[Bug c++/77509] ICE on invalid C++ code: in finish_class_member_access_expr, at cp/typeck.c:2783

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77509 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug bootstrap/77359] [7 Regression] AIX bootstrap failure due to alignment of stack pointer + STACK_DYNAMIC_OFFSET

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77359 --- Comment #14 from Dominik Vogt --- Okay, it looks like outgoing_args_size is rounded up to a multiple of preferred_stack_boundary, so there's no problem on s390 or other targets with a stack allocation size smaller than STACK_BOUNDARY. So,

[Bug libfortran/77393] [7 Regression] Revision r237735 changed the behavior of F0.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77393 --- Comment #14 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #13 from Jerry DeLisle --- > Author: jvdelisle > Date: Tue Sep 6 23:22:26 2016 > New Revision: 240018 > > URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240018=gcc=rev > Log: >

[Bug c++/77513] -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant vs 0, nullptr, NULL and __null

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77513 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- The "3" flag on the line marker marks the following lines as originating from a system header where warnings are suppressed. Use -Wsystem-headers to enable them.

[Bug fortran/57117] [OOP] ICE for sourced allocation of a polymorphic entity using TRANSPOSE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57117 --- Comment #13 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 39581 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39581=edit Shorter version to fix the issue. Hi all, Dominique pointed out, that the patches proposed by Paul

[Bug c++/77513] -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant vs 0, nullptr, NULL and __null

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77513 --- Comment #2 from petschy at gmail dot com --- I don't want to enable them. The problem is not with too little but too many warnings. A snippet from one of the problematic files: { NULL, NULL, false, false } is preprocessed to {

[Bug middle-end/77377] [7 Regression] c-c++-common/pr59037.c ICEs with -fpic -msse on i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77377 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zsojka at seznam dot cz --- Comment #6

[Bug rtl-optimization/77401] [7 Regression] ICE: in simplify_binary_operation_1, at simplify-rtx.c:3731 with out-of-bounds vector access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77401 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/77498] [7 regression] Performance drop after r239414 on spec2000/172mgrid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77498 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug driver/77497] [5/6/7 Regression] Setting DWARF level and debug level together has flag-ordering-dependent results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77497 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.5 Summary|Setting DWARF

[Bug target/77483] [6/7 regression] gcc.target/i386/mask-unpack.c etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77483 --- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- > You could add dg-skip-if or XFAILs to the tests now failing. IMHO a testsuite > issue. I though about just adding -mno-stackrealign to the

[Bug middle-end/66661] incorrect memory access in optimization with flexible array member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1 Florian Weimer changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug bootstrap/77512] New: gcc compilation stops with Arithmetic Exception

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77512 Bug ID: 77512 Summary: gcc compilation stops with Arithmetic Exception Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug other/29842] [meta-bug] outstanding patches / issues from STMicroelectronics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29842 Bug 29842 depends on bug 24194, which changed state. Bug 24194 Summary: emit_input_reload_insns secondary reload handling is unsafe https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24194 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/77304] ICE on C++ code with invalid template parameter: in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:11260

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77304 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2016-9-7 CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/24194] emit_input_reload_insns secondary reload handling is unsafe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24194 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/30199] config/freebsd.h does not define HANDLE_PRAGMA_PACK_PUSH_POP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30199 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/77450] [5/6 Regression] ICE: in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:1016 on very simple code with vectors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77450 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Sep 7 08:22:01 2016 New Revision: 240025 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240025=gcc=rev Log: 2016-09-07 Richard Biener PR c/77450 *

[Bug other/31566] @missing_file gives bad error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31566 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||easyhack Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/77510] New: genautomata memory footprint for MIPS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77510 Bug ID: 77510 Summary: genautomata memory footprint for MIPS Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap

[Bug target/77493] [6/7 Regression] -fcrossjumping (-O2) on ppc64le causes segfaults (jump to 0x0) (first bad r230091)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77493 --- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #11) > CCing libstdc++ people -- not sure if std::stable_sort (on which kind of > collection?) is safe for std::shared_ptr. It's required to work correctly. It

