[Bug bootstrap/83062] [8 regression] Bootstrap failure: libsanitizer/tsan/tsan_rtl.h:713:44: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline ‘void __tsan::MemoryRead(__tsan::ThreadState*, __sanitizer:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83062 --- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Mon Nov 20 09:55:02 2017 New Revision: 254946 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254946=gcc=rev Log: PR bootstrap/83062 * ipa-inline.c (can_inline_edge_p): Fix typo in

[Bug c++/6023] Unhelpful error message with forgotten "template"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6023 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/83062] [8 regression] Bootstrap failure: libsanitizer/tsan/tsan_rtl.h:713:44: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline ‘void __tsan::MemoryRead(__tsan::ThreadState*, __sanitizer:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83062 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/78821] GCC7: Copying whole 32 bits structure field by field not optimised into copying whole 32 bits at once

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78821 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Nov 20 10:10:23 2017 New Revision: 254948 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254948=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/78821 * gimple-ssa-store-merging.c

[Bug c++/83045] [8 Regression] -Wreturn-type regression in C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83045 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/83044] [8 Regression] ice in contains_struct_check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83044 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug tree-optimization/83053] [8 Regression] ICE in vrp_prop::check_array_ref at cc/tree-vrp.c:4811

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83053 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/83015] [8 regression] bootstrap comparison failure on ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83015 --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka --- Terbium however now fails with In file included from /gcc/spec/sb-terbium-head-64/gcc/libgcc/config/ia64/unwind-ia64.c:2448: /gcc/spec/sb-terbium-head-64/gcc/libgcc/unwind.inc: In function

[Bug bootstrap/83015] [8 regression] bootstrap comparison failure on ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83015 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||igor.v.tsimbalist at intel dot com ---

[Bug libstdc++/83066] New: [8 regression] 26_numerics/gcd/gcd_neg.cc fails since r254736

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83066 Bug ID: 83066 Summary: [8 regression] 26_numerics/gcd/gcd_neg.cc fails since r254736 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/55826] -ftime-report causes internal compiler error with Boost.Asio

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55826 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/83060] ICE on valid C++ code: in ignore_overflows, at cp/cvt.c:583

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83060 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini --- Related to PR82872?

[Bug rtl-optimization/82020] ICE in decompose at rtl.h:2126

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82020 --- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries --- Author: vries Date: Mon Nov 20 08:20:35 2017 New Revision: 254944 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254944=gcc=rev Log: Fix comparison mode in simplify_ternary_operation 2017-11-20 Tom de Vries

[Bug c++/83060] ICE on valid C++ code: in ignore_overflows, at cp/cvt.c:583

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83060 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/83045] [8 Regression] -Wreturn-type regression in C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83045 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/83044] [8 Regression] ice in contains_struct_check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83044 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/82180] assign_spill_hard_regs spills to unaligned register pair

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82180 --- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries --- Created attachment 42656 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42656=edit Tentative patch

[Bug tree-optimization/83047] [8 regression] glibc/crypt/crypt_util.c gets miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83047 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug c++/83058] [8 Regression] ICE on C++ code with negative array index: in warn_placement_new_too_small, at cp/init.c:2666

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83058 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0 Summary|ICE on C++ code

[Bug bootstrap/83062] [8 regression] Bootstrap failure: libsanitizer/tsan/tsan_rtl.h:713:44: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline ‘void __tsan::MemoryRead(__tsan::ThreadState*, __sanitizer:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83062 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug rtl-optimization/82020] ICE in decompose at rtl.h:2126

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82020 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/83041] redundant assignment from member array not eliminated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83041 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/83059] ICE on invalid C++ code: in tree_to_uhwi, at tree.c:6633

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83059 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug preprocessor/83063] New: [8 Regression] ICE on an invalid preprocessor snippet

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83063 Bug ID: 83063 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE on an invalid preprocessor snippet Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/82851] [8 regression] g++.dg/vect/slp-pr56812.cc, i386/avx2-vpaddq-3.c, i386/avx2-vpsubq-3.c fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82851 Andrey Guskov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/82852] [8 regression] i386/vect-unpack-1.c, i386/avx512f-gather-2.c, i386/avx256-unaligned-store-2.c fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82852 --- Comment #2 from Andrey Guskov --- Yeah, seems like it`s gone.

[Bug target/82852] [8 regression] i386/vect-unpack-1.c, i386/avx512f-gather-2.c, i386/avx256-unaligned-store-2.c fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82852 Andrey Guskov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/82180] assign_spill_hard_regs spills to unaligned register pair

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82180 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kcy at codesourcery dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/83049] Allow overloading of ?: conditional operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83049 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug fortran/83064] New: DO CONCURRENT inconsistent results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83064 Bug ID: 83064 Summary: DO CONCURRENT inconsistent results Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug lto/83061] -Wmaybe-uninitialized warnings in gcc/lto/lto-object.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83061 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Well, the warnings are false positives given the uses are guarded with an error check (that can never trigger due to implementation details).

[Bug tree-optimization/83047] [8 regression] glibc/crypt/crypt_util.c gets miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83047 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 42657 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42657=edit gcc8-pr83047.patch Untested fix.

[Bug ipa/60243] IPA is slow on large cgraph tree

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60243 --- Comment #20 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Sun, 19 Nov 2017, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60243 > > --- Comment #19 from Jan Hubicka --- > Author: hubicka > Date: Sun Nov 19

[Bug bootstrap/83062] [8 regression] Bootstrap failure: libsanitizer/tsan/tsan_rtl.h:713:44: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline ‘void __tsan::MemoryRead(__tsan::ThreadState*, __sanitizer:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83062 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug bootstrap/83062] [8 regression] Bootstrap failure: libsanitizer/tsan/tsan_rtl.h:713:44: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline ‘void __tsan::MemoryRead(__tsan::ThreadState*, __sanitizer:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83062 --- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Sorry, started with r254937.

[Bug tree-optimization/83043] [8 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.graphite/force-parallel-1.c scan-tree-dump-times graphite "2 loops carried no dependency" 1 (found 0 times)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83043 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0 Summary|FAIL:

[Bug tree-optimization/83053] [8 Regression] ICE in vrp_prop::check_array_ref at cc/tree-vrp.c:4811

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83053 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- I see in tree-vrp.c:4804: (gdb) p print_generic_expr(stderr, ref, 0) *array.0_159[0]$10 = void (gdb) p debug_tree(ref) unit-size align:8 warn_if_not_align:0 symtab:0 alias-set 8

[Bug ipa/83051] [8 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3: in edge_badness, at ipa-inline.c:1024

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83051 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug ipa/83054] [8 Regression] ICE in operator>, at profile-count.h:823

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83054 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|7.0 |8.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/83052] [8 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2305 starting from r254560

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83052 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*

[Bug target/83008] [performance] Is it better to avoid extra instructions in data passing between loops?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83008 --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Sun, 19 Nov 2017, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83008 > > Jan Hubicka changed: > >What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/83040] __attribute__((always_inline)) causes internal_compiler_error (segmentation fault) (with recursive meta-template programming function)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83040 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug tree-optimization/83047] [8 regression] glibc/crypt/crypt_util.c gets miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83047 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/83062] [8 regression] Bootstrap failure: libsanitizer/tsan/tsan_rtl.h:713:44: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline ‘void __tsan::MemoryRead(__tsan::ThreadState*, __sanitizer:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83062 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug ipa/83065] New: [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2017 523/623 compfail (ICE)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83065 Bug ID: 83065 Summary: [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2017 523/623 compfail (ICE) Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/83067] wrong code on arm-linux-gnueabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83067 --- Comment #2 from Yibiao Yang --- $ arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc-cross/arm-linux-gnueabi/5/lto-wrapper Target: arm-linux-gnueabi Configured with:

[Bug tree-optimization/78821] GCC7: Copying whole 32 bits structure field by field not optimised into copying whole 32 bits at once

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78821 --- Comment #20 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 20 Nov 2017, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78821 > > --- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek --- > (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment

[Bug libstdc++/83066] [8 regression] 26_numerics/gcd/gcd_neg.cc fails since r254736

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83066 Ville Voutilainen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/83068] New: Suboptimal code generated with -m32 using MMX reg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83068 Bug ID: 83068 Summary: Suboptimal code generated with -m32 using MMX reg Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug rtl-optimization/83068] Suboptimal code generated with -m32 using MMX reg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83068 --- Comment #1 from Richard Bradfield --- And as usual I forget to mention these things: I am compiling everything using gcc trunk, at commit r254929 from Sun Nov 19 This behaviour is not present in GCC 7.2

[Bug bootstrap/81315] powerpc64 vs building lang/gcc7-devel (on FreeBSD head): xgcc gets segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81315 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug libstdc++/48101] obscure error message with std::set

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48101 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- You can't allocate const memory, but in essence yes, that's the reason. The standard says that an allocator's value type must be a non-const, non-volatile object type, so std::allocator is undefined

[Bug gcov-profile/83030] [8 regression] ICE in create_pseudo_cfg, at dwarf2cfi.c:2840

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83030 --- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE Uni-Bielefeld.DE> --- >> --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- [...] >> Can you please bisect to a single revision? > > Sure,

[Bug debug/82933] [8 Regression] valgrind error in set_cur_line_info_table with -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82933 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 42663 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42663=edit gcc8-pr82933.patch Or we can just hack around this and hope dwarf2out or others don't rely on some other hooks to be

[Bug gcov-profile/83074] New: Shared object built with `-pie --coverage' hangs forever

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83074 Bug ID: 83074 Summary: Shared object built with `-pie --coverage' hangs forever Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/83079] ICE in gfc_widechar_to_char, at fortran/scanner.c:198

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83079 --- Comment #1 from G. Steinmetz --- While these variants compile : $ cat z3.f90 program p print *, transfer('xy', ['a']) end $ cat z4.f90 program p print *, transfer(4_'xy', [4_'ab']) end $ cat z5.f90 program p

[Bug target/81291] [6/7/8 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -fno-rerun-cse-after-loop -fno-tree-ter -fno-tree-vrp -funroll-loops due to improper carry

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81291 --- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool --- Fixed on trunk. This may be the same as PR82621, which I'll backport this week.

[Bug target/82981] [7 Regression] unnecessary __multi3 call for mips64r6 linux kernel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82981 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 42662 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42662=edit gcc8-pr82981-arm.patch Untested fix for the arm issue.

[Bug tree-optimization/78821] GCC7: Copying whole 32 bits structure field by field not optimised into copying whole 32 bits at once

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78821 --- Comment #30 from Uroš Bizjak --- Another unhandled case: --cut here-- typedef __SIZE_TYPE__ size_t; void baz (char *buf, size_t base, unsigned int data) { buf[base] = data; buf[base+1] = data >> 8; } --cut here-- compiles to:

[Bug other/83048] wrap multi-statement macros in do {} while (0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83048 --- Comment #3 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #2) > I wonder if we could use a macro like this: > ... > #define SAFE_MACRO_STMT(stmt) \ Submitted RFC at

[Bug debug/82933] [8 Regression] valgrind error in set_cur_line_info_table with -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82933 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/83073] Range for VR_VARYING | [1, 1]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83073 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/48101] obscure error message with std::set

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48101 --- Comment #5 from gccbugs at jbapple dot com --- What is the virtue of making std::allocator an error? Is this required by the standard? Is it because calls to construct are writing to const memory?

[Bug tree-optimization/83041] redundant assignment from member array not eliminated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83041 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > I think we have a duplicate bug for this looking like Yes bug 23094.

[Bug libstdc++/83077] New: sso-string @ gnu-versioned-namespace.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83077 Bug ID: 83077 Summary: sso-string @ gnu-versioned-namespace. Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug fortran/83076] New: [8 Regression] ICE in gfc_deallocate_scalar_with_status, at fortran/trans.c:1598

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83076 Bug ID: 83076 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in gfc_deallocate_scalar_with_status, at fortran/trans.c:1598 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/83075] [8 Regression] Invalid strncpy optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83075 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug libstdc++/83077] sso-string @ gnu-versioned-namespace.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83077 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/83052] [8 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2305 starting from r254560

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83052 --- Comment #1 from Andi Kleen --- I'm not sure why you call it a regression? You must be running the test suite manually with the new option. I haven't tested, but likely it will fail if you run that test with -mcmodel=large too. The

[Bug tree-optimization/83026] missing strlen optimization for strcmp of unequal strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83026 Qing Zhao changed: What|Removed |Added CC||qing.zhao at oracle dot com --- Comment #2

[Bug tree-optimization/83041] redundant assignment from member array not eliminated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83041 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization See Also|

[Bug gcov-profile/83030] [8 regression] ICE in create_pseudo_cfg, at dwarf2cfi.c:2840

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83030 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED CC|ebotcazou

[Bug tree-optimization/83075] [8 Regression] Invalid strncpy optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83075 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/83075] New: [8 Regression] Invalid strncpy optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83075 Bug ID: 83075 Summary: [8 Regression] Invalid strncpy optimization Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c/83056] GCC suggests the use of previously reported undeclared identifiers when reporting new undeclared identifiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83056 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug middle-end/79538] missing -Wformat-overflow with %s and non-member array arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79538 Qing Zhao changed: What|Removed |Added CC||qing.zhao at oracle dot com --- Comment #2

[Bug tree-optimization/83026] missing strlen optimization for strcmp of unequal strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83026 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/48101] obscure error message with std::set

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48101 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- Even if we allowed allocator you still can't use std::set because the container code assumes a non-const value type in several places.

[Bug fortran/83078] ICE in gfc_typenode_for_spec, at fortran/trans-types.c:1110

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83078 --- Comment #1 from G. Steinmetz --- Detected without "implicit none" : $ cat z2.f90 program p type t integer :: a(n) end type t type(t) :: x = t([1, 2]) end $ gfortran-8-20171119 -c z2.f90 z2.f90:3:19:

[Bug fortran/83078] New: ICE in gfc_typenode_for_spec, at fortran/trans-types.c:1110

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83078 Bug ID: 83078 Summary: ICE in gfc_typenode_for_spec, at fortran/trans-types.c:1110 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/79538] missing -Wformat-overflow with %s and non-member array arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79538 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|qing.zhao

[Bug middle-end/83074] Shared object built with `-pie --coverage' hangs forever

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83074 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/83079] New: ICE in gfc_widechar_to_char, at fortran/scanner.c:198

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83079 Bug ID: 83079 Summary: ICE in gfc_widechar_to_char, at fortran/scanner.c:198 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/83074] Shared object built with `-pie --coverage' hangs forever

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83074 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1) > Hi. > > Thanks for the report. I isolated the issue and it's related to how > constructors are called and hang in GCOV is just demonstration of the > problem. > >

[Bug rtl-optimization/70134] combine misses jump optimization on powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70134 --- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool --- PowerPC has no simple way to set a CR field to "equal". We could add a pattern to do that (which will cost 2 insns, so works for 3->2 combinations, like we in fact get here; something like li X,0 ;

[Bug middle-end/83074] Shared object built with `-pie --coverage' hangs forever

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83074 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Stefan Vargyas from comment #3) > This feature is quite useful in practice -- for example, the > GNU C library is runnable this way too: > > $ /lib64/libc.so.6 > GNU C Library stable

[Bug middle-end/83074] Shared object built with `-pie --coverage' hangs forever

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83074 --- Comment #3 from Stefan Vargyas --- > > Why do you expect you can use a PIE as a shared library? > Well, with `-pie' one can issue 'foo.so' by itself: $ ./foo.so foo.so: version 0.1 This feature is quite useful in practice -- for

[Bug tree-optimization/83082] New: [8 regression] libgomp.graphite/force-parallel-1.c fails starting with r254888

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83082 Bug ID: 83082 Summary: [8 regression] libgomp.graphite/force-parallel-1.c fails starting with r254888 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/83083] New: c++2a concepts without -fconcepts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83083 Bug ID: 83083 Summary: c++2a concepts without -fconcepts Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug target/83052] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2305 starting from r254560

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83052 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2017-11-20 Summary|[8

[Bug bootstrap/81315] powerpc64 vs building lang/gcc7-devel (on FreeBSD head): xgcc gets segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81315 --- Comment #4 from Mark Millard --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #3) > Builds fine on powerpc64-linux, both trunk and 7. Could you give information on how to set up and run this test, including pointing to what distribution to

[Bug c/83011] -Wformat-truncation wrongly computes length (depends on the position of numbers in the addition)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83011 --- Comment #4 from Julien ÉLIE --- Martin, the following thing still puzzles me. len = 52 * timer_count + 27 + (prefix == NULL ? 0 : strlen(prefix)) + 1; => gives a warning, as explained below len = 1 + 52 * timer_count + 27 + (prefix == NULL

[Bug fortran/79072] ICE with class(*) pointer function result and character value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79072 --- Comment #15 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Mon Nov 20 19:09:34 2017 New Revision: 254966 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254966=gcc=rev Log: 2017-11-20 Paul Thomas PR fortran/79072 *

[Bug target/77687] frame access after release without redzone on powerpc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77687 --- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Mon Nov 20 20:10:28 2017 New Revision: 254968 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254968=gcc=rev Log: rs6000: Don't touch below the stack pointer (PR77687) With the 32-bit SVR4

[Bug tree-optimization/83081] New: [8 regression][arm] gcc.dg/pr80218.c fails since r254888

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83081 Bug ID: 83081 Summary: [8 regression][arm] gcc.dg/pr80218.c fails since r254888 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/79072] ICE with class(*) pointer function result and character value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79072 --- Comment #16 from neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com --- I've confirmed Dominique's findings: Code in comments 0, 5, 11 are working now with Paul's commit (Thanks!), but comment 12 code still gives an ICE. Should I create a new PR for that

[Bug go/83071] gccgo: ICE in set_type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83071 --- Comment #2 from pmatos at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Ian Lance Taylor from comment #1) > This is of course a compiler bug, but it's a crash on invalid code. You > can't write `input++` when `input` is a string type. In Go the `++` >

[Bug target/77687] frame access after release without redzone on powerpc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77687 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/83074] Shared object built with `-pie --coverage' hangs forever

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83074 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/83045] [8 Regression] -Wreturn-type regression in C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83045 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

  1   2   3   >