[Bug fortran/78092] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE when calling SIZEOF on CLASS(*) entry

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78092 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/78121] [7 Regression] ice in set_value_range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78121 --- Comment #4 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 39904 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39904=edit untested patch testing this patch

[Bug fortran/78092] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE when calling SIZEOF on CLASS(*) entry

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78092 --- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Thu Oct 27 05:00:46 2016 New Revision: 241611 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241611=gcc=rev Log: 2016-10-26 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/78092

[Bug target/78117] New: gcc on tilegx builds faulty strstr() function (from glibc)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78117 Bug ID: 78117 Summary: gcc on tilegx builds faulty strstr() function (from glibc) Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/78037] Incorrect code generated at optimization level -O2 for tzcnt and binary and

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78037 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/78110] freestanding libstdc++ fails to compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78110 --- Comment #4 from Bernd Edlinger --- First I was a bit shocked, but i think my patch above looks reasonable. Because the installation is free-standing it is natural that we cannot #include . Although the eCos has no memalign, that is benign,

[Bug middle-end/78098] error: interrupt service routine can't be called directly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78098 --- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #10) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #9) > > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6) > > > Why would we be not able to tailcall in an interupt handler? > > > > We

[Bug gcov-profile/78086] FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-1.c, etc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78086 --- Comment #6 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2016-10-26 7:08 AM, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > May I please ask you for testing the patch on your hppa64 machine? Testing. Thanks, Dave

[Bug target/78056] [7 Regression] build failure on Power7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78056 Bill Seurer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com ---

[Bug fortran/78108] Generic type-bound operator conflicts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78108 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/78105] ICE during LTO bootstrap on AARCH64 with extra options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78105 --- Comment #9 from PeteVine --- Ha! It's not about the extra options, thank you! ;) Completely vanilla environment and gcc 5.4 produce this after a while: ../build-lto-noflags/./gcc/xgcc -B../build-lto-noflags/./gcc/

[Bug rtl-optimization/78116] [7 regression] Performance drop after r241173 on avx512 target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78116 --- Comment #1 from Yuri Rumyantsev --- Created attachment 39892 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39892=edit test-case to reproduce Must be compiled with "-Ofast -funroll-loops -march=knl" options.

[Bug target/78117] gcc on tilegx builds faulty strstr() function (from glibc)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78117 --- Comment #4 from Henrik Grindal Bakken --- Output when running (on target) the code built with gcc-4.8.2-tilera: [hgbcarbon:~] $ ./tile-ss ee ss2: Found ee in abcdeefgh12345 [hgbcarbon:~] $ ./tile-ss 123 ss2: Found 123 in abcdeefgh12345

[Bug fortran/78108] Generic type-bound operator conflicts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78108 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Wed Oct 26 14:48:02 2016 New Revision: 241555 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241555=gcc=rev Log: 2016-10-26 Paul Thomas PR fortran/78108 *

[Bug target/78057] [7 Regression]: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/bmi-{4,5,6}.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78057 --- Comment #8 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Wed Oct 26 15:13:39 2016 New Revision: 241556 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241556=gcc=rev Log: Backport from mainline 2016-10-21 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/78037] Incorrect code generated at optimization level -O2 for tzcnt and binary and

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78037 --- Comment #20 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Wed Oct 26 15:13:39 2016 New Revision: 241556 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241556=gcc=rev Log: Backport from mainline 2016-10-21 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug fortran/77973] [6/7 Regression] ICE in scan_omp_1_op, at omp-low.c:3841

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77973 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Oct 26 16:21:56 2016 New Revision: 241581 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241581=gcc=rev Log: PR fortran/77973 * gimplify.c (gimplify_adjust_omp_clauses_1): For

[Bug c++/69905] Digit separators break literal operators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69905 TC changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rs2740 at gmail dot com --- Comment #4 from TC

[Bug target/77308] surprisingly large stack usage for sha512 on arm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77308 --- Comment #19 from Bernd Edlinger --- I think the problem with anddi iordi and xordi instructions is that they obscure the data flow between low and high half words. When they are not enabled, we have the low and high parts expanded

[Bug target/77687] frame access after release without redzone on powerpc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77687 --- Comment #1 from Olivier Hainque --- Created attachment 39899 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39899=edit bandaid patch we're currently using

