[Bug fortran/61767] [OOP] ICE in generate_finalization_wrapper at fortran/class.c:1491

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61767 --- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #5) > The most immediate way to fix it is this: > [...] > This gets rid of the ICE on the given test case. I will check if it survives > a full regtest. Indeed the

[Bug tree-optimization/77856] [7 Regression] wrong code at -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu in 32-bit mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77856 --- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > So, %ebx doesn't hold 1 as it is supposed to, but 1 << %ecx (64). > Vlad, could you please have a look? It is a bug in a new optimization (invariant

[Bug gcov-profile/35038] GCOV - using "--coverage" results in libgcov.a(_gcov.o) is referenced by DSO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35038 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/78532] New: [7 Regression] libsanitizer fails to build on sparc64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78532 Bug ID: 78532 Summary: [7 Regression] libsanitizer fails to build on sparc64-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/61767] [OOP] ICE in generate_finalization_wrapper at fortran/class.c:1491

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61767 --- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #7) > This alternative patch fixes the ICE as well: Unfortunately it causes a few regressions: FAIL: gfortran.dg/allocate_with_source_14.f03 -O

[Bug lto/78529] New: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/strcat-chk.c failed with lto/O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78529 Bug ID: 78529 Summary: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/strcat-chk.c failed with lto/O2 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libgomp/78468] [7 regression] libgomp.c/reduction-10.c and many more FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78468 --- Comment #18 from Dominik Vogt --- Another approach may be to make the middleend ask the backend for the actual value of REGNO_POINTER_ALIGN (VIRTUAL_STACK_DYNAMIC_REGNUM). Since on Sparc the address is always 4 mod 8, we'd get an additional

[Bug c/78512] [7 Regression] r242674 miscompiles Linux kernel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78512 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/78527] [7 Regression] ice on valid C code at -O3 in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal compiler error: in smallest_mode_for_size, at stor-layout.c:364)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78527 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Nov 25 17:12:29 2016 New Revision: 242879 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242879=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/78527 * combine.c

[Bug rtl-optimization/77541] [7 Regression] wrong code with 512bit vectors of int128 @ -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77541 --- Comment #8 from Vladimir Makarov --- Author: vmakarov Date: Fri Nov 25 17:42:21 2016 New Revision: 242881 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242881=gcc=rev Log: 2016-11-25 Vladimir Makarov PR

[Bug bootstrap/78531] New: [7 Regression] gnat bootstrap broken on linux targets with _FORTIFY_SOURCE enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78531 Bug ID: 78531 Summary: [7 Regression] gnat bootstrap broken on linux targets with _FORTIFY_SOURCE enabled Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug sanitizer/69840] two ASAN help nits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69840 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/78526] [7 Regression] ICE: in decompose, at rtl.h:2117 with -g -mavx512bw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78526 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug gcov-profile/17040] GCOV not working properly on Windows platforms

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17040 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/61767] [OOP] ICE in generate_finalization_wrapper at fortran/class.c:1491

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61767 --- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- The most immediate way to fix it is this: Index: gcc/fortran/class.c === --- gcc/fortran/class.c (revision 242875) +++

[Bug fortran/60853] [OOP] Failure to disambiguate generic with unlimited polymorphic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60853 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/61767] [OOP] ICE in generate_finalization_wrapper at fortran/class.c:1491

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61767 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug rtl-optimization/78526] [7 Regression] ICE: in decompose, at rtl.h:2117 with -g -mavx512bw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78526 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- What happens is that valtrack creates a paradoxical subreg: (debug_insn 28 14 15 2 (var_location:V4TI D#2 (subreg:V4TI (reg:TI 94) 0)) -1 (nil)) (insn 15 28 16 2 (set (subreg:TI (reg/v:V4TI 90 [ v ]) 0)

[Bug web/71666] profile-generate not documented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71666 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Fri Nov 25 14:23:54 2016 New Revision: 242878 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242878=gcc=rev Log: Fix documentation reference (PR web/71666) PR web/71666 *

[Bug gcov-profile/78086] FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-1.c, etc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78086 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug web/71666] profile-generate not documented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71666 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/78086] FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-1.c, etc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78086 --- Comment #9 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Fri Nov 25 14:23:25 2016 New Revision: 242877 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242877=gcc=rev Log: Don't use priority {cd}tors if not supported by a target (PR PR

[Bug fortran/60853] [OOP] Failure to disambiguate generic with unlimited polymorphic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60853 --- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Fri Nov 25 17:22:37 2016 New Revision: 242880 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242880=gcc=rev Log: 2016-11-25 Janus Weil PR fortran/60853

