https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81361
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou ---
Created attachment 42177
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42177=edit
Tentative fix
Lightly tested on Darwin and Linux so far.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81128
--- Comment #14 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri Sep 15 09:13:29 2017
New Revision: 252792
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252792=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport r249735
2017-09-15 Martin Liska
Backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39851
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81361
--- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou ---
> (1) The failure reported in pr82141 does not need -O2:
>
> ada/rts% /opt/gcc/build_w/gcc/xgcc -B/opt/gcc/build_w/gcc/ -c g-exptty.adb
>
> raised RTSFIND.RE_NOT_AVAILABLE : rtsfind.adb:851
Yes, it does
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81361
--- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou ---
Bootstrap completed on Darwin with the tentative fix (and the workaround for PR
target/80556) and the ACATS testsuite is clean.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82001
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri Sep 15 12:14:19 2017
New Revision: 252812
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252812=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport r251530
2017-09-15 Martin Liska
Backport from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81355
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri Sep 15 12:14:01 2017
New Revision: 252811
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252811=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport r251020
2017-09-15 Martin Liska
Backport from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81224
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri Sep 15 12:14:40 2017
New Revision: 252813
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252813=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport r249728
2017-09-15 Martin Liska
Backport from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82195
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Fri Sep 15 12:23:57 2017
New Revision: 252815
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252815=gcc=rev
Log:
[demangler] Fix nested generic lambda
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78648
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63361
--- Comment #18 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri Sep 15 09:13:57 2017
New Revision: 252793
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252793=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport r250336
2017-09-15 Martin Liska
Backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80947
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Vlad Zolotarov from comment #10)
> (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #9)
> > It says not to attach an archive containing the things we don't want (e.g.
> > sources without includes).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82217
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81128
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81361
--- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Darwin's linker (ld64) needs code/data to be separable into "atoms" =>
> non-zero-length chunks of code/data starting with a linker-visible label.
My initial assumption, but I don't think so in the end.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82112
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Sep 15 11:24:49 2017
New Revision: 252804
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252804=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-09-12 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81325
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Sep 15 11:26:03 2017
New Revision: 252805
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252805=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-09-14 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70123
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Note the r251855 incremental fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81863
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82195
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Bug 54367 depends on bug 82195, which changed state.
Bug 82195 Summary: Undemangleable lambda
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82195
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82219
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81355
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri Sep 15 09:17:18 2017
New Revision: 252795
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252795=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport r251020
2017-09-15 Martin Liska
Backport from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39851
--- Comment #14 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri Sep 15 09:19:36 2017
New Revision: 252797
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252797=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport r251400
2017-09-15 Martin Liska
Backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82217
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Sep 15 09:19:36 2017
New Revision: 252796
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252796=gcc=rev
Log:
2017-09-15 Richard Biener
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39851
--- Comment #15 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri Sep 15 09:20:37 2017
New Revision: 252798
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252798=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport r251406
2017-09-15 Martin Liska
Backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82001
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri Sep 15 09:21:42 2017
New Revision: 252799
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252799=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport r251530
2017-09-15 Martin Liska
Backport from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81650
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81361
--- Comment #13 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #12)
> Bootstrap completed on Darwin with the tentative fix (and the workaround for
> PR target/80556) and the ACATS testsuite is clean.
Also, doing a bootstrap on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81355
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81696
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81224
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82001
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63361
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81923
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63361
--- Comment #19 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri Sep 15 12:13:21 2017
New Revision: 252809
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252809=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport r250336
2017-09-15 Martin Liska
Backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81696
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri Sep 15 12:13:42 2017
New Revision: 252810
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252810=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport r250951
2017-09-15 Martin Liska
Backport from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81128
--- Comment #16 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri Sep 15 12:13:04 2017
New Revision: 252808
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252808=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport r249735
2017-09-15 Martin Liska
Backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81715
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81361
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ---
It looks like the DW_CFA_set_loc instruction is mishandled in FDEs:
.set L$set$24,LEFDE3-LASFDE3
.long L$set$24 # FDE Length
LASFDE3:
.long LASFDE3-EH_frame1 # FDE CIE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Sep 15 12:11:13 2017
New Revision: 252807
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252807=gcc=rev
Log:
2017-09-15 Richard Biener
PR lto/81968
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81066
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81361
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
(1) The failure reported in pr82141 does not need -O2:
ada/rts% /opt/gcc/build_w/gcc/xgcc -B/opt/gcc/build_w/gcc/ -c g-exptty.adb
raised RTSFIND.RE_NOT_AVAILABLE : rtsfind.adb:851
(2) I see similar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81696
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri Sep 15 09:15:32 2017
New Revision: 252794
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252794=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport r250951
2017-09-15 Martin Liska
Backport from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81361
--- Comment #9 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #7)
> Created attachment 42177 [details]
> Tentative fix
>
> Lightly tested on Darwin and Linux so far.
Hi Eric,
Will look at this patch shortly;
Darwin's linker
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82112
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Sep 15 11:22:57 2017
New Revision: 252803
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252803=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-09-12 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81224
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri Sep 15 12:15:52 2017
New Revision: 252814
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252814=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport r249728
2017-09-15 Martin Liska
Backport from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67591
--- Comment #4 from Christophe Lyon ---
Author: clyon
Date: Fri Sep 15 13:12:33 2017
New Revision: 252817
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252817=gcc=rev
Log:
[PR target/67591] ARM v8 Thumb IT blocks are deprecated
2017-09-15 Christophe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82114
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82220
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82215
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
Second thoughts on the parsing *.mod file thing... that
would not work very well because compile-time constants would
be expanded already.
A source-to-source-utility (or compiler flag) would be better.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81314
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Sep 15 11:27:07 2017
New Revision: 252806
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252806=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-09-14 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968
--- Comment #16 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
> Thanks for the detailed analysis. Indeed
>
> /* Mark sections as preserved that are required by to be preserved
> sections. */
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82221
Bug ID: 82221
Summary: internal compiler error: in print_reg, at
config/i386/i386.c:17656
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82221
--- Comment #3 from Josh Poimboeuf ---
This has been seen on Fedora GCC 7.1.1 and Debian GCC 6.2.0-3.
This bug can be recreated with the above kernel git branch and the attached
.config by typing "make ARCH=i386 arch/x86/events/core.o".
I've
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79987
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82069
--- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Another testcase:
struct A {
void foo(int *);
};
struct B : A {
template void bar(int *p1) {
[&] { foo(p1); };
};
};
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65530
Bug 65530 depends on bug 79987, which changed state.
Bug 79987 Summary: [CHKP] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:12151
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79987
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81715
--- Comment #3 from Arnd Bergmann ---
(In reply to Arnd Bergmann from comment #2)
> Created attachment 42178 [details]
> preprocessed linux/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv090x.c, compressed
>
> This is one of the typical files showing the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21850
--- Comment #6 from palves at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: palves
Date: Fri Sep 15 14:53:48 2017
New Revision: 252822
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252822=gcc=rev
Log:
Fix compile time error when using ansidecl.h with an old version of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82221
--- Comment #2 from Josh Poimboeuf ---
Created attachment 42180
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42180=edit
kernel config file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82221
--- Comment #1 from Josh Poimboeuf ---
Created attachment 42179
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42179=edit
preprocessed source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82192
--- Comment #16 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #15)
> Also, stripped gcc/*.o files from the latest stage between non-patched and
> patched differ just in the expected combine.o and cc1*checksum.o.
I see no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82158
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82192
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Sep 15 15:54:04 2017
New Revision: 252824
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252824=gcc=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/82192
* combine.c (make_extraction): Don't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82184
--- Comment #9 from Andrey Guskov ---
Yep, 187 seems to be working now.
