[Bug rtl-optimization/82602] IRA considers volatile asm to be moveable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82602 --- Comment #16 from David Brown --- (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #8) > (In reply to David Brown from comment #7) > > > There is no intention to make "asm volatile" a barrier, as you get with a > > memory clobber. The intention is to

[Bug tree-optimization/82604] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2006 410.bwaves ~50% performance regression with trunk@253679 when ftree-parallelize-loops is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82604 --- Comment #2 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > I suppose loop distribution inserted a version copy turning this into a > non-perfect nest for outer loops and thus disabling autopar there. > > What

[Bug gcov-profile/82614] New: GCOV crashes while parsing gcda file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82614 Bug ID: 82614 Summary: GCOV crashes while parsing gcda file Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/81742] c++: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81742 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/67629] bogus -Wreturn-type in a function with tautological if-else

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67629 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- That's for CC. However as the warning is triggered early, we don't have optimized IL: (gdb) p debug_function(cfun->decl, 0) foo (_Bool a) { int D.1836; [0.00%] [count: INV]: if (a != 0) goto ;

[Bug bootstrap/82610] [8 Regression] Bootstrap fails on macOS 10.13 because of abort redefinition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82610 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/82613] New: Cannot access private definitions in base clause of friend class template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82613 Bug ID: 82613 Summary: Cannot access private definitions in base clause of friend class template Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/71197] for range loop causes an error with inline function references

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71197 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/79689] ICE with trailing return type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79689 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/79711] [concepts] ICE in instantiate_decl, at cp/pt.c:22474

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79711 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/81797] gcc 7.1.0 fails to build on macOS 10.13 (High Sierra):

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81797 --- Comment #29 from Francois-Xavier Coudert --- As suggested by Marc, I've removed the @ from include/Makefile.in, and removed the leading - for lines with LN_S. The result of "make -d --trace -j8 all-target-libstdc++-v3", in a build where

[Bug tree-optimization/82604] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2006 410.bwaves ~50% performance regression with trunk@253679 when ftree-parallelize-loops is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82604 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 19 Oct 2017, amker at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82604 > > --- Comment #2 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from

[Bug tree-optimization/82604] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2006 410.bwaves ~50% performance regression with trunk@253679 when ftree-parallelize-loops is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82604 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug c/60440] Bogus -Wreturn-type warning after error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60440 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Thanks for CC. Patches are currently under review. About this PR: as 'b' is undeclared, the whole statement with the expression is ignored and we have: (gdb) p debug_function(cfun->decl, 0) f (int a) {

[Bug fortran/82568] [6/7/8] ICE with do-loop inside BLOCK inside omp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82568 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Oct 19 07:38:59 2017 New Revision: 253878 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253878=gcc=rev Log: PR fortran/82568 * gfortran.h (gfc_resolve_do_iterator): Add a bool

[Bug sanitizer/82517] use-after-scope for a variable with big alignment causes a false positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82517 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Thu Oct 19 07:50:48 2017 New Revision: 253879 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253879=gcc=rev Log: Do not instrument use-after-scope for vars with large alignment (PR

[Bug lto/82575] [8 Regression] lto debugobj references __gnu_lto_slim, ld test liblto-17 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82575 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Alan Modra from comment #2) > Created attachment 42397 [details] > proposed patch > > I hadn't debugged past grepping for "debugobj" when I created the bugzilla. > Now that I've looked

[Bug c++/71082] Internal compiler error when create initializer list with pointers to members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71082 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/70869] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault on array of pointer to function members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70869 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||farmaazon at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug gcov-profile/82614] GCOV crashes while parsing gcda file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82614 --- Comment #1 from Marco Castelluccio --- Created attachment 42399 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42399=edit GCNO file

[Bug target/82580] Optimize comparisons for __int128 on x86-64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82580 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Oct 19 08:37:04 2017 New Revision: 253884 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253884=gcc=rev Log: PR target/82580 * config/i386/i386.md (setcc + movzbl to xor +

