https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81783
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
I have a patch, but as usually, there's a problem with constants coming from
macros...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81485
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81736
--- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Thu Aug 10 15:29:05 2017
New Revision: 251028
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251028=gcc=rev
Log:
i386: Don't use frame pointer without stack access
When there is no stack
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81800
Bug ID: 81800
Summary: [8 regression] on aarch64 ilp32 lrint should not be
inlined as two instructions
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67638
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81804
Bug ID: 81804
Summary: m32c ICE during configure at leaf_function_p, at
final.c:4317
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81805
Bug ID: 81805
Summary: Another libgomp.c/for-5.c failure on nvptx -- illegal
memory access
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 8.0.0 20170810 (experimental) [trunk revision 251019] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -O2 -c small.c
$
$ gcc-trunk -O3 -c small.c
small.c: In function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81800
--- Comment #1 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
b.c:
long f(double x)
{
return __builtin_lrint(x);
}
and an example value where the exceptions are wrong is 0x1p32 + 0.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81801
Bug ID: 81801
Summary: [PATCH] Difference of two pointers generates signed
overflow
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81803
James Cowgill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||james410 at cowgill dot org.uk
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81357
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81803
Bug ID: 81803
Summary: Miscompilation at -O1 on mips64el
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81797
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Do you have the file $target/libstdc++-v3/include/stamp-bits-sup ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81795
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81485
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81800
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81802
Bug ID: 81802
Summary: Report cuLaunchKernel launch dimensions in
GOMP_OFFLOAD_run
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81671
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Aug 11 05:35:39 2017
New Revision: 251046
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251046=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/81671 - nullptr_t template parameter
* pt.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79391
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81643
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81519
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81784
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu Aug 10 08:54:04 2017
New Revision: 251021
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251021=gcc=rev
Log:
PR testsuite/81784
* gcc.dg/compare2.c: Update dg-bogus and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81784
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40298
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81790
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81791
Bug ID: 81791
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in
cfg_layout_redirect_edge_and_branch, at cfgrtl.c:4422
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81791
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81791
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81355
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||5.4.0, 6.3.0, 7.1.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81355
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Thu Aug 10 07:43:49 2017
New Revision: 251020
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251020=gcc=rev
Log:
Fix target attribute handling (PR c++/81355).
2017-08-10 Martin Liska
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69004
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69025
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69026
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81389
rockeet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rockeet at gmail dot com
--- Comment #9 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81790
Bug ID: 81790
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in vn_nary_build_or_lookup_1, at
tree-ssa-sccvn.c:1738
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80551
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #3)
> It apparently started failing last week of January 2017. Only 64-bit
> fails, -m32 is fine.
>
> I don't know where that missing function name is coming
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77732
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81337
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81691
Igor Venevtsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||igor.venevtsev at intel dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81797
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I don't see how this can happen, that header is present in the libstdc++ source
tree and there's nothing target-specific about it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67638
--- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> Can't reproduce with cross compiler on trunk and gcc-5 branch. Is it
> reproducible with cross compiler? Which options do you use?
You have to use -m4 or -m4a (SH4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81485
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2017-08-08 00:00:00 |2017-8-10
--- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81485
--- Comment #6 from Oleg Endo ---
And in fact, there has been a change to the function sh_find_set_of_reg. I'd
have to dig through the archives etc to find out what was going on there.
Meanwhile, it seems that the small backport patch below
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81802
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81805
--- Comment #1 from Alexander Monakov ---
Can't reproduce this on my end. Are you going to proceed with analyzing the
failure?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81803
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81141
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81799
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81806
Bug ID: 81806
Summary: Split in pbds works in O(n) instead of O(log n)
Product: gcc
Version: 6.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81586
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81586
--- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Thu Aug 10 17:40:11 2017
New Revision: 251029
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251029=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/81586 - valgrind error in output_buffer_append_r with -Wall
gcc/ChangeLog:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81359
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Aug 10 19:55:48 2017
New Revision: 251036
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251036=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/81359 - Unparsed NSDMI error from SFINAE context.