[Bug c++/77513] New: -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant vs 0, nullptr, NULL and __null

d=c++14 -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant 20160907-null.cpp -E > 20160907-null.ii Yesterday I switched on the warning for a ~250kloc codebase to clean it up. Used 7.0, it was tedious but it was done. I had to replace NULLs also, not just 0s, but at that time I wasn't suspecting anything, though it

[Bug rtl-optimization/77499] [7 Regression] Regression after code-hoisting, due to combine pass failing to evaluate known value range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77499 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > It seems with thumb the code is only if-converted after reload for some > reason. Most likely because it is going through the cond_exec route.

[Bug c++/77347] [6/7 Regression] Incorrect auto deduction failure in template class member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77347 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/10802] Bootstrap of gcc-3.3 on Solaris 9 x86 fails on undefined symbol in libgcj.so

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10802 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #14 from Andrew

[Bug c++/77508] [7 Regression] ICE on valid C++ code: in finish_class_member_access_expr, at cp/typeck.c:2783

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77508 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug middle-end/21786] Segmentation fault under FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p15

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21786 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/77503] [7 regression] ICE in vect_transform_stmt compiling postgresql

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77503 --- Comment #11 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #10) > (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #6) > > markus@x4 tmp % cat fsmpage.i > > You got to it before I could do that :). Yeah, sorry. I already

[Bug rtl-optimization/77499] [7 Regression] Regression after code-hoisting, due to combine pass failing to evaluate known value range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77499 --- Comment #7 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org --- if-convert is a no go here, for the reason Andrew pointed out, sorry missed that comment! So I dont know... Only thing I can think of is better "value-range"-like analysis for combine, but that

[Bug tree-optimization/77503] [7 regression] ICE in vect_transform_stmt compiling postgresql

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77503 --- Comment #12 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- ICE is because prologue peeling changes code (to be specific, the initial argument of reduction phi node in loop header), as a result, the statement to be vectorized is not the statement that was

[Bug rtl-optimization/77499] [7 Regression] Regression after code-hoisting, due to combine pass failing to evaluate known value range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77499 --- Comment #9 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org --- > > So I dont know... Only thing I can think of is better "value-range"-like > > analysis for combine, but that might be too costly? > > So we are not really looking for combine to combine the

[Bug tree-optimization/77503] [7 regression] ICE in vect_transform_stmt compiling postgresql

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77503 --- Comment #13 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to amker from comment #12) > ICE is because prologue peeling changes code (to be specific, the initial > argument of reduction phi node in loop header), as a result, the statement > to

[Bug middle-end/77383] -fcheck-pointer-bounds -mmpx ICE with VLA struct return type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77383 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug bootstrap/30136] bootstrap fail for 4.3-20061209

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30136 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/77501] ICE in gfc_match_generic, at fortran/decl.c:9429

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77501 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code Target

[Bug c++/77508] New: ICE on valid C++ code: in finish_class_member_access_expr, at cp/typeck.c:2783

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77508 Bug ID: 77508 Summary: ICE on valid C++ code: in finish_class_member_access_expr, at cp/typeck.c:2783 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug java/16200] gcj generates dependencies on the full contents of the extensions directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16200 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/77499] [7 Regression] Regression after code-hoisting, due to combine pass failing to evaluate known value range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77499 --- Comment #6 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org --- > so we are talking about the uxthne insn (I don't know arm / thumb very well). Yes, the uxthne is the "zero_extend" that is otherwise optimized away if you turn off code-hoisting. This is

[Bug c/77511] New: libbacktrace could not find executable to open

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77511 Bug ID: 77511 Summary: libbacktrace could not find executable to open Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug rtl-optimization/77499] [7 Regression] Regression after code-hoisting, due to combine pass failing to evaluate known value range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77499 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Oh, and with -fno-code-hoisting I see movwr6, #45345 .L5: smull lr, r4, r5, r1 sub r4, r4, r1, asr #31 add r4, r4, r4, lsl #1 cmp r1, r4

