[Bug target/80510] Optimize Power7/power8 Altivec load/stores

2017-06-03 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80510 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab --- FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/pr80510-1.c (test for excess errors) Excess errors: /daten/gcc/gcc-20170602/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr80510-1.c:132:29: warning: left shift count >=

[Bug c++/68754] Explicitly defaulted constexpr assignment operator fails to compile

2017-06-03 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68754 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.4

[Bug fortran/65542] [5/6 Regression] SPREAD intrinsic incorrectly accepted in initialization expressions with -std=f95

2017-06-03 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65542 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sat Jun 3 11:26:38 2017 New Revision: 248855 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248855=gcc=rev Log: 2017-05-03 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/65542

[Bug middle-end/80960] [5/6/7/8 Regression] Huge memory use when compiling a very large test case

2017-06-03 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80960 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Timings and memory use for various releases. They show a timing regression for gcc-7 and trunk compared to gcc-6. % time gfortran-4.8.5 pr80960_db.f90 -fdefault-integer-8 -O2 -ftime-report ... phase

[Bug target/80556] [8 Regression] bootstrap failure for Ada compiler

2017-06-03 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80556 --- Comment #31 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #29 from Dominique d'Humieres --- >> Did you try what I suggested in comment #16 as a stopgap measure? >> No GNAT developer builds the mainline compiler on Darwin

[Bug go/80964] New: cross-gotools are not executable on host system

2017-06-03 Thread bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80964 Bug ID: 80964 Summary: cross-gotools are not executable on host system Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: go

[Bug target/80556] [8 Regression] bootstrap failure for Ada compiler

2017-06-03 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80556 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/80556] [8 Regression] bootstrap failure for Ada compiler

2017-06-03 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80556 --- Comment #30 from Dominique d'Humieres --- s/I could I/how could I/

[Bug middle-end/80960] [5/6/7/8 Regression] Huge memory use when compiling a very large test case

2017-06-03 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80960 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The second change in memory size occurred between revisions r201916 (1996MB) and r202560 (6196Mb).

[Bug fortran/80945] Invalid code with allocatable character array in READ/WRITE statement

2017-06-03 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80945 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/80556] [8 Regression] bootstrap failure for Ada compiler

2017-06-03 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80556 --- Comment #32 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- Oh, I forgot: does anyone have an explanation why i386-apple-darwin16.7.0 and i386-apple-darwin11.4.2 bootstraps *with* Ada still work fine while their x86_64 counterparts fail?

[Bug tree-optimization/79483] [7/8 Regression] [graphite] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block 31 does not dominate use in block 28)

2017-06-03 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79483 --- Comment #8 from David Binderman --- Reduced code: a; b() { int c, d; if (a) d = b(); return 1 + c + d; } Flag -O2 required.

[Bug sanitizer/80963] New: UBSAN false positive with visibility=hidden

2017-06-03 Thread jengelh at inai dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80963 Bug ID: 80963 Summary: UBSAN false positive with visibility=hidden Product: gcc Version: 7.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/65542] [5 Regression] SPREAD intrinsic incorrectly accepted in initialization expressions with -std=f95

2017-06-03 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65542 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/79483] [7/8 Regression] [graphite] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block 31 does not dominate use in block 28)

2017-06-03 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79483 --- Comment #7 from David Binderman --- Problem seems to be between gcc revision 248553 and 248835. I'll have a go at reducing the demonstrator code.

[Bug tree-optimization/79483] [7/8 Regression] [graphite] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block 31 does not dominate use in block 28)

2017-06-03 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79483 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug fortran/80965] [7/8 Regression] ICE with class argument and -O2 optimization

2017-06-03 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80965 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug go/80964] cross-gotools are not executable on host system

2017-06-03 Thread ian at airs dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80964 --- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor --- Those programs are not supposed to be installed in bindir when not doing a native build. I'm not sure why that has gone wrong for you. In your build directory, in gotools/config.status, what are the

[Bug target/80968] New: [SPARC] Stack frame reference allowed in delay slot of return instruction.

2017-06-03 Thread davem at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80968 Bug ID: 80968 Summary: [SPARC] Stack frame reference allowed in delay slot of return instruction. Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/80965] [7/8 Regression] ICE with class argument and -O2 optimization

2017-06-03 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80965 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug fortran/80965] New: ICE with class argument and -O2 optimization

2017-06-03 Thread david.sagan at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80965 Bug ID: 80965 Summary: ICE with class argument and -O2 optimization Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/80966] ICE with -fstack-limit-register and large frames

2017-06-03 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80966 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/80966] New: ICE with -fstack-limit-register and large frames

2017-06-03 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80966 Bug ID: 80966 Summary: ICE with -fstack-limit-register and large frames Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/80967] New: ICE in tsubst_decomp_names, at cp/pt.c:15660

2017-06-03 Thread ryan.burn at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80967 Bug ID: 80967 Summary: ICE in tsubst_decomp_names, at cp/pt.c:15660 Product: gcc Version: c++-concepts Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug sanitizer/80963] UBSAN false positive with visibility=hidden

2017-06-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80963 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > To fix this you need to have the visibility default attribute on the class > Archive . And not just on factory.

[Bug sanitizer/80963] UBSAN false positive with visibility=hidden

2017-06-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80963 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- I think the error message is correct as the class has a linkage of hidden in the shared library. That is Archive in the shared library and in the main executable are considered two different classes. To

[Bug bootstrap/80887] gnat bootstrap fails at s-regpat.o: raised STORAGE_ERROR : stack overflow or erroneous memory access

2017-06-03 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80887 --- Comment #10 from Marc Glisse --- Before FRE, we have the following. I marked with comments the SSA_NAMEs that are value numbered as something other than themselves. f () { unsigned int t2; unsigned int t1; int a; unsigned int u;

[Bug c++/80967] ICE in tsubst_decomp_names, at cp/pt.c:15660

2017-06-03 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80967 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/80956] [7/8 Regression] ICE with abstract class vector

2017-06-03 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80956 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug target/80556] [8 Regression] bootstrap failure for Ada compiler

2017-06-03 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80556 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|WONTFIX