[Bug tree-optimization/81297] [8 Regression] ICE in get_single_symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81297 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/81636] Confusing warning message containing "#‘obj_type_ref’ not supported by expression#"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81636 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/81612] lto1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81612 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Thanks, but I will need output generated with '-E' which will create pre-processed source file that I can test. Can you please create it for me?

[Bug bootstrap/81638] [8 Regression] AIX bootstrap failure due to Recover GOTO predictor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81638 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0 Summary|[7 Regression]

[Bug lto/81612] lto1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81612 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- Ok, are you able to at least append build flags (CFLAGS) to the build system? If so, adding --save-temps and --verbose will save the file and you can attach it here.

[Bug target/81643] New: FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/long_branch_1.c scan-assembler Ltb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81643 Bug ID: 81643 Summary: FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/long_branch_1.c scan-assembler Ltb Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/81297] [8 Regression] ICE in get_single_symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81297 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Aug 1 07:04:10 2017 New Revision: 250758 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250758=gcc=rev Log: 2017-08-01 Richard Biener PR

[Bug target/79499] ICE in rtl_verify_bb_insns, at cfgrtl.c:2661

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79499 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/81641] Assemble failure with named address spaces and -masm=intel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81641 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com See

[Bug tree-optimization/81620] [8 Regression] ICE in is_inv_store_elimination_chain, at tree-predcom.c:1651 with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81620 --- Comment #3 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: amker Date: Tue Aug 1 09:17:29 2017 New Revision: 250763 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250763=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/81620 * tree-predcom.c

[Bug target/81635] nvptx SLP test cases regressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81635 --- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries --- I. The test-case slp.c (minus dg-final checks) looks like this: ... /* { dg-options "-O2 -ftree-slp-vectorize" } */ int p[1000] __attribute__((aligned(8))); int p2[1000] __attribute__((aligned(8))); void

[Bug tree-optimization/81635] [8 Regression] nvptx SLP test cases regressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81635 --- Comment #3 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > So maybe finally a testcase where that SCEV analysis did sth useful... > > x86_64 testcase should be possible with changing the datatype to double? Yep. This

[Bug tree-optimization/81620] [8 Regression] ICE in is_inv_store_elimination_chain, at tree-predcom.c:1651 with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81620 amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/81637] [8 regression] compilation of 416.gamess from spec2006 fails starting with r250670

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81637 amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/81400] Stack smashing not caught by stack protector strong and allowing me to stack smash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81400 --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #6) > TLS canary is initialized by the libc; in Glibc sources you can grep for > THREAD_STACK_SET_GUARD. > > In this example the leftmost byte of the SSP canary is

[Bug lto/81612] lto1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81612 --- Comment #2 from vctrex at mailfence dot com --- The arduino code is: void setup() { Serial.begin(9600); } void loop() { } Arduino:1.8.3 (Linux), Płytka:"Arduino/Genuino Uno" /usr/lib/arduino/arduino-builder -dump-prefs -logger=machine

[Bug target/81641] New: Assemble failure with named address spaces and -masm=intel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81641 Bug ID: 81641 Summary: Assemble failure with named address spaces and -masm=intel Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/81588] [7/8 Regression] Wrong code at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81588 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Aug 1 08:32:37 2017 New Revision: 250760 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250760=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/81588 * tree-ssa-reassoc.c

[Bug tree-optimization/81588] [7/8 Regression] Wrong code at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81588 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Aug 1 08:43:45 2017 New Revision: 250761 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250761=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/81588 * tree-ssa-reassoc.c

[Bug tree-optimization/81627] [8 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3: in check_loop_closed_ssa_use, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:707

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81627 --- Comment #3 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: amker Date: Tue Aug 1 09:20:08 2017 New Revision: 250764 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250764=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/81627 * tree-predcom.c

[Bug c++/81640] [8 Regression] ICE in lookup_fnfields_slot_nolazy w/ -Wshadow=compatible-local

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81640 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Version|7.0

[Bug c++/81642] New: -Wtype-limits should not trigger for defined numbers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81642 Bug ID: 81642 Summary: -Wtype-limits should not trigger for defined numbers Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/81642] -Wtype-limits should not trigger for defined numbers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81642 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug target/81639] New: ICE in rtl_verify_bb_insns, at cfgrtl.c:2669 with a naked function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81639 Bug ID: 81639 Summary: ICE in rtl_verify_bb_insns, at cfgrtl.c:2669 with a naked function Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/81624] [8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr59501-3a.c scan-assembler-not and[^\n\r]*sp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81624 Andrey Guskov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com ---

[Bug tree-optimization/81633] [7/8 Regression] Incorrect floating point result with tree vectoriser

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81633 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- To answer myself, child_index doesn't need to be equal to i, e.g. if some operand is constant in all the statements, then there is no SLP child for it. If there are no NULL oprnd, then we can as well just

[Bug target/81639] ICE in rtl_verify_bb_insns, at cfgrtl.c:2669 with a naked function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81639 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/81640] [8 Regression] ICE in lookup_fnfields_slot_nolazy w/ -Wshadow=compatible-local

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81640 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/81400] Stack smashing not caught by stack protector strong and allowing me to stack smash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81400 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- I don't think we should be adding -lssp automatically. -mstack-protector-guard= is meant mainly for kernel or special purpose libraries, libssp.a we build in gcc is just one of the many possible

[Bug target/81641] Assemble failure with named address spaces and -masm=intel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81641 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/53542] Diagnostic of USE-associated variables shows original instead of renamed symbol name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53542 --- Comment #3 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: dominiq Date: Tue Aug 1 09:02:58 2017 New Revision: 250762 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250762=gcc=rev Log: 2017-08-01 Dominique d'Humieres PR

[Bug c++/81640] New: [8 Regression] ICE in lookup_fnfields_slot_nolazy w/ -Wshadow=compatible-local

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81640 Bug ID: 81640 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in lookup_fnfields_slot_nolazy w/ -Wshadow=compatible-local Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug target/80846] auto-vectorized AVX2 horizontal sum should narrow to 128b right away, to be more efficient for Ryzen and Intel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80846 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Aug 1 08:26:14 2017 New Revision: 250759 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250759=gcc=rev Log: PR target/80846 * optabs.def (vec_extract_optab, vec_init_optab):

[Bug tree-optimization/81633] [7/8 Regression] Incorrect floating point result with tree vectoriser

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81633 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/81588] [7/8 Regression] Wrong code at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81588 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/81640] [8 Regression] ICE in lookup_fnfields_slot_nolazy w/ -Wshadow=compatible-local

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81640 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug target/81635] nvptx SLP test cases regressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81635 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug tree-optimization/81635] [8 Regression] nvptx SLP test cases regressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81635 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |tree-optimization Target

[Bug middle-end/81400] Stack smashing not caught by stack protector strong and allowing me to stack smash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81400 --- Comment #10 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8) > I don't think we should be adding -lssp automatically. > -mstack-protector-guard= > is meant mainly for kernel or special purpose libraries, libssp.a we build >

[Bug middle-end/81400] Stack smashing not caught by stack protector strong and allowing me to stack smash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81400 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/56698] "array subscript is above array bounds" triggered on code that doesn't have that problem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56698 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/56698] "array subscript is above array bounds" triggered on code that doesn't have that problem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56698 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug lto/52322] lto1: internal compiler error: in lto_symtab_register_decl, at lto-symtab.c:148

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52322 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/55808] excessive memory usage from gcc 4.7.2 when compiling mame source code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55808 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c/81566] invalid attribute aligned accepted on functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81566 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|attribute aligned with no |invalid attribute aligned

[Bug other/80437] large decimal numbers in diagnostics are hard to read

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80437 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/53362] gcc 4.7 generates invalid code with -O3 and -mtune=bdver1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53362 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug lto/53312] crash in materialize_cgraph (invalid free)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53312 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/71440] ICE on invalid C++ code on x86_64-linux-gnu: in instantiate_type, at cp/class.c:8247

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71440 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug other/80437] large decimal numbers in diagnostics are hard to read

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80437 --- Comment #4 from David Malcolm --- If the warning is based of a const, maybe lead with that e.g. in the 2nd place here: bug.c:11:5: warning: 'memset': specified size 18446744073709551611 (aka 0x___fffb, 1<<64 - 5, SOME_CONST)

[Bug other/80437] large decimal numbers in diagnostics are hard to read

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80437 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug rtl-optimization/81625] GCC v4.7 ... v8 is bloating code by > 25% compared to v3.4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81625 Fredrik Hederstierna changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug target/52811] -O3 flag makes xorg-server-1.11.4 compile fail on amd64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52811 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/81503] [8 Regression] Wrong code at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81503 --- Comment #9 from Bill Schmidt --- This is overkill, it has some test case fallout. Will have to look a bit deeper.

[Bug other/80437] large decimal numbers in diagnostics are hard to read

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80437 --- Comment #3 from David Malcolm --- Maybe could also make creative use of underscores in large hex values to make things easier on the eye e.g.: bug.c:11:5: warning: 'memset': specified size 18446744073709551611 (aka 0x___fffb,

[Bug target/81654] Should interrupt attribute be allowed together with naked attribute?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81654 --- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Tue Aug 1 20:25:41 2017 New Revision: 250793 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250793=gcc=rev Log: 386: Disallow naked attribute with interrupt attribute gcc/ PR

[Bug c/57821] 'array is too large' error is missing when sizetype overflows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57821 --- Comment #13 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- Previous discussions in this bug suggest it was specific to 32-bit HOST_WIDE_INT. HOST_WIDE_INT is now always 64-bit.

[Bug tree-optimization/81038] [8 regression] test case g++.dg/vect/slp-pr56812.cc fails starting with r248678

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81038 Steve Ellcey changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/48256] gcc4.4.5 internal compiler error: in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:1954

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48256 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/81657] New: [8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/20050503-1.c scan-assembler-not call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81657 Bug ID: 81657 Summary: [8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/20050503-1.c scan-assembler-not call Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug driver/81658] New: gcc configured with --enable-default-pie on SPARC produces buggy executable from working .o files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81658 Bug ID: 81658 Summary: gcc configured with --enable-default-pie on SPARC produces buggy executable from working .o files Product: gcc Version: 6.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug other/49284] -fdump-ipa-cgraph leads to ICE in generate_canonical_option, at opts-common.c:303

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49284 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug other/80437] large decimal numbers in diagnostics are hard to read

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80437 --- Comment #2 from David Malcolm --- Maybe all four (decimal, hex, formula, and constant): bug.c:11:5: warning: 'memset': specified size 18446744073709551611 (aka 0xfffb, 1<<64 - 5, SOME_CONST) exceeds maximum object size

[Bug c/81656] New: incompatible _Alignas silently accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81656 Bug ID: 81656 Summary: incompatible _Alignas silently accepted Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug target/81654] Should interrupt attribute be allowed together with naked attribute?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81654 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/81605] -Wignored-attributes emitted when decltype(function) used in template for function with __nonnull__

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81605 --- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- In my view, whenever it's meaningful to act on an attribute for a call via a function pointer (e.g. format, format_arg, const, pure, noreturn, ...), the attribute should apply to the type

[Bug target/81647] inconsistent LTGT behavior at different optimization levels on AArch64.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81647 --- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- Indeed, it's purely the *internal* LTGT_EXPR and LTGT RTL for which the semantics are unclear; the semantics of the built-in function are unambiguous (exception only for signaling NaNs).

[Bug c/57821] 'array is too large' error is missing when sizetype overflows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57821 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/46861] alpha gcc 4.2 -fPIC visibility hidden => gp-relative relocation against dynamic symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46861 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Target||alphaev5-unknown-linux-gnu

[Bug target/81654] Should interrupt attribute be allowed together with naked attribute?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81654 --- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak --- Short answer to the question in the summary: No. You are out of luck with every function that touches the stack in any kind of automatic way. Patch that makes interrupt and naked attribute mutually exclusive

[Bug middle-end/81657] [8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/20050503-1.c scan-assembler-not call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81657 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/81641] Assemble failure with named address spaces and -masm=intel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81641 --- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Tue Aug 1 22:06:11 2017 New Revision: 250801 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250801=gcc=rev Log: PR target/81641 * config/i386/i386.c

[Bug c/81656] incompatible _Alignas silently accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81656 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- To be clear: that requirement is not a constraint, so no diagnostic is required. Diagnosis may make sense for _Alignas, but I don't think different choices of __attribute__ ((aligned))

[Bug gcov-profile/81561] [7 Regression] Segfault in gcov with -a argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81561 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Tue Aug 1 14:49:54 2017 New Revision: 250782 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250782=gcc=rev Log: Fix segfault in gcov.c (PR gcov-profile/81561). 2017-08-01 Martin Liska

[Bug gcov-profile/81561] [7 Regression] Segfault in gcov with -a argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81561 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/69981] -f[no]keep-static-consts has no effect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69981 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug libgomp/81591] segmentation fault when using priorities of nested tasks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81591 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- I believe the check that triggers here is just wrong, if we have 2 different queuest, it is very well possible that they will have different tasks with the same priority as the next candidates. And the code

