[Bug preprocessor/84161] preprocessor should discard Fortran comments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84161 --- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > It should not. Well, why not? If you say that the preprocessor is meant only for C/C++, then it shouldn't be used with Fortran at all. If one uses

[Bug rtl-optimization/84164] New: [8 Regression] ICE: in elimination_costs_in_insn, at reload1.c:3633 at -O1

n/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch --prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-257290-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-aarch64 Thread model: posix gcc version 8.0.1 20180201 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug target/82795] [7/8 Regression] ICE in predicate_mem_writes, at tree-if-conv.c:2251

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82795 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug target/82795] [7/8 Regression] ICE in predicate_mem_writes, at tree-if-conv.c:2251

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82795 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Feb 1 12:07:46 2018 New Revision: 257292 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257292=gcc=rev Log: 2018-02-01 Richard Biener Backport from mainline

[Bug fortran/84141] [8 regression] Internal error: type_name(): Bad type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141 --- Comment #20 from Paul Thomas --- A temporary fix: Index: ../trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-io.c === *** ../trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-io.c (revision 257261) ---

[Bug fortran/84155] [8 Regression] program hangs on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84155 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas --- A temporary fix: Index: ../trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-io.c === *** ../trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-io.c (revision 257261) ---

[Bug middle-end/83665] [8 regression] Big code size regression and some code quality improvement at Jan 2 2018

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83665 --- Comment #13 from Jan Hubicka --- I have started with experiments on czerny. Set --param inline-min-speedup from 8 to 15 at 30th of January and to 30 yesterday. Most of size regression comes away with 15 and I observed to off-noise

[Bug preprocessor/84165] #define strlen asdf affects calls to asdf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84165 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/84013] wrong __restrict clique with inline asm operand

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84013 --- Comment #4 from Katsunori Kumatani --- Thanks, it's quite useful in some "meta asm" cases (in conjunction with plugins, asms can be useful since you can't add builtins). Or when doing custom calls in asms (or syscalls, etc) and you know what

[Bug c/84168] New: Please backport "Avoid assembler warnings from AArch64 constructor/destructor priorities."

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84168 Bug ID: 84168 Summary: Please backport "Avoid assembler warnings from AArch64 constructor/destructor priorities." Product: gcc Version: 7.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/80569] i686: "shrx" instruction generated in 16-bit mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80569 --- Comment #16 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > This shouldn't happen with degagnu after > > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=dejagnu.git;a=commit;h=5256bd82343000c76bc0e48139003f90b6184347 Which would mean requiring at least

[Bug target/83846] Some SVE tests fail with -mabi=ilp32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83846 --- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rsandifo Date: Thu Feb 1 11:04:58 2018 New Revision: 257290 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257290=gcc=rev Log: [AArch64] Fix SVE testsuite failures for ILP32 (PR 83846) The

[Bug rtl-optimization/84157] [8 Regression] [nvptx] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'lshiftrt'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84157 --- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool --- I've tested this on powerpc64-linux {-m64,-m32} as well (change_zero_ext is pretty important for us; we have big testcases for this and related code). No issues found.

[Bug rtl-optimization/84164] [8 Regression] ICE: in elimination_costs_in_insn, at reload1.c:3633 at -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84164 --- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- We encounter an unrecognizable insn: (insn 59 58 43 7 (set (reg:DI 124) (rotatert:DI (reg:DI 125 [ c ]) (subreg:QI (and:SI (reg:SI 128) (const_int 65535

[Bug target/80569] i686: "shrx" instruction generated in 16-bit mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80569 --- Comment #13 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #12) > I've just checked a x86_64-apple-darwin11.4.2 build: the test PASSes for > -m64, but FAILs for -m32 with > >

[Bug target/35179] execs crash in shared lib destructor = do_global_dtors_aux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35179 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug preprocessor/84165] New: #define strlen asdf affects calls to asdf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84165 Bug ID: 84165 Summary: #define strlen asdf affects calls to asdf Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/84158] [6/7/8 Regression] missing -Wreturn-type due to incorrect handling of attributes for template specializations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84158 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.5

[Bug target/80569] i686: "shrx" instruction generated in 16-bit mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80569 --- Comment #15 from H.J. Lu --- > > Could be a bug in the old Apple as. However, the testcase is fishy in > explicitly passing -m16. For multilibbed x86 targets, that gets > overridden for the non-default multilibs (either with -m32 or m64).

[Bug target/83370] [AARCH64]Tailcall register may be corrupted by epilogue code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83370 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/81635] [8 Regression] nvptx SLP test cases regressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81635 --- Comment #13 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rsandifo Date: Thu Feb 1 14:17:07 2018 New Revision: 257296 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257296=gcc=rev Log: Use range info in split_constant_offset (PR 81635) This patch

[Bug target/84164] [8 Regression] ICE: in elimination_costs_in_insn, at reload1.c:3633 at -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84164 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|rtl-optimization|target Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/80569] i686: "shrx" instruction generated in 16-bit mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80569 --- Comment #14 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- >> /var/folders/zz/zyxvpxvq6csfxvn_n87r00021y/T//cchNxmiW.s:7:no such >> instruction: `shrx %eax, 4(%esp),%eax' > http://www.felixcloutier.com/x86/SARX:SHLX:SHRX.html Could be a

[Bug c++/84158] [6/7/8 Regression] missing -Wreturn-type due to incorrect handling of attributes for template specializations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84158 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- As C++ now has standardized attributes, the question is what does the standard say about whether standard attributes on a template are inherited to specializations or not, and if the standard is fuzzy about

[Bug tree-optimization/82726] ICE in verify_ssa during GIMPLE pass: pcom

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82726 --- Comment #7 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: amker Date: Thu Feb 1 12:00:57 2018 New Revision: 257291 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257291=gcc=rev Log: Backport from mainline 2017-11-15 Bin Cheng

[Bug tree-optimization/70754] [6 Regression] ICE during predictive commoning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70754 --- Comment #21 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: amker Date: Thu Feb 1 12:00:57 2018 New Revision: 257291 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257291=gcc=rev Log: Backport from mainline 2017-11-15 Bin Cheng

[Bug fortran/84155] [8 Regression] program hangs on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84155 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/84141] [8 regression] Internal error: type_name(): Bad type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/80569] i686: "shrx" instruction generated in 16-bit mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80569 --- Comment #12 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- I've just checked a x86_64-apple-darwin11.4.2 build: the test PASSes for -m64, but FAILs for -m32 with /var/folders/zz/zyxvpxvq6csfxvn_n87r00021y/T//cchNxmiW.s:7:no such

[Bug c/84166] New: Wrong warning message emitted for loss of qualifiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84166 Bug ID: 84166 Summary: Wrong warning message emitted for loss of qualifiers Product: gcc Version: 6.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/84162] Internal compiler error: in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:13617 / SEGFAULT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84162 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug middle-end/81812] [7/8 Regression] Empty virtual function fails to compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81812 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mliska at suse dot cz --- Comment #8 from

[Bug tree-optimization/81661] [7 Regression] ICE in gimplify_modify_expr, at gimplify.c:5638

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81661 Bug 81661 depends on bug 84117, which changed state. Bug 84117 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in gimplify_modify_expr, at gimplify.c:5798 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84117 What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/83845] [8 regression] new failures after r256620

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83845 --- Comment #5 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rsandifo Date: Thu Feb 1 11:02:52 2018 New Revision: 257285 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257285=gcc=rev Log: [AArch64] Tighten aarch64_secondary_reload condition (PR 83845)

[Bug target/82795] [7 Regression] ICE in predicate_mem_writes, at tree-if-conv.c:2251

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82795 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug web/84167] New: bugzilla should have a "next bug" button

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84167 Bug ID: 84167 Summary: bugzilla should have a "next bug" button Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: web

[Bug target/83370] [AARCH64]Tailcall register may be corrupted by epilogue code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83370 --- Comment #1 from Renlin Li --- Author: renlin Date: Thu Feb 1 13:02:24 2018 New Revision: 257294 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257294=gcc=rev Log: [PR83370][AARCH64]Use tighter register constraint for sibcall patterns. In aarch64

[Bug target/80569] i686: "shrx" instruction generated in 16-bit mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80569 --- Comment #11 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- The problem still exists, and according to gcc-testresults the test FAILs on i386-pc-solaris2.11, x86_64-pc-solaris2.11, x86_64-apple-darwin15.6.0, i686-pc-linux-gnu, and

[Bug rtl-optimization/84164] [8 Regression] ICE: in elimination_costs_in_insn, at reload1.c:3633 at -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84164 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/77331] incorrect range location in -Wformat with a concatenated format literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77331 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug target/83370] [AARCH64]Tailcall register may be corrupted by epilogue code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83370 Renlin Li changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/84164] [8 Regression] ICE: in elimination_costs_in_insn, at reload1.c:3633 at -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84164 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/83503] [8 Regression] bogus -Wattributes for const and pure on function template specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83503 --- Comment #17 from Jason Merrill --- On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 9:45 PM, msebor at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Jason, I'm only starting to look into it but if I understand your suggestion > correctly, I don't think the bug

[Bug fortran/60576] [6/7/8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/assumed_rank_7.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60576 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/28831] [6/7/8 Regression] Aggregate copy not elided when using a return value as a pass-by-value parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28831 --- Comment #32 from Aldy Hernandez --- errr, slightly LESS worse code

[Bug fortran/83975] [8 Regression] ICE in set_parm_default_def_partition, at tree-ssa-coalesce.c:1919

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83975 --- Comment #8 from Janne Blomqvist --- Author: jb Date: Thu Feb 1 19:47:15 2018 New Revision: 257310 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257310=gcc=rev Log: PR 83975 Associate target with non-constant character length When associating a

[Bug fortran/59781] [6 Regression] [F03] Incorrect initialisation of derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59781 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug target/83743] -mcpu=native causes gcc to exit in error if cpu is not recognized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83743 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/82249] [8 Regression] wrong mismatched argument pack lengths

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82249 --- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Thu Feb 1 18:44:41 2018 New Revision: 257307 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257307=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/84126 - ICE with variadic generic lambda PR c++/84036

[Bug c++/84126] [8 Regression] ICE in variadic generic lambda inside a template function calling a function with arguments by reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84126 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Thu Feb 1 18:44:41 2018 New Revision: 257307 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257307=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/84126 - ICE with variadic generic lambda PR c++/84036

[Bug c++/84036] [8 Regression] ICE on valid code in C++14, variadic lambda capture in a template function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84036 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Thu Feb 1 18:44:41 2018 New Revision: 257307 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257307=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/84126 - ICE with variadic generic lambda PR c++/84036

[Bug c++/84171] [8 Regression] ICE with -Wsign-compare

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84171 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/33699] [6/7/8 regression] missing optimization on const addr area store

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33699 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2012-01-04 00:00:00 |2018-2-1 CC|

[Bug target/84113] [7/8 Regression] gcc-7.3.0/libgcc/unwind.inc:136:1: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84113 --- Comment #17 from Douglas Mencken --- diff of libgcc/unwind-dw2.c between 6.4 and 7.1 --- a/libgcc/unwind-dw2.c +++ b/libgcc/unwind-dw2.c @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ /* DWARF2 exception handling and frame unwind runtime interface routines. -

[Bug c++/84160] [8 Regression] ICE on valid C++11 code: in build_capture_proxy, at cp/lambda.c:446

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84160 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug fortran/83344] Use of uninitialized memory with ASSOCIATE and strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83344 --- Comment #11 from Janne Blomqvist --- Author: jb Date: Thu Feb 1 19:47:15 2018 New Revision: 257310 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257310=gcc=rev Log: PR 83975 Associate target with non-constant character length When associating a

[Bug fortran/60576] [6/7/8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/assumed_rank_7.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60576 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug fortran/83823] [8 Regression] Character length issues with PACK()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83823 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig --- -fsanitize=address gives: ==21482==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: global-buffer-overflow on address 0x00402624 at pc 0x7f6d755ede76 bp 0x7ffed65778c0 sp 0x7ffed6577070 READ of size 5 at 0x00402624 thread

[Bug tree-optimization/21485] [6/7/8 Regression] missed load PRE, PRE makes i?86/7/8 suck

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21485 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2011-02-06 23:54:40 |2018-2-1 CC|

[Bug target/27855] [6/7/8 regression] reassociation causes the RA to be confused

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27855 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/28831] [6/7/8 Regression] Aggregate copy not elided when using a return value as a pass-by-value parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28831 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2010-01-17 13:10:45 |2018-2-1 CC|

[Bug fortran/60576] [6/7/8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/assumed_rank_7.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60576 --- Comment #25 from Thomas Koenig --- Strange, I don't see it; what I get is ig25@linux-d6cw:/tmp> gfortran -g -fsanitize=address assumed_rank_7.f90 ig25@linux-d6cw:/tmp> ./a.out

[Bug target/56010] Powerpc, -mcpu=native and -mtune=native use the wrong name for target 7450

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56010 --- Comment #11 from Peter Bergner --- Author: bergner Date: Thu Feb 1 18:26:51 2018 New Revision: 257305 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257305=gcc=rev Log: PR target/56010 PR target/83743 *

[Bug target/83743] -mcpu=native causes gcc to exit in error if cpu is not recognized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83743 --- Comment #6 from Peter Bergner --- Author: bergner Date: Thu Feb 1 18:26:51 2018 New Revision: 257305 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257305=gcc=rev Log: PR target/56010 PR target/83743 *

[Bug target/84169] [8 Regression] wrong code with u128 multiplication result at aarch64 -O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84169 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/68560] [6/7/8 Regression] The test gfortran.dg/shape_8.f90 now fails when compiled with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68560 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug fortran/79886] [6 Regression] ICE in pp_format, at pretty-print.c:681

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79886 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/56010] Powerpc, -mcpu=native and -mtune=native use the wrong name for target 7450

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56010 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/84126] [8 Regression] ICE in variadic generic lambda inside a template function calling a function with arguments by reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84126 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug web/84167] bugzilla should have a "next bug" button

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84167 Frédéric Buclin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/84171] New: [8 Regression] ICE with -Wsign-compare

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84171 Bug ID: 84171 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE with -Wsign-compare Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: error-recovery, ice-on-invalid-code Severity:

[Bug target/29256] [6/7/8 regression] loop performance regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29256 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2013-12-09 04:50:02 |2018-2-1 CC|

[Bug fortran/46496] Missing strlen check / interop warnings with BIND(C) and non-C_* kinds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46496 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #0) > f) The following two examples are invalid - but seemingly gfortran does not > check the string length of DT character components: > > module mytypes >use

[Bug target/68028] [6/7/8 regression] Compilation error "lto1: error: target attribute or pragma changes single precision floating point" with LTO on PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68028 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9

[Bug target/84128] i686: Stack spilling in -fstack-clash-protection prologue neglects %esp change

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84128 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/84128] i686: Stack spilling in -fstack-clash-protection prologue neglects %esp change

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84128 --- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Thu Feb 1 16:22:56 2018 New Revision: 257303 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257303=gcc=rev Log: PR target/84128 * config/i386/i386.c

[Bug c/84166] Wrong warning message emitted for loss of qualifiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84166 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- It's not confused. It's saying that it's type-safe to convert "uint32_t **" to "volatile uint32_t *const *", but not to convert it to "volatile uint32_t *".

[Bug target/83926] ICE during RTL pass: ira, in elimination_costs_in_insn, at reload1.c:3633

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83926 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug debug/83935] DWARF for a variant part is incorrect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83935 --- Comment #6 from Pierre-Marie de Rodat --- Just got a notification that it got assigned issue #180123.1: http://dwarfstd.org/ShowIssue.php?issue=180123.1

[Bug c++/83796] [6/7 Regression] Abstract classes allowed to be instantiated when initialised as default parameter to function or constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83796 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] Abstract |[6/7 Regression] Abstract

[Bug rtl-optimization/84157] [8 Regression] [nvptx] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'lshiftrt'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84157 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/84158] [6/7/8 Regression] missing -Wreturn-type due to incorrect handling of attributes for template specializations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84158 --- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor --- I tested the modified C++ 11 example below with Clang, EDG, GCC, ICC, and MSVC. Of these, only MSVC implements the behavior I expect and doesn't warn. The others do. (I verified that MSVC does support the

[Bug target/84169] New: [8 Regression] wrong code with u128 multiplication result at aarch64 -O

gnu --target=aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu --with-ld=/usr/bin/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu-ld --with-as=/usr/bin/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch --prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-257303-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-aarch64 Thread model: posix gcc version 8.0.1 20180201 (experimen

[Bug target/83926] ICE during RTL pass: ira, in elimination_costs_in_insn, at reload1.c:3633

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83926 --- Comment #10 from Peter Bergner --- A similar error happens with the __builtin_vsx_udiv_2di() that happens with __builtin_vsx_div_2di(), which shows the splitter for vsx_udiv_v2di calling gen_udivdi3() directly: [bergner@makalu-lp1 PR83926]$

[Bug rtl-optimization/84157] [8 Regression] [nvptx] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'lshiftrt'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84157 --- Comment #10 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Thu Feb 1 16:04:18 2018 New Revision: 257302 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257302=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/84157 * combine.c (change_zero_ext):

Your Weekly Breeze - February. 01 - February. 07

This email newsletter was sent to you in graphical HTML format. If you're seeing this version, your email program prefers plain text emails. You can read the original version online: http://ymlptrack7.com/zwbctq

[Bug middle-end/84089] [8 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1y/lambda-generic-x.C -std=gnu++14 (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84089 --- Comment #6 from Aldy Hernandez --- Author: aldyh Date: Thu Feb 1 17:12:28 2018 New Revision: 257304 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257304=gcc=rev Log: PR target/84089 * config/pa/predicates.md (base14_operand): Handle

[Bug ipa/80899] [6/7/8 Regression] Devirtualization causes incorrect code generation with placement new in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80899 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug c++/83796] [6/7/8 Regression] Abstract classes allowed to be instantiated when initialised as default parameter to function or constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83796 --- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Thu Feb 1 15:36:04 2018 New Revision: 257298 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257298=gcc=rev Log: /cp 2018-02-01 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug target/84169] [8 Regression] wrong code with u128 multiplication result at aarch64 -O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84169 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug c++/84158] [6/7/8 Regression] missing -Wreturn-type due to incorrect handling of attributes for template specializations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84158 --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > I actually think it is the right thing that the attributes from templates > are inherited by specializations. That cannot be correct. Because there is no way to

[Bug c++/84158] [6/7/8 Regression] missing -Wreturn-type due to incorrect handling of attributes for template specializations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84158 --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > As C++ now has standardized attributes, the question is what does the > standard say about whether standard attributes on a template are inherited > to

[Bug libstdc++/84170] New: std::find_if performance issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84170 Bug ID: 84170 Summary: std::find_if performance issues Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug middle-end/84089] [8 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1y/lambda-generic-x.C -std=gnu++14 (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84089 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/84172] option "-O3" create slower code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84172 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-suse-linux Component|c

[Bug c++/81475] missing -Wsequence-point on a self-referential array access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81475 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug fortran/84141] [8 regression] Internal error: type_name(): Bad type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141 --- Comment #21 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > A temporary fix: > ... Preliminary tests look good! Thanks.

[Bug rtl-optimization/84123] internal compiler error: in gen_rtx_SUBREG, at emit-rtl.c:908, alpha linux.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84123 --- Comment #6 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Thu Feb 1 22:22:03 2018 New Revision: 257318 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257318=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/84123 * combine.c (change_zero_ext):

[Bug fortran/84141] [8 regression] Internal error: type_name(): Bad type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141 --- Comment #22 from Jürgen Reuter --- I'm actually running our code right now. It fixes _almost all_ of our unit and functional tests. There is still one failing unit test and at least one failing functional test. Still waiting for the full

[Bug fortran/84155] [8 Regression] program hangs on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84155 --- Comment #9 from Jürgen Reuter --- This fixes almost all of our unit and functional test, but not all of them. There are still 19 functional tests failing, all of them seem to have to do with some sort of I/O . And one unit tests, which I

  1   2   >