[Bug c++/70565] New: ICE at gimplify.c:8832 (cilkplus array extension)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70565 Bug ID: 70565 Summary: ICE at gimplify.c:8832 (cilkplus array extension) Product: gcc Version: 5.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/70565] ICE at gimplify.c:8832 (cilkplus array extension)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70565 --- Comment #1 from Yves Vandriessche --- Additionally, the same internal compile error is produced when substituting: > cilk_for ( int row = 0; row < nrows; row++ ) { with >#pragma omp parallel scheduler(dynamic, 256) > for ( int row = 0;

[Bug c/70566] Bad ARM code generated for evaluating unsigned int bitfield value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70566 --- Comment #1 from Daniel Drake --- Created attachment 38205 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38205=edit other.c test case source

[Bug c/70566] New: Bad ARM code generated for evaluating unsigned int bitfield value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70566 Bug ID: 70566 Summary: Bad ARM code generated for evaluating unsigned int bitfield value Product: gcc Version: 5.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/70566] Bad ARM code generated for evaluating unsigned int bitfield value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70566 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Drake --- Created attachment 38206 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38206=edit main.i preprocessed output

[Bug preprocessor/69391] [5/6 Regression] Incorrect __LINE__ expansion with -ftrack-macro-expansion=0 on g++5.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69391 --- Comment #6 from Richard Henderson --- Author: rth Date: Wed Apr 6 18:35:16 2016 New Revision: 234794 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234794=gcc=rev Log: PR preprocessor/61817 PR preprocessor/69391 * internal.h

[Bug preprocessor/61817] Inconsistent location of tokens in the expansion list of a built-in macro

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61817 --- Comment #4 from Richard Henderson --- Author: rth Date: Wed Apr 6 18:35:16 2016 New Revision: 234794 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234794=gcc=rev Log: PR preprocessor/61817 PR preprocessor/69391 * internal.h

[Bug preprocessor/61817] Inconsistent location of tokens in the expansion list of a built-in macro

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61817 Richard Henderson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug preprocessor/60723] Line directives with incorrect system header flag

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60723 Bug 60723 depends on bug 61817, which changed state. Bug 61817 Summary: Inconsistent location of tokens in the expansion list of a built-in macro https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61817 What|Removed

[Bug preprocessor/69391] [5 Regression] Incorrect __LINE__ expansion with -ftrack-macro-expansion=0 on g++5.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69391 Richard Henderson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Summary|[5/6

[Bug bootstrap/70519] genmatch fails to compile under gcc-5.2.0 - missing '-lstdc++' .

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70519 --- Comment #9 from Jason Vas Dias --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8) > Where do you see -nostdlib being used? I see it neither in your #c0, nor in > #c1. > Looking at my buildlog, -nostdlib is used to link only some libraries,

[Bug libstdc++/70564] New: Problem with std::experimental::not_fn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70564 Bug ID: 70564 Summary: Problem with std::experimental::not_fn Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug bootstrap/70519] genmatch fails to compile under gcc-5.2.0 - missing '-lstdc++' .

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70519 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Jason Vas Dias from comment #9) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8) > > Where do you see -nostdlib being used? I see it neither in your #c0, nor in > > #c1. > > Looking at my

[Bug fortran/52393] I/O: "READ format" statement with parenthesed default-char-expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52393 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > The code in #5 is missing the initial parenthesised expression that exposes > the flaw in parsing logic - the left hand operand of the string concatenation > needs to be `('(')`, and not just the

[Bug fortran/52884] double precision constants promoted to 16 byte by -fdefault-real-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52884 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- I am planning to submit the following patch --- ../_clean/gcc/fortran/invoke.texi 2016-03-13 09:07:16.0 +0100 +++ gcc/fortran/invoke.texi 2016-04-06 20:44:26.0 +0200 @@ -361,9

[Bug fortran/52393] I/O: "READ format" statement with parenthesed default-char-expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52393 --- Comment #6 from Ian Harvey --- The code in #5 is missing the initial parenthesised expression that exposes the flaw in parsing logic - the left hand operand of the string concatenation needs to be `('(')`, and not just the string literal.

