[Bug rtl-optimization/69737] [5 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr64682.c -O2 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69737 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/69577] [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -fno-forward-propagate -mavx and 128bit arithmetics since r215450

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69577 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/56007] Remarkably bad error message with DO array=1,2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56007 --- Comment #8 from Harald Anlauf --- Proposed patch posted here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2016-02/msg00026.html

[Bug target/69738] New: PowerPC built-in __builtin_addg6s should be enabled on 64-bit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69738 Bug ID: 69738 Summary: PowerPC built-in __builtin_addg6s should be enabled on 64-bit Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug other/69554] [6 Regression] Multi-location diagnostics writes too many lines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69554 --- Comment #17 from David Malcolm --- Candidate patch posted here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-02/msg00646.html

[Bug c++/69730] problem with references and templates when using O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69730 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/68532] [ARM] Incorrect code result on arm big endian

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68532 --- Comment #4 from cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: cbaylis Date: Tue Feb 9 18:49:05 2016 New Revision: 233252 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233252=gcc=rev Log: [ARM] PR68532 Fix up vzip recognition for big endian gcc/ChangeLog:

[Bug target/68532] [ARM] Incorrect code result on arm big endian

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68532 cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/68730] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in 32-bit mode)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68730 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/69723] pre-post-increment/decrement and reading the same variable that is assigned should not be considered uses for Wunused-but-set-variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69723 --- Comment #8 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7) > As for the missed -Wuninitialized at -O0, wonder if we couldn't do something > about it for GCC 7. Sounds good to me, but perhaps it is better to open a

[Bug target/68532] [ARM] Incorrect code result on arm big endian

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68532 --- Comment #3 from cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: cbaylis Date: Tue Feb 9 18:47:55 2016 New Revision: 233251 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233251=gcc=rev Log: [ARM] PR68532: Fix up vuzp for big endian gcc/ChangeLog: 2016-02-09

[Bug bootstrap/69725] profiledbootstrap failure due to unsats for isl functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69725 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- I wondered if the system ISL (isl-0.14-4.fc23) was being picked up instead of the one in my tree (isl-0.15), or some combination of both at different times. So I tried --with-isl thinking that might be

[Bug c++/69736] [4.9/5/6 Regression] "error: too few arguments to function" in c++14 but not c++11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69736 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- In some contexts yes, but 5.1.1 [expr.prim.general] p6 says: A parenthesized expression is a primary expression whose type and value are identical to those of the enclosed expression. The presence of

[Bug tree-optimization/68654] [6 Regression] CoreMark Pro performance degradation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68654 --- Comment #24 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 8 Feb 2016, law at redhat dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68654 > > --- Comment #23 from Jeffrey A. Law --- > I don't think it's worth the effort to try

[Bug c++/69731] New: Inconsistent SFINAE in interaction with variable templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69731 Bug ID: 69731 Summary: Inconsistent SFINAE in interaction with variable templates Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/67451] [5/6 Regression] [F08] ICE with sourced allocation from coarray.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67451 Dominik Vogt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com ---

[Bug libstdc++/68515] std::result_of<F(X)> doesn't work when F is abstract (with pure virtual functions)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68515 TC changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rs2740 at gmail dot com --- Comment #3 from TC

[Bug libstdc++/68515] std::result_of<F(X)> doesn't work when F is abstract (with pure virtual functions)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68515 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/67451] [5/6 Regression] [F08] ICE with sourced allocation from coarray.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67451 --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > gfortran.dg/coarray_allocate_3.f08 crashed with an invalid free() > on s390 and s390x. If the test is compiled with -fsanitize=address, I get ==19013==ERROR: AddressSanitizer:

[Bug tree-optimization/69726] [6 Regression] Bogus warnings with -O3 -Wuninitialized because dead code after if-conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69726 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug bootstrap/69725] profiledbootstrap failure due to unsats for isl functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69725 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Not sure if LTO bootstrap with in-tree ISL is properly tested. Which ISL version did you choose? Anything suspicious in closure.c?