[Bug tree-optimization/20192] Unnecessary jump from &

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20192 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/77499] [7 Regression] Regression after code-hoisting, due to combine pass failing to evaluate known value range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77499 --- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 7 Sep 2016, avieira at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77499 > > --- Comment #7 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org --- > if-convert is a no go here,

[Bug target/77483] [6/7 regression] gcc.target/i386/mask-unpack.c etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77483 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #5

[Bug target/63346] xserver_xorg-server-1.15.1 crash on RaspberryPi when compiled with gcc-4.9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63346 --- Comment #5 from Peter Seiderer --- Seems to be fixed in 5.4.0, tested with the original buildroot/xserver/dillo testcase (with up to date buildroot) and the provided fbpict.c testcase.

[Bug c++/77513] -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant vs 0, nullptr, NULL and __null

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77513 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to petschy from comment #0) > For c++11 and later code, why is NULL defined as __null, rather than nullptr? Because defining NULL as nullptr would violate the requirements of the standard, which

[Bug fortran/60483] [5/6/7 Regression] No IMPLICIT type error with: ASSOCIATE( X => derived_type() ) [i.e. w/ structure constructor]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60483 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug fortran/66459] bogus warning 'w.offset' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66459 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/71710] [7 Regression] ICE on valid C++11 code with decltype and alias template: in lookup_member, at cp/search.c:1255

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71710 --- Comment #3 from Zhendong Su --- A related, but simpler test that triggers the same ICE: template < typename > struct A { A a; template < int > using B = decltype (a); B < 0 > b; };

[Bug middle-end/77475] unnecessary or misleading context in reporting command line problems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77475 --- Comment #4 from Christophe Lyon --- Author: clyon Date: Wed Sep 7 20:18:17 2016 New Revision: 240030 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240030=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/77475: Fix AArch64 testcases. 2016-09-07 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug fortran/48298] [F03] User-Defined Derived-Type IO (DTIO)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48298 --- Comment #19 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Wed Sep 7 21:21:16 2016 New Revision: 240032 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240032=gcc=rev Log: 2016-09-07 Dominique Dhumieres PR fortran/48298

[Bug c/77521] New: %qc format directive should quote non-printable characters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77521 Bug ID: 77521 Summary: %qc format directive should quote non-printable characters Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libgcc/77519] New: [5/6/7 Regression] complex multiply / divide excess precision handling inverted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77519 Bug ID: 77519 Summary: [5/6/7 Regression] complex multiply / divide excess precision handling inverted Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c/77520] wrong value for extended ASCII characters in -Wformat message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77520 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Severity|normal

[Bug c/77520] New: wrong value for extended ASCII characters in -Wformat message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77520 Bug ID: 77520 Summary: wrong value for extended ASCII characters in -Wformat message Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libgcc/77519] [5/6/7 Regression] complex multiply excess precision handling inverted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77519 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[5/6/7 Regression] complex |[5/6/7 Regression] complex

[Bug libgcc/77519] [5/6 Regression] complex multiply excess precision handling inverted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77519 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.5 Summary|[5/6/7

[Bug fortran/77507] gfortran rejects keyworded calls to procedures from intrinsic modules

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77507 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/57117] [OOP] ICE for sourced allocation of a polymorphic entity using TRANSPOSE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57117 --- Comment #14 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Created attachment 39581 [details] > Shorter version to fix the issue. > ... The patch fixes the ICEs, but generates wrong-code for the original test: the output at run time is FAIL: T T T T F

[Bug tree-optimization/77514] [6/7 Regression] ICE in VN_INFO_GET, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:406 w/ -O2 (and above)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77514 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/30026] useless stack movement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30026 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- I think this might be fixed now.

