[Bug rtl-optimization/79149] bad optimization on MIPS and ARM leading to excessive stack usage in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79149 Arnd Bergmann changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #40546|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug fortran/79165] [7 Regression] 100% compile-time increase between r244557 and r244598

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79165 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Index: gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c === --- gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c(revision 244586) +++ gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c(revision 244587) @@

[Bug fortran/79157] gfortran crashed on sparc with openmpi build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79157 --- Comment #2 from Igor Kozhukhov --- Created attachment 40551 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40551=edit conftestf.c test C file from configure

[Bug fortran/79157] gfortran crashed on sparc with openmpi build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79157 --- Comment #3 from Igor Kozhukhov --- Created attachment 40552 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40552=edit conftestf.f test fortran file from configure

[Bug fortran/79157] gfortran crashed on sparc with openmpi build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79157 --- Comment #5 from Igor Kozhukhov --- forgot to add info about gcc-6 $ gcc-6 -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc-6 COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/gcc/6/lib/gcc/sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11/6.3.0/lto-wrapper Target: sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11 Configured

[Bug libstdc++/79162] [7 Regression] [C++17] ambiguity in string assignment due to string_view overload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79162 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug ipa/79043] Wrong code with optimize(("-fno-strict-aliasing")) and always_inline

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79043 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Fri Jan 20 12:09:22 2017 New Revision: 244709 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244709=gcc=rev Log: Reload global options when strict aliasing is dropped (PR ipa/79043). 2017-01-20

[Bug c++/40901] Access qualifiers of embedded templates are discarded

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40901 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Last

[Bug c++/59002] [meta-bug] Access checking in templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59002 Bug 59002 depends on bug 40901, which changed state. Bug 40901 Summary: Access qualifiers of embedded templates are discarded https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40901 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/79163] Access-checking not done in template argument list of partial specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79163 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug go/79146] [7 Regression] Bootstrapping go on s390x fails; redefined symbols

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79146 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Didn't really help: [ 2448s] ../s390x-suse-linux/libgo/.libs/libgo.so: undefined reference to `math_ big.hasVectorFacility' [ 2448s] collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

[Bug fortran/79165] New: [7 Regression] 100% compile-time increase between r244557 and r244598

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79165 Bug ID: 79165 Summary: [7 Regression] 100% compile-time increase between r244557 and r244598 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug bootstrap/78985] [7 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure by -Wuninitialized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78985 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/78985] [7 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure by -Wuninitialized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78985 --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 20 Jan 2017, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78985 > > Martin Liška changed: > >What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/78985] [7 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure by -Wuninitialized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78985 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #4) > On Fri, 20 Jan 2017, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78985 > > > > Martin Liška changed: > > > >

[Bug c++/77829] Bad fix-it for nested-name-specifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77829 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/78656] Fix-it suggestion for std::alocator doesn't include std::allocator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78656 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/79166] [ARM] Implement neon_valid_immediate tricks for BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79166 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug rtl-optimization/70681] [6/7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ira-shrinkwrap-prep-2.c gcc.dg/pr10474.c on arm and powerpc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70681 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug fortran/79165] [7 Regression] 100% compile-time increase for polyhedron aermod between r244557 and r244598

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79165 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/79165] [7 Regression] 100% compile-time increase for polyhedron aermod between r244557 and r244598

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79165 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4) > r244557: 19.77s > r244586: 34.18s > r244587: 33.91s > > so neither party is guilty... bisecting. > > r244575: 19.66s > r244581: 33.84s > r244578: 19.82s >

[Bug fortran/79165] [7 Regression] 100% compile-time increase for polyhedron aermod between r244557 and r244598

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79165 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener

[Bug target/79160] gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-elemrev-4.c fails on powerpc BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79160 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/72785] [7 Regression] kernel build error since r236831

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72785 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/78656] Fix-it suggestion for std::alocator doesn't include std::allocator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78656 --- Comment #3 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Fri Jan 20 14:36:46 2017 New Revision: 244715 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244715=gcc=rev Log: C++: fix fix-it hints for misspellings within explicit namespaces

[Bug libstdc++/79156] incorrect c++ usage in gcc7 void function returns a value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79156 --- Comment #4 from mib.bugzilla at gmail dot com --- Thank you so much! (That means I won't need to change the Intel compiler to accommodate). Best regards

[Bug target/71270] [7 Regression] fortran regression after fix SLP PR58135

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71270 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/70681] [6/7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ira-shrinkwrap-prep-2.c gcc.dg/pr10474.c on arm and powerpc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70681 --- Comment #4 from Nick Clifton --- Created attachment 40555 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40555=edit Proposed patch

[Bug rtl-optimization/70681] [6/7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ira-shrinkwrap-prep-2.c gcc.dg/pr10474.c on arm and powerpc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70681 --- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Fine with me, Nick. But I suppose gcc-patches is the place to ask, I think Segher also had something to say for shrink-wrapping

[Bug c++/77829] Bad fix-it for nested-name-specifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77829 --- Comment #2 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Fri Jan 20 14:36:46 2017 New Revision: 244715 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244715=gcc=rev Log: C++: fix fix-it hints for misspellings within explicit namespaces

[Bug target/79166] New: [ARM] Implement neon_valid_immediate tricks for BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79166 Bug ID: 79166 Summary: [ARM] Implement neon_valid_immediate tricks for BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug target/71270] [7 Regression] fortran regression after fix SLP PR58135

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71270 --- Comment #11 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Fri Jan 20 14:36:57 2017 New Revision: 244716 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244716=gcc=rev Log: [ARM] PR target/71270 fix neon_valid_immediate for big-endian

[Bug libstdc++/79156] incorrect c++ usage in gcc7 void function returns a value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79156 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- In cases like this where it's just a dumb bug in our library headers (in a non-standard extension which hadn't been adequately tested) we'd definitely rather fix it here, not require other compilers to

[Bug rtl-optimization/71596] [7 Regression] gcc bootstrap fails due to segv in genrecog

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71596 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com Target

[Bug fortran/79157] gfortran crashed on sparc with openmpi build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79157 --- Comment #7 from Igor Kozhukhov --- what is correct command ? will be better for copy/past to be sure i do what you need :)

[Bug rtl-optimization/79149] bad optimization on MIPS and ARM leading to excessive stack usage in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79149 --- Comment #6 from Maxim Kuvyrkov --- Without looking at the code (it's 11pm) my guess is that 1st scheduling pass is misbehaving in some way, most likely it is doing a lot of interblock moves. One of the big differences between x86 and

[Bug rtl-optimization/79149] bad optimization on MIPS and ARM leading to excessive stack usage in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79149 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski --- The other thing to do is try with -fsched-pressure . PowerPC turns on -fsched-pressure by default (see PR 11488).

[Bug target/77346] [7 Regression] ICE in push_reload, at reload.c:1350

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77346 --- Comment #14 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Removing in gcc-8 sounds reasonable to me. Given that my analysis of undesirable sharing of range info for the other bug I was looking at was enough for Richi to find and fix the problem, I guess I'll

[Bug target/78516] [7 Regression] ICE in lra_assign for e500v2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 CC|

[Bug go/79146] [7 Regression] Bootstrapping go on s390x fails; redefined symbols

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79146 --- Comment #5 from Ian Lance Taylor --- Well, it helped in that it uncovered a different problem. Fixed again.

[Bug testsuite/79169] New: g++.dg/warn/Wduplicated-branches1.C fails on powerpc since its introduction in r244705

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79169 Bug ID: 79169 Summary: g++.dg/warn/Wduplicated-branches1.C fails on powerpc since its introduction in r244705 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/79149] bad optimization on MIPS and ARM leading to excessive stack usage in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79149 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||11488 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug fortran/79157] gfortran crashed on sparc with openmpi build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79157 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug go/79146] [7 Regression] Bootstrapping go on s390x fails; redefined symbols

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79146 --- Comment #4 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ian Date: Fri Jan 20 20:39:10 2017 New Revision: 244731 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244731=gcc=rev Log: PR go/79146 math/big: fix build on s390x Don't build

[Bug c/69558] [6/7 Regression] glib2 warning pragmas stopped working

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69558 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #18

[Bug tree-optimization/79159] [7 regression] spurious array-bounds warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79159 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 CC|

[Bug go/79037] gccgo: Binaries crash with parforsetup: pos is not aligned on m68k

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79037 --- Comment #9 from Ian Lance Taylor --- The backend.h interface says that if you set the alignment, that is the alignment. I could change it to the GCC version--you can only increase the alignment--but I'd rather keep the backend.h interface

[Bug target/79170] New: memcmp builtin expansion sequence can overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79170 Bug ID: 79170 Summary: memcmp builtin expansion sequence can overflow Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/53012] unrelated friend operators in same namespace interfere with operator resolution outside of namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53012 Nathan Ridge changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zeratul976 at hotmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/60860] Friend function declaration incorrectly hides function in outer namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60860 Nathan Ridge changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zeratul976 at hotmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/53012] unrelated friend operators in same namespace interfere with operator resolution outside of namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53012 --- Comment #3 from Nathan Ridge --- (In reply to Nathan Ridge from comment #2) > This appears to be fixed in gcc 6, possibly by the same change that fixed > bug 60860 as well. Perhaps by bug 70522?

[Bug c++/60860] Friend function declaration incorrectly hides function in outer namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60860 --- Comment #4 from Nathan Ridge --- (In reply to Nathan Ridge from comment #3) > This appears to have been fixed in gcc 6. Perhaps by bug 70522?

[Bug c++/60860] Friend function declaration incorrectly hides function in outer namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60860 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kalaxy at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/53012] unrelated friend operators in same namespace interfere with operator resolution outside of namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53012 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/60860] Friend function declaration incorrectly hides function in outer namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60860 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/65608] [meta-bug] friend issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65608 Bug 65608 depends on bug 60860, which changed state. Bug 60860 Summary: Friend function declaration incorrectly hides function in outer namespace https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60860 What|Removed

[Bug target/77850] FAIL: gcc.dg/compat/scalar-by-value-4 c_compat_x_tst.o-c_compat_y_tst.o execute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77850 --- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Sat Jan 21 03:11:49 2017 New Revision: 244740 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244740=gcc=rev Log: rs6000: Small varargs for BE SVR4 (PR61729, PR77850) The varargs code for

[Bug target/61729] FAIL: g++.dg/abi/scoped1.C -std=gnu++11 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61729 --- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Sat Jan 21 03:11:49 2017 New Revision: 244740 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244740=gcc=rev Log: rs6000: Small varargs for BE SVR4 (PR61729, PR77850) The varargs code for

[Bug tree-optimization/78604] [7 regression] test case gcc.target/powerpc/p8vector-vectorize-1.c fails starting with r242750

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78604 --- Comment #6 from Michael Meissner --- Unless -ffast-math or -fno-honor-nans is used, you cannot invert < to >=, because you will get a different result if either operand is a NaN. However, the basic code for vector compares hasn't changed

[Bug fortran/79157] gfortran crashed on sparc with openmpi build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79157 --- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou --- > what is correct command ? gfortran -S conftestf.f -g -O2 -wrapper gdb

[Bug c/79171] New: I can't able to create static link of dynamic object.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79171 Bug ID: 79171 Summary: I can't able to create static link of dynamic object. Product: gcc Version: 4.9.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/77318] [7 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/graphite/pr68279.f90 -O (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77318 --- Comment #9 from Bill Schmidt --- Seen also on powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu, but not on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu.

[Bug rtl-optimization/79149] bad optimization on MIPS and ARM leading to excessive stack usage in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79149 --- Comment #9 from Arnd Bergmann --- The warning seems to reliably disappear with -fno-schedule-insns, on every combination I've tried it produces better (smaller stack and faster code) or identical results to -fno-sched-critical-path-heuristic

[Bug c/79171] I can't able to create static link of dynamic object.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79171 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/70179] PPC64 ICE with -mabi=ieeelongdouble and long double complex

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70179 --- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner --- I suspect the bug was fixed in a check in on May 2nd, 2016, when the complex float128 was supported.

[Bug go/79037] gccgo: Binaries crash with parforsetup: pos is not aligned on m68k

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79037 --- Comment #10 from Michael Karcher --- OK, I got it. I retract my last comment.

[Bug ipa/79108] [7 Regression] ICE on some fortran code with -flto -Ofast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79108 --- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor --- I have proposed a fix on the mailing list: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-01/msg01643.html

[Bug target/70179] PPC64 ICE with -mabi=ieeelongdouble and long double complex

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70179 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/79172] New: -Wunused-but-set-parameter gone nuts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79172 Bug ID: 79172 Summary: -Wunused-but-set-parameter gone nuts Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/60860] Friend function declaration incorrectly hides function in outer namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60860 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- It seems to have been fixed before the r235368 commit that fixed bug 70522, I'm trying to find the right commit.

[Bug target/79173] New: add-with-carry and subtract-with-borrow support (x86_64 and others)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79173 Bug ID: 79173 Summary: add-with-carry and subtract-with-borrow support (x86_64 and others) Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/79157] gfortran crashed on sparc with openmpi build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79157 --- Comment #9 from Igor Kozhukhov --- $ gdb --version GNU gdb (DilOS 7.11.1-2-5) 7.11.1 Copyright (C) 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later This is free software: you

[Bug rtl-optimization/79125] [7 Regression] ICE in rtl_verify_bb_insns, at cfgrtl.c:2661 (error: flow control insn inside a basic block)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79125 --- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Sat Jan 21 07:23:47 2017 New Revision: 244741 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244741=gcc=rev Log: 2017-01-21 Bernd Schmidt rtl-optimization/79125

[Bug rtl-optimization/79125] [7 Regression] ICE in rtl_verify_bb_insns, at cfgrtl.c:2661 (error: flow control insn inside a basic block)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79125 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/79157] gfortran crashed on sparc with openmpi build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79157 --- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou --- gfortran -S conftestf.f -g -O2 -wrapper gdb,--args

[Bug other/78068] warning: implicit declaration of function ‘time’; did you mean ‘nice’? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78068 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||69968 --- Comment #4 from David Malcolm

[Bug c++/77284] [5/6 Regression] ICE on valid C++11 code using initializer list: in potential_constant_expression_1, at cp/constexpr.c:5480

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77284 --- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Fri Jan 20 15:12:26 2017 New Revision: 244721 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244721=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/77545 PR c++/77284 * constexpr.c

[Bug c++/77545] [7 Regression] ICE on valid C++11 code: in potential_constant_expression_1, at cp/constexpr.c:5480

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77545 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Fri Jan 20 15:12:26 2017 New Revision: 244721 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244721=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/77545 PR c++/77284 * constexpr.c

[Bug c++/77284] [5 Regression] ICE on valid C++11 code using initializer list: in potential_constant_expression_1, at cp/constexpr.c:5480

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77284 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/78014] -Wformat -vs- size_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78014 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/78397] The stack is not 8 bytes aligned on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78397 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/66145] [5/6/7 Regression] std::ios_base::failure objects thrown from libstdc++.so use old ABI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66145 --- Comment #30 from Jonathan Wakely --- I don't plan to change this for gcc 5 and gcc 6, because changing the type of exception thrown by the library doesn't seem appropriate for a minor release within the 5.x or 6.x series.

[Bug target/77455] [AArch64] eh_return implementation fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77455 wilco at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/69240] Missing inequality operators for every param_type in

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69240 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/69240] Missing inequality operators for every param_type in

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69240 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Fri Jan 20 15:28:48 2017 New Revision: 244722 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244722=gcc=rev Log: PR69240 Define inequality operators for param types PR libstdc++/69240

[Bug target/79166] [ARM] Implement neon_valid_immediate tricks for BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79166 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/78985] [7 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure by -Wuninitialized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78985 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On January 20, 2017 3:07:37 PM GMT+01:00, "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78985 > >--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---

[Bug target/77455] [AArch64] eh_return implementation fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77455 --- Comment #3 from wilco at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: wilco Date: Fri Jan 20 15:34:41 2017 New Revision: 244724 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244724=gcc=rev Log: This patch simplifies the handling of EH return. We force the use of the

[Bug tree-optimization/79161] possibly lost DCE / invariant motion optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79161 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug rtl-optimization/79121] [6/7 Regression] invalid expansion of sign-extend unsigned plus left shift

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79121 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/64279] Warning missing for "(cond) ? A : A" / if(cond) expr1; else expr1; // same expression in if and else branch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64279 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Fri Jan 20 12:02:50 2017 New Revision: 244705 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244705=gcc=rev Log: PR c/64279 * c-common.h (do_warn_duplicated_branches_r):

[Bug libstdc++/72792] allocator_traits is too strict about rebinding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72792 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Fri Jan 20 12:03:36 2017 New Revision: 244706 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244706=gcc=rev Log: PR72792 detect allocator pointer types without invalid rebinding PR

[Bug ipa/79043] Wrong code with optimize(("-fno-strict-aliasing")) and always_inline

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79043 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/79149] bad optimization on MIPS and ARM leading to excessive stack usage in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79149 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- Can you try -fno-sched-insns?

[Bug c/79164] New: -Wduplicated-branches and macros

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79164 Bug ID: 79164 Summary: -Wduplicated-branches and macros Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c/79164] -Wduplicated-branches and macros

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79164 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug c/79152] -Wimplicit-fallthrough false positive triggered by goto statements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79152 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- I think the problem is that 1988 /* Don't warn for a non-case label followed by a statement: 1989case 0: 1990 foo (); 1991label: 1992 bar (); 1993 as these are

[Bug middle-end/79161] New: possibly lost DCE optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79161 Bug ID: 79161 Summary: possibly lost DCE optimization Product: gcc Version: 6.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end

[Bug c/64279] Warning missing for "(cond) ? A : A" / if(cond) expr1; else expr1; // same expression in if and else branch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64279 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/70366] [6 Regression] chromium fails to build with LTO due to segfault in ipa-inline-transform.c:inline_call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70366 --- Comment #8 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Fri Jan 20 12:04:46 2017 New Revision: 244708 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244708=gcc=rev Log: 2016-03-26 Richard Biener Prathamesh Kulkarni

  1   2   >