[Bug gcov-profile/28564] gcov fails to store the absolute path to the source files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28564 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/78528] New: Recursion not optimized in simple case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78528 Bug ID: 78528 Summary: Recursion not optimized in simple case Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/78505] [F08] Coarray source allocation not synchronizing on oversubscribed cores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78505 --- Comment #1 from Damian Rouson --- Section 9.7.1.2, paragraph 4, of the draft Fortran 2015 standard [1]: "When an ALLOCATE statement is executed for which an allocate-object is a coarray, there is an implicit synchronization of all active

[Bug tree-optimization/78528] Recursion not optimized in simple case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78528 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug fortran/77505] Negative character length not treated as LEN=0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77505 Janne Blomqvist changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jb at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8

[Bug rtl-optimization/78526] [7 Regression] ICE: in decompose, at rtl.h:2117 with -g -mavx512bw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78526 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/78527] [7 Regression] ice on valid C code at -O3 in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal compiler error: in smallest_mode_for_size, at stor-layout.c:364)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78527 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/78533] tree check fail in int_fits_type_p, at tree.c:9153

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78533 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |tree-optimization Depends on|

[Bug c++/78533] tree check fail in int_fits_type_p, at tree.c:9153

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78533 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman --- I forgot to mention that flag -O3 is required to cause the tree check fail.

[Bug fortran/78534] New: Use a larger integer type for character lengths on 64-bit targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78534 Bug ID: 78534 Summary: Use a larger integer type for character lengths on 64-bit targets Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug libstdc++/77459] [6 Regression] undefined reference to `snprintf' when building mingw-w64 cross-compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77459 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug rtl-optimization/78438] [7 Regression] incorrect comparison optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78438 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Nov 25 19:24:22 2016 New Revision: 242883 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242883=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/78438 PR rtl-optimization/78477 *

[Bug bootstrap/78477] [7 Regression] bootstrap broken on s390x-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78477 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Nov 25 19:24:22 2016 New Revision: 242883 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242883=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/78438 PR rtl-optimization/78477 *

[Bug rtl-optimization/78438] [7 Regression] incorrect comparison optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78438 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/78447] [7 Regression] wrong code when combine changes shifts by << 5 and >> 15 to >> 10 at -O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78447 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/78533] New: tree check fail in int_fits_type_p, at tree.c:9153

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78533 Bug ID: 78533 Summary: tree check fail in int_fits_type_p, at tree.c:9153 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug libstdc++/78530] std::copy of volatile array triggers invalid conversion error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78530 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- https://sourceforge.net/p/stlport/bugs/149/

[Bug rtl-optimization/78447] [7 Regression] wrong code when combine changes shifts by << 5 and >> 15 to >> 10 at -O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78447 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: segher Date: Wed Nov 23 14:33:13 2016 New Revision: 242757 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242757=gcc=rev Log: combine: Convert subreg-of-lshiftrt to zero_extract properly (PR78390) r242414,

[Bug rtl-optimization/78526] [7 Regression] ICE: in decompose, at rtl.h:2117 with -g -mavx512bw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78526 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Nov 25 18:56:50 2016 New Revision: 242882 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242882=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/78526 * simplify-rtx.c (simplify_immed_subreg):

[Bug fortran/78518] [6/7 Regression] Warning format regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78518 --- Comment #2 from physiker at toast2 dot net --- > This is what I get with 5.4.1 20160929 (Ubuntu 5.4.1-2ubuntu2). Which > version of gfortran 6 are you using exactly? > I am using gcc 6.2.0 release, provided by fink. LANG=C gfortran-fsf-6 -v

[Bug bootstrap/78531] [7 Regression] gnat bootstrap broken on linux targets with _FORTIFY_SOURCE enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78531 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/57965] [F03] Allocation of derived type containing an allocatable character component segfaults

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57965 Harald Anlauf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gmx dot de --- Comment #3

[Bug fortran/78534] Use a larger integer type for character lengths on 64-bit targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78534 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug fortran/78534] Use a larger integer type for character lengths on 64-bit targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78534 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/78535] New: [6.2] invalid code generation with -O1 -fdevirtualize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78535 Bug ID: 78535 Summary: [6.2] invalid code generation with -O1 -fdevirtualize Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug ipa/78535] [6.2] invalid code generation with -O1 -fdevirtualize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78535 --- Comment #1 from Daniel Starke --- Comparing the outputs created with -fdump-tree-all enabled for both tested command-line combinations hints that -flto -fdevirtualize fails when one of the following passes is enabled via -O1: - nothrow -

[Bug c/78537] #define something doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78537 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Andrew

[Bug c/78537] #define something doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78537 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/78536] #define something doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78536 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 78537 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug target/66358] [5/6/7 Regression] [SH] ICE: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2232

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66358 --- Comment #24 from Kazumoto Kojima --- (In reply to David Binderman from comment #23) > Problem seems to have gone away with gcc version 6.1.1, dated 20160621 Thanks for your report. I've confirmed that the testcases don't fail with the head

[Bug libstdc++/71500] regex::icase only works on first character in a range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71500 --- Comment #12 from Michael Duggan --- Just a ping. I haven't seen a fix for this (even the basic case) in the repo yet. I'm going to suggest that you at least install your initial patch, as it will work in the vast majority of cases.