[Bug fortran/67039] Documentation of pseudorandom number intrinsics is incorrect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67039 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- I am planning to submit the following patch --- ../_clean/gcc/fortran/intrinsic.texi2016-01-04 19:51:09.0 +0100 +++ gcc/fortran/intrinsic.texi 2016-04-06 17:15:01.0 +0200 @@

[Bug libstdc++/63345] Multiple undefined behaviors (static_cast<>) in libstdc++-v3/include/bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63345 Malcolm Parsons changed: What|Removed |Added CC||malcolm.parsons at gmail dot com ---

[Bug libstdc++/63345] Multiple undefined behaviors (static_cast<>) in libstdc++-v3/include/bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63345 --- Comment #11 from Malcolm Parsons --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #10) > > The attached patch fixes it for me. > > That seems to be a backport of r223746 from trunk, right? I'll look into > applying that to the gcc-5 branch.

[Bug libstdc++/63345] Multiple undefined behaviors (static_cast<>) in libstdc++-v3/include/bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63345 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Malcolm Parsons from comment #9) > Created attachment 38201 [details] > fix undefined behaviour in stl_tree.h > > (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #8) > > I believe all the real

[Bug tree-optimization/70177] [6 Regression] ICE in extract_ops_from_tree starting with r233660

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70177 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Apr 6 10:31:27 2016 New Revision: 234776 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234776=gcc=rev Log: 2016-04-06 Richard Biener Backport from mainline

[Bug c++/70513] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70513 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- But unfortunately that patch fixes Comment 3 but not the original testcase...

[Bug libstdc++/70560] New: Review configure checks for _GLIBCXX_ATOMIC_BUILTINS and atomicity_dir

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70560 Bug ID: 70560 Summary: Review configure checks for _GLIBCXX_ATOMIC_BUILTINS and atomicity_dir Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/70560] Review configure checks for _GLIBCXX_ATOMIC_BUILTINS and atomicity_dir

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70560 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/60290] 32-bit g++.dg/cilk-plus/CK/catch_exc.cc FAILs on Solaris/x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60290 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target|i386-pc-solaris2.1[01] |i386-pc-solaris2.1[012]

[Bug c/70436] [4.9/5/6 Regression] -Wparentheses missing ambiguous else warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70436 --- Comment #14 from Patrick Palka --- Author: ppalka Date: Wed Apr 6 23:10:14 2016 New Revision: 234802 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234802=gcc=rev Log: Fix C++ side of PR c/70436 (missing -Wparentheses warnings) gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

[Bug tree-optimization/68953] [6 Regression] [graphite] Wrong code w/ -O[12] -floop-nest-optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68953 --- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 38207 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38207=edit demonstrator patch In add_pdr_constraints, for the EXTRADIM=0 case we have: ... accesses: { S_4[i1, i2] ->

[Bug target/70568] PowerPC64: union of floating and fixed doesn't use POWER8 GPR/VSR moves

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70568 --- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool --- sradi, that is.

[Bug c++/70567] internal compiler error: in retrieve_specialization, at cp/pt.c:1020

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70567 --- Comment #1 from baoshan --- This issue is seen from 4.8 to 5.0.

[Bug c++/70567] New: internal compiler error: in retrieve_specialization, at cp/pt.c:1020

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70567 Bug ID: 70567 Summary: internal compiler error: in retrieve_specialization, at cp/pt.c:1020 Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/70436] [4.9/5/6 Regression] -Wparentheses missing ambiguous else warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70436 --- Comment #13 from Patrick Palka --- Author: ppalka Date: Wed Apr 6 23:07:21 2016 New Revision: 234801 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234801=gcc=rev Log: Fix new -Wparentheses warnings encountered during bootstrap gcc/ChangeLog:

[Bug tree-optimization/68953] [6 Regression] [graphite] Wrong code w/ -O[12] -floop-nest-optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68953 --- Comment #6 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to vries from comment #5) > The patch changes the order of the subscript functions Oops, that's accesses, actually. > (that was the easiest > for me to implement) to: > [alias set,

[Bug target/70568] New: PowerPC64: union of floating and fixed doesn't use POWER8 GPR/VSR moves

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70568 Bug ID: 70568 Summary: PowerPC64: union of floating and fixed doesn't use POWER8 GPR/VSR moves Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/70568] PowerPC64: union of floating and fixed doesn't use POWER8 GPR/VSR moves

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70568 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/70569] configure: error: source directory already configured; run "make distclean" there first

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70569 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|libstdc++ |bootstrap --- Comment #1 from Andrew