[Bug fortran/78108] Generic type-bound operator conflicts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78108 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Wed Oct 26 16:13:49 2016 New Revision: 241575 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241575=gcc=rev Log: 2016-10-26 Paul Thomas PR fortran/78108 *

[Bug target/78117] gcc on tilegx builds faulty strstr() function (from glibc)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78117 --- Comment #1 from Henrik Grindal Bakken --- Created attachment 39894 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39894=edit Preprocessed source code reproducing the bug

[Bug c++/69905] Digit separators break literal operators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69905 aaron.mcdaid at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aaron.mcdaid at gmail dot

[Bug target/77687] frame access after release without redzone on powerpc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77687 --- Comment #2 from Olivier Hainque --- Thanks for stepping in Segher ! Much appreciated :-) FWIW, I have just attached the bandaid patch we're currently using on our gcc-6 based compilers. It's more brutal than the original suggestion on the

[Bug target/78117] gcc on tilegx builds faulty strstr() function (from glibc)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78117 --- Comment #5 from Henrik Grindal Bakken --- Created attachment 39897 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39897=edit Preprocessed source code reproducing the bug (this time built with 6.2)

[Bug target/77308] surprisingly large stack usage for sha512 on arm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77308 --- Comment #18 from Bernd Edlinger --- Created attachment 39898 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39898=edit proposed patch This disables problematic di patterns when no fpu is used, and there is absolutely no chance that

[Bug middle-end/78115] New: Missed optimization for "int modulo 2^31"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78115 Bug ID: 78115 Summary: Missed optimization for "int modulo 2^31" Product: gcc Version: 6.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug rtl-optimization/78116] New: [7 regression] Performance drop after r241173 on avx512 target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78116 Bug ID: 78116 Summary: [7 regression] Performance drop after r241173 on avx512 target Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/78117] gcc on tilegx builds faulty strstr() function (from glibc)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78117 --- Comment #2 from Henrik Grindal Bakken --- Created attachment 39895 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39895=edit Assembly output with working compiler (4.8.2-tilera)

[Bug bootstrap/77359] [7 Regression] AIX bootstrap failure due to alignment of stack pointer + STACK_DYNAMIC_OFFSET

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77359 --- Comment #18 from David Edelsohn --- As long as GCC claims that it can make a distinction between the various alignments and macros, the GCC code generation must continue to honor it. On AIX, at least, the ABI claims a different stack

[Bug target/78117] gcc on tilegx builds faulty strstr() function (from glibc)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78117 --- Comment #3 from Henrik Grindal Bakken --- Created attachment 39896 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39896=edit Assembly output with non-working compiler (6.2)

[Bug c++/69905] Digit separators break literal operators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69905 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/78092] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE when calling SIZEOF on CLASS(*) entry

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78092 --- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Thu Oct 27 03:08:13 2016 New Revision: 241610 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241610=gcc=rev Log: 2016-10-26 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/78092

[Bug fortran/71796] Link error referencing compiler generated symbol __vtab_xxx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71796 --- Comment #3 from Ian Harvey --- If you want a test case that exhibits no run time error upon successful compilation and linking, then replace the entire main program with an END statement. MODULE ma IMPLICIT NONE PRIVATE TYPE, PUBLIC,

[Bug c++/78124] New: [7 regression][c++1z] explicit inheriting constructor is ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78124 Bug ID: 78124 Summary: [7 regression][c++1z] explicit inheriting constructor is ignored Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/78121] [7 Regression] ice in set_value_range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78121 kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libfortran/78123] New: Short reads with T edit descriptor not padding correctly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78123 Bug ID: 78123 Summary: Short reads with T edit descriptor not padding correctly Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libfortran/77828] [7 Regression] Linking gfortran-7 compiled program with libgfortran of 5.x allowed but crashes when containing write to string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77828 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/78105] ICE during LTO bootstrap on AARCH64 with extra options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78105 --- Comment #10 from PeteVine --- Hold on, I'm investigating the effect of binutils downgrade (2.27 -> 2.26) and switching to ld.bfd. Strange that it all works fine during normal bootstrap, regardless of the codegen options.

[Bug fortran/48298] [F03] User-Defined Derived-Type IO (DTIO)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48298 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/20585] [meta-bug] Fortran 2003 support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20585 Bug 20585 depends on bug 48298, which changed state. Bug 48298 Summary: [F03] User-Defined Derived-Type IO (DTIO) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48298 What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/43750] -march unconditionally added to COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43750 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/43515] Basic block re-ordering unconditionally disabled for Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43515 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization --- Comment #5 from

[Bug libstdc++/78110] New: freestanding libstdc++ fails to compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78110 Bug ID: 78110 Summary: freestanding libstdc++ fails to compile Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug target/78118] xtensa: ICE in gcc-6.1.0/libgcc/libgcc2.c:1992:1: error: unrecognizable insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78118 --- Comment #2 from jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org --- The change that made xtensa backend go ICE looks completely unrelated, and indeed, the issue is caused by the side effect of compute_frame_size() function call hidden in the

[Bug rtl-optimization/18146] if-conversion is not performed for some reason

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18146 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/78110] freestanding libstdc++ fails to compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78110 Bernd Edlinger changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/78118] xtensa: ICE in gcc-6.1.0/libgcc/libgcc2.c:1992:1: error: unrecognizable insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78118 jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug bootstrap/77359] [7 Regression] AIX bootstrap failure due to alignment of stack pointer + STACK_DYNAMIC_OFFSET

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77359 --- Comment #20 from David Edelsohn --- If STACK_DYNAMIC_OFFSET has to be increased to 16, it has to be increased. info->parm_size probably was adjusted for VMX parameters. Note that GCC has gone through contortions with STACK_BOUNDARY,

[Bug target/77308] surprisingly large stack usage for sha512 on arm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77308 --- Comment #20 from wilco at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #19) > I think the problem with anddi iordi and xordi instructions is that > they obscure the data flow between low and high half words. > When they are

[Bug debug/78112] [7 regression] invalid DWARF generated by the compiler: DIE has multiple AT_inline attributes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78112 --- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- > Try http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-10/msg02062.html ? Didn't help, unfortunately: I rebuilt cc1plus with the patch and compiled the

[Bug c++/78119] New: wrong diagnostic pointer for -Werror=ignored-qualifiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78119 Bug ID: 78119 Summary: wrong diagnostic pointer for -Werror=ignored-qualifiers Product: gcc Version: 6.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/78110] freestanding libstdc++ fails to compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78110 --- Comment #5 from Bernd Edlinger --- Author: edlinger Date: Wed Oct 26 17:26:00 2016 New Revision: 241591 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241591=gcc=rev Log: 2016-10-26 Bernd Edlinger PR

[Bug target/78118] New: xtensa: ICE in gcc-6.1.0/libgcc/libgcc2.c:1992:1: error: unrecognizable insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78118 Bug ID: 78118 Summary: xtensa: ICE in gcc-6.1.0/libgcc/libgcc2.c:1992:1: error: unrecognizable insn Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug bootstrap/77359] [7 Regression] AIX bootstrap failure due to alignment of stack pointer + STACK_DYNAMIC_OFFSET

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77359 --- Comment #19 from Ulrich Weigand --- I've been looking into this a bit with Dominik, and here's what I understand of the problem so far: - It really all starts with emit-rtl.c:init_emit doing: REGNO_POINTER_ALIGN

[Bug other/78109] ld with -pie creates a shared library instead of an executable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78109 --- Comment #3 from Hadrien --- Thank you for your messages. I called the 'file' command on a .so and an executable, they both show the same kind of information. I understand that a program like the file explorer can get confused. As

[Bug debug/77773] [6/7 Regression] Segfault when compiling __simd64_float16_t using arm-none-eabi-g++ with debug information

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING

[Bug debug/77773] [6/7 Regression] Segfault when compiling __simd64_float16_t using arm-none-eabi-g++ with debug information

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3 --- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez --- Created attachment 39901 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39901=edit proposed patch

[Bug debug/77773] [6/7 Regression] Segfault when compiling __simd64_float16_t using arm-none-eabi-g++ with debug information

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3 --- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez --- simple_type_specificer() is dereferencing a NULL result from c_common_type_for_mode and segfaulting: int prec = TYPE_PRECISION (t); if (ALL_FIXED_POINT_MODE_P (TYPE_MODE (t)))

