https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83317
Bug ID: 83317
Summary: ICE in lra_eliminate_reg_if_possible compiling Python
with -mfpmath=sse on x86 Linux, possible 7 regression
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82934
--- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl ---
On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 12:29:50AM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> allocate( character(len=*) :: bar )
>
> However, the type-spec in the allocate statement does coincide with
s/does/does
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82934
--- Comment #9 from Steve Kargl ---
On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 12:52:31AM +, sgk at troutmask dot
apl.washington.edu wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82934
>
> --- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl ---
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83318
Bug ID: 83318
Summary: Illegal program causes internal compiler error with
tags gfc_trans_allocate, at fortran/trans-stmt.c:5646
and Aborted (program f951)
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83318
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81906
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Dec 7 23:56:34 2017
New Revision: 255486
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255486=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/81906
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_expand_rint): Handle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82934
--- Comment #10 from Steve Kargl ---
On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 01:14:44AM +, sgk at troutmask dot
apl.washington.edu wrote:
>
> I don't know how I missed F2008:C631
>
> C631 (R626) A type-param-value in a type-spec shall be an asterisk if
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81568
--- Comment #5 from Dave Pagan ---
Thanks for the update, Martin.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83075
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Dec 7 23:55:18 2017
New Revision: 255485
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255485=gcc=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/83075
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/strncpy-2.c: Use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83318
--- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl ---
On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 11:42:53PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> + if (!ts.u.cl->length)
Whoops.
if (ts.type == BT_CHARACTER && !ts.u.cl->length)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82016
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83316
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83318
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
gfcx -c a.f90
a.f90:5:13:
allocate(character(len=*) :: string_array(2))
1
Error: Type-spec at (1) must contain a scalar integer expression
Index: match.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81906
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[7/8 Regression] Calls to |[7 Regression] Calls to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81568
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83318
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83252
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 8 00:03:28 2017
New Revision: 255487
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255487=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/83252
* gcc.target/i386/i386.exp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82934
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83318
--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl ---
I don't know how I missed F2008:C631
C631 (R626) A type-param-value in a type-spec shall be an asterisk if
and only if each allocate-object is a dummy argument for which the
corresponding type parameter
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80397
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55023
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81126
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|2017-06-19
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77493
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83316
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80791
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69888
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83312
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81483
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81155
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83319
Bug ID: 83319
Summary: [7/8 Regression] ICE on use of allocatable component
in derived type coarray defined in module
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83063
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83320
Bug ID: 83320
Summary: Mismatched free() / delete / delete [] in
gimple-loop-interchange.cc:948
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81568
Dave Pagan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dave.pagan at oracle dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81568
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83300
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83301
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83308
--- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo ---
Go will not work on SH just by adding it to the list of targets. For instance
split stacks support is not implemented on SH.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83164
--- Comment #11 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9)
> Created attachment 42810 [details]
> gcc8-pr83164.patch
Sorry, I shouldn't have taken this long.
> So like this? It makes no sense to call types_compatible_p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81165
--- Comment #16 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Patch posted at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-12/msg00376.html
(before seeing Jeff's comments)
Anyway, I think this is simple enough to go into 8. It isn't hard to add
caching, should we find
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83296
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Dec 7 13:21:51 2017
New Revision: 255466
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255466=gcc=rev
Log:
2017-12-07 Richard Biener
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83296
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80101
--- Comment #6 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kelvin
Date: Thu Dec 7 13:20:27 2017
New Revision: 255465
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255465=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2017-12-07 Kelvin Nilsen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82046
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81601
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83312
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82641
--- Comment #11 from Tamar Christina ---
Author: tnfchris
Date: Thu Dec 7 14:54:22 2017
New Revision: 255468
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255468=gcc=rev
Log:
2017-12-07 Tamar Christina
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81572
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81575
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81782
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83239
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82016
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79281
--- Comment #15 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to Ian Lance Taylor from comment #11)
> Thanks. I committed the patch to the GCC 6 branch.
