[Bug target/78254] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr77822.C -O3 -g (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78254 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- The expression would be undefined at runtime, so it doesn't matter if we generate an unspecified result.

[Bug c/78270] New: ice in gimplify_switch_expr, at gimplify.c:2272

Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dcb314 at hotmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 40001 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40001=edit gzipped C source code The attached code, when compiled by gcc trunk dated 20161

[Bug sanitizer/78267] [7 Regression] libsanitizer breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin16 at r241977

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78267 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Unfortunately I don’t know the answers to the questions. I am under OS X 10.12.1 (aka darwin16.1) and Xcode 8.1. /usr/lib/libc.dylib points to libSystem.B.dylib. Dominique > Le 9 nov. 2016 à 08:54,

[Bug tree-optimization/78248] [7 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu (in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78248 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/78270] ice in gimplify_switch_expr, at gimplify.c:2272

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78270 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman --- Reduced code typedef struct { } bdaddr_t; struct mgmt_cp_read_local_oob_ext_data { __u8 type } fn1() { struct mgmt_cp_read_local_oob_ext_data *cp; switch (cp->type) &(bdaddr_t) {}

[Bug debug/78271] New: Fortran, additional pointer type for deferred length strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78271 Bug ID: 78271 Summary: Fortran, additional pointer type for deferred length strings Product: gcc Version: 6.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug debug/78271] Fortran, additional pointer type for deferred length strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78271 --- Comment #1 from Bernhard Heckel --- Created attachment 40003 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40003=edit Debug info Icc

[Bug testsuite/78256] [7 Regression] test case gcc.dg/pr35691-1.c fails starting with its introduction in r241915

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78256 Thomas Preud'homme changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/46459] ICE (segfault): Invalid read in compare_actual_formal [error recovery]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46459 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/78248] [7 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu (in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78248 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/78248] [7 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu (in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78248 --- Comment #13 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 40004 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40004=edit bad combine dump

[Bug tree-optimization/78248] [7 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu (in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78248 --- Comment #14 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 40005 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40005=edit good combine dump

[Bug target/78254] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr77822.C -O3 -g (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78254 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/78254] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr77822.C -O3 -g (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78254 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab --- Author: schwab Date: Wed Nov 9 10:40:00 2016 New Revision: 241996 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241996=gcc=rev Log: PR target/78254 * config/m68k/m68k.md: Reject out-of-range bit pos in bit-fields

[Bug libstdc++/64735] std::future broken on armel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64735 --- Comment #9 from Pauli --- atomicity.h uses exactly same builtins if _GLIBCXX_ATOMIC_BUILTINS is set 1. Difference include check for __gthread_active_p check and annotations for race detector. Annotations are empty macros in default build.

[Bug target/78007] Important loop from 482.sphinx3 is not vectorized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78007 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Nov 9 08:19:05 2016 New Revision: 241992 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241992=gcc=rev Log: 2016-11-09 Richard Biener PR

[Bug target/78253] [5/6/7 Regression] [ARM] call weak function instead of strong when called through pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78253 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code CC|

[Bug sanitizer/78267] [7 Regression] libsanitizer breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin16 at r241977

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78267 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug c++/78263] Compile failure with AltiVec library on PPC64le and -std=c++11 flag

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78263 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc64le-*-* --- Comment #3 from

[Bug tree-optimization/78248] [7 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu (in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78248 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- Still can't reproduce. Can you please paste output of gcc-trunk -Os small.c --verbose and it would be usefull to paste output of -S. Thanks

[Bug tree-optimization/53947] [meta-bug] vectorizer missed-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947 Bug 53947 depends on bug 78007, which changed state. Bug 78007 Summary: Important loop from 482.sphinx3 is not vectorized https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78007 What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/78261] vect pass only vectorizes half of the array in gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68532.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78261 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/78257] missing memcmp optimization with constant arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78257 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/71894] [OOP] ICE in gfc_add_component_ref, at fortran/class.c:227

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71894 --- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Wed Nov 9 09:22:52 2016 New Revision: 241993 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241993=gcc=rev Log: 2016-11-09 Janus Weil PR fortran/71894

[Bug tree-optimization/78248] [7 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu (in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78248 --- Comment #7 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6) > Still can't reproduce. Can you please paste output of > gcc-trunk -Os small.c --verbose It fails for me: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. main

[Bug fortran/71894] [OOP] ICE in gfc_add_component_ref, at fortran/class.c:227

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71894 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/78248] [7 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu (in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78248 --- Comment #8 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #7) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6) > > Still can't reproduce. Can you please paste output of > > gcc-trunk -Os small.c --verbose > > It fails for me: > >