[Bug rtl-optimization/78120] [6/7 Regression] If conversion no longer performed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78120 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug c++/69905] Digit separators break literal operators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69905 emsr at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||emsr at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/78056] [7 Regression] build failure on Power7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78056 --- Comment #16 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kelvin Date: Wed Oct 26 20:19:39 2016 New Revision: 241599 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241599=gcc=rev Log: gcc/ChangeLog: 2016-10-26 Kelvin Nilsen

[Bug debug/78112] [7 regression] invalid DWARF generated by the compiler: DIE has multiple AT_inline attributes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78112 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug debug/78112] New: [7 regression] invalid DWARF generated by the compiler: DIE has multiple AT_inline attributes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78112 Bug ID: 78112 Summary: [7 regression] invalid DWARF generated by the compiler: DIE has multiple AT_inline attributes Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/78073] inherited initializer_list constructor is not accessible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78073 lucdanton at free dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lucdanton at free dot fr ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/43515] Basic block re-ordering unconditionally disabled for Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43515 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/78111] [7 regression] experimental/filesystem/operations/canonical.cc FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78111 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug libstdc++/78111] New: [7 regression] experimental/filesystem/operations/canonical.cc FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78111 Bug ID: 78111 Summary: [7 regression] experimental/filesystem/operations/canonical.cc FAILs Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/78110] freestanding libstdc++ fails to compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78110 --- Comment #1 from Bernd Edlinger --- oh, I am using eCos and that is based on newlib but on a very very old one. I don't know what happens when I dont use --with-newlib, but I can try... configure.ac has this: # First, test for "known"

[Bug libstdc++/78110] freestanding libstdc++ fails to compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78110 --- Comment #2 from Bernd Edlinger --- without --with-newlib the build fails miserably... this works for me: --- libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/new_opa.cc.orig 2016-09-16 20:09:14.0 +0200 +++ libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/new_opa.cc 2016-10-26

[Bug target/78105] ICE during LTO bootstrap on AARCH64 with extra options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78105 --- Comment #7 from PeteVine --- Restarted the whole thing from scratch using gcc 5.4 and it segfaulted again. ../../../libgcc/libgcc2.c: In function ‘__powitf2’: ../../../libgcc/libgcc2.c:1851:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault }

[Bug c/78000] -Wimplicit-function-declaration inhibited with macro from system headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78000 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug debug/78112] [7 regression] invalid DWARF generated by the compiler: DIE has multiple AT_inline attributes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78112 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Try http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-10/msg02062.html ?

[Bug c/77750] [7 Regression] gcc build not working with -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77750 --- Comment #6 from louis.krupp at zoho dot com --- It's still there. I'm maintaining the attached changes to my debug tree. (I'm not sure my last message got through.) Louis On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 03:01:42 -0700 Louis Krupp

[Bug libstdc++/78111] [7 regression] experimental/filesystem/operations/canonical.cc FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78111 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/78111] [7 regression] experimental/filesystem/operations/canonical.cc FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78111 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #2) > Created attachment 39884 [details] > Configure patch to correctly detect realpath > > You will need at least the attached patch that includes for > PATH_MAX. >

[Bug gcov-profile/78086] FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-1.c, etc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78086 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 39886 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39886=edit Untested patch May I please ask you for testing the patch on your hppa64 machine?

[Bug rtl-optimization/78029] [7 Regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2285

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78029 --- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool --- Created attachment 39887 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39887=edit testcase

[Bug libstdc++/78110] freestanding libstdc++ fails to compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78110 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #1) > oh, I am using eCos and that is based on newlib but on a very very old one. > I don't know what happens when I dont use --with-newlib, but I can try... > >

[Bug sanitizer/77982] deadlock in asan thread initialization/interception.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77982 --- Comment #11 from Maxim Ostapenko --- Created attachment 39882 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39882=edit Untested fix Untested fix (works for me with attached testcase). To sum up: 1) dlopen grabs a