[Bug middle-end/69729] [6 regression] [CHKP] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69729 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug tree-optimization/69599] [6 Regression] libgomp.c fipa-pta tests compiled with -flto -flto-partition=max fail in execution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69599 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/69599] [6 Regression] libgomp.c fipa-pta tests compiled with -flto -flto-partition=max fail in execution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69599 --- Comment #9 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vries Date: Tue Feb 9 08:52:26 2016 New Revision: 233240 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233240=gcc=rev Log: Fix GOMP/GOACC_parallel optimization in ipa-pta 2016-02-09 Tom de Vries

[Bug other/69722] [6 Regression] gcc/doc/extend.texi:7526: warning: node `Constraints' is next for `Extended Asm' in menu but not in sectioning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69722 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/69730] problem with references and templates when using O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69730 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/69730] New: problem with references and templates when using O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69730 Bug ID: 69730 Summary: problem with references and templates when using O2 Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/69729] New: [6 regression] [CHKP] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69729 Bug ID: 69729 Summary: [6 regression] [CHKP] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/69726] [6 Regression] Bogus warnings with -O3 -Wuninitialized because dead code after if-conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69726 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- It solved itself with 2016-02-08 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/69719 * tree-vect-data-refs.c (vect_prune_runtime_alias_test_list): Properly use absolute

[Bug tree-optimization/68021] [6 Regression] ice in rewrite_use_nonlinear_expr with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68021 --- Comment #15 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Though the previous patch can work, I am testing another patch less intrusive.

[Bug c++/64697] C++11 thread_local: relocation truncated to fit: R_X86_64_PC32 against undefined symbol `TLS init function for N::ptd'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64697 --- Comment #11 from Václav Zeman --- Created attachment 37638 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37638=edit logs of compilation with -fno-lto (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #8) > Your compiler doesn't have proper LTO

[Bug target/68973] [6 regression] Internal compiler error on power for gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr67211.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68973 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug bootstrap/69727] [6 Regression] ICE in profiledbootstrap in reg_save_code at ../../gcc/caller-save.c:141

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69727 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Target|

[Bug tree-optimization/69726] Bogus warnings with -O3 -Wuninitialized because of if-conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69726 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic, |

[Bug tree-optimization/69726] Bogus warnings with -O3 -Wuninitialized because of if-conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69726 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Ok, so forwprop fixes things up but nothing removes dead code before uninit and it is confused by vect__ifc__525.36_152 = MEM[(int *) + 224B]; vect__ifc__523.38_154 = VEC_COND_EXPR ; where only _154

[Bug tree-optimization/69728] New: [6 Regression] internal compiler error: in outer_projection_mupa, at graphite-sese-to-poly.c:1175

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69728 Bug ID: 69728 Summary: [6 Regression] internal compiler error: in outer_projection_mupa, at graphite-sese-to-poly.c:1175 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/67451] [5/6 Regression] [F08] ICE with sourced allocation from coarray.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67451 --- Comment #9 from Dominik Vogt --- I.e. free(0x1) is called: Load foobar.1497 to r12 0x8998 <+40>:larl%r12,0x80002408 (gdb) p /x $r12 0x80002408 First malloc call, store mem pointer in foobar.1497

[Bug middle-end/69715] [4.9/5 regression] ICE: in store_bit_field_1, at expmed.c:839

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69715 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||6.0 Summary|[4.9/5/6

[Bug middle-end/69715] [4.9/5 regression] ICE: in store_bit_field_1, at expmed.c:839

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69715 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||6.0 Summary|[4.9/5/6

[Bug tree-optimization/69732] [6 Regression] Missed vectorization due to failed dependence analysis

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69732 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0 Summary|Missed

[Bug c++/69733] New: -Wignored-qualifiers points to wrong const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69733 Bug ID: 69733 Summary: -Wignored-qualifiers points to wrong const Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug tree-optimization/69732] New: Missed vectorization due to failed dependence analysis

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69732 Bug ID: 69732 Summary: Missed vectorization due to failed dependence analysis Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/69732] [6 Regression] Missed vectorization due to failed dependence analysis

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69732 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libgomp/69625] S/390 deadlock in libgomp.c/doacross-1.c test (vararg function trashes r6)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69625 Dominik Vogt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/10200] [6 Regression] Weird clash with same names in different scopes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10200 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug c++/10200] [6 Regression] Weird clash with same names in different scopes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10200 --- Comment #34 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #33) > we now have a regression from 5 to 6, right? Right.

[Bug rtl-optimization/69052] [6 Regression] Performance regression after r229402.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69052 --- Comment #12 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Patch sent for review at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-02/msg00612.html It works for the reduced test case, could you please help me to check if it works for you original case? Thanks,

[Bug c++/69723] pre-post-increment/decrement and reading the same variable that is assigned should not be considered uses for Wunused-but-set-variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69723 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- As for the missed -Wuninitialized at -O0, wonder if we couldn't do something about it for GCC 7. volatile int v; void bar (void) { int x; v++; for (; x < 100; x++) v++; v++; } Here, we have # x_1

[Bug tree-optimization/69735] New: [6 Regression] internal compiler error: in harmful_loop_in_region, at graphite-scop-detection.c:1045

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69735 Bug ID: 69735 Summary: [6 Regression] internal compiler error: in harmful_loop_in_region, at graphite-scop-detection.c:1045 Product: gcc Version: 6.0

[Bug bootstrap/69727] [6 Regression] ICE in profiledbootstrap in reg_save_code at ../../gcc/caller-save.c:141

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69727 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 37645 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37645=edit caller-save.ii.bz2 caller-save.ii.bz2

[Bug c++/59627] ICE with OpenMP "declare reduction" and -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59627 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot

[Bug target/69614] [6 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-expensive-optimizations -fschedule-insns -mtpcs-leaf-frame -fira-algorithm=priority @ armv7a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69614 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vmakarov at redhat dot com

[Bug rtl-optimization/69714] [5/6 Regression] ffmpeg crc.c test miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69714 --- Comment #14 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2016-02-09 7:32 AM, bernds at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > (In reply to John David Anglin from comment #0) > >> >- ldh 2(%r31),%r20 > Could you verify whether the test works if you replace

[Bug bootstrap/69727] [6 Regression] ICE in profiledbootstrap in reg_save_code at ../../gcc/caller-save.c:141

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69727 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug bootstrap/69727] [6 Regression] ICE in profiledbootstrap in reg_save_code at ../../gcc/caller-save.c:141

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69727 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 37646 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37646=edit caller-save.gcda caller-save.gcda

[Bug c++/59627] ICE with OpenMP "declare reduction" and -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59627 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Eventually. I have dozens of changes (mostly non-OpenMP related) I have committed to trunk only in the past few months, need to find time and backport those that should be backported to the older branches.

[Bug bootstrap/69727] [6 Regression] ICE in profiledbootstrap in reg_save_code at ../../gcc/caller-save.c:141

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69727 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- The ICE is around 140 ok = (cached_reg_save_code[reg][mode] != -1 141 && cached_reg_restore_code[reg][mode] != -1); 0x10e84a24 : stw

[Bug target/69671] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512vl-vpmovqb-1.c scan-assembler-times vpmovqb[ \\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+[^\n]*%xmm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}{z}(?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69671 --- Comment #12 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Kirill Yukhin from comment #8) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7) > > So do you want to use reg_or_0_operand? I don't think we usually tie output > > with input already in the

[Bug middle-end/69729] [6 regression] [CHKP] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69729 --- Comment #1 from Ilya Enkovich --- Here is a patch which caused the regression: diff --git a/gcc/lto-streamer-out.c b/gcc/lto-streamer-out.c index 0cefc15..6bb76cc 100644 --- a/gcc/lto-streamer-out.c +++ b/gcc/lto-streamer-out.c @@ -2320,7

[Bug bootstrap/69727] [6 Regression] ICE in profiledbootstrap in reg_save_code at ../../gcc/caller-save.c:141

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69727 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 37647 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37647=edit auto-host.h auto-host.h

[Bug bootstrap/69727] [6 Regression] ICE in profiledbootstrap in reg_save_code at ../../gcc/caller-save.c:141

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69727 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/69614] [6 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-expensive-optimizations -fschedule-insns -mtpcs-leaf-frame -fira-algorithm=priority @ armv7a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69614 --- Comment #9 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- You're right. Any change in the flags or to the code that appears to makes the failure go away just happens to reduce register pressure. In the failing case the reload dump shows that LRA does

[Bug c++/64697] C++11 thread_local: relocation truncated to fit: R_X86_64_PC32 against undefined symbol `TLS init function for N::ptd'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64697 --- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu --- Please provide the output of "objdump -r use.o".