[Bug sanitizer/82517] use-after-scope for a variable with big alignment causes a false positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82517 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.0 Known to fail|

[Bug c++/81024] ICE within convert_like_real with std::initializer_list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81024 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/82612] missing -Warray-bounds on a non-zero offset from the address of a non-array object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82612 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- But we are not even having an ARRAY_REF in the IL ... So try int g (int i) { int (*p)[2] = (int (*)[2]) return (*p)[2]; } where we also do not warn. Or the VLA variant: int g (int i, int n) {

[Bug c++/79917] Internal compiler error with variadic template and concepts, internal compiler error: in tsubst_constraint, at cp/constraint.cc:1956

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79917 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/82545] [7 Regression] -O2: ICE in gimple_split_edge, at tree-cfg.c:2838, during GIMPLE pass sanopt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82545 --- Comment #10 from Ivo Raisr --- Thank you for the fix. Works on the full source file as well.

[Bug c++/79781] ICE on valid C++ code with -std=c++14 (in assemble_integer, at varasm.c:2733)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79781 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---

[Bug gcov-profile/82614] GCOV crashes while parsing gcda file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82614 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/55189] enable -Wreturn-type by default

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55189 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug driver/82534] [meta-bug] POSIX compliant compiler options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82534 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/82615] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2006 453.povray ~10% performance deviation with trunk@248863

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82615 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2017-10-19 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/82615] New: [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2006 453.povray ~10% performance deviation with trunk@248863

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82615 Bug ID: 82615 Summary: [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2006 453.povray ~10% performance deviation with trunk@248863 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug gcov-profile/82614] GCOV crashes while parsing gcda file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82614 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Marco Castelluccio from comment #3) > > Thanks for the report Marco. Looks it comes from Firefox, am I right? > > Yes, that's correct. Actually, from a build of the JS shell. > > > Which

[Bug c/81795] Stray "originally defined here" when using -Wc++-compat with #pragma GCC diagnostic push/pop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81795 --- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager --- Compiling with an older GCC makes me wonder: could the fix for this bug also be backported to the other open branches?

[Bug lto/82575] [8 Regression] lto debugobj references __gnu_lto_slim, ld test liblto-17 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82575 --- Comment #5 from Alan Modra --- > --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- > Hmm, but those symbols will prevail, enlarging the final symbol table? > Or are weak + hidden symbols removed even for shared libaries? Well, they are still

[Bug sanitizer/82616] New: ../bfd/.libs/libbfd.a(plugin.o): undefined reference to symbol 'dlsym@@GLIBC_2.16'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82616 Bug ID: 82616 Summary: ../bfd/.libs/libbfd.a(plugin.o): undefined reference to symbol 'dlsym@@GLIBC_2.16' Product: gcc Version: 8.0 URL:

[Bug fortran/81048] [6/7/8 Regression] incorrect derived type initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81048 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Thu Oct 19 12:16:41 2017 New Revision: 253889 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253889=gcc=rev Log: 2017-10-19 Paul Thomas PR fortran/81048 *

[Bug fortran/81048] [6/7/8 Regression] incorrect derived type initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81048 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/82618] New: Inefficient double-word subtration on x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82618 Bug ID: 82618 Summary: Inefficient double-word subtration on x86_64 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/82580] Optimize comparisons for __int128 on x86-64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82580 --- Comment #15 from Morwenn --- That was insanely fast, thanks a lot! :)

[Bug sanitizer/82595] bootstrap fails in libsanitizer on powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82595 --- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > Well, lsan_preinit.o shouldn't be linked into liblsan.so.*, either we should > just ignore it completely, or install and link in like asan_preinit.o or >

[Bug target/82618] Inefficient double-word subtration on x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82618 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Or add a pattern for (set (reg:DI 100) (subreg:DI (minus:TI (reg/v:TI 90 [ x ]) (reg/v:TI 94 [ y ])) 8)) that combine would match and then reload that differently if not using SSE regs and

[Bug gcov-profile/82614] GCOV crashes while parsing gcda file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82614 --- Comment #3 from Marco Castelluccio --- > Thanks for the report Marco. Looks it comes from Firefox, am I right? Yes, that's correct. Actually, from a build of the JS shell. > Which version of GCC have you been using? The build was done

[Bug c++/81942] ICE on empty constexpr constructor with C++14

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81942 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nsz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #18

[Bug c++/82023] [arm] constexpr ICE: in cxx_eval_constant_expression, at cp/constexpr.c:4556

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82023 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug driver/81829] [7 Regression] /usr/bin/gcc-{ar,nm,ranlib} segfault without arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81829 --- Comment #8 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Thu Oct 19 11:08:28 2017 New Revision: 253886 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253886=gcc=rev Log: Revert r238089 (PR driver/81829). 2017-10-19 Martin Liska

[Bug driver/81829] [7 Regression] /usr/bin/gcc-{ar,nm,ranlib} segfault without arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81829 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.0 --- Comment #9 from Martin Liška

[Bug fortran/82617] New: Internal compiler error in expand_expr_real_1 when compiling the attached file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82617 Bug ID: 82617 Summary: Internal compiler error in expand_expr_real_1 when compiling the attached file Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug middle-end/82617] Internal compiler error in expand_expr_real_1 when compiling the attached file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82617 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libgomp/82623] many omp tests failed for both C++ and Fortran, gcc-6.4 on Redhat 7.3/64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82623 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/82625] New: lower-optimization are not inlined with symbol multiversioning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82625 Bug ID: 82625 Summary: lower-optimization are not inlined with symbol multiversioning Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug sanitizer/82595] bootstrap fails in libsanitizer on powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82595 --- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager --- On 10/19/17, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82595 > > --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- > BTW, why --without-pic? What you

[Bug fortran/82620] [PDT] ICE: free_expr0(): Bad expr type (at fortran/expr.c:497)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82620 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug libstdc++/81797] gcc 7.1.0 fails to build on macOS 10.13 (High Sierra):

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81797 --- Comment #32 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Misty De Meo from comment #31) > For what it's worth, Apple's response was: "We analyzed the issue and > determined the problem to be a latent bug in gcc’s build system that is > revealed by

[Bug rtl-optimization/82597] [8 Regression] ICE at -O2 and -O3 x86_64-linux-gnu in the 32-bit mode: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2207

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82597 --- Comment #5 from Arseny Solokha --- So there is another testcase in PR82592.

[Bug gcov-profile/82614] GCOV crashes while parsing gcda file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82614 --- Comment #5 from Marco Castelluccio --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4) > (In reply to Marco Castelluccio from comment #3) > > > Thanks for the report Marco. Looks it comes from Firefox, am I right? > > > > Yes, that's correct.

[Bug fortran/79402] ICE with submodules: module procedure interface defined in parent module

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79402 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/82624] New: [msp430] Target must allow for NULL pointer dereferences

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82624 Bug ID: 82624 Summary: [msp430] Target must allow for NULL pointer dereferences Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/82624] [msp430] Target must allow for NULL pointer dereferences

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82624 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Patches should be sent to gcc-patches@.

[Bug target/81924] [6 Regression] ICE: in simplify_binary_operation_1, at simplify-rtx.c:3678 on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81924 --- Comment #5 from Bill Schmidt --- Yeah, that looks like a backporting oversight. I'll have a look after I recover from the post-vacation email slog.

[Bug rtl-optimization/82597] [8 Regression] ICE at -O2 and -O3 x86_64-linux-gnu in the 32-bit mode: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2207

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82597 --- Comment #6 from Michael Collison --- Yes I am aware of that report. I have a fix that should be sent to gcc-patches shortly.