[Bug c++/70570] New: Assembler error "symbol already defined" from nested lambdas and function-static variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70570 Bug ID: 70570 Summary: Assembler error "symbol already defined" from nested lambdas and function-static variable Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/70571] New: ICE on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in verify_ctor_sanity, at cp/constexpr.c:2259

--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 6.0.0 20160406 (experimental) [trunk revision 234771] (GCC) $ $ g++-5.3 -c small.cpp $ $ g++-trunk -c small.cpp small.cpp: In function ‘void foo(vec, vec, int)’: small.cpp:4:14: internal compiler error

[Bug libstdc++/51749] Including pollutes global namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51749 --- Comment #32 from Yaakov Selkowitz --- In an effort to enable C99-in-C++ functionality on newlib-based targets (including Cygwin and RTEMS), we just overhauled our feature test macros to be functionally compatible with glibc's. Ignoring the

[Bug libstdc++/70569] New: configure: error: source directory already configured; run "make distclean" there first

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70569 Bug ID: 70569 Summary: configure: error: source directory already configured; run "make distclean" there first Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/43207] [OOP] invalid (pointer) assignment to and from abstract non-polymorphic expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43207 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/62254] [4.9/5/6 Regression] gcc-4.9 ICEs on linux kernel zlib for armv3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62254 --- Comment #21 from Ramana Radhakrishnan --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #19) > (In reply to Julien Margetts from comment #17) > > The following test case still fails with the patch applied (originally bug > > 70362) > > > >

[Bug target/70557] uint64_t zeroing on 32-bit hardware

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70557 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug fortran/65438] Unnecessary ptr check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65438 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Schwinge --- Created attachment 38200 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38200=edit patch

[Bug ipa/70559] Miscompilation of nsTextFormatter.cpp from Firefox with -Os -fomit-frame-pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70559 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug fortran/59093] Segfault in gfc_trans_pointer_assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59093 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||damian at sourceryinstitute dot or

[Bug target/70333] [5 Regression] Test miscompiled with -O0.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70333 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/68963] [4.9 Regression] O3 vs. O2 discards part of loop and terminates early

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68963 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Apr 6 07:57:47 2016 New Revision: 234774 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234774=gcc=rev Log: 2016-04-06 Richard Biener Backport from mainline

[Bug ipa/70559] New: Miscompilation of nsTextFormatter.cpp from Firefox with -Os -fomit-frame-pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70559 Bug ID: 70559 Summary: Miscompilation of nsTextFormatter.cpp from Firefox with -Os -fomit-frame-pointer Product: gcc Version: 4.9.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/70484] [4.9 Regression] Wrong optimization with aliasing and access via char

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70484 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||5.4.0 Summary|[4.9/5

[Bug target/70450] [6 Regression] Wrong code with -O0 and -O1.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70450 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Apr 6 07:45:34 2016 New Revision: 234772 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234772=gcc=rev Log: 2016-04-06 Richard Biener Backport from mainline

[Bug c++/70430] Incorrect result for logical "and" operation with mixed vector and scalar

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70430 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug target/70333] [5 Regression] Test miscompiled with -O0.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70333 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Apr 6 07:45:34 2016 New Revision: 234772 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234772=gcc=rev Log: 2016-04-06 Richard Biener Backport from mainline

[Bug c++/70430] Incorrect result for logical "and" operation with mixed vector and scalar

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70430 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Apr 6 07:45:34 2016 New Revision: 234772 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234772=gcc=rev Log: 2016-04-06 Richard Biener Backport from mainline

[Bug middle-end/70424] [4.9/5 Regression] Pointer derived from integer gets reduced alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70424 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Apr 6 07:51:19 2016 New Revision: 234773 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234773=gcc=rev Log: 2016-04-06 Richard Biener Backport from mainline

[Bug tree-optimization/70115] [5 Regression] gcc ICE at -O2 (seg fault) and above on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70115 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Apr 6 07:51:19 2016 New Revision: 234773 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234773=gcc=rev Log: 2016-04-06 Richard Biener Backport from mainline

[Bug middle-end/70022] [4.9/5 Regression] ICE: in tree_to_shwi, at tree.c:7328 with out-of-bounds vector index

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70022 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Apr 6 07:51:19 2016 New Revision: 234773 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234773=gcc=rev Log: 2016-04-06 Richard Biener Backport from mainline

[Bug tree-optimization/70115] [5 Regression] gcc ICE at -O2 (seg fault) and above on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70115 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug target/67478] gcc-5.1.0/gcc-5.2.0 undefined symbol std::__once_callable in AIX 6.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67478 --- Comment #9 from Qingshan Zhang --- Or do we have any work round for this issue ? Thank you.

[Bug middle-end/70550] -Wuninitialized false positives in OpenMP code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70550 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #38194|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/70549] insn does not satisfy its constraints aarch64 gcc-4.8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70549 --- Comment #6 from Christophe Lyon --- I've reproduced it too with our latest 4.8, and I confirm it compiles OK with the very first commit in branch 4.9. Since you switched to 4.9, I will not investigate more.

[Bug middle-end/70561] Crash in recog_for_combine_1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70561 --- Comment #2 from Dominik Vogt --- (Ah, probably add_clobbers should have added the clobber, but it hasn't. It doesn't have any code for that pattern.)

[Bug ipa/70348] [6 Regression][openacc] ICE in visit_ref_for_mod_analysis, at ipa-prop.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70348 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org |cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug middle-end/70561] Crash in recog_for_combine_1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70561 --- Comment #1 from Dominik Vogt --- P.S.: (gdb) p debug_rtx(pat) (set (reg:SI 67 [+4 ]) (and:SI (not:SI (subreg:SI (reg/v:DI 65 [ b+-4 ]) 4)) (mem:SI (plus:DI (reg:DI 2 %r2 [ a ]) (const_int 4 [0x4])) [1 *a_2(D)+4

[Bug middle-end/70550] -Wuninitialized false positives in OpenMP code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70550 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Apr 6 12:42:24 2016 New Revision: 234779 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234779=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/70550 * tree.h (OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT):

[Bug middle-end/70550] -Wuninitialized false positives in OpenMP code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70550 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/70559] Miscompilation of nsTextFormatter.cpp from Firefox with -Os -fomit-frame-pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70559 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/39159] unhelpful attribute warning on matching declaration after definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39159 --- Comment #6 from Gert --- I forgot to mention: the patch is against 5.3.0.

[Bug target/70557] uint64_t zeroing on 32-bit hardware

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70557 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- In that case it is a backend enhancement request. Backends have many ways how to deal with this, starting from specialized patterns, or using the lower subreg passes, using their own splitters etc. and many

[Bug fortran/70562] New: User defined assignment does not distinguish between ranks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70562 Bug ID: 70562 Summary: User defined assignment does not distinguish between ranks Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/70561] New: Crash in recog_for_combine_1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70561 Bug ID: 70561 Summary: Crash in recog_for_combine_1 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end

[Bug target/70557] uint64_t zeroing on 32-bit hardware

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70557 --- Comment #4 from Albert Cahalan --- Mostly it's more like PR58741 because of the long long issue. PR22141 (and PR23684 which is a better match) is about merging small things. Two of the six examples here show that problem, those being the

[Bug c++/39159] unhelpful attribute warning on matching declaration after definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39159 Gert changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gw.fossdev at gmail dot com --- Comment #5 from

[Bug target/67478] gcc-5.1.0/gcc-5.2.0 undefined symbol std::__once_callable in AIX 6.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67478 --- Comment #10 from David Edelsohn --- The libstdc++ build process was updated to recognize LTS symbols. Please use GCC 5.3 or later.

[Bug target/70557] uint64_t zeroing on 32-bit hardware

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70557 --- Comment #5 from Albert Cahalan --- This example shows the most simple form of the problem: unsigned long long ull; void simple64(void){ ull = 0; } NOTE: In the assembly below, I might have missing/excess parentheses. Assembler

[Bug fortran/55427] [OOP] ICE with class-array-pointer result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55427 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC|dominiq at lps dot ens.fr | --- Comment #4 from

[Bug middle-end/70561] Crash in recog_for_combine_1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70561 Dominik Vogt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/60853] Failure to disambiguate generic with unlimited polymorphic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60853 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||baradi09 at gmail dot com ---

[Bug fortran/70562] User defined assignment does not distinguish between ranks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70562 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/55427] [OOP] ICE with class-array-pointer result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55427 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/70559] Miscompilation of nsTextFormatter.cpp from Firefox with -Os -fomit-frame-pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70559 --- Comment #2 from Mike Hommey --- Created attachment 38198 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38198=edit nsTextFormatter.ii Err, sorry.

