https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61593
--- Comment #1 from Eric Gallager ---
The gcc documentation says pragma mark should be accepted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Darwin-Pragmas.html#Darwin-Pragmas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78671
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> Started with r243038.
It has just triggered a latent bug. It is a pretty interesting bug. The
problem is that a TImode pseudo has class INT_SSE_REGS and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78674
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78654
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
It is mostly -fsanitize=alignment related on the serpent_generic.i, all the
other undefined sanitizers together cause largest frame of size 600 or so.
Also, if you use -fsanitize=undefined
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71965
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78631
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEW
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu ---
(In
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78626
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71965
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78551
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78715
Bug ID: 78715
Summary: [concepts] Access specifiers ignored after concept
declaration
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78716
Bug ID: 78716
Summary: [7 Regression] ICE in gimplify_va_arg_expr, at
gimplify.c:12650 (i686-linux-gnu)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72683
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77862
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78716
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
I think I see the error. If I add this hunk back (that r240072 removed), it
doesn't ICE anymore:
--- a/gcc/builtins.c
+++ b/gcc/builtins.c
@@ -4124,6 +4124,8 @@ std_canonical_va_list_type (tree type)
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66414
AK changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hiraditya at msn dot com
--- Comment #6 from AK
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78617
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
Author: thopre01
Date: Wed Dec 7 17:56:53 2016
New Revision: 243374
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243374=gcc=rev
Log:
2016-12-07 Thomas Preud'homme
gcc/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78617
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
Author: thopre01
Date: Wed Dec 7 18:15:52 2016
New Revision: 243375
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243375=gcc=rev
Log:
2016-12-07 Thomas Preud'homme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72775
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78719
--- Comment #2 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
Interestingly, following invalid variant with "type(t)"
is silently accepted and gives same results as z0.f90 in comment 1.
$ cat z2.f90
program p
type t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61593
--- Comment #2 from Sean ---
Eric, thanks for your reply.
Those docs read to me like the pragma is only supported *on* Darwin.
I guess I was not clear when creating this ticket: I'm interested in the pragma
being
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78717
Bug ID: 78717
Summary: no definition of string::find when lowered to gimple
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70149
Gerhard Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71691
--- Comment #18 from Aldy Hernandez ---
On 12/07/2016 11:38 AM, law at redhat dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71691
>
> --- Comment #17 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
> It's just latent. We still need to fix it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69543
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78550
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78718
Bug ID: 78718
Summary: ICE in gfc_get_symbol_decl, at
fortran/trans-decl.c:1427
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78719
Bug ID: 78719
Summary: ICE in gfc_get_symbol_decl, at
fortran/trans-decl.c:1438
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72775
--- Comment #14 from Marek Polacek ---
I think you're right. I dropped the check and am regtesting this again.
Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78716
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78708
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> Works? You mean it doesn't ICE? [...]
That's what I meant.
Of course, when the bug is fixed, calling GCC as I did will will give tons of
undefined symbols
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78631
--- Comment #11 from Ilya Enkovich ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #10)
>
> MPX wrapper library isn't built with -z bndplt since it doesn't call
> external functions with bounds. But some internal functions, which
> need bounds, are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68569
--- Comment #2 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
Update, backtrace :
$ gfortran-7-20161204 -c z2a.f90
z2a.f90:4:12:
data x /'a'/
1
Warning: Initialization string at (1) was truncated to fit the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78719
--- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
Detected with type "real" instead of "class(t)" :
$ cat z3.f90
program p
type t
integer :: n
end type
real :: g !!
abstract interface
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68725
Lukas Wunner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lukas at wunner dot de
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77862
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78671
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #3)
> It has just triggered a latent bug. It is a pretty interesting bug. The
> problem is that a TImode pseudo has class INT_SSE_REGS and r15(44) smoothly
> goes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77862
--- Comment #7 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> So is this fixed now?
It seems fixed to me. Latest gcc trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68725
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think this has now been fixed on the trunk. There is a pass which combines
stores for constants.
On 12/05/2016 03:24 PM, luke B wrote:
The following code seems to be correctly executed when compiled with
GCC 4.4.7 and LLVM 6.1. It does not correctly compile with gcc version
5.4.0 20160609 (Ubuntu 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.4).
I created a bug report and added some info.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78682
Damian Rouson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||damian at sourceryinstitute
dot or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 71537, which changed state.
