https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77485
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 14 Dec 2016, law at redhat dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77485
>
> --- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
> There was a bit of cruft and a missed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77485
--- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
That ought to be significantly easier and cleaner. I really didn't like the
transformation into memset. I'll give that a whirl tomorrow.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78788
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Dec 14 08:33:12 2016
New Revision: 243631
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243631=gcc=rev
Log:
2016-12-14 Richard Biener
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78788
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78801
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72709
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78795
--- Comment #11 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
On Debian, after path canonicalization, this is /usr/lib/bfd-plugins, but only
packages should manage files under /usr/lib (unlike /usr/local, for instance).
I've sent a mail to the Debian GCC Maintainers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59170
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jan Kratochvil from comment #11)
> (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #9)
> > Most developers don't even know the debug mode exists.
>
> That's a problem communicating it to users.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78795
--- Comment #9 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Vincent Lefèvre from comment #8)
> (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #7)
> > And no, it is not a libtool issue. You can use your systems binutils just
> > fine, just add a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78731
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Dec 14 10:35:11 2016
New Revision: 243644
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243644=gcc=rev
Log:
2016-12-14 Richard Biener
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78796
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 14 10:39:36 2016
New Revision: 243645
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243645=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/78796
* gcc.dg/tls/pr78796.c: New test.
Added:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78805
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78805
--- Comment #1 from Xingcan Lan ---
In addition, this bug affects at least from GCC 4.8.x to GCC 6.x, earlier
version of GCC was not yet tested.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77673
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
Author: thopre01
Date: Wed Dec 14 10:07:01 2016
New Revision: 243637
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243637=gcc=rev
Log:
Fix PR77673: bswap loads passed end of object
2016-12-14 Thomas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78599
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78806
Bug ID: 78806
Summary: gcc assumes gold always supports -plugin
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: driver
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78731
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77673
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
Author: thopre01
Date: Wed Dec 14 09:58:23 2016
New Revision: 243635
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243635=gcc=rev
Log:
Fix PR77673: bswap loads passed end of object
2016-12-14 Thomas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77673
Thomas Preud'homme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72709
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||David.Duffy at qimr dot edu.au
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78803
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71694
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78731
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Dec 14 10:31:37 2016
New Revision: 243641
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243641=gcc=rev
Log:
2016-12-14 Richard Biener
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48111
Thomas Henlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78796
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 14 10:50:46 2016
New Revision: 243646
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243646=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/78796
* config/aarch64/aarch64.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78672
--- Comment #4 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Wed Dec 14 11:52:09 2016
New Revision: 243647
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243647=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
2016-12-14 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78795
--- Comment #8 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #7)
> And no, it is not a libtool issue. You can use your systems binutils just
> fine, just add a symlink to lib/bfd-plugins/.
I'm using Debian packages. So,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78803
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78805
Bug ID: 78805
Summary: std::vector::emplace_back is not exception safe.
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78795
--- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
You can find that directory by:
% echo "int main(){}" | g++ -x c++ - && strace nm 2>&1 | grep bfd-plugins
On my system:
% ls -l /usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/binutils-bin/lib/bfd-plugins/
total 8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78802
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78731
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Dec 14 10:32:56 2016
New Revision: 243642
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243642=gcc=rev
Log:
2016-12-14 Richard Biener
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78796
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed for 6.3+, keeping open for possible backport to 5.x.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78428
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Dec 13 15:26:14 2016
New Revision: 243610
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243610=gcc=rev
Log:
Fill bitregion_{start,end} in store_constructor (PR tree-optimization/78428)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71270
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71270
--- Comment #9 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #8)
> After playing around with this I believe the problem is in the
> *neon_mov pattern in the arm backend. The way it constructs the
> const_vector of {1, 0,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59170
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7)
> "print it" should not automatically dereference.
The Python code that registers the printers for iterators even says:
# These shouldn't be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78694
--- Comment #16 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Yes, the bug is in the arm backend.
