[Bug fortran/64962] Use "nonnull"/"returns_nonnull" attribute annotation for procedures (user code + libgfortran)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64962 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/57262] Optimize bound intrinsics with dim=var for rank one arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57262 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/68243] QOI: no warning about unused entities in submodules

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68243 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #2) > That's a wierd one! I'll take a look later on. I presume that I have to lay out the common block with the pointer and the string length variable together? It's the

[Bug fortran/68243] QOI: no warning about unused entities in submodules

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68243 --- Comment #4 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com --- Sorry! Wrong PR. On 8 November 2015 at 11:18, pault at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68243 > > --- Comment #3

[Bug fortran/50406] ld undefined reference to __MOD_str

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50406 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/44265] Link error with reference to parameter array in specification expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44265 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zeccav at gmail dot com ---

[Bug fortran/44265] Link error with reference to parameter array in specification expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44265 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #22202|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug fortran/66494] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE on using same name for embedded subroutine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66494 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/44348] ICE in build_function_decl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44348 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gerhard.steinmetz.fortran@t

[Bug fortran/66494] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE on using same name for embedded subroutine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66494 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #2 from

[Bug other/68247] New: Remove pass_first_instance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68247 Bug ID: 68247 Summary: Remove pass_first_instance Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: other

[Bug fortran/44265] Link error with reference to parameter array in specification expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44265 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Variant: If one adds a > subroutine test() > print *, get(1) > end subroutine test > in the module itself, one gets an ICE: > > foo.f90:18:0: internal compiler error: in

[Bug fortran/47266] Optimization: Declare PRIVATE module procedures as "TREE_PUBLIC = 0" ("static function")

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47266 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/36854] [meta-bug] fortran front-end optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36854 Bug 36854 depends on bug 54238, which changed state. Bug 54238 Summary: If possible, TRANSFER should use assignment instead of MEMCPY https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54238 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/54238] If possible, TRANSFER should use assignment instead of MEMCPY

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54238 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Blocks|

[Bug middle-end/68117] [6 Regression] error: invalid PHI argument <<< Unknown tree: >>>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68117 --- Comment #14 from Joost VandeVondele --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #13) > *** Bug 68127 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** just FYI, for me (PR68127) the issue pops up in a non-deterministic way, I don't

[Bug fortran/57992] Pointless packing of contiguous arrays for simply contiguous functions results as actual arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57992 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libgomp/68242] [gomp4] FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/reduction-2.c -DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68242 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Schwinge --- (In reply to Nathan Sidwell from comment #3) > I think my firstprivate patch resolves this one. That is unlikely: the report here is about issues with the test cases themselves, on gomp-4_0-branch.

[Bug middle-end/68117] [6 Regression] error: invalid PHI argument <<< Unknown tree: >>>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68117 --- Comment #15 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Joost VandeVondele from comment #14) > (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #13) > > *** Bug 68127 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** > > just FYI, for me (PR68127)

[Bug rtl-optimization/68185] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in 64-bit mode)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68185 Thomas Preud'homme changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-linux-gnu

[Bug fortran/58787] ICE (error recovery) in check_proc_interface

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58787 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2013-12-21 00:00:00 |2015-11-8 CC|

[Bug fortran/55100] FORALL: If the RHS is scalar, not array temporary is needed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55100 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libfortran/68115] [6 Regression] Unsatisfied symbol "__sync_lock_test_and_set_4" in file /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/./libgomp/../libgfortran/.libs/libgfortran.sl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68115 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/68151] ICE on using select case with function of wrong type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68151 --- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Sun Nov 8 17:43:29 2015 New Revision: 229957 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229957=gcc=rev Log: 2015-11-08 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug libfortran/68115] [6 Regression] Unsatisfied symbol "__sync_lock_test_and_set_4" in file /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/./libgomp/../libgfortran/.libs/libgfortran.sl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68115 --- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2015-11-08, at 12:44 PM, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: > It looks target specific. Any progress? It's not possible to implement on hpux. We have a kernel helper on linux. Dave -- John

[Bug fortran/55858] When scalarizing contiguous whole-arrays, consider folding into a single loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55858 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/68224] ICE on referencing parameter array with dimension null

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68224 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/68151] ICE on using select case with function of wrong type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68151 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/68184] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Exception from a virtual function does not get caught

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68184 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com ---

[Bug fortran/68009] [6 Regression] prototype for gfortran_runtime_error with inline matmul

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68009 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/61298] redundant compare instructions for powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61298 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||6.0 --- Comment #7 from Segher

[Bug bootstrap/68231] [6 Regression] bootstrap failure after placement new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68231 --- Comment #9 from Martin Sebor --- The ILP32 failure should be fixed in r229959. I tested it with -m32 on x86_64 but not on AIX/powerpc, so I'll leave this open until test results confirm that the test passes.