Bug 71537 Summary: GCC rejects consetxpr boolean conversions and comparisons on
the result of pointer arithmetic.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71537
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77482
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 7 22:27:27 2016
New Revision: 243382
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243382=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-09-16 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78725
Bug ID: 78725
Summary: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in both 32-bit
and 64-bit modes)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66343
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 7 22:39:29 2016
New Revision: 243391
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243391=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-10-05 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78419
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 7 22:52:39 2016
New Revision: 243404
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243404=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-11-18 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77591
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 7 22:56:45 2016
New Revision: 243409
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243409=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-11-28 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77957
--- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Fixed on all open branches.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77957
--- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Wed Dec 7 23:11:23 2016
New Revision: 243416
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243416=gcc=rev
Log:
rs6000: Don't forget to initialize the TOC (PR77957)
The code generating
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78468
Dominik Vogt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78724
Bug ID: 78724
Summary: Incorrect ambiguous reference error when templace
class was forward declarated as a friend
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69153
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77638
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 7 22:31:33 2016
New Revision: 243386
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243386=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-09-20 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77665
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 7 22:32:34 2016
New Revision: 243387
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243387=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-09-22 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77722
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 7 22:35:29 2016
New Revision: 243389
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243389=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-09-27 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77666
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 7 22:34:05 2016
New Revision: 243388
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243388=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-09-27 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77919
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 7 22:45:33 2016
New Revision: 243395
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243395=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-10-29 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77285
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 7 22:51:48 2016
New Revision: 243403
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243403=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-11-18 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72808
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 7 22:59:28 2016
New Revision: 243412
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243412=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-11-28 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77587
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 7 22:29:01 2016
New Revision: 243383
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243383=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-09-19 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69153
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #5 from Peter
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77919
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 7 22:43:59 2016
New Revision: 243394
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243394=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-10-28 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78025
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 7 22:42:47 2016
New Revision: 243393
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243393=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-10-27 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77834
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 7 22:49:10 2016
New Revision: 243400
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243400=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-11-07 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78227
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 7 22:48:38 2016
New Revision: 243399
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243399=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-11-07 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77739
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 7 22:55:04 2016
New Revision: 243407
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243407=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-11-23 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78416
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 7 22:54:14 2016
New Revision: 243406
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243406=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-11-22 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67335
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 7 22:53:28 2016
New Revision: 243405
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243405=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-11-21 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78298
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 7 22:57:39 2016
New Revision: 243410
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243410=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-11-28 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78546
--- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 7 22:58:33 2016
New Revision: 243411
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243411=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-11-28 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77375
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 7 22:26:26 2016
New Revision: 243381
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243381=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-09-16 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77624
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 7 22:29:54 2016
New Revision: 243384
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243384=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-09-20 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77637
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 7 22:30:42 2016
New Revision: 243385
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243385=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-09-20 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77467
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 7 22:37:59 2016
New Revision: 243390
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243390=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-09-28 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77973
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 7 22:40:40 2016
New Revision: 243392
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243392=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-10-26 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78089
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 7 22:46:26 2016
New Revision: 243396
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243396=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-10-31 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77834
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 7 22:47:48 2016
New Revision: 243398
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243398=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-11-04 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78299
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 7 22:50:09 2016
New Revision: 243401
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243401=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-11-16 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78378
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 7 22:50:53 2016
New Revision: 243402
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243402=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-11-16 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69183
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 7 22:55:55 2016
New Revision: 243408
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243408=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-11-23 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78649
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 7 23:01:24 2016
New Revision: 243414
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243414=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-12-02 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78540
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 7 23:00:40 2016
New Revision: 243413
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243413=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-11-28 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77957
--- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Wed Dec 7 23:07:58 2016
New Revision: 243415
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243415=gcc=rev
Log:
rs6000: Don't forget to initialize the TOC (PR77957)
The code generating
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77957
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78720
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
% cat illegal_inst.cpp
extern signed char var_13;
long int rrr;
void foo() {
rrr = !0 % ((var_13 < 0) << 21);
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78722
Bug ID: 78722
Summary: noexcept and function pointers
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78692
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78720
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71537
Eric Fiselier changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65173
--- Comment #11 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #10)
> (In reply to Gerhard Steinmetz from comment #9)
> > Another example, together with LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 :
> >
> >
> > $ cat zz1.f90
> > program p
> >type t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78720
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bonzini at gnu dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78721
Bug ID: 78721
Summary: ICE on valid code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu:
in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:371
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60723
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #29
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78723
Bug ID: 78723
Summary: [variant] P0393r3: "Making variant greater equal
again" is unimplemented
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78703
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
For -fprintf-return-value, it is desirable to count with the worst case, but
I'm not sure it is the right behavior for the warning. If we are aware of just
1 and 2 byte decimal points in the wild, forcing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78706
Bug ID: 78706
Summary: [7 Regression] ICE in is_complex_reg (segfault)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78704
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78626
--- Comment #6 from Arseny Solokha ---
(In reply to Bernd Schmidt from comment #4)
> Created attachment 40269 [details]
> Candidate patch
It fixes this particular issue. I didn't run regtest, though.
Meanwhile, I have four additional snippets
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78692
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
*** Bug 78706 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78706
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
1 - 100 of 192 matches
Mail list logo