https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80870
--- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo ---
Right, thanks for checking. Can you please try out this patch:
Index: gcc/config/sh/sh_optimize_sett_clrt.cc
===
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83501
--- Comment #9 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: prathamesh3492
Date: Sun Jan 14 08:58:58 2018
New Revision: 256657
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256657=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-01-14 Prathamesh Kulkarni
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83051
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka ---
The patch fixes overfow so we no longer ICE, but we probably should try to
prevent branch prediction to predict loop to iterate so many times by special
casing very deep loop nests.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83835
Bug ID: 83835
Summary: constexpr constructor rejected in c++17 mode
(regression WRT c++14)
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80870
--- Comment #5 from Anders Montonen ---
With the patch from comment 4, the GCC 7 branch builds successfully.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83628
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83051
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Sun Jan 14 11:20:31 2018
New Revision: 256659
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256659=gcc=rev
Log:
PR ipa/83051
* gcc.c-torture/compile/pr83051.c: New testcase.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83834
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jwakely.gcc at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83831
Bug ID: 83831
Summary: [6/7/8 Regression][RX] Unused bclr,bnot,bset insns
Product: gcc
Version: 6.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83828
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
On GCC 7 branch, I got
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512vl-vpermb-2.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512vl-vpermb-2.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512vl-vpermi2b-2.c execution test
FAIL:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83830
--- Comment #1 from Daniel Krügler ---
Looks like an oversight on my side when I implemented
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2017/p0607r0.html for gcc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83834
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80846
Peter Cordes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 80846, which changed state.
Bug 80846 Summary: auto-vectorized AVX2 horizontal sum should narrow to 128b
right away, to be more efficient for Ryzen and Intel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80846
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80846
--- Comment #22 from Peter Cordes ---
Forgot the Godbolt link with updated cmdline options:
https://godbolt.org/g/FCZAEj.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83834
Bug ID: 83834
Summary: [6/7/8 Regression] FAIL: libstdc++-abi/abi_check
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83628
--- Comment #10 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Sun Jan 14 15:45:38 2018
New Revision: 256665
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256665=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2018-01-12 Uros Bizjak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83832
Bug ID: 83832
Summary: [RX] Improve bittests
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83532
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Yes, I can confirm python3-base package now builds fine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83842
Bug ID: 83842
Summary: extend -Wmemset-elt-size to memcpy and memmove
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83842
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83811
--- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Jan 14 21:44:50 2018
New Revision: 256675
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256675=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-01-14 Jerry DeLisle
Backport from trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83839
Bug ID: 83839
Summary: bootstrap fails in gcc/config/i386/i386.c on darwin
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83839
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 43124
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43124=edit
Try this patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83840
Bug ID: 83840
Summary: missing -Wmemset-elt-size with address of array
element
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83841
Bug ID: 83841
Summary: missing -Wmemset-elt-size with array element plus
offset
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83833
Bug ID: 83833
Summary: chi_squared_distribution::param() forgot to change the
member gamma_distribution
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83811
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81327
--- Comment #17 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Sun Jan 14 21:54:25 2018
New Revision: 256677
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256677=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/81327 - cast to void* does not suppress -Wclass-memaccess
gcc/ChangeLog:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83588
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83841
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83677
--- Comment #4 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Sun Jan 14 17:47:30 2018
New Revision: 256670
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256670=gcc=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2018-01-14 Bill Schmidt
Backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83837
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Between 20180112 (r256571) and 20180114 (r256664), two libgomp tests started to
FAIL. I'm seeing it on Solaris/SPARC and x86, but according to
gcc-testresults
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80846
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #23
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83811
--- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Jan 14 17:36:29 2018
New Revision: 256669
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256669=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-01-18 Jerry DeLisle
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83838
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80846
--- Comment #24 from Rainer Orth ---
The new gcc.target/i386/pr80846-1.c testcase FAILs on Solaris/x86 (32 and
64-bit):
+FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr80846-1.c scan-assembler-times vextracti 2 (found 1
times)
Assembler output attached.
Rainer
-gnu,
mips64el-unknown-linux-gnu
Between 20180112 (r256571) and 20180114 (r256664), the gcc.dg/vect/pr79920.c
test started to FAIL on a couple of targets:
+FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr79920.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect
"using an in-order (fold
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83836
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80481
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81092
--- Comment #15 from Andreas Schwab ---
Author: schwab
Date: Sun Jan 14 17:32:20 2018
New Revision: 256668
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256668=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/81092
* config/abi/post/ia64-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83677
--- Comment #5 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Sun Jan 14 17:49:39 2018
New Revision: 256671
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256671=gcc=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2018-01-14 Bill Schmidt
Backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83677
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80481
--- Comment #5 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 43121
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43121=edit
i386-pc-solaris2.11 -m64 assembler output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83838
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83838
Bug ID: 83838
Summary: Many gcc.target/i386/indirect-thunk*.c tests FAIL
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83838
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 43123
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43123=edit
i386-pc-solaris2.11 -m32 assembler output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83838
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
Solaris fails these tests due to
sol2.h:#define USE_HIDDEN_LINKONCE 0
We can limit these tests to Linux only.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83356
--- Comment #12 from Arnd Bergmann ---
Unfortunately that patch caused a regression (nothing to do with the compiler
really, just the way powerpc linux uses some libgcc functions), and I've done
some more investigation. The new finding is that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82007
--- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Should I backport this to 7?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51628
--- Comment #38 from H.J. Lu ---
A patch is posted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-01/msg01237.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83843
Bug ID: 83843
Summary: [8 Regression] wrong code at -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83508
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Mon Jan 15 06:15:09 2018
New Revision: 256683
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256683=gcc=rev
Log:
PR other/83508
* builtins.c (check_access): Avoid warning when the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83843
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83508
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43462
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83816
--- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo ---
Hmm ... if the program is changed in some places, it can also be triggered on
GCC 6.4. It seems it happens when adding/removing function calls inside of C++
lambda functions ... how to find the cause?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83013
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80846
--- Comment #25 from Peter Cordes ---
We're getting a spill/reload inside the loop with AVX512:
.L2:
vmovdqa64 (%esp), %zmm3
vpaddd (%eax), %zmm3, %zmm2
addl$64, %eax
vmovdqa64 %zmm2, (%esp)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83013
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Mon Jan 15 06:02:19 2018
New Revision: 256681
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256681=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/83013
* config/microblaze/microblaze.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80463
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #8
62 matches
Mail list logo