[Bug target/69734] no_caller_saved_registers attribute doesn't work with -mavx512f -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69734 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- This is on hjl/interrupt/stage1 branch. Trunk never spills mask registers.

[Bug rtl-optimization/69710] performance issue with SP Linpack with Autovectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69710 amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/69734] New: no_caller_saved_registers attribute doesn't work with -mavx512f -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69734 Bug ID: 69734 Summary: no_caller_saved_registers attribute doesn't work with -mavx512f -g Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/65702] [5 Regression] ICE (tree check: expected ssa_name, have var_decl in expand_gimple_basic_block, at cfgexpand.c:5506) on arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65702 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/69733] -Wignored-qualifiers points to wrong const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69733 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/69732] [6 Regression] Missed vectorization due to failed dependence analysis

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69732 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- The solution here is to have another set of base / access function forcibly using the pointer representation as a backup for dependence analysis.

[Bug c++/64697] C++11 thread_local: relocation truncated to fit: R_X86_64_PC32 against undefined symbol `TLS init function for N::ptd'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64697 --- Comment #13 from Václav Haisman --- Created attachment 37643 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37643=edit objdump -r use.o log (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #12) > Please provide the output of "objdump -r use.o".

[Bug rtl-optimization/69052] [6 Regression] Performance regression after r229402.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69052 --- Comment #13 from Yuri Rumyantsev --- I checked that performance is back for the whole benchmark. Thanks a lot. Yuri. 2016-02-09 14:17 GMT+03:00 amker at gcc dot gnu.org : >

[Bug debug/69705] [5/6 Regression] segfault in libgomp.fortran/task1.f90 with -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -fno-toplevel-reorder -O1 -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69705 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/69714] [5/6 Regression] ffmpeg crc.c test miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69714 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9

[Bug rtl-optimization/69714] [5/6 Regression] ffmpeg crc.c test miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69714 --- Comment #11 from Bernd Schmidt --- (In reply to John David Anglin from comment #0) > - ldh 2(%r31),%r20 Could you verify whether the test works if you replace the 2(%r31) with 0(%r31) ?

[Bug c++/64697] C++11 thread_local: relocation truncated to fit: R_X86_64_PC32 against undefined symbol `TLS init function for N::ptd'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64697 --- Comment #15 from H.J. Lu --- I didn't realize Windows linker uses ELF relocation names. I don't know what is wrong.

[Bug target/69734] no_caller_saved_registers attribute doesn't work with -mavx512f -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69734 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/69734] no_caller_saved_registers attribute doesn't work with -mavx512f -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69734 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- A simpler testcase: [hjl@gnu-6 interrupt-2]$ cat k.c void __attribute__((interrupt)) fn (void *frame) { asm ("#" : : : "k1"); } [hjl@gnu-6 interrupt-2]$ make k.o

[Bug bootstrap/69727] [6 Regression] ICE in profiledbootstrap in reg_save_code at ../../gcc/caller-save.c:141

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69727 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/69614] [6 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-expensive-optimizations -fschedule-insns -mtpcs-leaf-frame -fira-algorithm=priority @ armv7a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69614 --- Comment #10 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 37642 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37642=edit Reload pass dump

[Bug debug/69705] [5/6 Regression] segfault in libgomp.fortran/task1.f90 with -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -fno-toplevel-reorder -O1 -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69705 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.9.3 Target Milestone|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/69714] [5/6 Regression] ffmpeg crc.c test miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69714 --- Comment #10 from Bernd Schmidt --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9) > The referenced debian bug suggests that there is both an aliasing violation > and unaligned access. In their source code you mean? There's type punning going

[Bug c++/64697] C++11 thread_local: relocation truncated to fit: R_X86_64_PC32 against undefined symbol `TLS init function for N::ptd'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64697 --- Comment #14 from Václav Haisman --- Created attachment 37644 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37644=edit objdump -Ttr def.o log `objdump -Ttr def.o` in advance, just in case it is relevant.

