https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77648
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77646
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77655
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77674
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77375
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70530
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78255
--- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to wilco from comment #5)
> (In reply to avieira from comment #4)
> > OK so after some extra debugging and digging I found that the postreload
> > pass is basically turning the direct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78598
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Author: trippels
Date: Thu Dec 1 14:59:03 2016
New Revision: 243113
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243113=gcc=rev
Log:
Fix PR tree-optimization/78598 - tree-ssa-loop-prefetch.c:835:16: runtime
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77316
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54043
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71875
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67288
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77484
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka ---
Aha, indirect calls should probably be treated separately as their use cases
are quite
special. What about this patch? (Maritn, it would be great if you can run the
analyze_brprob
for it)
Honza
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68945
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77739
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77745
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78620
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Oops, I missed the first line off that actually does the initialization, sorry!
struct tm tt1;
fprintf(stderr, "no initialization\n");
print();
*That* is default-initialization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78140
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77605
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77484
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68390
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69019
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78255
wilco at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64516
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78616
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78623
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
GCC trunk and EDG both compile it without error.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77659
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77665
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77436
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77450
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77509
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70184
--- Comment #9 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Thu Dec 1 13:47:13 2016
New Revision: 243109
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243109=gcc=rev
Log:
[TER] PR target/48863: Don't replace expressions across local
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48863
--- Comment #8 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Thu Dec 1 13:47:13 2016
New Revision: 243109
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243109=gcc=rev
Log:
[TER] PR target/48863: Don't replace expressions across local
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74762
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76490
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49726
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78255
--- Comment #8 from Richard Earnshaw ---
Hmm, why is this even being considered on ARM?
arm.h:#define NO_FUNCTION_CSE 1
doc/tm.texi
@defmac NO_FUNCTION_CSE
Define this macro to be true if it is as good or better to call a constant
function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71724
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71784
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77484
wilco at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77484
--- Comment #7 from wilco at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #6)
> Created attachment 40216 [details]
> predict
>
> Aha, indirect calls should probably be treated separately as their use cases
> are quite
> special.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77754
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77767
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77522
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71506
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69311
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67410
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78634
Bug ID: 78634
Summary: [7 Regression] 30% performance drop after r242832.
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68945
--- Comment #14 from Rainer Orth ---
Author: ro
Date: Thu Dec 1 14:48:49 2016
New Revision: 243112
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243112=gcc=rev
Log:
Import libcilkrts Build 4467 (PR target/68945)
PR target/68945
Merge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77693
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #4 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78598
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78635
Bug ID: 78635
Summary: [6/7 Regression] internal compiler error: in
output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:4989
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78620
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=0
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77563
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77578
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77587
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78255
avieira at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wdijkstr at arm dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72824
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72816
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78596
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Author: trippels
Date: Thu Dec 1 14:04:13 2016
New Revision: 243111
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243111=gcc=rev
Log:
Fix rtl-optimization/78596 - combine.c:12561:14: runtime error: left shift
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72717
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70778
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71415
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69188
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78633
Bug ID: 78633
Summary: [7 Regression] [SH] libgcc/fp-bit.c:944:1: error:
invalid rtl sharing found in the insn
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66598
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77624
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77638
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77638
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.5 |6.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77339
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77363
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71190
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77309
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70909
--- Comment #20 from Mark Wielaard ---
Created attachment 40213
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40213=edit
Add is_cyclic check to d_lookup_template_argument
The patch that Marcel originally proposed tried to catch any
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78635
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78407
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77285
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67617
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72716
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78596
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72707
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71195
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78255
--- Comment #7 from wilco at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #6)
> (In reply to wilco from comment #5)
> > (In reply to avieira from comment #4)
> > > OK so after some extra debugging and digging I found that the postreload
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70322
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70909
--- Comment #21 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Why doesn't a mark/walk/unmark idiom when walking a potentially circular data
structure work here? I.e. add a mutable counter to demangle_component.
Inc/dec at start/end of d_print_comp? IIUC if it gets
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78636
--- Comment #2 from rhl ---
Created attachment 40220
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40220=edit
and the output of valgrind after remove offending Output function in favor out
std::cout
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77538
--- Comment #21 from Dmitry Vyukov ---
> is that huge number abnormal?
Let's say it is atypical for C/C++ programs because of fixed-size stacks. But
tsan has limit of 64K frames in the latest version (maybe 4.8.2 had limit of
32K frames).
But
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78589
--- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #4)
> I am testing a patch for gcc/cp/error.c that (apart from guarding
> against infinite recursion in some cases) should make g++ produce the
> same output as gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78235
--- Comment #5 from David Edelsohn ---
This fails in dbxout.c:dbxout_type_fields()
/* Output the name, type, position (in bits), size (in bits) of each
field that we can support. */
for (tem = TYPE_FIELDS (type); tem; tem = DECL_CHAIN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78636
Bug ID: 78636
Summary: PPC Optimization Bug in Libelemental unit test
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78608
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
I suspect the same problem should come up with a call to vsprintf. The patch
below should handle this case but I haven't don't done a bootstrap-ubsan to
verify there are no others like it.
diff --git
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77373
--- Comment #3 from David Edelsohn ---
int D::f1() int D::f2() int main() int D::f1() [with int N = 4] int
D::f2() [with int N = 4] int D::f1() [with int N = 8] int D::f2()
[with int N = 8]
Analyzing compilation unit
#0 _Z11fancy_abortPKciS0_
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/gcc-trunk/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20161201 (experimental
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78635
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78255
--- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Also note that on some targets indirect calls have a different ABI than calls
to named function. SO changing between direct and indirect calls is strictly
forbidden on some targets.
I suspect there's some
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78637
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56480
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78568
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
c_fully_fold should not be asked to fold the same expression more than
once. When a subexpression is folded during parsing, for whatever reason,
the result should be wrapped in a tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78101
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 222 matches
Mail list logo