I posted a patch to fix it at:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-12/msg00849.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78765
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78780
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78694
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78808
--- Comment #3 from Steven Noonan ---
Created attachment 40335
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40335=edit
compiled with -fopenmp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78757
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78808
--- Comment #1 from Steven Noonan ---
Created attachment 40333
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40333=edit
test.c - test case for target_clones with(out) -fopenmp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78808
--- Comment #2 from Steven Noonan ---
Created attachment 40334
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40334=edit
compiled without -fopenmp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78808
Bug ID: 78808
Summary: target_clones not applying to openmp functions
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77585
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77585
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78807
Bug ID: 78807
Summary: Loop optimization trigger bus error
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78807
--- Comment #1 from Mauritz Sundell ---
Created attachment 40332
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40332=edit
Stack trace and program disassembly
Crash is in clrx operation accessing long (8 byte) word on 4 byte address
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78780
--- Comment #2 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Wed Dec 14 12:49:45 2016
New Revision: 243648
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243648=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-12-14 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78694
Sebastian Huber changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78807
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Can you try GCC 6+? Looks like one of the (known) alignment issues with the
vectorizer that are notoriously hard to backport.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78757
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So the bug is that nothing has gimplified the MAX_EXPR in:
character(kind=1)[1:MAX_EXPR <_1, 0>] * pstr.0;
struct FRAME.MAIN__ FRAME.3;
character(kind=1)[1:30] * s;
integer(kind=4) _1;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78809
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78808
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78809
--- Comment #2 from wilco at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> We may have dups of this. And we now have inlining for strcmp/memcmp when
> the
> result is only compared against zero.
I don't see that happening
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78810
Bug ID: 78810
Summary: [7 Regression] Optimized out volatile memory access
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78771
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78757
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 14 Dec 2016, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78757
>
> --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> So the bug is that nothing has gimplified
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78809
Bug ID: 78809
Summary: Inline strcmp with small constant strings
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78810
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2016-12-14
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77585
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Created attachment 40337
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40337=edit
Let's try that again ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77659
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78757
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 40338
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40338=edit
gcc7-pr78757.patch
The following untested patch fixes the ICE for me, but whether it is right,
dunno...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78813
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78727
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78813
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77553
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||charles.frasch at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78814
Bug ID: 78814
Summary: ICE in symbol_rank, at fortran/interface.c:1265
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78815
Bug ID: 78815
Summary: ICE: segfault with -fopenmp -fsanitize=address
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78791
--- Comment #6 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> Created attachment 40339 [details]
> gcc7-pr78791.patch
>
> Untested fix. I don't see other easy fix than not reusing temporaries
> between those from the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78811
Bug ID: 78811
Summary: [7 Regression] raw-string-6.c testsuite failure
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78811
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59874
--- Comment #9 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Wed Dec 14 15:44:07 2016
New Revision: 243651
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243651=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/59874
* config/i386/i386.c (enum ix86_builtins):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77830
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #40324|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77445
--- Comment #8 from James Greenhalgh ---
Is anyone currently looking at this?
If the bug is still blocked on correcting the profile information (which sounds
like a large job), should we consider weakening or reverting the cost model for
GCC 7?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78811
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78811
--- Comment #2 from David Edelsohn ---
Started somewhere between 243555 and 243578.
Requires -mcpu=power7 or lower. Works with -mcpu=power8.
Possibly r243578 combine.c change.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78811
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-12/msg01272.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78417
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59874
--- Comment #10 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to uros from comment #9)
> Author: uros
> Date: Wed Dec 14 15:44:07 2016
> New Revision: 243651
This patch reintroduces __builtin_clzs and __builtin_ctzs to gcc-6 branch to
resolve compatibility
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78417
--- Comment #3 from David Edelsohn ---
Bounty available!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78812
Bug ID: 78812
Summary: Wrong code generation due to hoisting memory load
across function call
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72775
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78817
Bug ID: 78817
Summary: stage2 bootstrap failure in vec.h:1613:5: error:
argument 1 null where non-null expected after r243661
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78791
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 14 21:39:51 2016
New Revision: 243671
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243671=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/78791
* config/i386/i386.h (enum ix86_stack_slot): Add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78817
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78813
--- Comment #3 from Charles ---
Thanks; didn't find that ticket before I submitted the bug. Validated that the
error does not occur on a fresh gcc-6-branch checkout.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78791
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59874
--- Comment #12 from Uroš Bizjak ---
The above patch also reintroduces reintroduces __builtin_clzs and
__builtin_ctzs to mainline.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17308
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78786
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Wed Dec 14 21:58:19 2016
New Revision: 243672
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243672=gcc=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/78786 - GCC hangs/out of memory calling sprintf with large
precision
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59874
--- Comment #11 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Wed Dec 14 20:27:06 2016
New Revision: 243668
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243668=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/59874
* config/i386/i386-builtin.def: Add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59874
--- Comment #13 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Allan Jensen from comment #8)
> Thanks that looks good. I will test it when I have a chance. I am changing
> the Qt sources to not assume the presence of __builtin_clzs when __BMI__ is
> defined.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78786
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78815
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78814
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78817
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59874
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo