[Bug libstdc++/84139] C++17 Filesystem/Filesystem TS + cmcstl2 = GCC ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84139 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Christopher Di Bella from comment #0) > Please let me know if the issue > should be resubmitted for each version of GCC that it affects. No, definitely not.

[Bug target/84146] ICE with -mcet in dwarf2out_var_location, involving sigsetjmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84146 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Reduced testcase: /* PR target/84146 */ /* { dg-do compile } */ /* { dg-options "-O2 -g -mcet -fcf-protection=full" } */ int __setjmp (void **); void *buf[64]; void foo (void) { __setjmp (buf); for

[Bug fortran/78534] Use a larger integer type for character lengths on 64-bit targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78534 --- Comment #26 from Janne Blomqvist --- Author: jb Date: Wed Jan 31 13:23:20 2018 New Revision: 257233 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257233=gcc=rev Log: PR 78534 Reinstate better string copy algorithm As part of the change to larger

[Bug fortran/84119] Type parameter inquiry for PDT returns array instead of scalar

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84119 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/84146] ICE with -mcet in dwarf2out_var_location, involving sigsetjmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84146 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/84139] C++17 Filesystem/Filesystem TS + cmcstl2 = GCC ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84139 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug target/84148] New: CET shouldn't be enabled in 32-bit run-time libraries by default

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84148 Bug ID: 84148 Summary: CET shouldn't be enabled in 32-bit run-time libraries by default Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ipa/84149] New: [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2017 505.mcf/605.mcf ~10% performance regression with r256888

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84149 Bug ID: 84149 Summary: [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2017 505.mcf/605.mcf ~10% performance regression with r256888 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/84122] Incorrect statement sequence in PDT definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84122 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/81779] [6/7/8 Regression] bool define from stdbool.h suppresses -Wdeclaration-after-statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81779 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.4 Summary|bool define from

[Bug rtl-optimization/84071] [7/8 regression] wrong elimination of zero-extension after sign-extended load

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84071 --- Comment #15 from Wilco --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #10) > > The addition is performed on the full 32-bit register, so this obviously > > means that the top 24 bits have an undefined value. > > Not if the entire registers

[Bug c++/84132] [8 Regression] tree-data-ref.c:3938: poor coding ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84132 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/84132] [8 Regression] tree-data-ref.c:3938: poor coding ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84132 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jan 31 13:07:53 2018 New Revision: 257232 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257232=gcc=rev Log: 2018-01-31 Richard Biener PR

[Bug target/84146] New: ICE with -mcet in dwarf2out_var_location, involving sigsetjmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84146 Bug ID: 84146 Summary: ICE with -mcet in dwarf2out_var_location, involving sigsetjmp Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code

[Bug middle-end/84089] [8 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1y/lambda-generic-x.C -std=gnu++14 (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84089 --- Comment #5 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2018-01-31 4:57 AM, aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > I know nothing about the PA back-end, or whether E_VOIDmode is valid for > base14_operand, however... > > Before r196122, a VOIDmode

[Bug target/84148] CET shouldn't be enabled in 32-bit run-time libraries by default

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84148 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #1) > How old are the CPUs which treat it as UD? Older than i686/Pentium Pro? > Thanks. They are NOPs since Pentium Pro.

[Bug rtl-optimization/84071] [7/8 regression] wrong elimination of zero-extension after sign-extended load

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84071 --- Comment #17 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Wed Jan 31 15:01:40 2018 New Revision: 257237 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257237=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/84071 * doc/tm.texi.in

[Bug rtl-optimization/84071] [7/8 regression] wrong elimination of zero-extension after sign-extended load

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84071 --- Comment #18 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Wed Jan 31 15:01:53 2018 New Revision: 257238 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257238=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/84071 * doc/tm.texi.in

[Bug fortran/84143] Intrinsic output of PDT incorrectly includes type parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84143 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/84147] New: RTTI for base class in anonymous namespace could be avoided

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84147 Bug ID: 84147 Summary: RTTI for base class in anonymous namespace could be avoided Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/84037] [8 Regression] Speed regression of polyhedron benchmark since r256644

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84037 --- Comment #19 from Richard Biener --- On Zen I measure 23s with --param vect-max-version-for-alias-checks=0 (thus basically before the rev.) and 33s without. With the patch and the size parameter tuned to 146 I get 25s and with 90 it is

[Bug fortran/84120] Syntax for used for PDT constructors is incorrect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84120 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/84150] New: Wrong pointer size used in builtin setjmp/longjmp with -maddress-mode=long

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84150 Bug ID: 84150 Summary: Wrong pointer size used in builtin setjmp/longjmp with -maddress-mode=long Product: gcc Version: 6.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/84146] ICE with -mcet in dwarf2out_var_location, involving sigsetjmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84146 Florian Weimer changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com

[Bug tree-optimization/84037] [8 Regression] Speed regression of polyhedron benchmark since r256644

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84037 --- Comment #20 from Richard Biener --- Note that targets already have the opportunity to limit vectorization by adjusting their finish_cost hook - here they even have more useful information available (kind of).

[Bug tree-optimization/82518] [8 regression] gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/in-pack.f90 fails on armeb since r252917

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82518 --- Comment #9 from Christophe Lyon --- (In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #7) > Hi Nick! Hi all! > > Do we have a way of testing armeb, either through a simulator or through > some aarch64 with magic flags? > Please note that the bug

[Bug target/84146] ICE with -mcet in dwarf2out_var_location, involving sigsetjmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84146 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Untested fix: --- gcc/config/i386/i386.c.jj 2018-01-31 09:26:18.341505667 +0100 +++ gcc/config/i386/i386.c 2018-01-31 14:13:33.815243832 +0100 @@ -2609,31 +2609,27 @@ rest_of_insert_endbranch (void)

[Bug target/84148] CET shouldn't be enabled in 32-bit run-time libraries by default

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84148 Florian Weimer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fw at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug rtl-optimization/84071] [7/8 regression] wrong elimination of zero-extension after sign-extended load

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84071 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC|ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org | --- Comment #16 from Eric

[Bug fortran/84141] [8.0.1 regression] Internal error: type_name(): Bad type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141 --- Comment #10 from Jürgen Reuter --- Created attachment 43307 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43307=edit Reproducer_2, a little smaller

[Bug fortran/84116] [7/8 Regression] ICE in gfc_match_omp_clauses, at fortran/openmp.c:1354

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84116 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Indeed, started with r242037.

[Bug c++/84152] Internal compiler error when compiling a cxx file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84152 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/84143] Intrinsic output of PDT incorrectly includes type parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84143 --- Comment #2 from Neil Carlson --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1) > > gives 0. Should not it be 3? Yeah. I noticed the same thing myself. It is 3 if the type parameters are removed. I was intending to report it, but I

[Bug middle-end/84150] Wrong pointer size used in builtin setjmp/longjmp with -maddress-mode=long

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84150 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/84113] [7/8 Regression] gcc-7.3.0/libgcc/unwind.inc:136:1: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84113 Douglas Mencken changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||7.1.0, 7.2.0 --- Comment #6 from

[Bug fortran/84141] [8.0.1 regression] Internal error: type_name(): Bad type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141 --- Comment #11 from Jürgen Reuter --- When you run the binary created (seg_prod), you'll get | | Running self-test: mci_vamp |

[Bug c++/67935] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67935 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/84092] [8 Regression] ICE on C++14 code with variable template: in build_qualified_name, at cp/tree.c:2043

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84092 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Jan 31 16:07:06 2018 New Revision: 257242 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257242=gcc=rev Log: /cp 2018-01-31 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug middle-end/84150] Wrong pointer size used in builtin setjmp/longjmp with -maddress-mode=long

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84150 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- This test will fail on all ILP32 targets where Pmode == DImode and ptr_mode == SImode.

[Bug c++/84152] New: Internal compiler error when compiling a cxx file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84152 Bug ID: 84152 Summary: Internal compiler error when compiling a cxx file Product: gcc Version: 7.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/84092] [8 Regression] ICE on C++14 code with variable template: in build_qualified_name, at cp/tree.c:2043

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84092 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/84152] Internal compiler error when compiling a cxx file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84152 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/84141] [8.0.1 regression] Internal error: type_name(): Bad type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug fortran/84141] [8.0.1 regression] Internal error: type_name(): Bad type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/84116] [7/8 Regression] ICE in gfc_match_omp_clauses, at fortran/openmp.c:1354

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84116 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/84138] [8 Regression] ICE folding broken constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84138 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/84141] [8.0.1 regression] Internal error: type_name(): Bad type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141 --- Comment #9 from Jürgen Reuter --- Let me put a little smaller reproducer.

[Bug c++/84127] pragmas to disable -Wexpansion-to-defined compiler warnings seems to be broken since 7.x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84127 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/53431] C++ preprocessor ignores #pragma GCC diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53431 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||davydden at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug fortran/84141] [8.0.1 regression] Internal error: type_name(): Bad type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141 --- Comment #7 from Jürgen Reuter --- We reproduced this on Darwin 17.4.0 and OpenSuSe Leap 42.2 Linux and within a Docker Image running Ubuntu LTS. The two cases on Linux are the test example of which I extracted the smaller reproducer.

[Bug target/82641] Unable to enable crc32 for a certain function with target attribute on ARM (aarch32)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82641 --- Comment #26 from Richard Earnshaw --- (In reply to Arnd Bergmann from comment #25) > or to apply more force and add the ".arch" to each inline > asm individually. No, that would not be guaranteed to be supported: and you'd be lying to the

[Bug c++/84151] New: [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] g++ generates two identical loads in a volatile-qualified member function.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84151 Bug ID: 84151 Summary: [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] g++ generates two identical loads in a volatile-qualified member function. Product: gcc Version: 7.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/84071] [7/8 regression] wrong elimination of zero-extension after sign-extended load

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84071 --- Comment #19 from Wilco --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #16) > > Also I wonder whether this means AArch64 should set it since targets like > > MIPS > > and Sparc already set it. > > There seems to be a good reason against

[Bug c++/84138] [8 Regression] ICE folding broken constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84138 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Wed Jan 31 15:37:18 2018 New Revision: 257240 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257240=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/84138 * cp-gimplify.c (cp_fold): Check if X is an error

[Bug tree-optimization/84136] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with goto to an && label in another function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84136 --- Comment #3 from David Malcolm --- Discussion/patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-01/msg02451.html

[Bug target/84113] [7/8 Regression] gcc-7.3.0/libgcc/unwind.inc:136:1: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84113 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Because powerpc*-darwin* is neither a primary nor secondary platform, see http://gcc/gnu.org/gcc-8/criteria.html , and therefore bugs in such a port are not release critical.

[Bug bootstrap/80867] gnat bootstrap broken on powerpc64le-linux-gnu with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80867 --- Comment #13 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kelvin Date: Wed Jan 31 18:56:11 2018 New Revision: 257252 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257252=gcc=rev Log: gcc/ChangeLog: 2018-01-31 Richard Biener

[Bug fortran/84141] [8.0.1 regression] Internal error: type_name(): Bad type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Pass with r257125.

[Bug rtl-optimization/84032] ICE in optimize_sc, at modulo-sched.c:1064

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84032 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/84153] New: Bootstrap failure when using dependency libraries in non-system location

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84153 Bug ID: 84153 Summary: Bootstrap failure when using dependency libraries in non-system location Product: gcc Version: 7.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/84113] [7/8 Regression] gcc-7.3.0/libgcc/unwind.inc:136:1: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84113 Douglas Mencken changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||6.4.0 --- Comment #7 from Douglas

[Bug target/84113] [7/8 Regression] gcc-7.3.0/libgcc/unwind.inc:136:1: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84113 --- Comment #8 from Douglas Mencken --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4) > (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #2) > > You cut away the most interesting part: the insn pattern that does not > > exist. > > Could you show us?

[Bug bootstrap/80867] gnat bootstrap broken on powerpc64le-linux-gnu with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80867 --- Comment #12 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kelvin Date: Wed Jan 31 18:22:19 2018 New Revision: 257248 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257248=gcc=rev Log: gcc/ChangeLog: 2018-01-31 Richard Biener

[Bug target/84113] [7/8 Regression] gcc-7.3.0/libgcc/unwind.inc:136:1: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84113 --- Comment #11 from Segher Boessenkool --- It will be fixed. But not many people have access to powerpc-darwin systems to test on. Does this still happen on trunk as well?

[Bug target/82444] ICE in ira_init_register_move_cost, at ira.c:1581

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82444 --- Comment #1 from Vladimir Makarov --- Author: vmakarov Date: Wed Jan 31 19:03:11 2018 New Revision: 257254 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257254=gcc=rev Log: 2018-01-31 Vladimir Makarov PR target/82444

[Bug bootstrap/84153] Bootstrap failure when using dependency libraries in non-system location

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84153 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/84141] [8.0.1 regression] Internal error: type_name(): Bad type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141 --- Comment #14 from Dominique d'Humieres --- I get the ICE with r257065.

[Bug target/84113] [7/8 Regression] gcc-7.3.0/libgcc/unwind.inc:136:1: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84113 --- Comment #14 from Douglas Mencken --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #13) > No, it means anybody can fix it, just the release will not be blocked if it > is not fixed. Well, nice. May I fix it? What happened between 6.4 and 7.1?

[Bug target/84113] [7/8 Regression] gcc-7.3.0/libgcc/unwind.inc:136:1: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84113 --- Comment #10 from Douglas Mencken --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9) > Because powerpc*-darwin* is neither a primary nor secondary platform, see > http://gcc/gnu.org/gcc-8/criteria.html , and therefore bugs in such a port > are

[Bug rtl-optimization/84032] ICE in optimize_sc, at modulo-sched.c:1064

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84032 --- Comment #2 from David Malcolm --- Created attachment 43309 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43309=edit Dumpfile from sms pass (up to the assertion failure)

[Bug target/84113] [7/8 Regression] gcc-7.3.0/libgcc/unwind.inc:136:1: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84113 --- Comment #12 from Douglas Mencken --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #11) > It will be fixed. But not many people have access to powerpc-darwin systems > to test on. I prefer “would” before “will”, and I may give an access to

[Bug target/83926] ICE during RTL pass: ira, in elimination_costs_in_insn, at reload1.c:3633

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83926 --- Comment #9 from Peter Bergner --- So the problem is that the splitter for vsx_div_v2di unconditionally calls gen_divdi3() , which assumes we have a 64-bit integer HW div insn. If you do a scalar 64-bit div, we notice we don't have that HW

[Bug tree-optimization/84152] [7 Regression] Internal compiler error when compiling a cxx file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84152 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/70589] PowerPC target attribute/pragma cannot set/disable -mfloat128

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70589 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/80867] gnat bootstrap broken on powerpc64le-linux-gnu with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80867 kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/84141] [8.0.1 regression] Internal error: type_name(): Bad type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141 --- Comment #16 from Thomas Koenig --- This is strange. Looking at the small reproducer and grepping for the settings to dtype with diff -b -u repro.f90.old repro.f90.new |grep 'dtype.*=' where repro.f90.old is the output of

[Bug target/79038] Improve PowerPC ISA 3.0 conversion between integers and hardware _Float128

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79038 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/84155] [8.0 Regression] program hangs on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84155 --- Comment #1 from Jürgen Reuter --- Created attachment 43313 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43313=edit Reproducer, 48 lines

[Bug c++/83993] [7/8 Regression] ICE: constant not recomputed when ADDR_EXPR changed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83993 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Jan 31 20:46:36 2018 New Revision: 257265 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257265=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/83993 * constexpr.c (cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr):

[Bug c++/83993] [7/8 Regression] ICE: constant not recomputed when ADDR_EXPR changed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83993 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Jan 31 20:45:41 2018 New Revision: 257264 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257264=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/83993 * constexpr.c (diag_array_subscript): Emit different

[Bug fortran/84155] [8.0 Regression] program hangs on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84155 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig

[Bug libfortran/84156] New: [8 Regression] valgrind error with print *,1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84156 Bug ID: 84156 Summary: [8 Regression] valgrind error with print *,1 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c/81779] [6/7/8 Regression] bool define from stdbool.h suppresses -Wdeclaration-after-statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81779 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Wed Jan 31 22:12:46 2018 New Revision: 257271 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257271=gcc=rev Log: PR c/81779 * c-parser.c (c_parser_compound_statement_nostart):

[Bug target/84154] New: PowerPC GCC 7 and 8 have regression in converting fp to short/char and returning it

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84154 Bug ID: 84154 Summary: PowerPC GCC 7 and 8 have regression in converting fp to short/char and returning it Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug sanitizer/83987] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with OpenMP, sanitizer and virtual bases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83987 Volker Reichelt changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6/7 Regression] ICE with |[6/7/8 Regression] ICE with

[Bug libgomp/84088] [8 Regression][nvptx] libgomp.oacc-fortran/declare-*.f90 execution fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84088 --- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Wed Jan 31 20:28:35 2018 New Revision: 257262 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257262=gcc=rev Log: 2018-01-31 Paul Thomas PR fortran/84088 *

[Bug target/81084] [8 Regression] powerpcspe port full of confusing configury / command-line options not related to SPE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084 --- Comment #13 from Andrew Jenner --- Created attachment 43312 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43312=edit Patch in progress so far

[Bug fortran/84155] New: [8.0 Regression] program hangs on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84155 Bug ID: 84155 Summary: [8.0 Regression] program hangs on valid code Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/84116] [7/8 Regression] ICE in gfc_match_omp_clauses, at fortran/openmp.c:1354

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84116 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Jan 31 20:47:48 2018 New Revision: 257266 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257266=gcc=rev Log: PR fortran/84116 * openmp.c (gfc_match_omp_clauses): If all the

[Bug middle-end/84150] Wrong pointer size used in builtin setjmp/longjmp with -maddress-mode=long

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84150 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 43314 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43314=edit A patch I am testing this.

[Bug rtl-optimization/84123] internal compiler error: in gen_rtx_SUBREG, at emit-rtl.c:908, alpha linux.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84123 --- Comment #5 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Wed Jan 31 21:37:54 2018 New Revision: 257270 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257270=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/84123 * combine.c (change_zero_ext):

[Bug libfortran/84156] [8 Regression] valgrind error with print *,1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84156 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug c/81779] [6/7 Regression] bool define from stdbool.h suppresses -Wdeclaration-after-statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81779 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] bool |[6/7 Regression] bool

[Bug rtl-optimization/84157] [8 Regression] [nvptx] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'lshiftrt'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84157 --- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries --- Regression caused by r257270.

[Bug rtl-optimization/84157] New: [8 Regression] [nvptx] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'lshiftrt'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84157 Bug ID: 84157 Summary: [8 Regression] [nvptx] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'lshiftrt' Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/84141] [8.0.1 regression] Internal error: type_name(): Bad type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141 --- Comment #15 from Jürgen Reuter --- Created attachment 43311 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43311=edit Isolated file: small reproducer, 250 lines This should print 1: 2: INSIDE MCI_VAMP_WRITE VAMP integrator:

[Bug fortran/84116] [7 Regression] ICE in gfc_match_omp_clauses, at fortran/openmp.c:1354

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84116 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug c++/83993] [7 Regression] ICE: constant not recomputed when ADDR_EXPR changed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83993 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[7/8 Regression] ICE: |[7 Regression] ICE:

[Bug fortran/84155] [8.0 Regression] program hangs on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84155 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/84157] [8 Regression] [nvptx] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'lshiftrt'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84157 --- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries --- Created attachment 43315 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43315=edit lrand48.c

  1   2   >