https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84077
--- Comment #13 from Flössie ---
Thanks for the thorough analysis. We'll discuss in our team how to cope with
it.
Best regards,
Flössie
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84077
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83372
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||GC, ice-on-valid-code,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83372
--- Comment #16 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #15)
> Alan: are you able to test Nathan's bug to see if it fixes the issue for you?
^^^
pa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84263
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84289
--- Comment #2 from claudio daffra ---
yes, but people expects g++ emit warning , Independent from optimisation
level , referring others simlar bug . can you fix ?
Il 09 feb 2018 00:09, "manu at gcc dot gnu.org"
ha scritto:
> https://gcc.gnu.o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84319
Bug ID: 84319
Summary: [8 regression] Location views break bootstrap with
Solaris/SPARC as
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84319
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84276
--- Comment #14 from Steve Kargl ---
On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 02:20:20AM +, mecej4 at outlook dot com wrote:
>
> Will keyword arguments in statement function references be retained as a GNU
> extension?
>
The extension will remain, but I in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83892
--- Comment #7 from simon at pushface dot org ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #5)
> It would be nice if acats could honor dejagnu RUNTESTFLAGS. That is,
> I regularly do
>
> make check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix/-g"
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84308
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83987
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] ICE with |[6/7 Regression] ICE with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84244
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84219
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56691
--- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sat Feb 10 18:16:14 2018
New Revision: 257550
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257550&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-10 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/84141
PR fortran/8415
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84155
--- Comment #20 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sat Feb 10 18:16:14 2018
New Revision: 257550
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257550&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-10 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/84141
PR fortran/8415
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141
--- Comment #38 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sat Feb 10 18:16:14 2018
New Revision: 257550
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257550&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-10 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/84141
PR fortran/8415
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84114
--- Comment #3 from Wilco ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> This is probably related to targetm.sched.reassociation_width where reassoc
> will widen a PLUS chain so several instructions will be executable in
> parallel
> without
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84155
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141
Bug 84141 depends on bug 84155, which changed state.
Bug 84155 Summary: [8 Regression] program hangs on valid code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84155
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84155
--- Comment #22 from Jürgen Reuter ---
I just started building r257550 of the trunk and will check our code. I'll
report back of there are any issues.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56691
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84089
--- Comment #8 from John David Anglin ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Feb 10 19:55:06 2018
New Revision: 257552
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257552&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2018-02-01 Aldy Hernandez
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84089
--- Comment #9 from John David Anglin ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Feb 10 20:04:59 2018
New Revision: 257553
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257553&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2018-02-01 Aldy Hernandez
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84289
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84074
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|RES
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84320
Bug ID: 84320
Summary: Program_Error exp_util.adb:4352 explicit raise related
to lock-free protected type
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84148
Gianluigi Tiesi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sherpya at netfarm dot it
--- Comment
28 matches
Mail list logo