[Bug c/78539] feature request: __noextension__

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78539 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- >Without that, I have to resort to using two cases: one for __STRICT_ANSI__ and one without I think you still need two. The reason is __noextension__ will turn off extensions even with -pedantic.

[Bug c/78536] New: #define something doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78536 Bug ID: 78536 Summary: #define something doesn't work Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c/78539] New: feature request: __noextension__

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78539 Bug ID: 78539 Summary: feature request: __noextension__ Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c/78537] New: #define something doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78537 Bug ID: 78537 Summary: #define something doesn't work Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c/78536] #define something doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78536 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- IPPORT_FTP is used as an enum which is what is causing the issue. I am generating a testcase which shows why the error message is not clear.

[Bug c/78538] New: system header diagnostic for enum with a define is not good

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78538 Bug ID: 78538 Summary: system header diagnostic for enum with a define is not good Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic

[Bug c/78536] #define something doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78536 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ada/78524] [7 regression] failure of ACATS c41104a at -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78524 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug target/70120] [6 Regression][aarch64] -g causes Assembler messages: Error: unaligned opcodes detected in executable segment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70120 --- Comment #13 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to James Greenhalgh from comment #12) > I can still trigger this with a testcase using 16-bit floating-point types, > and the tiny memory model: > > int > main (__fp16 x) > { > __fp16 a

[Bug tree-optimization/78528] Recursion not optimized in simple case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78528 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- For the int case, we can recognize easily that the function is doing f()+N. While for the Int case it looks worse: [100.0%]: _2 = s_7(D) + 1; D.3625 = strlen (_2); lhs$m_value_13 = MEM[(struct Int

[Bug libstdc++/78530] New: std::copy of volatile array triggers invalid conversion error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78530 Bug ID: 78530 Summary: std::copy of volatile array triggers invalid conversion error Product: gcc Version: 5.4.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code

[Bug target/70120] [6 Regression][aarch64] -g causes Assembler messages: Error: unaligned opcodes detected in executable segment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70120 James Greenhalgh changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED CC|

[Bug middle-end/78517] error: non-trivial conversion at assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78517 amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/78510] [7 Regression] ICE on invalid C code at -O2 and above in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78510 amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com ---

[Bug gcov-profile/78467] [7 regression] gcc.dg/tree-prof/comp-goto-1.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78467 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/78396] [7 regression] gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-cond-1.c FAILs after fix for PR77848

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78396 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Nov 25 08:59:28 2016 New Revision: 242865 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242865=gcc=rev Log: 2016-11-25 Richard Biener PR

[Bug middle-end/78501] [7 regression] SEGV in vrp_val_max

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78501 --- Comment #20 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: prathamesh3492 Date: Fri Nov 25 08:03:51 2016 New Revision: 242858 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242858=gcc=rev Log: 2016-11-25 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug rtl-optimization/77541] [7 Regression] wrong code with 512bit vectors of int128 @ -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77541 --- Comment #7 from Uroš Bizjak --- The test needs /* { dg-require-effective-target int128 } */ instead of /* { dg-require-effective-target lp64 } */

[Bug middle-end/78517] error: non-trivial conversion at assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78517 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/78517] error: non-trivial conversion at assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78517 --- Comment #4 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Yes, it duplicates PR78510.

[Bug target/78509] [7 regression] ICE in in excess_precision_type, at tree.c:8875

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78509 --- Comment #9 from James Greenhalgh --- Author: jgreenhalgh Date: Fri Nov 25 09:25:31 2016 New Revision: 242866 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242866=gcc=rev Log: [Patch i386] PR78509 - TARGET_C_EXCESS_PRECISION should not return

[Bug c++/78514] ICE in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:13073

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78514 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- clang++ rejects it (version 3.6.1): > clang++ -S t.C -std=c++11 t.C:21:39: error: extraneous template parameter list in alias template declaration template template using n = g;

[Bug c++/78514] ICE in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:13073

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78514 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/44685] internal compiler error: in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2650 while compiling program with complex types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44685 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug middle-end/78517] error: non-trivial conversion at assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78517 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug ipa/78515] [7 Regression] ICE: in fold_binary_loc, at fold-const.c:8999 with -Os -mavx512bw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78515 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug middle-end/78501] [7 regression] SEGV in vrp_val_max

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78501 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/38319] Memory leaks in allocatable component expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38319 --- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas --- Of the testcases originally highlighted: alloc_comp_assign_2.f90 still leaks alloc_comp_assign_4.f90 still leaks alloc_comp_basics_2.f90 still leaks alloc_comp_basics_5.f90 is OK -

[Bug gcov-profile/78467] [7 regression] gcc.dg/tree-prof/comp-goto-1.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78467 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Nov 25 08:51:38 2016 New Revision: 242864 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242864=gcc=rev Log: PR gcov-profile/78467 * gcc.dg/tree-prof/comp-goto-1.c (insn_t):

[Bug lto/78211] [7 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78211 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Note -fcompare-debug compares the -fdump-final-insns= dumps, those include RTL, but not the LTO streams. So while it might not be very useful for -flto, there is no inherent reason why it wouldn't work. Of

[Bug lto/78211] [7 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78211 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Ah, I can reproduce even on current trunk with additional -fno-printf-return-value.

[Bug target/78516] [7 Regression] ICE in lra_assign for e500v2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug ipa/78494] Issues pointed out by valgrind --tool=exp-dhat

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78494 --- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Another issue. cse only uses 1% of its allocations: ==15253== 17 of 100 ==15253== max-live:536,400 in 1 blocks

[Bug sanitizer/78513] [7 Regression] Failure to build linux kernel with KASAN support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78513 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to ktkachov from comment #4) > Then GCC 7 won't build any kernel with KASAN until those kernel patches go > in? > That's unfortunate, but I guess it's not easy to teach GCC to enable >

[Bug sanitizer/78513] [7 Regression] Failure to build linux kernel with KASAN support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78513 --- Comment #6 from Dmitry Vyukov --- > Then GCC 7 won't build any kernel with KASAN until those kernel patches go in? Yes. Kernel passes -fsanitize=kernel-address, some behavior tuning can be done based on that flag. Please notify

[Bug tree-optimization/70965] [7 Regression] ICE on released SSA name during IPA SRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70965 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/77673] [5/6/7 Regression] 4-byte load generated instead of 1-byte load, possibly reading past the end of object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77673 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Preud'homme --- Author: thopre01 Date: Fri Nov 25 10:03:38 2016 New Revision: 242869 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242869=gcc=rev Log: Fix PR77673: bswap loads passed end of object 2016-11-25 Thomas

[Bug fortran/70070] ICE on initializing character data beyond min/max bound

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70070 --- Comment #4 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- At a first glance with gfortran-6 (configured with --enable-checking=yes), still ICEs for all posted and unposted cases. A dedicated one : $ gfortran-6 z3.f90

[Bug fortran/70070] ICE on initializing character data beyond min/max bound

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70070 --- Comment #5 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- FYI, for some circumstances there existed related issues like : using LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 f951: internal compiler error: Speicherzugriffsfehler 0xc4265f

[Bug c++/78523] New: ICE on valid lambda code with implicit capture

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78523 Bug ID: 78523 Summary: ICE on valid lambda code with implicit capture Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug middle-end/78524] [7 regression] failure of ACATS c41104a at -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78524 --- Comment #1 from Eric Botcazou --- Created attachment 40147 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40147=edit Reduced testcase Compile with just gcc/gnat1 -quiet p.adb

[Bug tree-optimization/78319] [7 Regression] PASS->FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 20)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78319 amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/78343] [6 Regression] Loop is not eliminated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78343 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||7.0 Summary|[6/7

[Bug tree-optimization/78343] [6/7 Regression] Loop is not eliminated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78343 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Nov 25 10:22:57 2016 New Revision: 242872 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242872=gcc=rev Log: 2016-11-24 Richard Biener PR

[Bug tree-optimization/78319] [7 Regression] PASS->FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 20)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78319 --- Comment #11 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to amker from comment #10) > Hi Prathamesh, > I saw it starting XPASS on arm-none-eabi in test now: > > spawn /.../gcc/xgcc -B/.../gcc/ >

[Bug target/78509] [7 regression] ICE in in excess_precision_type, at tree.c:8875

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78509 --- Comment #11 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #10 from James Greenhalgh --- > Should now be fixed, but I'll leave open for Rainer to confirm. I'd included your patch in last night's i386-pc-solaris2.12 bootstraps

  1   2   >