[Bug tree-optimization/78107] [7 Regression] verify_gimple failed ICE caused by Gimple loop splitting patch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78107 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug c/77965] -Wduplicated-cond should find duplicated condition / identical expressions of form "a || a" or "a && a"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77965 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/71676] [avr] casesi won't handle switch values larger than 16 bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71676 --- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay --- Author: gjl Date: Wed Oct 26 09:46:44 2016 New Revision: 241547 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241547=gcc=rev Log: gen-pass-instances.awk is sensitive to the order in which passes

[Bug target/71678] [avr] ICE from switch / case on long long (casesi + DImode)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71678 --- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay --- Author: gjl Date: Wed Oct 26 09:46:44 2016 New Revision: 241547 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241547=gcc=rev Log: gen-pass-instances.awk is sensitive to the order in which passes

[Bug target/78105] ICE during LTO bootstrap on AARCH64 with extra options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78105 --- Comment #8 from PeteVine --- FWIW, here's the corresponding backtrace: #0 0x00afa00c in df_get_live_out () at ../../gcc/df.h:1159 #1 update_ebb_live_info (tail=, head=0x137b838 ) at ../../gcc/lra-constraints.c:5612 #2

[Bug c/77750] [7 Regression] gcc build not working with -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77750 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c/77750] [7 Regression] gcc build not working with -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77750 --- Comment #5 from louis.krupp at zoho dot com --- It's still there. I'm maintaining these changes to my debug tree: --- gcc/combine.c (revision 241547) +++ gcc/combine.c (working copy) @@ -11371,6 +11371,8 @@ simplify_compare_const (enum

[Bug libstdc++/78111] [7 regression] experimental/filesystem/operations/canonical.cc FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78111 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ubizjak at gmail dot com --- Comment #2

[Bug rtl-optimization/78029] [7 Regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2285

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78029 --- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool --- Created attachment 39888 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39888=edit split4 dump (right before sched2)

[Bug libstdc++/78111] [7 regression] experimental/filesystem/operations/canonical.cc FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78111 --- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak --- [...] > You will need at least the attached patch that includes for > PATH_MAX. > > PATH_MAX is used as a bypass in configure check for realpath.

[Bug tree-optimization/78107] [7 Regression] verify_gimple failed ICE caused by Gimple loop splitting patch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78107 --- Comment #3 from Tamar Christina --- Thanks!

[Bug c/71602] [6 regression] ICE on __builtin_va_arg in build_va_arg, at c-family/c-common.c:5810

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71602 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/78108] Generic type-bound operator conflicts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78108 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/78111] [7 regression] experimental/filesystem/operations/canonical.cc FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78111 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- I fixed the detection of realpath, but also fixed the problem with the fallback code that was being used when realpath is not available.

[Bug fortran/71862] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE in gfc_add_component_ref, at fortran/class.c:241

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71862 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres --- This is a 5/6 Regression. May I do the back port?

[Bug tree-optimization/78088] [7 Regression] error: non-trivial conversion in unary operation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78088 --- Comment #3 from Michael Matz --- Author: matz Date: Wed Oct 26 12:54:30 2016 New Revision: 241551 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241551=gcc=rev Log: fix pr78060 pr78061 pr78088 PR tree-optimization/78060 PR

[Bug tree-optimization/78060] [7 Regression] -O3 causes "error: type mismatch in binary expression"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78060 --- Comment #5 from Michael Matz --- Author: matz Date: Wed Oct 26 12:54:30 2016 New Revision: 241551 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241551=gcc=rev Log: fix pr78060 pr78061 pr78088 PR tree-optimization/78060 PR

[Bug tree-optimization/78061] [7 Regression] -O3 causes "Error: definition in block 117 does not dominate use in block 164"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78061 --- Comment #4 from Michael Matz --- Author: matz Date: Wed Oct 26 12:54:30 2016 New Revision: 241551 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241551=gcc=rev Log: fix pr78060 pr78061 pr78088 PR tree-optimization/78060 PR

[Bug c++/20710] g++ should warn when hiding non-virtual method in base class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20710 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Stephan Bergmann from comment #9) > (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7) > > The C++0x override control works for virtual and non-virtual names > > That's not true for what then

[Bug tree-optimization/78107] [7 Regression] verify_gimple failed ICE caused by Gimple loop splitting patch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78107 Michael Matz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

  1   2   >