[Bug c++/77509] New: ICE on invalid C++ code: in finish_class_member_access_expr, at cp/typeck.c:2783

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77509 Bug ID: 77509 Summary: ICE on invalid C++ code: in finish_class_member_access_expr, at cp/typeck.c:2783 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug bootstrap/30136] bootstrap fail for 4.3-20061209

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30136 --- Comment #9 from David Binderman --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8) > Does this work with a much newer GCC? Hard to say for definite. The machine was recycled many years ago and is probably in landfill by now. Given the great

[Bug fortran/77507] gfortran rejects keyworded calls to procedures from intrinsic modules

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77507 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libgcc/77519] [5/6/7 Regression] complex multiply excess precision handling inverted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77519 --- Comment #2 from Joseph S. Myers --- Author: jsm28 Date: Wed Sep 7 23:02:56 2016 New Revision: 240033 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240033=gcc=rev Log: Correct libgcc complex multiply excess precision handling (PR libgcc/77519).

[Bug fortran/77507] gfortran rejects keyworded calls to procedures from intrinsic modules

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77507 --- Comment #2 from Steve Kargl --- On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 10:12:22PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > This should have been 2 separate bug reports as ieee support > is distinct from ISO C binding support. This patch fixes > the

[Bug target/77494] -mcpu=cortex-a53 does not allow use of crc extensions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77494 --- Comment #5 from Richard Earnshaw --- (In reply to Jools Wills from comment #4) > Thanks - reported here - > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20567 And already fixed in GAS earlier today.

[Bug target/77494] -mcpu=cortex-a53 does not allow use of crc extensions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77494 --- Comment #6 from Jools Wills --- Thanks for the fix - I'll mark the other bug as resolved.

[Bug c++/77522] New: ICE on invalid code C++14 code: in tsubst_decl, at cp/pt.c:12447

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77522 Bug ID: 77522 Summary: ICE on invalid code C++14 code: in tsubst_decl, at cp/pt.c:12447 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/77523] New: rejects valid C++14 code with initialized lambda capture

COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/gcc-trunk/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.0.0/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.0 20160907 (experimental

[Bug preprocessor/53469] #pragma GCC diagnostic works, but using _Pragma doesn't for -Wunused-local-typedefs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53469 j8spencer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||spencer8 at sbcglobal dot net --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/77514] New: [7 Regression] ICE in VN_INFO_GET, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:406 w/ -O2 (and above)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77514 Bug ID: 77514 Summary: [7 Regression] ICE in VN_INFO_GET, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:406 w/ -O2 (and above) Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug middle-end/77515] New: GCC fusing of multiply-add ["FMA"] occurring at "-O3" withOUT "-ffast-math" and withOUT "-ffp-contract=fast"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77515 Bug ID: 77515 Summary: GCC fusing of multiply-add ["FMA"] occurring at "-O3" withOUT "-ffast-math" and withOUT "-ffp-contract=fast" Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status:

[Bug rtl-optimization/77499] [7 Regression] Regression after code-hoisting, due to combine pass failing to evaluate known value range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77499 --- Comment #10 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to avieira from comment #9) > > > So I dont know... Only thing I can think of is better "value-range"-like > > > analysis for combine, but that might be too costly? That is what nonzero_bits

[Bug middle-end/77515] GCC fusing of multiply-add ["FMA"] occurring at "-O3" withOUT "-ffast-math" and withOUT "-ffp-contract=fast"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77515 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/77505] Negative character length not treated as LEN=0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77505 --- Comment #2 from Steve Kargl --- On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 07:01:40PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > --- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- > This is going to require someone smarting than I to fix. > The problem lies in

[Bug c++/77513] -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant vs 0, nullptr, NULL and __null

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77513 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/77517] New: ICE in conv_intrinsic_move_alloc, at fortran/trans-intrinsic.c:9517

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77517 Bug ID: 77517 Summary: ICE in conv_intrinsic_move_alloc, at fortran/trans-intrinsic.c:9517 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/77517] ICE in conv_intrinsic_move_alloc, at fortran/trans-intrinsic.c:9517