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81738
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Thu Aug 10 19:58:16 2017
New Revision: 251037
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251037=gcc=rev
Log:
PR81738: Split vect-alias-check-6.c
The second loop in the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81738
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81810
Bug ID: 81810
Summary: unused strcpy to a local buffer not eliminated
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81811
Bug ID: 81811
Summary: missing -Wreturn-local-addr returning strcpy result
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81808
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81708
--- Comment #12 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Aug 10 20:59:10 2017
New Revision: 251040
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251040=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/81708
* config/i386/i386.opt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81811
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81812
Bug ID: 81812
Summary: Empty virtual function fails to compile
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81812
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Which target is this on?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81812
--- Comment #2 from Ben Woodard ---
Uncommenting the printf allows it to compile.
This showed up on F26 x86_64 compiling MRNet
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81808
--- Comment #7 from David Edelsohn ---
I have no objection to skipping the test on AIX if the test is not correct for
AIX behavior.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81812
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81803
--- Comment #2 from Aurelien Jarno ---
(In reply to James Cowgill from comment #1)
> Here's another testcase which is reduced a bit further using creduce. It
> requires -O2 to trigger the bug (but that may be unrelated).
I reported it as a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81798
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79845
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81808
Bug ID: 81808
Summary: 27_io /basic_fstream/53984.cc failure on AIX
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81808
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81808
--- Comment #3 from David Edelsohn ---
After in >> x, x appears to contain the value 0x02ff22770.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80452
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81807
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64*-*-*, |
|aarch64*-*-*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80452
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Aug 10 19:07:30 2017
New Revision: 251035
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251035=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/80452 - Core 1579, implicit move semantics on return/throw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81808
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to David Edelsohn from comment #3)
> After in >> x, x appears to contain the value 0x02ff22770.
That's just an indeterminate value because it was never initialized, and
doesn't get written to by
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80451
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81797
Bug ID: 81797
Summary: gcc 7.1.0 fails to build on macOS 10.13 (High Sierra):
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81798
Bug ID: 81798
Summary: Please introduce new attribute to tell that function
zeroes returned memory
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81485
--- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3)
>
> Good, I can confirm it works for GCC 5. Let's then bisect that..
I'm not sure whether this will reveal anything useful.
It's probably just a bug in the function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81795
--- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #1)
> You're right, do you want to send a patch or should I handle it?
It'd probably be better if you handled it; my hard drive that has the ssh keys
that let me
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81807
Bug ID: 81807
Summary: many *.cc asan tests fail on powerpc64
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81805
--- Comment #3 from Alexander Monakov ---
The new testcase fails on any target and not related to offloading. Simplified
further:
#define N 32ULL
int a[N];
const unsigned long long c = 0x7fffULL;
f2_tpf_static32 (void)
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81807
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64*-*-* |powerpc64*-*-*,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81808
--- Comment #2 from David Edelsohn ---
Created attachment 41967
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41967=edit
Pre-processed source of testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80452
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80451
Bug 80451 depends on bug 80452, which changed state.
Bug 80452 Summary: [DR 1579] incorrect value category deduced for return value
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80452
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81337
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Bug 52477 deals with the parallel issue for construction. As I mentioned
there, I think the right solution is to handle attribute constructor/destructor
using the C++ __static_initialization_and_destruction
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81482
--- Comment #4 from kloetzl ---
> And changing the algorithm to make no copies would not make it opaque, because
> the lack of copies would be observable. As the standard says, whether copies
> are made or not is unspecified. So if you want to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81779
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81792
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81784
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80551
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Why disable it? Can the feature not work, can the test not work?
Disabling the test is papering over the problem as far as I see.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80551
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #5)
> Why disable it? Can the feature not work, can the test not work?
>
> Disabling the test is papering over the problem as far as I see.
The test does not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80551
--- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Why can't the unwinder find the function name here?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81805
--- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries ---
Simplified version, aborts in host code because loop has no effect:
...
#include
extern void abort ();
#define N 32ULL
#pragma omp declare target
int a[N];
#pragma omp end declare target
const unsigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81803
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52477
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81337
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52477
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81809
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
See Also|
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