[Bug tree-optimization/78248] [7 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu (in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78248 --- Comment #9 from Uroš Bizjak --- Created attachment 4 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4=edit --verbose-asm assembly

[Bug testsuite/78256] [7 Regression] test case gcc.dg/pr35691-1.c fails starting with its introduction in r241915

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78256 --- Comment #2 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: prathamesh3492 Date: Wed Nov 9 09:46:13 2016 New Revision: 241994 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241994=gcc=rev Log: 2016-11-09 Prathamesh Kulkarni

[Bug tree-optimization/78248] [7 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu (in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78248 --- Comment #10 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #8) > I've already tried running the test-case in valgrind. But I can't see the > problem :) May you please paste -S file and --verbose output? Done. What I find

[Bug testsuite/78256] [7 Regression] test case gcc.dg/pr35691-1.c fails starting with its introduction in r241915

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78256 --- Comment #3 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Bill, could you please confirm if r241994 fixes the test-cases for you ? Thanks, Prathamesh

[Bug middle-end/35691] Missed (a == 0) && (b == 0) into (a|(typeof(a)(b)) == 0 when the types don't match

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35691 prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||prathamesh3492 at gcc

[Bug rtl-optimization/78200] [7 Regression] 429.mcf of cpu2006 regresses in GCC trunk for avx2 target.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78200 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- OTOH we _do_ have initial RTL (insn 167 166 168 20 (set (reg:CCGOC 17 flags) (compare:CCGOC (reg/v:DI 217 [ red_cost ]) (const_int 0 [0]))) "pbeampp.c":42 -1 (nil)) (jump_insn 168

[Bug rtl-optimization/78200] [7 Regression] 429.mcf of cpu2006 regresses in GCC trunk for avx2 target.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78200 --- Comment #11 from Venkataramanan --- Hi Richard On haswell machine original run time for -O3 -max2 -mprefer-avx2 real2m35.325s user2m35.257s sys 0m0.070s Changing the assembly from .L98: jle .L97 cmpl

[Bug ipa/78258] [7 Regression] ICE in compare_values_warnv, at tree-vrp.c:1218

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78258 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug tree-optimization/78257] missing memcmp optimization with constant arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78257 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- 'f0' function is optimized out as of r242000

[Bug c/77750] [7 Regression] gcc build not working with -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77750 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug target/78275] [avr] at43usb320 in wrong multilib set.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78275 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Target||avr Priority|P3

[Bug target/78275] New: [avr] at43usb320 in wrong multilib set.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78275 Bug ID: 78275 Summary: [avr] at43usb320 in wrong multilib set. Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug rtl-optimization/78200] [7 Regression] 429.mcf of cpu2006 regresses in GCC trunk for avx2 target.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78200 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- So RTL expansion ends up in /* If jumps are cheap and the target does not support conditional compare, turn some more codes into jumpy sequences. */ else if (BRANCH_COST

[Bug fortran/60777] [F03] RECURSIVE function rejected in specification expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60777 --- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- I think the patch in comment 1 actually does not work as expected (due to a spurious semicolon). However, this variant seems to work well and regtests cleanly: Index: gcc/fortran/expr.c

[Bug c++/78263] Compile failure with AltiVec library on PPC64le and -std=c++11 flag

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78263 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/61978] implement blacklist for sanitizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61978 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug rtl-optimization/78200] [7 Regression] 429.mcf of cpu2006 regresses in GCC trunk for avx2 target.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78200 --- Comment #12 from Richard Biener --- Btw, I see with -mavx2 addq(%r9), %rax jns .L90 .L90: je .L92 cmpl$2, 24(%rdx) je .L91 thus there is no extra cmpq $0, %rdi in the

[Bug c++/78274] New: Rejected specialization in different namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78274 Bug ID: 78274 Summary: Rejected specialization in different namespace Product: gcc Version: 6.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/78272] [7 Regression] ICE in unshare_expr_without_location while building 471.omnetpp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78272 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug ipa/78268] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78268 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/78200] [7 Regression] 429.mcf of cpu2006 regresses in GCC trunk for avx2 target.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78200 --- Comment #13 from Richard Biener --- When I compare GCC 6 (r241818) against trunk (r241997) with -Ofast -march=native (on Haswell) I get 429.mcf 9120230 39.7 S9120240 38.0 * 429.mcf 9120

[Bug tree-optimization/77719] [7 Regression] ICE in pp_string, at pretty-print.c:955

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77719 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/78259] [7 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_subcomponent_assign, at fortran/trans-expr.c:7330

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78259 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug testsuite/78256] [7 Regression] test case gcc.dg/pr35691-1.c fails starting with its introduction in r241915

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78256 --- Comment #5 from Bill Seurer --- Looks good on power, too. Thanks!

[Bug middle-end/77718] [7 Regression] expand_builtin_memcmp swaps args

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77718 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Nov 9 16:21:45 2016 New Revision: 242007 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242007=gcc=rev Log: PR target/77718 * builtins.c (expand_builtin_memcmp): Formatting

[Bug ipa/78268] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78268 Yuri Rumyantsev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ysrumyan at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/77718] [7 Regression] expand_builtin_memcmp swaps args

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77718 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug libstdc++/78276] New: regex_search is slow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78276 Bug ID: 78276 Summary: regex_search is slow Product: gcc Version: 6.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug testsuite/78256] [7 Regression] test case gcc.dg/pr35691-1.c fails starting with its introduction in r241915

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78256 prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/71762] [5/6/7 Regression] ~X & Y to X < Y doesn't work for uninitialized values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71762 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug tree-optimization/78248] [7 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu (in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78248 --- Comment #15 from Segher Boessenkool --- Hi, could you try https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-11/msg00775.html ? And sorry for the breakage.

[Bug middle-end/71762] [5/6/7 Regression] ~X & Y to X < Y doesn't work for uninitialized values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71762 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #7

[Bug fortran/78278] ICE in gfc_wide_memset, at fortran/scanner.c:153

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78278 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/78282] New: [6/7 Regression] Overload resolution failure, in parameter pack expansion, inside a template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78282 Bug ID: 78282 Summary: [6/7 Regression] Overload resolution failure, in parameter pack expansion, inside a template class Product: gcc Version: 6.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/78283] -Wc++1z-compat warning is sticky

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78283 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/78283] New: -Wc++1z-compat warning is sticky

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78283 Bug ID: 78283 Summary: -Wc++1z-compat warning is sticky Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug libstdc++/78276] regex_search is slow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78276 Tim Shen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||timshen at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug sanitizer/78267] [7 Regression] libsanitizer breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin16 at r241977

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78267 --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Attaching untested fix. > Dominique, could you try it? Now breaks with libtool: compile: /opt/gcc/build_w/./gcc/xgcc -shared-libgcc -B/opt/gcc/build_w/./gcc -nostdinc++

[Bug c/77750] [7 Regression] gcc build not working with -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77750 --- Comment #8 from louis.krupp at zoho dot com --- The patch is no longer necessary, because it looks like the problem with combine.c was fixed on 1 November: === r241744 | foreese | 2016-11-01 09:29:51 -0600 (Tue, 01 Nov 2016) | 5 lines Mark

[Bug c++/78282] [6/7 Regression] Overload resolution failure, in parameter pack expansion, inside a template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78282 --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kondratskiy --- Created attachment 40010 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40010=edit The source before the preprocessing step

[Bug fortran/46459] ICE (segfault): Invalid read in compare_actual_formal [error recovery]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46459 --- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Wed Nov 9 20:33:24 2016 New Revision: 242020 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242020=gcc=rev Log: 2016-11-09 Mikael Morin Janus Weil

[Bug fortran/60500] [5/6/7 Regression] Spurious warning on derived type initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60500 --- Comment #12 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Well, the change introduced by r241885 is quite complicated. It may cause major regressions. I don't recommend backporting it.

[Bug fortran/20585] [meta-bug] Fortran 2003 support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20585 Bug 20585 depends on bug 60777, which changed state. Bug 60777 Summary: [F03] RECURSIVE function rejected in specification expression https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60777 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/60777] [F03] RECURSIVE function rejected in specification expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60777 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/66544] [F03] ICE on function with procedure-pointer result in combination with implicit none

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66544 Gerhard Steinmetz changed: What|Removed |Added Version|5.1.1

[Bug fortran/69499] [F03] ICE-on-invalid on combining select type with wrong statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69499 --- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- With gcc version 7.0.0 20161109 (experimental) [trunk revision 242009] (GCC) the ICE is gone for all three cases in comment 0. However, it persists for some of the cases in comment 1

[Bug ipa/78268] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78268 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com

[Bug ipa/78281] [7 regression] spec2006 test case 471.omnetpp fails to compile (ICE) starting with r241990

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78281 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c/77750] [7 Regression] gcc build not working with -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77750 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/78277] ICE in is_anonymous_component, at fortran/interface.c:450

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78277 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/78278] ICE in gfc_wide_memset, at fortran/scanner.c:153

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78278 --- Comment #3 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- Well, it's an extension ... $ gfortran-7-20161106 -std=f95 -c z2.f90 # or -std=f2008 z2.f90:3:17: data x /null()/ 1 Error: GNU Extension:

[Bug target/78262] [7 Regression] wrong code with -fschedule-insns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78262 --- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Wed Nov 9 20:41:17 2016 New Revision: 242022 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242022=gcc=rev Log: PR target/78262 * config/i386/i386.md (*3_doubleword): Mark

[Bug c++/78280] GCC incorrectly accepts assignment in bitfield width

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78280 Nathan Ridge changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zeratul976 at hotmail dot com ---

[Bug fortran/46459] ICE (segfault): Invalid read in compare_actual_formal [error recovery]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46459 --- Comment #10 from Mikael Morin --- (In reply to janus from comment #8) > As mentioned by Harald, the patch in comment 1 works well and is close to > obvious. > > Mikael, are you going to commit this, or do you want me to do it? Please do, I

[Bug target/78262] [7 Regression] wrong code with -fschedule-insns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78262 --- Comment #2 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Wed Nov 9 19:21:11 2016 New Revision: 242013 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242013=gcc=rev Log: PR target/78262 * config/i386/i386.md (*3_doubleword): Mark

[Bug ipa/78281] New: [7 regression] spec2006 test case 471.omnetpp fails to compile (ICE) starting with r241990

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78281 Bug ID: 78281 Summary: [7 regression] spec2006 test case 471.omnetpp fails to compile (ICE) starting with r241990 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/77685] rs6000 target has builtin expansion for memcpy but not memcmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77685 acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/78262] [7 Regression] wrong code with -fschedule-insns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78262 --- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Wed Nov 9 19:44:22 2016 New Revision: 242014 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242014=gcc=rev Log: PR target/78262 * config/i386/i386.md (*3_doubleword): Mark

[Bug ipa/78268] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78268 --- Comment #7 from Bill Seurer --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #0) > Either r241990 or r241989 causes a new ICE From a bisect I did it is definitely r241990.

[Bug fortran/46459] ICE (segfault): Invalid read in compare_actual_formal [error recovery]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46459 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/78262] [7 Regression] wrong code with -fschedule-insns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78262 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/78283] -Wc++1z-compat warning is sticky

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78283 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 40011 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40011=edit gcc7-pr78283.patch Untested fix.

[Bug sanitizer/78267] [7 Regression] libsanitizer breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin16 at r241977

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78267 --- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Maxim Ostapenko from comment #1) > Eh, mine. > > typedef void (^os_trace_payload_t)(xpc_object_t xdict) looks very strange, > it seems that it's an Objective-C declaration, right? It's declaring

[Bug fortran/77680] [5/6/7 Regression] [F03] ICE in ctor_for_folding, at varpool.c:419

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77680 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug libstdc++/78273] The transparent version of {map,set}::count should call _M_count_tr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78273 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/78277] New: ICE in is_anonymous_component, at fortran/interface.c:450

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78277 Bug ID: 78277 Summary: ICE in is_anonymous_component, at fortran/interface.c:450 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/78257] missing memcmp optimization with constant arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78257 --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor --- Created attachment 40008 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40008=edit Very lightly tested patch. The attached (only superficially tested) patch changes fold_bultin_memcmp to fold the

[Bug fortran/78279] ICE in identical_array_ref, at fortran/dependency.c:104

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78279 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/65173] ICE while compiling wrong code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65173 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Note that the tests z1.f90 and z8.f90 fail in a different way: pr65173_3.f90:3:39: character(:), allocatable :: x(n) 1 Error: Allocatable component of

[Bug sanitizer/78267] [7 Regression] libsanitizer breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin16 at r241977

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78267 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/77518] [5/6/7 Regression] [Coarray] [OOP] ICE in gfc_advance_chain, at fortran/trans.c:58

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77518 --- Comment #2 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- New backtrace : $ gfortran-7-20161106 -fcoarray=single z1.f90 z1.f90:5:0: print *, sizeof(z) internal compiler error: Segmentation fault 0xc3a64f

[Bug fortran/78278] New: ICE in gfc_wide_memset, at fortran/scanner.c:153

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78278 Bug ID: 78278 Summary: ICE in gfc_wide_memset, at fortran/scanner.c:153 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug debug/78265] Excess emission of debug info for ODR used global variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78265 --- Comment #2 from David Blaikie --- A side note/commentary: Producing debug info for global variable declarations at all is an interesting choice. If the whole program is built with debug info*, the global variable's definition will have

  1   2   >