Not sure about performance, will check this next week when the automatic perf
build arrives.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82220
--- Comment #2 from Alexander Nesterovskiy ---
Yes, I've applied a patch and looks like it helped:
---
Overhead SamplesSymbol
trunk@252796 + patch
31.57%412037mgau_eval
30.54%--> 397608vector_gautbl_eval_logs3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81715
--- Comment #2 from Arnd Bergmann ---
Created attachment 42178
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42178=edit
preprocessed linux/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv090x.c, compressed
This is one of the typical files showing the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79987
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri Sep 15 14:11:57 2017
New Revision: 252820
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252820=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport r251049
2017-09-15 Martin Liska
Backport from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79987
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri Sep 15 14:11:27 2017
New Revision: 252819
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252819=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport r251049
2017-09-15 Martin Liska
Backport from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81361
--- Comment #14 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #13)
> (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #12)
> > Bootstrap completed on Darwin with the tentative fix (and the workaround for
> > PR target/80556) and the ACATS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71026
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Fri Sep 15 16:17:55 2017
New Revision: 252827
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252827=gcc=rev
Log:
2017-09-15 Jackson Woodruff
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64644
--- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Sep 15 19:22:35 2017
New Revision: 252835
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252835=gcc=rev
Log:
/cp
2017-09-15 Manuel Lopez-Ibanez
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82223
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
What target is this for?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64644
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81361
--- Comment #21 from Iain Sandoe ---
Created attachment 42183
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42183=edit
assembler for C++ testcase with .cfi_xxx
this gives, when linked to the GCC8 static libstdc++ (I have a patch that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81361
--- Comment #20 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #19)
> Created attachment 42182 [details]
> assembler for pr81241 Ada testcase with .cfi_xxx
>
> I rebased my patches to enable .cfi_xxx for Darwin (no claim that they
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68177
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||benni.buch at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82221
--- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Josh Poimboeuf from comment #9)
> I might be misunderstanding, but I don't think we need DRAP for our use
> case. We just need assurance that the frame pointer (RBP) has been set up
> before the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82223
Bug ID: 82223
Summary: Incorrect optimization for lossy round trips of
arithmetic types
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82223
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse ---
(float)INT_MAX gets rounded to 2^31. When you try to convert it to int, it
doesn't fit, so the compiler is at liberty to return INT_MAX if it likes.
clang's -fsanitize=undefined does complain on your code (not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71026
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968
--- Comment #17 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On September 15, 2017 5:02:36 PM GMT+02:00, "ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE" wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968
>
>--- Comment #16 from ro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81361
--- Comment #19 from Iain Sandoe ---
Created attachment 42182
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42182=edit
assembler for pr81241 Ada testcase with .cfi_xxx
I rebased my patches to enable .cfi_xxx for Darwin (no claim that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82215
--- Comment #5 from Lee Busby ---
Thank you very much for reading my report, Mr. Koenig. I probably should have
pulled out footnote #6 as an explicit comment here, as it comes closest to my
own first guess at a "feature request".
As you have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81361
--- Comment #15 from Eric Botcazou ---
Created attachment 42181
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42181=edit
C++ testcase
To be compiled at -O2 and run:
(botcazou@goole) ~ $ g++ -o t t.C -O2
(botcazou@goole) ~ $ ./t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82221
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8
Bug ID: 8
Summary: wrong uninitialized reference in lambda capture in
fold expression
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81361
--- Comment #17 from Eric Botcazou ---
> So, FAOD, the fix is a work-around for a bug in either the assembler or
> unwinder? (the original DWARF output is expected to be well-formed?)
Yes, that's my understanding.
> Given that the GCC unwinder
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82221
--- Comment #7 from Josh Poimboeuf ---
Putting "sp" in the clobbers list is something that was suggested to me on the
GCC mailing list a while back. And, other than this rare bug, it seems to do
exactly what we want, which is, force GCC to save
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82221
--- Comment #9 from Josh Poimboeuf ---
I might be misunderstanding, but I don't think we need DRAP for our use case.
We just need assurance that the frame pointer (RBP) has been set up before the
inline asm is inserted.
If clobbering "sp"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81361
--- Comment #16 from Eric Botcazou ---
> I did this and there's nothing interesting revealed - everything
> consistently gives the same output (and dwarfdump --verify claims it's
> valid).
Not for me though. Here's the output on the C++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82221
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82221
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu ---
Try this one:
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
index 4f0414ffa9d..ee27273c80d 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
@@ -13801,6 +13801,7 @@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79622
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 15 Sep 2017, spop at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79622
>
> --- Comment #4 from Sebastian Pop ---
> Yes, that phi node looks like a reduction.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82114
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri Sep 15 08:19:33 2017
New Revision: 252789
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252789=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport r252024
2017-09-15 Martin Liska
Backport from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39851
--- Comment #13 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri Sep 15 08:18:34 2017
New Revision: 252787
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252787=gcc=rev
Log:
Subject: Backport r251400
2017-09-15 Martin Liska
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82001
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri Sep 15 08:19:15 2017
New Revision: 252788
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252788=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport r251530
2017-09-15 Martin Liska
Backport from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82145
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Committed just the postreload.c fix + testcase so far, that should fix it, the
i386.c change is still waiting for review, but is just a cleanup.
1 - 100 of 166 matches
Mail list logo