[Bug target/70557] uint64_t zeroing on 32-bit hardware

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70557 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug target/67478] gcc-5.1.0/gcc-5.2.0 undefined symbol std::__once_callable in AIX 6.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67478 Qingshan Zhang changed: What|Removed |Added CC||qshanz at cn dot ibm.com --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/69760] [4.9/5 Regression] Wrong 64-bit memory address caused by an unneeded overflowing 32-bit integer multiplication on x86_64 under -O2 and -O3 code optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69760 --- Comment #15 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Apr 6 08:09:40 2016 New Revision: 234775 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234775=gcc=rev Log: 2016-04-06 Richard Biener Backport from mainline

[Bug middle-end/69983] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/scop-sor.c scan-tree-dump-times graphite "number of SCoPs: 1" 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69983 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Apr 6 08:09:40 2016 New Revision: 234775 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234775=gcc=rev Log: 2016-04-06 Richard Biener Backport from mainline

[Bug c++/70558] POD datatype array crash in initialization when using optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70558 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/55427] [OOP] ICE with class-array-pointer result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55427 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- Comment #3

[Bug fortran/65438] Unnecessary ptr check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65438 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Status|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/52393] I/O: "READ format" statement with parenthesed default-char-expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52393 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Note that the following test compiles with gfortran from at least 4.8 up to trunk (6.0) PROGRAM ReadMeTwo IMPLICIT NONE CHARACTER(10) :: var READ '('//'A)', var PRINT *, var END PROGRAM

[Bug target/70559] Miscompilation of nsTextFormatter.cpp from Firefox with -Os -fomit-frame-pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70559 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Seems this got fixed (or is dup of) PR64905, r220416 in particular, but you want r220414 and r220441 too.

[Bug c++/68159] Demangler crash (GDB PR 19190)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68159 Paul Brannan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||curlypaul924 at gmail dot com ---

[Bug bootstrap/70519] genmatch fails to compile under gcc-5.2.0 - missing '-lstdc++' .

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70519 --- Comment #4 from Jason Vas Dias --- Thanks for having a look at this, Richard . Yes, "some weirdness" is definitely going on - but I'd like to determine precisely which "weirdness". This occurred when building my new LFS system's system

[Bug bootstrap/70519] genmatch fails to compile under gcc-5.2.0 - missing '-lstdc++' .

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70519 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug ipa/70348] [6 Regression][openacc] ICE in visit_ref_for_mod_analysis, at ipa-prop.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70348 --- Comment #9 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org --- The patch I posted for PR70289 a couple of days ago also resolves this issue: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-04/msg00202.html

[Bug fortran/66605] -Wunused-parameter causes internal compiler error with gfortran 5.1.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66605 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/70563] New: SFINEA fails when trying invalid template instantiation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70563 Bug ID: 70563 Summary: SFINEA fails when trying invalid template instantiation Product: gcc Version: 5.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/70398] [6 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/slp-multitypes-9.c FAILs with -fno-tree-loop-optimize -fno-tree-ter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70398 --- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov --- Author: vmakarov Date: Wed Apr 6 16:48:36 2016 New Revision: 234792 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234792=gcc=rev Log: 2016-04-06 Vladimir Makarov PR

[Bug bootstrap/70519] genmatch fails to compile under gcc-5.2.0 - missing '-lstdc++' .

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70519 --- Comment #7 from Jason Vas Dias --- So since I've produced a working Stage3 compiler in the build directory, './', './prev-gcc' should be the directory containing the Stage2 gcc build, and it does in my case, with a config.log : $ grep

[Bug bootstrap/70519] genmatch fails to compile under gcc-5.2.0 - missing '-lstdc++' .

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70519 --- Comment #6 from Jason Vas Dias --- Yes, Jakub, thanks, I know : > If you link with g++ or xg++ instead of gcc or xgcc, then the driver is > adding > -lstdc++ automatically. But it is not ME linking, it is the gcc-5.3.0 Makefile.in /

[Bug c/63336] cilkplus array notation ICE in find_rank

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63336 Yves Vandriessche changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yves.vandriessche at intel dot com

[Bug c++/66487] sanitizer/warnings for lifetime DSE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66487 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

  1   2   >