[Bug rtl-optimization/82597] [8 Regression] ICE at -O2 and -O3 x86_64-linux-gnu in the 32-bit mode: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2207

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82597 Michael Collison changed: What|Removed |Added CC||michael.collison at linaro dot org

[Bug fortran/79402] ICE with submodules: module procedure interface defined in parent module

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79402 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Thu Oct 19 17:54:58 2017 New Revision: 253908 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253908=gcc=rev Log: 2017-10-19 Paul Thomas PR fortran/79402 *

[Bug middle-end/82617] Internal compiler error in expand_expr_real_1 when compiling the attached file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82617 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The ICE depends on the configuration of the compiler: with --enable-checking=release, I get during RTL pass: expand pr82617.f90:27:0: items = strwords_impl(str,white) internal compiler error:

[Bug regression/82626] New: -msse and -mfpmath=sse Causes __FLT_EVAL_METHOD__ to be -1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82626 Bug ID: 82626 Summary: -msse and -mfpmath=sse Causes __FLT_EVAL_METHOD__ to be -1 Product: gcc Version: 6.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/82623] New: many omp tests failed for both C++ and Fortran, gcc-6.4 on Redhat 7.3/64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82623 Bug ID: 82623 Summary: many omp tests failed for both C++ and Fortran, gcc-6.4 on Redhat 7.3/64 Product: gcc Version: 6.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/82620] [PDT] ICE: free_expr0(): Bad expr type (at fortran/expr.c:497)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82620 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/82618] Inefficient double-word subtration on x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82618 --- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak --- Maybe a peephole2 pattern for sub_3 with: "find_regno_note (peep2_next_insn (0), REG_UNUSED, operand[0])" constraint that converts to equivalent compare would do the trick? Hopefully, later passes

[Bug target/82445] ARM target generates unaligned STRD instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82445 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/82595] bootstrap fails in libsanitizer on powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82595 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- BTW, why --without-pic? What you want to achieve by that?

[Bug middle-end/82601] missing uninitialized warning for INTENT(OUT) argument with -O0 / -Og

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82601 --- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Here is a variant of the example in comment 0, where the subroutine has been substituted by a function: program uninit integer :: p,q p = -1 q = f(p) if (p

[Bug target/82615] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2006 453.povray ~10% performance deviation with r248863

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82615 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > The rev. was supposed to be a no-op? I also guess so.

[Bug bootstrap/49582] configure-target-libquadmath fail on powerpc-darwin8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49582 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/82445] ARM target generates unaligned STRD instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82445 --- Comment #6 from Richard Earnshaw --- Author: rearnsha Date: Thu Oct 19 13:10:42 2017 New Revision: 253890 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253890=gcc=rev Log: [ARM] PR 82445 - suppress 32-bit aligned ldrd/strd peepholing with

[Bug sanitizer/82595] bootstrap fails in libsanitizer on powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82595 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/82618] Inefficient double-word subtration on x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82618 --- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak --- Created attachment 42402 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42402=edit Prototype patch Attached patch compiles the test to: movq%rsi, %r10 cmpq%rdx, %rdi

[Bug target/82618] Inefficient double-word subtration on x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82618 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Comment on attachment 42402 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42402 Prototype patch Nice, thanks.

[Bug middle-end/82601] missing uninitialized warning with -O0 / -Og

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82601 --- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > (does intent(out) mean it comes in uninitialized?) Yes. To quote the Fortran 2008 standard (from section 5.3.10): "The INTENT (OUT) attribute for a

[Bug bootstrap/37704] RFE: Need specific version of --disable-multilib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37704 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fang at csl dot cornell.edu --- Comment

[Bug target/48097] new Throw_2 failures in libjava under Xcode 4.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48097 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug libstdc++/81797] gcc 7.1.0 fails to build on macOS 10.13 (High Sierra):

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81797 --- Comment #30 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #29) > The result of "make -d --trace -j8 all-target-libstdc++-v3", in a build > where x86_64-apple-darwin17.0.0/libstdc++-v3 was entirely removed, can be >

[Bug lto/82575] [8 Regression] lto debugobj references __gnu_lto_slim, ld test liblto-17 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82575 --- Comment #7 from Alan Modra --- > --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de --- > OK. I suppose they are properly prevailed by any global symbol of the same > name > as well? Like a weak definition with default visibility? Or is there

[Bug preprocessor/82130] stringification (#) in traditional mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82130 --- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Heiko Eißfeldt from comment #1) > This variant works for me with: Yes, that's a simple workaround. Still, it would be nice to have support for the stringification operator '#' in

[Bug debug/82509] DW_AT_endianity issues with attribute scalar_storage_order

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82509 --- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Thu Oct 19 13:50:10 2017 New Revision: 253893 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253893=gcc=rev Log: PR debug/82509 * dwarf2out.c (new_die_raw): New static inline

[Bug debug/82509] DW_AT_endianity issues with attribute scalar_storage_order

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82509 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libgomp/81591] segmentation fault when using priorities of nested tasks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81591 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Sistek --- Hello, are there any news regarding this issue, please? Were you able to reproduce it? Best wishes, Jakub Sistek

[Bug target/82615] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2006 453.povray ~10% performance deviation with r248863

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82615 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |8.0 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener

[Bug tree-optimization/82434] -fstore-merging does not work reliably.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82434 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/82600] [8 Regression] Address of local variable returned [-Werror=return-local-addr] when building mozilla-central

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82600 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Oct 19 14:24:39 2017 New Revision: 253899 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253899=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/82600 * typeck.c (check_return_expr): Don't call

[Bug c++/82600] [8 Regression] Address of local variable returned [-Werror=return-local-addr] when building mozilla-central

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82600 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/82575] [8 Regression] lto debugobj references __gnu_lto_slim, ld test liblto-17 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82575 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On October 19, 2017 2:33:17 PM GMT+02:00, amodra at gmail dot com wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82575 > >--- Comment #5 from Alan Modra --- >>

[Bug target/82445] ARM target generates unaligned STRD instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82445 --- Comment #8 from Richard Earnshaw --- Author: rearnsha Date: Thu Oct 19 13:16:42 2017 New Revision: 253892 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253892=gcc=rev Log: [ARM] PR 82445 - suppress 32-bit aligned ldrd/strd peepholing with

[Bug target/82445] ARM target generates unaligned STRD instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82445 --- Comment #7 from Richard Earnshaw --- Author: rearnsha Date: Thu Oct 19 13:14:55 2017 New Revision: 253891 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253891=gcc=rev Log: [ARM] PR 82445 - suppress 32-bit aligned ldrd/strd peepholing with

[Bug bootstrap/82610] [8 Regression] Bootstrap fails on macOS 10.13 because of abort redefinition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82610 --- Comment #2 from David Malcolm --- Sorry about the breakage. (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Hmm, include/ shouldn't include system headers directly :/ Of course they > all do... > > is probably not too bad to include

[Bug target/82626] -msse and -mfpmath=sse Causes __FLT_EVAL_METHOD__ to be -1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82626 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target||i?86-*-* Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/82628] New: wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu in the 32-bit mode

/tmp/gcc/gcc-trunk/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/8.0.0/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --prefix=/home/su/software/tmp/gcc/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 8.0.0 20171019 (experimental

[Bug c++/82308] [C++17] deduction of template arguments results in internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82308 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Fri Oct 20 00:30:41 2017 New Revision: 253920 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253920=gcc=rev Log: 2017-10-19 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug target/82626] -msse and -mfpmath=sse Causes __FLT_EVAL_METHOD__ to be -1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82626 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug lto/82575] [8 Regression] lto debugobj references __gnu_lto_slim, ld test liblto-17 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82575 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/81712] gcc does not compile when using glib 2.26 (everything works fine with 2.25)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81712 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- Fixed by r249731 on trunk and r249956 on gcc-7-branch

  1   2   >