[Bug c/77331] incorrect range location in -Wformat with a concatenated format literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77331 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/80619] bad fix-it hint for GCC %lu directive with int argument: %wu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80619 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/81626] Need effective target omp_target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81626 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/78736] enum warnings in GCC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78736 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/81646] i386 SSE2 compilation mode which preserves psABI stack alignment without requiring it

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81646 --- Comment #3 from Florian Weimer --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > The Linux ABI says the stack should be 16-byte alignment, anything else is a > bug. The GCC manual recommends this (under -mincoming-stack-boundary):

[Bug tree-optimization/80925] [8 Regression] vect peeling failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80925 --- Comment #20 from Steve Ellcey --- Author: sje Date: Tue Aug 1 15:37:22 2017 New Revision: 250783 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250783=gcc=rev Log: 2017-08-01 Steve Ellcey PR tree-optimization/80925

[Bug target/81646] New: i386 SSE2 compilation mode which preserves psABI stack alignment without requiring it

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81646 Bug ID: 81646 Summary: i386 SSE2 compilation mode which preserves psABI stack alignment without requiring it Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/81647] inconsistent LTGT behavior at different optimization levels on AArch64.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81647 --- Comment #1 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- According to thread https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-02/msg00583.html it's still not clear if LTGT should be quite or singaling, but inconsistent behavior seems not correct here.

[Bug target/81646] i386 SSE2 compilation mode which preserves psABI stack alignment without requiring it

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81646 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug tree-optimization/71752] [7 Regression] ICE in compute_live_loop_exits, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:229 w/ -O1 -ftree-vectorize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71752 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Aug 1 13:58:13 2017 New Revision: 250779 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250779=gcc=rev Log: 2017-08-01 Richard Biener PR

[Bug c/80383] wrong caret location and missing detail in warning: initializer element is not a constant expression on a signed overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80383 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/81639] ICE in rtl_verify_bb_insns, at cfgrtl.c:2669 with a naked function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81639 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c/80454] -Wmissing-braces wrongly warns about universal zero initializer {0}

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80454 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/80409] Document that va_arg(ap, void*) can be used to consume any pointer argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80409 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||documentation, easyhack

[Bug bootstrap/81638] [8 Regression] AIX bootstrap failure due to Recover GOTO predictor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81638 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 41878 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41878=edit Reduced test-case Reduced test-case that contains maybe uninitialized warning from the mentioned commit. Note that

[Bug rtl-optimization/81644] ICE in rtl_verify_bb_insn, BBRO pass duplicates BB that ends with flow control insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81644 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86 CC|

[Bug bootstrap/81638] [8 Regression] AIX bootstrap failure due to Recover GOTO predictor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81638 --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 41882 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41882=edit Suggested patch Patch I'm suggesting. Can you David please test it?

[Bug tree-optimization/81635] [8 Regression] nvptx SLP test cases regressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81635 --- Comment #5 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #4) > Looking at the x86_64 example, the difference between the signed and > unsigned case happens here in split_constant_offset_1: Same thing for nvptx.

[Bug target/81647] New: inconsistent LTGT behavior at different optimization levels on AArch64.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81647 Bug ID: 81647 Summary: inconsistent LTGT behavior at different optimization levels on AArch64. Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/81635] [8 Regression] nvptx SLP test cases regressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81635 --- Comment #7 from Tom de Vries --- Author: vries Date: Tue Aug 1 13:52:14 2017 New Revision: 250778 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250778=gcc=rev Log: Simplify nvptx/slp* test-cases Use signed loop iteration variable in nvtpx/slp*

[Bug tree-optimization/81633] [7/8 Regression] Incorrect floating point result with tree vectoriser

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81633 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Aug 1 13:58:13 2017 New Revision: 250779 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250779=gcc=rev Log: 2017-08-01 Richard Biener PR

[Bug sanitizer/81645] Learn UBSAN to support -fsanitize=builtin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81645 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|7.0 |8.0 Target Milestone|8.0

[Bug target/81646] i386 SSE2 compilation mode which preserves psABI stack alignment without requiring it

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81646 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Yes, I think everything asked for is already present via those options (just no way to configure a different default). Thus either INVALID or WORKSFORME. Pick ;)

  1   2   >