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77517 --- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- Similar with subroutine named "a" : $ cat z2.f90 program p class(*), allocatable :: a, b call move_alloc (a, b) contains subroutine a end end $

[Bug fortran/77517] ICE in conv_intrinsic_move_alloc, at fortran/trans-intrinsic.c:9517

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77517 --- Comment #2 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- For completeness, older versions below 5 give : $ gfortran-4.9 z1.f90 z1.f90:3.20: call move_alloc (a, b) 1 Error: 'from' argument of

[Bug fortran/77518] New: ICE in gfc_advance_chain, at fortran/trans.c:58

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77518 Bug ID: 77518 Summary: ICE in gfc_advance_chain, at fortran/trans.c:58 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/67971] Failure to unify conditional argument selection with conditional result selection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67971 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Note we should able to optimize this just to int f1 (int cond, double x, double y) { double z1, z2; z2 = __builtin_cos (cond ? x : y); return z2 == z2; } But that is 64700.

[Bug target/77494] -mcpu=cortex-a53 does not allow use of crc extensions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77494 --- Comment #4 from Jools Wills --- Thanks - reported here - https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20567

[Bug fortran/77505] Negative character length not treated as LEN=0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77505 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/77514] [6/7 Regression] ICE in VN_INFO_GET, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:406 w/ -O2 (and above)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77514 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/77515] GCC fusing of multiply-add ["FMA"] occurring at "-O3" withOUT "-ffast-math" and withOUT "-ffp-contract=fast"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77515 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- >This seems to be in violation of preservation of exactly the same results Huh? Where did you read that? Also GCC defaults not to on but to: -ffp-contract=fast Read:

[Bug fortran/77506] stamdard for f2008 does not allow CHARACTER(LEN=*) in array constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77506 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/77503] [7 regression] ICE in vect_transform_stmt compiling postgresql

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77503 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #6) > markus@x4 tmp % cat fsmpage.i You got to it before I could do that :).

[Bug c/77490] bit-not (~) on boolean should be warned about

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77490 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/70473] genautomata memory footprint for arm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70473 --- Comment #15 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Leonid Lisovskiy from comment #14) > (In reply to ktkachov from comment #13) > > Marking this as fixed then. Thanks for testing. > > Could you repeat the same optimizations for MIPS

[Bug fortran/77516] New: ICE in is_gimple_min_invariant, at gimple-expr.c:706

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77516 Bug ID: 77516 Summary: ICE in is_gimple_min_invariant, at gimple-expr.c:706 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug bootstrap/30136] bootstrap fail for 4.3-20061209

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30136 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/63346] xserver_xorg-server-1.15.1 crash on RaspberryPi when compiled with gcc-4.9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63346 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/60918] [mips] unaligned memory copy with LWL/LWR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60918 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/39616] Stage 2 Werror - trunk revision 145459 - libcpp/identifiers.c:113: error: variably modified 'proxy_assertion_broken' at file scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39616 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/64364] gcc ICE on min() on Intel Sandy Bridge CPU if compiler built on Haswell

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64364 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/77507] New: gfortran rejects keyworded calls to procedures from intrinsic modules

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77507 Bug ID: 77507 Summary: gfortran rejects keyworded calls to procedures from intrinsic modules Product: gcc Version: 6.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/77493] [6/7 Regression] -fcrossjumping (-O2) on ppc64le causes segfaults (jump to 0x0) (first bad r230091)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77493 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/77493] [6/7 Regression] -fcrossjumping (-O2) on ppc64le causes segfaults (jump to 0x0) (first bad r230091)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77493 --- Comment #12 from David Abdurachmanov --- Looks to be std::vector (aka ConstRecHitContainer). Here is the class and typedef for the containers:

[Bug fortran/77501] ICE in gfc_match_generic, at fortran/decl.c:9429

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77501 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/77500] ICE in gfc_trans_omp_atomic, at fortran/trans-openmp.c:2822

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77500 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code

  1   2   >