[Bug c++/67813] [C++14] copy-initialization of object with pointer member fails in constexpr function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67813 Ville Voutilainen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com

[Bug fortran/68153] ICE for intrinsic reshape with negative dim in effective shape

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68153 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug driver/68181] djgpp: minor linker invocation issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68181 Andris Pavenis changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andris.pavenis at iki dot fi ---

[Bug fortran/68053] lower bound of implied shape array restricted too much

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68053 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/67202] Fortran FE should load scalar pass-by-reference intent-in arguments at the beginning of a function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67202 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/55980] missed optimizations with internal_pack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55980 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/68224] ICE on referencing parameter array with dimension null

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68224 --- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Sun Nov 8 17:25:16 2015 New Revision: 229955 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229955=gcc=rev Log: 2015-11-08 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/68224

[Bug fortran/68218] ALLOCATE with size given by a module function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68218 --- Comment #3 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vehre Date: Sun Nov 8 17:37:42 2015 New Revision: 229956 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229956=gcc=rev Log: gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: 2015-11-08 Andre Vehreschild

[Bug fortran/68153] ICE for intrinsic reshape with negative dim in effective shape

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68153 --- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Sun Nov 8 17:53:36 2015 New Revision: 229958 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229958=gcc=rev Log: 2015-11-08 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug c++/67942] diagnose placement new buffer overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67942 --- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Sun Nov 8 17:53:51 2015 New Revision: 229959 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229959=gcc=rev Log: Clean up fallout on ILP32 from r229831. gcc/ PR c++/67942 *

[Bug fortran/68224] ICE on referencing parameter array with dimension null

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68224 --- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Sun Nov 8 18:05:30 2015 New Revision: 229960 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229960=gcc=rev Log: 2015-11-08 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug rtl-optimization/67864] [6 Regression] CSiBE size regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67864 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/43437] ICE in CSE, during libgcc build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43437 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/36557] -m32 -mpowerpc64 produces better code than -m64 for a!=0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36557 --- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool --- We now do cntlzw 3,3 srwi 3,3,5 xori 3,3,0x1 blr which is still not optimal (and not what -m32 / -m32 -mpowerpc64 do).

[Bug tree-optimization/68249] New: wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68249 Bug ID: 68249 Summary: wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug rtl-optimization/68182] [6 Regression] ICE in reorder_basic_blocks_simple building libitm/beginend.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68182 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/54110] lower-subreg related code quality for long long function return

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54110 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.8.3, 6.0 --- Comment #1 from

[Bug inline-asm/68095] "cc" clobber with Flag Output Operands

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68095 --- Comment #3 from David --- > "=@ccc"(r) does not output to the "cc" register, it > outputs to a general register. Actually, I don't believe it does. In v5, you *did* have to use "setc %0" with a general register AND it generated an extra

[Bug libfortran/51119] MATMUL slow for large matrices

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51119 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug inline-asm/68095] "cc" clobber with Flag Output Operands

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68095 --- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool --- Let me put it differently. At the C level, your asm statement outputs to an integer register. Internally, the asm outputs to a condition reg, and the C statement is expanded to also do a move from that

[Bug tree-optimization/68248] New: ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in uniform_vector_p, at tree.c:10807

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68248 Bug ID: 68248 Summary: ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in uniform_vector_p, at tree.c:10807 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug other/66259] Combined gcc and binutils build from git-master fails, with gas/as-new not existing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66259 --- Comment #10 from Segher Boessenkool --- Is this fixed now? Michael, could you test again?

[Bug rtl-optimization/68250] New: wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in 64-bit mode)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68250 Bug ID: 68250 Summary: wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in 64-bit mode) Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/68182] [6 Regression] ICE in reorder_basic_blocks_simple building libitm/beginend.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68182 --- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Mon Nov 9 03:57:19 2015 New Revision: 229983 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229983=gcc=rev Log: Fix bb-reorder problem with degenerate cond_jump (PR68182) The code

[Bug fortran/68053] lower bound of implied shape array restricted too much

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68053 --- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Mon Nov 9 05:50:24 2015 New Revision: 229992 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229992=gcc=rev Log: 2015-11-08 Steven g. Kargl PR

[Bug rtl-optimization/68189] [4.9/5/6 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu by RTL if-conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68189 --- Comment #7 from Mikael Pettersson --- (In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #6) > Started with r208165 (on x86_64-linux with -O3). And the subsequent fix in r208222 does not help for this test case.

[Bug fortran/66577] ICE in generate_finalization_wrapper, at fortran/class.c:1567

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66577 --- Comment #5 from neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com --- > Error: Function result 'intsuccess' at (1) cannot have an initializer > I don't understand. C506 -- the type specification for a function result cannot have an initialization.

[Bug fortran/66465] Procedure pointer component & non-component interpreted as different type or kind

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66465 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Nov 8 16:47:58 2015 New Revision: 229954 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229954=gcc=rev Log: 2015-11-08 Paul Thomas PR fortran/68196 *

[Bug fortran/68196] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE on function result with procedure pointer component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68196 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Nov 8 16:47:58 2015 New Revision: 229954 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229954=gcc=rev Log: 2015-11-08 Paul Thomas PR fortran/68196 *

[Bug fortran/68053] lower bound of implied shape array restricted too much

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68053 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/68053] lower bound of implied shape array restricted too much

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68053 --- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Mon Nov 9 06:06:52 2015 New Revision: 229993 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229993=gcc=rev Log: 2015-11-08 Steven g. Kargl PR