[Bug middle-end/65702] [5 Regression] ICE (tree check: expected ssa_name, have var_decl in expand_gimple_basic_block, at cfgexpand.c:5506) on arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65702 --- Comment #12 from Bernd Schmidt --- Author: bernds Date: Tue Feb 9 13:10:39 2016 New Revision: 233242 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233242=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/65702 * varasm.c (make_decl_rtl): Mark invalid

[Bug rtl-optimization/69714] [5/6 Regression] ffmpeg crc.c test miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69714 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- If the problem is in bswap, then the most suspect branches/gcc-5-branch commit is r232664.

[Bug rtl-optimization/69714] [5/6 Regression] ffmpeg crc.c test miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69714 --- Comment #13 from Bernd Schmidt --- Yes, that's the one I've been zeroing in on. It does look wrong, but it was intended as a fix, so I guess I'll be reinvestigating the original bug.

[Bug target/63206] Gcc 4.9.1 Generated code needlessly stacks r3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63206 --- Comment #2 from Pype --- reproduced with tail-call + r3 stack bug on 4.8.3 4.8.4 4.9.2 5.1 appears fixed in 5.3

[Bug fortran/69368] [6 Regression] spec2006 test case 416.gamess fails with the g++ 6.0 compiler starting with r232508

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69368 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug rtl-optimization/69710] performance issue with SP Linpack with Autovectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69710 --- Comment #7 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hmm, the first problem is the two iv uses from dy load/store are not recognized as having same base address/object. This may caused by my patch disabling expansion of iv base. Or it exists all

[Bug fortran/69368] [6 Regression] spec2006 test case 416.gamess fails with the g++ 6.0 compiler starting with r232508

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69368 --- Comment #36 from Jakub Jelinek --- As Richard said, you can do similar (invalid too) stuff in C too, say: struct S { int a[1]; } s; in one TU and struct S { int a[1]; } s; int foo (int x) { return s.a[x]; } int bar (int x) { return

[Bug bootstrap/69725] profiledbootstrap failure due to unsats for isl functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69725 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- I used the download_prerequistes script to download isl-0.15. I have gmp-4.3.2, mpc-0.8.1, and mpfr-2.4.2. I didn't know that in-tree ISL wasn't being tested. Let me see if I get farther by either

[Bug target/63206] Gcc 4.9.1 Generated code needlessly stacks r3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63206 Pype changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pype_1999.geo at yahoo dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug target/63206] Gcc 4.9.1 Generated code needlessly stacks r3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63206 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug other/67552] [meta] x86 interrupt attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67552 Bug 67552 depends on bug 69734, which changed state. Bug 69734 Summary: no_caller_saved_registers attribute doesn't work with -mavx512f -g https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69734 What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/69734] no_caller_saved_registers attribute doesn't work with -mavx512f -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69734 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Blocks|

[Bug testsuite/69573] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr61053.c (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69573 --- Comment #4 from Chen Gang --- (In reply to Chen Gang from comment #3) > Created attachment 37625 [details] > Under my Darwin mac book OS X Yosemite 10.10.4, it looks short wide alignas > for long wide type will cause issue. Oh, sorry, it is

[Bug target/66660] [ia64] Speculative load not checked before use, leading to a NaT Consumption Vector interruption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=0 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jermar --- Thank you, I will get back to you once I am done with the test.

[Bug bootstrap/68404] [6 Regression] PGO/LTO bootstrap failure on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68404 --- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek --- *** Bug 69727 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/69736] New: [4.9/5/6 Regression] "error: too few arguments to function" in c++14 but not c++11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69736 Bug ID: 69736 Summary: [4.9/5/6 Regression] "error: too few arguments to function" in c++14 but not c++11 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/69727] [6 Regression] ICE in profiledbootstrap in reg_save_code at ../../gcc/caller-save.c:141

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69727 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/68404] [6 Regression] PGO/LTO bootstrap failure on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68404 --- Comment #22 from Martin Sebor --- After applying the patch from comment #19 my profiledbootstrap also just completed on the big-endian powerpc64-redhat-linux-gnu (it failed before due to the duplicate bug 69727).

  1   2   >