 2015
New Revision: 226969
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226969root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/67222
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61578
--- Comment #18 from Fredrik Hederstierna
fredrik.hederstie...@securitas-direct.com ---
Created attachment 36202
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36202action=edit
Disasm for -mthumb also, code size increase was +48%.
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo