[Bug c++/72764] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid C++11 code instantiating an alias template: tree check: expected class ‘type’, have ‘exceptional’ (error_mark) in typedef_variant_p, at tree.c:12660

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72764 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Paolo, any progress with this? The last mail on the subject is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-01/msg01813.html

[Bug sanitizer/80403] UBSAN: compile time crash with "type mismatch in binary expression" message in / and % expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80403 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- *** Bug 80405 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug sanitizer/80404] UBSAN: compile time crash with "non-trivial conversion at assignment" error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80404 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/80405] UBSAN: compile time crash with "type mismatch in shift expression" error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80405 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/80403] UBSAN: compile time crash with "type mismatch in binary expression" message in / and % expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80403 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- *** Bug 80404 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug sanitizer/80403] UBSAN: compile time crash with "type mismatch in binary expression" message in / and % expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80403 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #41183|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug lto/80407] New: --as-needed cannot be combined with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80407 Bug ID: 80407 Summary: --as-needed cannot be combined with -flto Product: gcc Version: 6.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto

[Bug middle-end/79209] [5/6/7 Regression] AArch64: Inconsistent packed volatile bitfield accesses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79209 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug target/77728] [5/6/7 Regression] Miscompilation multiple vector iteration on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77728 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug middle-end/80100] simplify-rtx.c sanitizer detects undefined behaviour with optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80100 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Vittorio Zecca from comment #7) > Looking at the diff file, where is the change in line 2744? > "int count = INTVAL (XEXP (op0, 1));" > > Old and new look the same to me. Whitespace fix,

[Bug sanitizer/80403] UBSAN: compile time crash with "type mismatch in binary expression" message in / and % expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80403 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 41183 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41183=edit gcc7-pr80403.patch Untested fix.

[Bug sanitizer/80349] [6 Regression] UBSAN: compile time crash with "type mismatch in binary expression" message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80349 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org|jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/79671] [7 Regression] mapnik miscompilation on armv7hl since r235622

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671 --- Comment #103 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Apr 12 07:35:49 2017 New Revision: 246866 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246866=gcc=rev Log: 2017-04-12 Richard Biener Bernd Edlinger

[Bug lto/80407] --as-needed cannot be combined with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80407 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||lto Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/80399] Premature optimization with unsigned

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80399 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Related case (but I know it goes down a different path) is: struct ss { int aa; int s; }; int f(int a, struct ss *rn, int i) { return rn[i-1].s == a; } Which shows up in SPEC INT.

[Bug tree-optimization/80406] Reduced false positive test case for -Warray-bounds with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80406 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug middle-end/80399] Premature optimization with unsigned

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80399 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/80100] simplify-rtx.c sanitizer detects undefined behaviour with optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80100 --- Comment #7 from Vittorio Zecca --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > Author: jakub > Date: Tue Apr 11 17:21:51 2017 > New Revision: 246851 > > URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246851=gcc=rev > Log: > PR

[Bug sanitizer/80349] [6/7 Regression] UBSAN: compile time crash with "type mismatch in binary expression" message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80349 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Apr 12 06:12:26 2017 New Revision: 246865 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246865=gcc=rev Log: PR sanitizer/80349 * fold-const.c (fold_binary_loc) : Convert

[Bug lto/80407] --as-needed cannot be combined with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80407 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- I suggest to file a bug at sourceware.org/bugzilla for GNU ld.

[Bug c++/72764] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid C++11 code instantiating an alias template: tree check: expected class ‘type’, have ‘exceptional’ (error_mark) in typedef_variant_p, at tree.c:12660

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72764 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|paolo.carlini at

[Bug tree-optimization/80406] Reduced false positive test case for -Warray-bounds with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80406 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug target/77728] [5/6/7 Regression] Miscompilation multiple vector iteration on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77728 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- aarch64_function_arg_alignment has: for (tree field = TYPE_FIELDS (type); field; field = DECL_CHAIN (field)) alignment = std::max (alignment, DECL_ALIGN (field)); and thus has similar problem (no

[Bug tree-optimization/79390] [7 Regression] 10% performance drop in SciMark2 LU after r242550

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79390 --- Comment #24 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Apr 12 09:41:02 2017 New Revision: 246869 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246869=gcc=rev Log: 2017-04-12 Richard Biener PR

[Bug middle-end/80411] New: DCE vs. offloading

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80411 Bug ID: 80411 Summary: DCE vs. offloading Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: openacc, openmp Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug rtl-optimization/78127] [5/6 Regression] AArch64 internal compiler error: in lra_eliminate, at lra-eliminations.c:1440

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78127 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/79209] [5/6/7 Regression] AArch64: Inconsistent packed volatile bitfield accesses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79209 --- Comment #5 from Pekka S --- It's true what you quoted, but on the other hand the current behaviour does not produce code that will not fault -- it will indeed fault. I see the rationale behind the packed

[Bug target/80082] [5/6 regression] GCC incorrectly assumes Cortex-r[578] have 64-bit single-copy atomic LDRD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80082 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/77728] [5/6/7 Regression] Miscompilation multiple vector iteration on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77728 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8) > The problem is that TYPE_FIELDS in C++ don't contain just FIELD_DECLs, but > lots of other stuff, e.g. TYPE_DECLs, CONST_DECLs, FUNCTION_DECLs. Forgot about

[Bug target/80236] ARM NEON: Crash in std::map

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80236 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/77728] [5/6/7 Regression] Miscompilation multiple vector iteration on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77728 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/80382] ICE with error: unrecognizable insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80382 --- Comment #11 from Segher Boessenkool --- Fixed on trunk (I forgot the marker in the checkin comment, oops): rs6000: Enforce quad_address_p in TImode atomic_load/store (PR80382) Whatever expand expands to should be valid instructions. The

[Bug fortran/80408] New: Problems with SIGNAL, pthread and print together

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80408 Bug ID: 80408 Summary: Problems with SIGNAL, pthread and print together Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c/80409] New: Document that va_arg(ap, void*) can be used to consume any pointer argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80409 Bug ID: 80409 Summary: Document that va_arg(ap, void*) can be used to consume any pointer argument Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/80408] Problems with SIGNAL, pthread and print together

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80408 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- You may not call arbitrary functions in signal context but only async-signal safe ones.

[Bug target/77728] [5/6/7 Regression] Miscompilation multiple vector iteration on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77728 --- Comment #11 from Ramana Radhakrishnan --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10) > aarch64_function_arg_alignment > has: > for (tree field = TYPE_FIELDS (type); field; field = DECL_CHAIN (field)) > alignment = std::max

[Bug target/77728] [5/6/7 Regression] Miscompilation multiple vector iteration on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77728 --- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 12 Apr 2017, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77728 > > Jakub Jelinek changed: > >What|Removed |Added

[Bug rtl-optimization/78116] [7 regression] Performance drop after r241173 on avx512 target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78116 Andrew Senkevich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrew.n.senkevich at gmail dot co

[Bug target/77728] [5/6/7 Regression] Miscompilation multiple vector iteration on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77728 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alan.lawrence.arm at gmail dot com

[Bug rtl-optimization/78255] [5/6 regression] Indirect sibling call causing wrong code generation for ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78255 Andre Vieira changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andre.simoesdiasvieira@arm.

[Bug c/80410] New: Improve merging of identical branches

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80410 Bug ID: 80410 Summary: Improve merging of identical branches Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug tree-optimization/79390] [7 Regression] 10% performance drop in SciMark2 LU after r242550

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79390 --- Comment #27 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 12 Apr 2017, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79390 > > --- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek --- > Created attachment 41189 > -->

[Bug rtl-optimization/80357] [7 Regression] ICE in model_update_limit_points_in_group, at haifa-sched.c:1982 on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80357 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/80163] ICE on hopefully valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80163 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/59910] ICE in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:5327

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59910 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > A patch to fix the problem exposed by code in comment #1 > has been committed to trunk. Same patch does not fix > 5-branch. Closing as fixed. It does for me provided the patch is applied at the

[Bug target/79671] [7 Regression] mapnik miscompilation on armv7hl since r235622

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/80376] Some vec_xxpermdi usage lead to ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80376 --- Comment #7 from Bill Schmidt --- Author: wschmidt Date: Wed Apr 12 13:37:30 2017 New Revision: 246873 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246873=gcc=rev Log: 2017-04-12 Bill Schmidt Backport from

[Bug target/80376] Some vec_xxpermdi usage lead to ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80376 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/79590] ICE (internal compiler error) in nothrow_spec_p with generic lambda and `noexcept(noexcept(...))` expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79590 --- Comment #2 from Vittorio Romeo --- This is still present. Here are some more examples: int main() { [](auto x) noexcept(noexcept(x)) { } (0); } :3:40: internal compiler error: in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1159 [](auto x)

[Bug middle-end/80163] ICE on hopefully valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80163 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Apr 12 13:57:45 2017 New Revision: 246876 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246876=gcc=rev Log: PR c/80163 * expr.c : For EXPAND_INITIALIZER determine SIGN_EXTEND

[Bug gcov-profile/77698] Unrolled loop not considered hot after profiling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77698 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/77728] [5/6/7 Regression] Miscompilation multiple vector iteration on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77728 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek --- For the base class alignment vs. alignment of base class members, I think testcases could be e.g. like: struct B { char a __attribute__((aligned (8))); }; struct A : public B {}; A foo (int x, A y) {

[Bug sanitizer/69279] Uncomplete documentation for -fsanitize-recovery option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69279 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/80359] [7 Regression] DSE causes error: invalid reference prefix

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80359 --- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law --- That's exactly what I tested yesterday. It bootstraps and regression tests successfully. So no need to wait on the testrun.

[Bug target/80376] Some vec_xxpermdi usage lead to ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80376 --- Comment #8 from Bill Schmidt --- Author: wschmidt Date: Wed Apr 12 13:45:27 2017 New Revision: 246874 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246874=gcc=rev Log: 2017-04-12 Bill Schmidt Backport from

[Bug target/80315] Calling __builtin_crypto_vshasigmaw with argument 3 out of range creates an unrecognizable insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80315 --- Comment #5 from Bill Schmidt --- Author: wschmidt Date: Wed Apr 12 13:45:27 2017 New Revision: 246874 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246874=gcc=rev Log: 2017-04-12 Bill Schmidt Backport from

[Bug tree-optimization/80359] [7 Regression] DSE causes error: invalid reference prefix

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80359 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/80315] Calling __builtin_crypto_vshasigmaw with argument 3 out of range creates an unrecognizable insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80315 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/80409] Document that va_arg(ap, void*) can be used to consume any pointer argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80409 --- Comment #2 from Pascal Cuoq --- > it should work even with standard c Quoting from 7.6.1.1:2 … the behavior is undefined, except for the following cases: * … * one type is pointer to void and the other is a pointer to a character

[Bug tree-optimization/80359] [7 Regression] DSE causes error: invalid reference prefix

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80359 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|law at

[Bug debug/80321] [7 regression] infinite recursion with inlining of nested function and debug info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80321 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Note this breaks profiledbootstrap with Ada on various targets.

[Bug target/80315] Calling __builtin_crypto_vshasigmaw with argument 3 out of range creates an unrecognizable insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80315 --- Comment #4 from Bill Schmidt --- Author: wschmidt Date: Wed Apr 12 13:37:30 2017 New Revision: 246873 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246873=gcc=rev Log: 2017-04-12 Bill Schmidt Backport from

[Bug rtl-optimization/80357] [7 Regression] ICE in model_update_limit_points_in_group, at haifa-sched.c:1982 on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80357 --- Comment #11 from Segher Boessenkool --- The pressure becomes quite negative here... that isn't supposed to happen as far as I can see. Allowing all negative pressures in the asserts makes everything compile fine, but there really shouldn't

[Bug tree-optimization/80359] [7 Regression] DSE causes error: invalid reference prefix

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80359 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Apr 12 13:47:26 2017 New Revision: 246875 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246875=gcc=rev Log: 2017-04-12 Richard Biener Jeff Law

[Bug middle-end/80131] powerpc: 1U << (31 - x) doesn't generate optimised code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80131 wilco at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug middle-end/80399] Premature optimization with unsigned

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80399 wilco at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/80198] [6/7/8 Regression] does not vectorize generic inplace integer operation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80198 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com Target

[Bug tree-optimization/79390] [7 Regression] 10% performance drop in SciMark2 LU after r242550

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79390 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P2

[Bug c++/80412] [c++17] crash with class template deduction guide and inheritance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80412 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery

[Bug c++/80412] [c++17] crash with class template deduction guide and inheritance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80412 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code --- Comment

[Bug gcov-profile/71672] inlining indirect calls does not work with autofdo

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71672 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/79390] [7 Regression] 10% performance drop in SciMark2 LU after r242550

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79390 --- Comment #25 from Richard Biener --- So the original report is fixed (-O3 -march-native). But adding -ffast-math still ends up regressing. At this point it's probably appropriate to re-target to GCC 8.

[Bug rtl-optimization/80357] [7 Regression] ICE in model_update_limit_points_in_group, at haifa-sched.c:1982 on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80357 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug tree-optimization/79390] [7 Regression] 10% performance drop in SciMark2 LU after r242550

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79390 --- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 41189 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41189=edit gcc7-pr79390-ecm.patch Untested fix for the -O3 -ffast-math -march=haswell case. The difference between

[Bug c++/80412] New: [c++17] crash with class template deduction guide and inheritance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80412 Bug ID: 80412 Summary: [c++17] crash with class template deduction guide and inheritance Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/80411] DCE vs. offloading

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80411 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/80409] Document that va_arg(ap, void*) can be used to consume any pointer argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80409 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- I don't see why this needs to be documented as it should work even with standard c. That is for an example %p in printf takes a void* but nobody casts it to void* when passing to printf.

[Bug debug/77343] ICE in dwarf2out_frame_debug_expr, at dwarf2cfi.c:1596

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77343 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/80361] [5/6/7 Regression] bogus recursive call to nonrecursive procedure with -fcheck=recursion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80361 --- Comment #16 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- This seems to be sufficient to fix the runtime error on the reduced test case in comment #13: Index: gcc/fortran/class.c === ---

[Bug fortran/80361] [5/6/7 Regression] bogus recursive call to nonrecursive procedure with -fcheck=recursion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80361 --- Comment #17 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #16) > This seems to be sufficient to fix the runtime error on the reduced test > case in comment #13: And it also does the trick for PR 67505 ...

[Bug fortran/67505] [F03] bogus runtime error with final subroutine and -fcheck=recursion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67505 --- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- The patch in PR 80361 comment 16 fixes the error.

[Bug c++/79566] [6 Regression] elaborated-type-specifier incorrectly rejected in range-based for

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79566 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Apr 12 19:22:50 2017 New Revision: 246887 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246887=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/79566 - elaborated-type-specifier in range for * parser.c

[Bug c++/79050] [5/6 Regression] ICE: tree code 'template_type_parm' is not supported in LTO streams

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79050 --- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Apr 12 19:22:32 2017 New Revision: 246884 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246884=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/79050 - ICE with undeduced auto and LTO * decl.c

[Bug c++/79461] [5/6 Regression] [C++1z] ICE when capturing a variable in a lambda in a constexpr constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79461 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Apr 12 19:22:25 2017 New Revision: 246883 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246883=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/79461 - ICE with lambda in constexpr constructor *

[Bug c++/79508] [6 Regression] Parse error in template argument list using nested template arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79508 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Apr 12 19:22:38 2017 New Revision: 246885 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246885=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/79508 - lookup error with member template * parser.c

[Bug c++/79580] [5/6 Regression] ICE in nested_anon_class_index, at cp/mangle.c:1604

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79580 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Apr 12 19:22:44 2017 New Revision: 246886 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246886=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/79580 - ICE with compound literal * parser.c

[Bug fortran/59910] ICE in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:5327

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59910 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/79929] [7 Regression] Bogus Warning: '__builtin_memset': specified size 4294967291 exceeds maximum object size 2147483647

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79929 --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor --- Thanks for the C test case. In it, the warning is a false positive caused by GCC's failure to eliminate the excessive memset at -O1. The call is emitted by the ccp1 pass at all optimization levels. At -O2,

[Bug target/78994] -Ofast makes aarch64 C++ benchmark slower for A53

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78994 wilco at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug lto/79062] -Walloca-larger-than and -Wformat-overflow warnings disabled by -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79062 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- The following allows the format string to be recognized even with LTO. The sprintf pass runs and seems to work correctly, but warnings from it for some reason do not appear on output. It's as if they were

[Bug fortran/79929] [7 Regression] Bogus Warning: '__builtin_memset': specified size 4294967291 exceeds maximum object size 2147483647

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79929 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig --- Here's equivlalent C code: $ cat bug.c #include #include char * foo(char *c, int len) { char *p, *n; n = malloc(len + 5); p = c + 5; memmove (c, n, p-c); if (p < c) memset (n + 5, 32, c-p);

[Bug fortran/79929] [7 Regression] Bogus Warning: '__builtin_memset': specified size 4294967291 exceeds maximum object size 2147483647

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79929 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Likely caused by revision r243419. Note that I don't get the warning with the C code in comment 4.

[Bug sanitizer/80404] UBSAN: compile time crash with "non-trivial conversion at assignment" error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80404 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Apr 12 18:08:29 2017 New Revision: 246881 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246881=gcc=rev Log: PR sanitizer/80403 PR sanitizer/80404 PR sanitizer/80405

[Bug sanitizer/80403] UBSAN: compile time crash with "type mismatch in binary expression" message in / and % expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80403 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Apr 12 18:08:29 2017 New Revision: 246881 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246881=gcc=rev Log: PR sanitizer/80403 PR sanitizer/80404 PR sanitizer/80405

[Bug sanitizer/80405] UBSAN: compile time crash with "type mismatch in shift expression" error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80405 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Apr 12 18:08:29 2017 New Revision: 246881 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246881=gcc=rev Log: PR sanitizer/80403 PR sanitizer/80404 PR sanitizer/80405

[Bug c/80413] New: sanitizer detects undefined behaviour in gcov-io.c using -ftest-coverage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80413 Bug ID: 80413 Summary: sanitizer detects undefined behaviour in gcov-io.c using -ftest-coverage Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug sanitizer/80403] UBSAN: compile time crash with "type mismatch in binary expression" message in / and % expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80403 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/79390] [7 Regression] 10% performance drop in SciMark2 LU after r242550

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79390 --- Comment #28 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Apr 12 18:09:47 2017 New Revision: 246882 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246882=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/79390 * optabs.c (emit_conditional_move): If

[Bug fortran/80361] [5/6/7 Regression] bogus recursive call to nonrecursive procedure with -fcheck=recursion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80361 --- Comment #18 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #17) > (In reply to janus from comment #16) > > This seems to be sufficient to fix the runtime error on the reduced test > > case in comment #13: > > And it also

[Bug middle-end/79929] [7 Regression] Bogus Warning: '__builtin_memset': specified size 4294967291 exceeds maximum object size 2147483647

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79929 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P4 |P3 Component|fortran

  1   2   >