[Bug target/83488] [8 Regression] ICE on a CET test-case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83488 --- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek --- Leaving open for the case OPT_mavx512vnni: if (value) { opts->x_ix86_isa_flags2 |= OPTION_MASK_ISA_AVX512VNNI_SET; opts->x_ix86_isa_flags2_explicit |=

[Bug rtl-optimization/82973] [8 regression] ICE in output_constant_pool_2, at varasm.c:3896 on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82973 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Dec 21 09:11:58 2017 New Revision: 255939 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255939=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/82973 * emit-rtl.h

[Bug rtl-optimization/82973] [8 regression] ICE in output_constant_pool_2, at varasm.c:3896 on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82973 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Dec 21 09:11:29 2017 New Revision: 255938 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255938=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/82973 * emit-rtl.h

[Bug middle-end/81897] [6/7/8 Regression] spurious -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81897 --- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law --- So just a note. We *could* pick this up without waiting on Aldy's work. After the second DOM pass we're failing to merge a pair of blocks because there are still SSA_NAMEs queued for renaming. If we were

[Bug target/83488] [8 Regression] ICE on a CET test-case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83488 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Dec 21 08:45:30 2017 New Revision: 255937 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255937=gcc=rev Log: PR target/83488 * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_target_string): Move

[Bug target/83524] New: [8 Regression] bootstrap fails build a nvptx cross: ICE in get_insn_template, at final.c:2099

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: doko at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- seen with trunk 20171221, r255910 libtool: compile: /<>/build-nvptx/./gcc/xgcc -B/<>/build-

[Bug c/83526] -Wrestrict makes no sense with -fno-strict-aliasing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83526 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/83526] New: -Wrestrict makes no sense with -fno-strict-aliasing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83526 Bug ID: 83526 Summary: -Wrestrict makes no sense with -fno-strict-aliasing Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/83525] New: open(newunit=funit, status="scratch") fails if an internal file (characters) was read previously.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83525 Bug ID: 83525 Summary: open(newunit=funit, status="scratch") fails if an internal file (characters) was read previously. Product: gcc Version: unknown Status:

[Bug target/65294] No easy way of setting default Mac OS X target - darwin_minversion not enough

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65294 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/83081] [8 regression][arm] gcc.dg/pr80218.c fails since r254888

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83081 --- Comment #7 from Christophe Lyon --- I've attached the .s and .ira dump generated by the above command + -save-temps.

[Bug c++/82764] [7/8 Regression] ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5030

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82764 --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #6) > Not sure about Martin's c#2. It just reproduced on the trunk for me. > r255837 Yep, sorry. Forget about the comment.

[Bug tree-optimization/83521] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: invalid operand in unary operation)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83521 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug middle-end/83487] [8 Regression] ICE in expand_call, at calls.c:4098

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83487 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- Adjusted testcase, so that it is valid C and C++: struct __attribute__ ((aligned)) A {}; struct A a; void bar (int, int, int, int, int, int, int, struct A); void foo (void) { bar (6, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,

[Bug ipa/82027] [7/8 Regression] wrong code with -O3 -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82027 --- Comment #9 from Martin Jambor --- We create an "artificial_thunk" for an IPA-CP clone, which is really nothing but a thunk with skipped arguments but we do not stream its args_to_skip because output_cgraph_opt_summary_p returns false because

[Bug debug/83527] New: [8 Regression] Another statement-frontiers -fcompare-debug failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83527 Bug ID: 83527 Summary: [8 Regression] Another statement-frontiers -fcompare-debug failure Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/83487] [8 Regression] ICE in expand_call, at calls.c:4098

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83487 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- I certainly didn't mean this kind of change, after all, it will also break testing on what the alignof of the type is etc. What I meant is in calls.c, when considering alignment of arguments ignore it for

[Bug c++/83529] New: ICE in canonical types differ for identical types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83529 Bug ID: 83529 Summary: ICE in canonical types differ for identical types Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/83513] [8 Regression] ICE: qsort checking failed (error: qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 3) in fill_vec_av_set in selective scheduler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83513 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/83528] Nios2: redundant pointers to the record fields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83528 --- Comment #1 from Michael_S --- I did a little more research and found out that it is relatively recent regression introduced in gcc version 4.9.2 (Altera 15.1 Build 185). gcc version 4.8.3 20140320 (prerelease) (Altera 14.1 Build 186) still

[Bug rtl-optimization/83530] New: [8 Regression] ICE in reset_sched_cycles_in_current_ebb, at sel-sched.c:7150

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83530 Bug ID: 83530 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in reset_sched_cycles_in_current_ebb, at sel-sched.c:7150 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug rtl-optimization/82973] [8 regression] ICE in output_constant_pool_2, at varasm.c:3896 on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82973 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug bootstrap/82831] [8 Regression] Broken PGO bootstrap after r254379

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82831 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Summary|[8

[Bug other/83520] format string bug in libvtv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83520 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ctice at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug fortran/83436] Internal file cannot be accessed by UNFORMATTED data transfer when reading from /dev/urandom

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83436 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/83487] [8 Regression] ICE in expand_call, at calls.c:4098

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83487 --- Comment #10 from Marek Polacek --- (But it doesn't work because it breaks the "canonical types differ for identical types %qT and %qT" test...)

[Bug tree-optimization/83523] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: statement marked for throw, but doesn't)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83523 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.5 Summary|[8 Regression]

[Bug tree-optimization/83081] [8 regression][arm] gcc.dg/pr80218.c fails since r254888

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83081 --- Comment #5 from Christophe Lyon --- Created attachment 42938 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42938=edit dump file

[Bug tree-optimization/83081] [8 regression][arm] gcc.dg/pr80218.c fails since r254888

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83081 --- Comment #4 from Christophe Lyon --- (In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #3) > Is this on a cross? I still can't reproduce on an x86_64 x > arm-non-linux-gnueabi as specified above. Yes, I'm using a cross-compiler, on an x86_64 host.

[Bug tree-optimization/83081] [8 regression][arm] gcc.dg/pr80218.c fails since r254888

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83081 --- Comment #6 from Christophe Lyon --- Created attachment 42939 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42939=edit generated assembly

[Bug other/83508] [8 regression][arm] c-c++-common/Wrestrict.c fails since r255836

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83508 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target|arm |arm, sparc CC|

[Bug target/83496] MIPS BE: wrong code generates under "-Os -mbranch-cost=1"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496 --- Comment #2 from Hauke Mehrtens --- Should I git bisect this or will someone else do this? If I should do that, is there some documentation on how to setup a test case and build and run this automatically?

[Bug target/83496] MIPS BE: wrong code generates under "-Os -mbranch-cost=1"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c/83528] New: Nios2: redundant pointers to the record fields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83528 Bug ID: 83528 Summary: Nios2: redundant pointers to the record fields Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug other/83520] format string bug in libvtv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83520 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug tree-optimization/83521] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: invalid operand in unary operation)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83521 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/83436] Internal file cannot be accessed by UNFORMATTED data transfer when reading from /dev/urandom

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83436 --- Comment #14 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Thu Dec 21 10:34:35 2017 New Revision: 255940 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255940=gcc=rev Log: 2017-12-21 Thomas Koenig Backport from trunk

[Bug fortran/83436] Internal file cannot be accessed by UNFORMATTED data transfer when reading from /dev/urandom

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83436 --- Comment #16 from Daan van Vugt --- Thanks guys :) What version will this be included in? On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 11:36 AM, tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org < gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83436 >

[Bug rtl-optimization/83512] ICE: in df_compact_blocks, at df-core.c:1729 with -freorder-blocks-algorithm=simple

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83512 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug debug/83527] [8 Regression] Another statement-frontiers -fcompare-debug failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83527 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug tree-optimization/83544] Missed optimization opportunity for constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83544 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- In one case we optimize super early to int t = 1 / (int) x <= 0 ? 1 / 0 : 1; which prevents the VRP optimization from the other case. We almost recover in isolate-paths, except that Jeff insisted on using

[Bug fortran/83458] F2008: inquire fails on units opened with newunit=

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83458 --- Comment #3 from Daan van Vugt --- Ahh, okay, thanks! On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 5:58 AM, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org < gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83458 > > Jerry DeLisle changed: > >

[Bug fortran/83458] F2008: inquire fails on units opened with newunit=

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83458 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/83546] New: -march=silvermont doesn't enable rdrnd by default despite what docs say

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83546 Bug ID: 83546 Summary: -march=silvermont doesn't enable rdrnd by default despite what docs say Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/83462] [8 regression] c-c++-common/Warray-bounds-3.c fails on arm-none-eabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83462 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug tree-optimization/83543] New: strlen of a local array member not optimized on some targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83543 Bug ID: 83543 Summary: strlen of a local array member not optimized on some targets Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/83543] strlen of a local array member not optimized on some targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83543 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization --- Comment #1 from

[Bug debug/83157] [8 regression] gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83157 Mark Wielaard changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mark at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug debug/83419] [8 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83419 --- Comment #9 from Alexandre Oliva --- Author: aoliva Date: Fri Dec 22 02:07:31 2017 New Revision: 255966 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255966=gcc=rev Log: [SFN] sync up debug-only stmt list's side effects with empty stmts too for

[Bug debug/83527] [8 Regression] Another statement-frontiers -fcompare-debug failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83527 --- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva --- Author: aoliva Date: Fri Dec 22 02:07:31 2017 New Revision: 255966 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255966=gcc=rev Log: [SFN] sync up debug-only stmt list's side effects with empty stmts too for

[Bug middle-end/83487] [8 Regression] ICE in expand_call, at calls.c:4098

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83487 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/83448] [7 Regression] ice in get_source_location_for_substring, at input.c:1507

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83448 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[7/8 Regression] ice in |[7 Regression] ice in

[Bug ada/83535] [8 regression] indirect atomic access with wrong size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83535 --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Thu Dec 21 22:02:45 2017 New Revision: 255958 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255958=gcc=rev Log: PR ada/83535 * gcc-interface/decl.c (gnat_to_gnu_entity) :

[Bug c++/83542] template deduction failure when using pack in both deduced and non-deduced contexts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83542 --- Comment #1 from Barry Revzin --- This slightly different example: template struct list { }; template void foo(list, list, void(*)(T..., U)) { } void f(int, int) { } int main() { foo(list{}, list{}, ); } fails with a different

[Bug debug/83527] [8 Regression] Another statement-frontiers -fcompare-debug failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83527 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/83542] New: template deduction failure when using pack in both deduced and non-deduced contexts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83542 Bug ID: 83542 Summary: template deduction failure when using pack in both deduced and non-deduced contexts Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/83544] New: Missed optimization opportunity for constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83544 Bug ID: 83544 Summary: Missed optimization opportunity for constant folding Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/83540] New: [8 Regression] Invalid code with MATMUL, -fno-realloc-lhs -ffrontend-optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83540 Bug ID: 83540 Summary: [8 Regression] Invalid code with MATMUL, -fno-realloc-lhs -ffrontend-optimize Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug lto/82027] [7/8 Regression] wrong code with -O3 -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82027 --- Comment #12 from Martin Jambor --- Thanks, I have submitted the patch to the mailing list: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-12/msg01457.html

[Bug ada/83535] [8 regression] indirect atomic access with wrong size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83535 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/83541] New: Missed optimization with int overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83541 Bug ID: 83541 Summary: Missed optimization with int overflow Product: gcc Version: tree-ssa Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/83541] Missed optimization with int overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83541 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- Yes, it is a known issue, (E)VRP is too conservative. pushing new range for x_2(D): [2147483647, +INF] EQUIVALENCES: { x_2(D) } (1 elements) Visiting stmt _4 = x_2(D) + 1; Visiting statement: _4 = x_2(D) +

[Bug tree-optimization/83541] Missed optimization with int overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83541 --- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse --- int test(void) { int x = __INT_MAX__; return x+1; } CCP also turns this into INT_MIN, again it could be bolder.

[Bug debug/83527] [8 Regression] Another statement-frontiers -fcompare-debug failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83527 --- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva --- Patch posted at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-12/msg01462.html

[Bug c/83448] [7/8 Regression] ice in get_source_location_for_substring, at input.c:1507

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83448 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Dec 21 23:09:14 2017 New Revision: 255960 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255960=gcc=rev Log: PR c/83448 * gimple-ssa-sprintf.c (maybe_warn): Don't call

[Bug middle-end/83487] [8 Regression] ICE in expand_call, at calls.c:4098

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83487 --- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Dec 21 23:10:45 2017 New Revision: 255961 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255961=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/83487 * config/i386/i386.c

[Bug tree-optimization/83543] strlen of a local array member not optimized on some targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83543 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug target/83536] One 'false' too much in r255699 for mingw target (in config/i386/i386.c)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83536 --- Comment #2 from mateuszb at poczta dot onet.pl --- Yes, I agree. The 80-chars width limit was also significant in this case -- instead of writing code you must fight with too long lines. I think that there is the time to change this limit to

[Bug testsuite/83462] [8 regression] c-c++-common/Warray-bounds-3.c fails on arm-none-eabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83462 --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Fri Dec 22 00:07:39 2017 New Revision: 255962 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255962=gcc=rev Log: PR testsuite/83462 - c-c++-common/Warray-bounds-3.c fails gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog

[Bug middle-end/83487] [8 Regression] ICE in expand_call, at calls.c:4098

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83487 --- Comment #15 from H.J. Lu --- There were discussions in the x86-64 psabi group to make empty class passed the same way for C and C++. We were waiting for GCC to implement it before updating the psabi.

[Bug target/83528] Nios2: redundant pointers to the record fields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83528 --- Comment #5 from Michael_S --- Created attachment 42944 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42944=edit good asm output (gcc 4.8.3)

[Bug ipa/82027] [7/8 Regression] wrong code with -O3 -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82027 --- Comment #10 from Martin Jambor --- OK, so I did not realize that duplicate_thunk_for_node does not set clone_of but former_clone of, which is of course what it must do. I have checked and this is the only place where we currently set

[Bug debug/83527] [8 Regression] Another statement-frontiers -fcompare-debug failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83527 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/82096] ICE in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:403 with arm-linux-gnueabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82096 --- Comment #4 from sudi at gcc dot gnu.org --- I can see this failing with: $./arm-none-linux-gnueabi-gcc ./src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/di-longlong64-sync-1.c -mthumb -march=armv5t -O[g,1,2,3] and $./arm-none-linux-gnueabi-gcc

[Bug target/83531] New: Build broken on macOS 10.13.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83531 Bug ID: 83531 Summary: Build broken on macOS 10.13.2 Product: gcc Version: 5.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug target/83528] Nios2: redundant pointers to the record fields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83528 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/83531] Build broken on macOS 10.13.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83531 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/83528] Nios2: redundant pointers to the record fields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83528 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/81968] [8 regression] early lto debug objects make Solaris ld SEGV

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968 --- Comment #31 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- I'm having a look at what's still going wrong with Eric's updated patch. On Solaris/SPARC, there are only two failures left: FAIL: g++.dg/lto/pr51567-1

[Bug c++/83533] error: no type named 'X' in 'using = ...'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83533 --- Comment #1 from Rostislav Povelikin --- If I change aliasing of u with typedef instead of using - works fine.

[Bug rtl-optimization/83513] [8 Regression] ICE: qsort checking failed (error: qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 3) in fill_vec_av_set in selective scheduler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83513 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||abel at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/83488] [8 Regression] ICE on a CET test-case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83488 --- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to igor.v.tsimbalist from comment #19) > Created attachment 42947 [details] > 512VNNI patch What is the reason for moving it over? At least right now you don't have any |

[Bug target/83528] Nios2: redundant pointers to the record fields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83528 --- Comment #3 from Michael_S --- Well, the guidline here https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/ specifically tells me that it's one of the things that you don't want ;) But yes, I can.

[Bug middle-end/83487] [8 Regression] ICE in expand_call, at calls.c:4098

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83487 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek --- My understanding is that GCC and G++ now handle those the same. But for the > 16 byte aggregates the psABI would need some rule, like say: If in C++ the object has a non-POD structure or union type, or

[Bug target/83528] Nios2: redundant pointers to the record fields

s: .zero 220 .ident "GCC: (GNU) 8.0.0 20171221 (experimental)" So the issue looks to be fixed already. The only question is for which version it was fixed.

[Bug middle-end/83487] [8 Regression] ICE in expand_call, at calls.c:4098

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83487 --- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek --- I thought I've done it here by CCing relevant people. Or who else stands behind the x86-64 psABI these days? Anyway, I was looking at 0.95, seems newer psABI has more rules in there. Perhaps we can say

[Bug ipa/83532] New: [8 Regression] ICE in apply_scale, at profile-count.h:955

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83532 Bug ID: 83532 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in apply_scale, at profile-count.h:955 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code

[Bug c++/83533] New: error: no type named 'X' in 'using = ...'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83533 Bug ID: 83533 Summary: error: no type named 'X' in 'using = ...' Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/83534] New: C++17: typeinfo for noexcept function lacks noexcept information

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83534 Bug ID: 83534 Summary: C++17: typeinfo for noexcept function lacks noexcept information Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ada/66205] gnatbind generates invalid code when finalization is enabled in restricted runtime

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66205 --- Comment #16 from simon at pushface dot org --- I think this was actually INVALID. I’m glad to report that Arno’s notes in Comment #14 do in fact solve the problem (after supplying dummies for the parts of the standard library that aren’t

[Bug target/83528] Nios2: redundant pointers to the record fields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83528 --- Comment #4 from Michael_S --- Created attachment 42943 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42943=edit bad asm output (gcc 5.3.0)

[Bug middle-end/83487] [8 Regression] ICE in expand_call, at calls.c:4098

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83487 --- Comment #17 from H.J. Lu --- Please raise the issue at the psabi group.

[Bug target/83528] Nios2: redundant pointers to the record fields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83528 Michael_S changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|WONTFIX

[Bug tree-optimization/83326] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2017 648.exchange2_s ~6% performance regression with r255267 (reproducer attached)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83326 --- Comment #6 from Alexander Nesterovskiy --- Thanks! I see performance gain on 648.exchange2_s (~6% on Broadwell and ~3% on Skylake-X) reverting performance to r255266 level (Skylake-X regression was ~3%). And loops unrolled with 2 and 3

[Bug middle-end/83487] [8 Regression] ICE in expand_call, at calls.c:4098

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83487 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com,

[Bug target/83528] Nios2: redundant pointers to the record fields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83528 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Target||nios2-elf CC|

[Bug target/83528] Nios2: redundant pointers to the record fields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83528 --- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- And BTW in the future you can easily check all this yourself by building a stage1 cross-compiler: gcc_build_dir % ../gcc/configure --disable-bootstrap --enable-languages=c --target=nios2-elf

[Bug gcov-profile/83509] [8 Regression] gcov-dump-8 unable to dump any gcda files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83509 --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Thu Dec 21 14:22:08 2017 New Revision: 255941 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255941=gcc=rev Log: Fix gcov-dump tool for GCDA files (PR gcov-profile/83509). 2017-12-21 Martin

[Bug target/83488] [8 Regression] ICE on a CET test-case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83488 --- Comment #19 from igor.v.tsimbalist at intel dot com --- Created attachment 42947 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42947=edit 512VNNI patch

[Bug target/83488] [8 Regression] ICE on a CET test-case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83488 --- Comment #18 from igor.v.tsimbalist at intel dot com --- Added a patch for m512vnni, which is done similarly to 512vbmi2. It looks like most of avx512* bits have to be included in OPTION_MASK_ISA_AVX512F_UNSET. I leave it to a separate

  1   2   >