>
> GCC 7 will require a different fix, as the code has moved from C to Go. I'm
> not sure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64867
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||easyhack
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80026
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80907
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81566
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81675
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Summary|[6/7/8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81613
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81613
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83302
--- Comment #5 from Florian Weimer ---
FWIW, -fstack-clash-protection avoids these issues.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81197
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80947
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81304
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81481
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82641
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81922
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83301
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tschwinge at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83297
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83304
--- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool ---
At some point during combine we have
insn_cost 4 for72: r127:SI=0xff81
insn_cost 4 for 9: r130:SI=ctz(r125:SI)
insn_cost 4 for69: cc:CC=cmp(r125:SI,0)
insn_cost 4 for70:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83164
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 42810
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42810=edit
gcc8-pr83164.patch
So like this? It makes no sense to call types_compatible_p or 2x
useless_type_conversion_p if
/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/ptlrpcd.c?h=next-20171207#n492,
partially reduced test case follows:
struct ptlrpcd_ctl {
char pc_name[20];
};
struct ptlrpcd {
struct ptlrpcd_ctl pd_threads[6];
};
struct ptlrpcd *ptlrpcd_init_pd;
static void ptlrpcd_ctl_init(struct ptlrpcd_ctl *pc, int index
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83311
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83296
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83304
--- Comment #8 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 42808
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42808=edit
Assembly for aborting testcase
Attaching the assembly for -O2 -funroll-loops -mthumb -march=armv8-a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43871
--- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Thu Dec 7 09:36:28 2017
New Revision: 255464
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255464=gcc=rev
Log:
rs6000: Initialise rs6000_cpu correctly (PR43871)
Finally, set rs6000_cpu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83309
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
callgrind says all time is spent in lookup_field_1. I suppose
CLASSTYPE_SORTED_FIELDS isn't set during parsing the structure and we likely
look for duplicates here.
Nathan rewrote name-lookup for GCC 8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83301
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Schwinge ---
(In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #2)
> However, in my "--enable-checking=yes,df,fold,rtl" build I'll then run into
> a different ICE with the original 6.5 MiB file... :-/ So there is more work
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83302
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83164
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 7 Dec 2017, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83164
>
> --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> Created attachment 42810
> -->
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83309
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83301
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.5
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81906
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83309
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
yeah, I'm not surprised by these numbers. IIUC the linear search happens when
we get a qualified lookup during parsing. Unqualified lookup will find the
IDENTIFIER_VALUE binding. But ICBW.
Anyway, when
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83306
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83310
--- Comment #2 from Victor Porton ---
Created attachment 42807
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42807=edit
project file
note that sources should be put into src/ subfolder
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83310
--- Comment #1 from Victor Porton ---
Created attachment 42806
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42806=edit
forgotten Makefile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81827
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
Bisected to pauls r254427, the fix for PR81447 and PR82783.
Test adjustments suggest that we'll create even more malloc/free calls.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70268
--- Comment #10 from Boris Kolpackov ---
Second revision of the patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-12/msg00379.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83312
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83302
--- Comment #2 from Michael Matz ---
I guess the problem described in https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/10/188 is, that
the stack probe itself accesses a page which _doesn't_ belong to this threads
stack, but to something else. golang seems to use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83302
--- Comment #3 from Michael Matz ---
In any case, this is not something that GCC could do anything about. A probe
necessarily has to be a write, and writing to something not belonging to own
stack (or guard page) will always have this problem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83313
Bug ID: 83313
Summary: A whole lot of symbols cannot be demangled
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83297
Dendi Suhubdy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |MOVED
--- Comment #3 from Dendi Suhubdy
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67769
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Dec 7 13:21:51 2017
New Revision: 255466
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255466=gcc=rev
Log:
2017-12-07 Richard Biener
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83312
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
Ironically, it seems to be the same pass, VRP1, that warns that some piece of
code accesses pd_threads[j] for some negative j and later notices that the
corresponding path is dead. I don't know if we can shift
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83302
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83179
--- Comment #10 from Andrey Guskov ---
32-bit SPEC CPU2006::436 also affected.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83314
Bug ID: 83314
Summary: gccgo: Compiled binaries panic with "mmap errno 9" on
m68k
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81356
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80135
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Untested WIP patch attached to PR81922.
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo