[Bug tree-optimization/83288] [8 Regression] polyhedron gas_dyn 2-fold compile-time regression caused by r255103

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83288 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/83797] New: Inconsistent error messages for main

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83797 Bug ID: 83797 Summary: Inconsistent error messages for main Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug target/83801] [avr] String constant in __flash not put into .progmem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83801 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Target||avr Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug other/83786] Add VEC_ORDERED_REMOVE_IF

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83786 --- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries --- Latest version: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-01/msg00899.html

[Bug c++/78609] invalid member's visibility detection in constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78609 Matthijs Kooijman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matthijs at stdin dot nl ---

[Bug c++/83777] Invalid dependent initialization of a static data member.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83777 --- Comment #2 from Zahira Ammarguellat --- >From my understanding, the test case is trying to instantiate "C" with "void *" type, which doesn't have a member called "M". I think this should generate an error? Clang and MSVC both give an

[Bug middle-end/83729] [8 Regression] AVR ICE on convert_memory_address_addr_space_1 at explow.c:300

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83729 --- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay --- (In reply to gandalf from comment #3) > Another regression test case (compile with -O): > > void code_to_ascii(char buf[1], unsigned int code) > { > __attribute__((used)) > static const char __flash

[Bug target/83712] [6/7/8 Regression] "Unable to find a register to spill" when compiling for thumb1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83712 sudi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/83799] New: [8 Regression] bogus "no matching function for call to" error when building llvm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83799 Bug ID: 83799 Summary: [8 Regression] bogus "no matching function for call to" error when building llvm Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/79140] gcc.target/powerpc/ssp-1.c fails starting with its introduction in r244562

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79140 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libgomp/83590] [nvptx] openacc reduction C regressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83590 --- Comment #5 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #4) > [ But I see new failures. I've > investigated the first failure, and it's due to a missing cuda.h, which > seems to have gone missing on my nvidia testing laptop.

[Bug c++/83798] New: Enhancement to Wmain warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83798 Bug ID: 83798 Summary: Enhancement to Wmain warnings Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug tree-optimization/83435] [8 Regression] ICE in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:211

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83435 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Jan 11 13:42:29 2018 New Revision: 256535 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256535=gcc=rev Log: 2018-01-11 Richard Biener PR

[Bug tree-optimization/83435] [8 Regression] ICE in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:211

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83435 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/83800] New: [libquadmath] M_SQRT2q & sqrtq(2.0Q) off by one ULP ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83800 Bug ID: 83800 Summary: [libquadmath] M_SQRT2q & sqrtq(2.0Q) off by one ULP ? Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/83801] New: [avr] String constant in __flash not put into .progmem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83801 Bug ID: 83801 Summary: [avr] String constant in __flash not put into .progmem Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/83799] [8 Regression] bogus "no matching function for call to" error when building llvm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83799 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug c++/83799] [8 Regression] bogus "no matching function for call to" error when building llvm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83799 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug c++/83802] New: Caller doesn't destroy default argument passed to a constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83802 Bug ID: 83802 Summary: Caller doesn't destroy default argument passed to a constructor Product: gcc Version: 7.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/78875] -fstack-protector on powerpc64 now always use TLS, won't work for kernel/firmware

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78875 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/83653] [6/7/8 Regression] GCC fails to remove a can't-happen call on ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83653 --- Comment #7 from Matthew Wilcox --- OK, so how should we write this function/macro to accomplish what we want? And the requirement is "If the argument is one of these eight special constants, use this special instruction, otherwise call this

[Bug rtl-optimization/83575] [8 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: multiple hot/cold transitions found)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83575 --- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka --- Now it is fixed. It needs both patches.

[Bug middle-end/83653] [6/7/8 Regression] GCC fails to remove a can't-happen call on ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83653 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 11 Jan 2018, matthew at wil dot cx wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83653 > > --- Comment #5 from Matthew Wilcox --- > Hi Aldy! > > Thanks for looking into this.

[Bug other/83786] New: Add VEC_ORDERED_REMOVE_IF

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83786 Bug ID: 83786 Summary: Add VEC_ORDERED_REMOVE_IF Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: trivial Priority: P3 Component: other

[Bug target/83761] bfin: ICE: in require, at machmode.h:292

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83761 --- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rsandifo Date: Thu Jan 11 09:54:26 2018 New Revision: 256525 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256525=gcc=rev Log: Fix mode_for_size units in caller-save.c (PR83761) The new

[Bug libgomp/83792] New: [openacc] Factor out async argument utility functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83792 Bug ID: 83792 Summary: [openacc] Factor out async argument utility functions Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: trivial Priority: P3

[Bug target/82096] ICE in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:403 with arm-linux-gnueabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82096 --- Comment #7 from sudi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sudi Date: Thu Jan 11 10:46:59 2018 New Revision: 256526 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256526=gcc=rev Log: [PR82096] Fix ICE in int_mode_for_mode with arm-linux-gnueabi The bug

[Bug libgomp/83795] Call atexit (gomp_target_fini) before calling target plugin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83795 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries

[Bug target/82682] [8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr50038.c scan-assembler-times movzbl 2 (found 3 times) since r253958

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82682 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/82096] ICE in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:403 with arm-linux-gnueabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82096 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/82096] ICE in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:403 with arm-linux-gnueabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82096 --- Comment #9 from sudi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Yes I at least 6 and 7 need backports. Haven't gone beyond that yet.

[Bug lto/81968] [8 regression] early lto debug objects make Solaris ld SEGV

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968 --- Comment #60 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Jan 11 12:12:39 2018 New Revision: 256528 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256528=gcc=rev Log: 2018-01-11 Richard Biener Rainer Orth

[Bug c++/83793] New: Pack expansion outside of lambda containing the pack incorrectly rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83793 Bug ID: 83793 Summary: Pack expansion outside of lambda containing the pack incorrectly rejected Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/83768] ARM: wrong optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83768 --- Comment #4 from Sergey Organov --- Well, except how one can be sure the cause is actually fixed and not just [temporary?] hidden, if we only have the fact that it works fine in GCC 6+? No objection to closing this though, provided no one is

[Bug target/82096] [6/7 Regression] ICE in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:403 with arm-linux-gnueabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82096 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE in int_mode_for_mode, |[6/7 Regression] ICE in

[Bug c/83789] New: __builtin_altivec_lvx fails for powerpc for altivec-4.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83789 Bug ID: 83789 Summary: __builtin_altivec_lvx fails for powerpc for altivec-4.c Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/83790] New: Update nvptx target to work with cuda 9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83790 Bug ID: 83790 Summary: Update nvptx target to work with cuda 9 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug testsuite/83791] Move tests to libgomp.c-c++-common

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83791 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||openmp, patch --- Comment #1 from Tom de

[Bug testsuite/83791] New: Move tests to libgomp.c-c++-common

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83791 Bug ID: 83791 Summary: Move tests to libgomp.c-c++-common Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: trivial Priority: P3 Component: testsuite

[Bug go/83794] misc/cgo/test uses gigabytes of memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83794 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Looks like no useful logs are there btw, I killed the process and all I got (in gotools/cgo-testlog!?) is cd cgo-test-dir/misc/cgo/test &&

[Bug go/83794] misc/cgo/test uses gigabytes of memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83794 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/82682] [8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr50038.c scan-assembler-times movzbl 2 (found 3 times) since r253958

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82682 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- The effect of the patch on the testcase is: .L3: movzbl (%edx), %esi addl$2, %edx movzbl -1(%edx), %eax addl$1, %ecx - movl%esi, %ebx imull

[Bug c++/83796] New: Abstract classes allowed to be instantiated when initialised as default parameter to function or constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83796 Bug ID: 83796 Summary: Abstract classes allowed to be instantiated when initialised as default parameter to function or constructor Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0

[Bug target/83514] ABRT in arm_declare_function_name passing a null pointer to std::string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83514 --- Comment #5 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: prathamesh3492 Date: Thu Jan 11 12:13:42 2018 New Revision: 256529 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256529=gcc=rev Log: 2018-01-11 Prathamesh Kulkarni

[Bug tree-optimization/83189] [8 regression] internal compiler error: in probability_in, at profile-count.h:1050

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83189 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/81968] [8 regression] early lto debug objects make Solaris ld SEGV

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968 --- Comment #59 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #58 from rguenther at suse dot de --- > On Thu, 11 Jan 2018, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote: [...] >> [I'm continuing this with examples from a build using gas

[Bug libgomp/83792] [openacc] Factor out async argument utility functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83792 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||openacc, patch CC|

[Bug libgomp/83795] New: Call atexit (gomp_target_fini) before calling target plugin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83795 Bug ID: 83795 Summary: Call atexit (gomp_target_fini) before calling target plugin Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug go/83794] New: misc/cgo/test uses gigabytes of memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83794 Bug ID: 83794 Summary: misc/cgo/test uses gigabytes of memory Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: go

[Bug libgomp/83590] [nvptx] openacc reduction C regressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83590 --- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #3) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > > Created attachment 43098 [details] > > gcc8-pr83590.patch > > > Can you give this a spin? > > Will do. The patch

[Bug target/83514] ABRT in arm_declare_function_name passing a null pointer to std::string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83514 --- Comment #6 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Committed patch to conditionally set arch_to_print after Kyrill's approval. Thanks, Prathamesh

[Bug middle-end/82694] [8 regression] Linux kernel miscompiled since r250765

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82694 --- Comment #14 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #13) > Does the kernel still need this workaround? Shall we just add the option > and gradually add the checks? Yes - note I got stuck in the attempt to do the

[Bug target/83761] bfin: ICE: in require, at machmode.h:292

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83761 --- Comment #3 from Sebastian Huber --- Created attachment 43096 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43096=edit Test case. /home/sh/b-gcc-bfin/./gcc/xgcc -B/home/sh/b-gcc-bfin/./gcc/ -c

[Bug c++/83779] Trivial bounds error not detected with -fbounds-check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83779 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/83761] bfin: ICE: in require, at machmode.h:292

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83761 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/83770] [8 Regression] ICE in create_preheader, at cfgloopmanip.c:1536

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83770 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/83771] [8 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: non-cold basic block 3 reachable only by paths crossing the cold partition)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83771 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug tree-optimization/83189] [8 regression] internal compiler error: in probability_in, at profile-count.h:1050

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83189 --- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Thu Jan 11 08:14:33 2018 New Revision: 256480 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256480=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/83189 *

[Bug target/83775] Segfault in arm_declare_function_name()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83775 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/83514] ABRT in arm_declare_function_name passing a null pointer to std::string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83514 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug sanitizer/83780] False positive alignment error with -fsanitize=undefined with virtual base

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83780 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug libgomp/83590] [nvptx] openacc reduction C regressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83590 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- With that change, we end up with weird array, TYPE_SIZE_UNIT/TYPE_SIZE on its type is constant, but DECL_SIZE_UNIT/DECL_SIZE on the decl is non-constant (pedantically it is a VLA, but we know the sizes at

[Bug tree-optimization/83784] Missed optimization with bitfield

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83784 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- I'm afraid the bswap pass infrastructure is really unusable here, extending it so that it handles bit twiddling would be too expensive.

[Bug other/83786] Add VEC_ORDERED_REMOVE_IF

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83786 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries

[Bug lto/81968] [8 regression] early lto debug objects make Solaris ld SEGV

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968 --- Comment #57 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #56 from rguenther at suse dot de --- > On Wed, 10 Jan 2018, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote: [...] > I can reproduce that with -ffat-lto-objects where indeed we

[Bug debug/83788] New: Add .loc is_stmt support test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83788 Bug ID: 83788 Summary: Add .loc is_stmt support test Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: debug

[Bug debug/83788] Add .loc is_stmt support test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83788 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug target/83768] ARM: wrong optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83768 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/83775] Segfault in arm_declare_function_name()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83775 --- Comment #3 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to prathamesh3492 from comment #0) > Hi, > For the following test-case: > > #define STR "1234567" > > const char str[] = STR; > > char dst[10]; > > void copy_from_global_str

[Bug tree-optimization/83784] Missed optimization with bitfield

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83784 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/83435] [8 Regression] ICE in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:211

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83435 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- I have a patch robustifying VRP. Yes, we don't want to leak overflow constants into the IL but we're not there yet and I'd rather have this done in a robust way but couldn't yet thing of one (like not

[Bug libgomp/83590] [nvptx] openacc reduction C regressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83590 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 43098 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43098=edit gcc8-pr83590.patch Actually, the problem is much more severe. The thing is, neither the TYPE_SIZE_UNIT nor

[Bug middle-end/83772] [8 Regression] ICE in new test case gfortran.fortran-torture/compile/pr83081.f90 in r256423

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83772 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|testsuite |middle-end Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/83774] ICE at -O3 with -Wall: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83774 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Version|unknown

[Bug tree-optimization/83776] [6/7/8 Regression] missing -Warray-bounds indexing past the end of a string literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83776 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/83785] New: sh: ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2344

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83785 Bug ID: 83785 Summary: sh: ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2344 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/83777] Invalid dependent initialization of a static data member.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83777 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid

[Bug c++/83778] [8 regression] g++.dg/ext/altivec-cell-2.C fails starting with r256448

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83778 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug middle-end/83772] [8 Regression] ICE in new test case gfortran.fortran-torture/compile/pr83081.f90 in r256423

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83772 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/83575] [8 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: multiple hot/cold transitions found)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83575 --- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Thu Jan 11 08:02:26 2018 New Revision: 256479 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256479=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/83575 * cfgrtl.c (rtl_verify_edges): Only verify

[Bug middle-end/83772] [8 Regression] ICE in new test case gfortran.fortran-torture/compile/pr83081.f90 in r256423

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83772 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/81819] [7 Regression][RX] internal compiler error: in rx_is_restricted_memory_address, at config/rx/rx.c:311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81819 --- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo --- I can confirm that the problem still exists on GCC 7 branch and probably also on trunk (trunk does not build the app because of another bug). The patch above fixes the problem and the app runs.

[Bug go/83787] New: [8 regression] Many 32-bit Solaris/SPARC Go tests FAIL after Go1.10beta1 update

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83787 Bug ID: 83787 Summary: [8 regression] Many 32-bit Solaris/SPARC Go tests FAIL after Go1.10beta1 update Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug go/83787] [8 regression] Many 32-bit Solaris/SPARC Go tests FAIL after Go1.10beta1 update

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83787 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug libgomp/83590] [nvptx] openacc reduction C regressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83590 --- Comment #3 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > Created attachment 43098 [details] > gcc8-pr83590.patch > Can you give this a spin? Will do.

[Bug lto/81968] [8 regression] early lto debug objects make Solaris ld SEGV

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968 --- Comment #58 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 11 Jan 2018, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968 > > --- Comment #57 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE

[Bug sanitizer/83780] False positive alignment error with -fsanitize=undefined with virtual base

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83780 --- Comment #2 from Ivan Bodrov --- I have reported the same bug for Clang: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35902 Unlike GCC, Clang is also eager to generate unaligned "movaps" instructions, crashing the program. Afaik GCC does not

[Bug debug/68860] [6/7/8 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr36728-1.c -flto -O3 -g line 16/7 arg1 == 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68860 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/83799] [8 Regression] bogus "no matching function for call to" error when building llvm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83799 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/83804] [meta] LTO memory consumption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83804 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 43105 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43105=edit CPU & memory consumption for Inkscape with GCC 8

[Bug fortran/83803] Using -fc-prototypes on modules with empty dummy arg lists does not close paren.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83803 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/83805] Wrong constant merging for objects in different address spaces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83805 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug middle-end/83805] [8 Regression] Wrong constant merging for objects in different address spaces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83805 --- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4) > Well, 7.2 certainly doesn't have any special casing for address spaces in > categorize_decl_for_section etc., so before claiming it is a regression > you'd

[Bug tree-optimization/82518] [8 regression] gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/in-pack.f90 fails on armeb since r252917

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82518 --- Comment #4 from Christophe Lyon --- Indeed it looks like the testcase has been failing with -fno-vect-cost-model for a very long time. Trying the find the 'good' starting point for a bisect. (I'm using qemu, I have no such board either)

[Bug lto/83804] [meta] LTO memory consumption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83804 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 43103 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43103=edit -fmem-report-wpa for Inkscape with -O2 for GCC 8

[Bug lto/83804] [meta] LTO memory consumption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83804 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 43102 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43102=edit -fmem-report-wpa for Inkscape with -O2 for GCC 7

[Bug lto/83804] [meta] LTO memory consumption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83804 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 43104 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43104=edit CPU & memory consumption for Inkscape with GCC 7

[Bug fortran/79383] USE statement error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79383 --- Comment #3 from Walt Brainerd --- Yes, Sounds like you have it fixed. Thanks. On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 7:06 PM, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org < gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79383 > > kargl at

[Bug target/83801] [8 Regression][avr] String constant in __flash not put into .progmem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83801 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||7.2.1 Summary|[avr]

[Bug tree-optimization/83695] [8 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83695 --- Comment #6 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: amker Date: Thu Jan 11 15:41:41 2018 New Revision: 256541 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256541=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/83695 * gimple-loop-linterchange.cc

  1   2   >