https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82368
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 43412
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43412=edit
gcc8-pr82368.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84322
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84317
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
>> --- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE > Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
> [...]
>> I'm currently
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83723
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84377
--- Comment #2 from Andreas K. Huettel ---
>
> but it doesn't fail for me, does it for you?
Yes it fails here.
(~amd64 chroot) pinacolada ~/test # gcc -m32 -O2 -std=gnu11 -fgnu89-inline
-fno-strict-aliasing -frounding-math
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82005
--- Comment #28 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 14 Feb 2018, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82005
>
> --- Comment #27 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> > For completeness here is a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83831
--- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Wed Feb 14 12:33:37 2018
New Revision: 257655
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257655=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/83831
* config/rx/rx-protos.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83990
--- Comment #15 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Wed Feb 14 12:55:47 2018
New Revision: 257656
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257656=gcc=rev
Log:
Fix location handling in ipa_modify_call_arguments
2018-02-14 Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55836
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82005
--- Comment #27 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> For completeness here is a fixed diff:
With the patch the failures (-m32/-m64) went down from 1059 to 467.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83789
--- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool ---
See https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-02/msg00031.html -- I think Kaushik
is still looking at this?
ses there is some misleading 'noise' in the diagnostics.
Errors for the free standing function:
20180214-pmf.cpp: In function ‘void foo()’:
20180214-pmf.cpp:25:19: error: cannot declare pointer to ‘void’ member
void(Bar::*mfpf)(MyFoo, bool, const char*);
^
There is NO 'v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84313
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 14 12:12:15 2018
New Revision: 257654
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257654=gcc=rev
Log:
PR fortran/84313
* testsuite/libgomp.fortran/threadprivate4.f90:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84374
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81930
Bug 81930 depends on bug 55836, which changed state.
Bug 55836 Summary: Weffc++: warning: base class 'class std::list' has a non-virtual destructor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55836
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83789
--- Comment #8 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #7)
> See https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-02/msg00031.html -- I think
> Kaushik
> is still looking at this?
Ah, ok. I do agree with your comment to use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84368
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84364
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #4)
> (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> > Insert obligatory "we should fix -Weffc++ or deprecate it" comment.
>
> Insert obligatory statement of my
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84357
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Wed Feb 14 13:14:51 2018
New Revision: 257657
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257657=gcc=rev
Log:
Check array indices in object_address_invariant_in_loop_p (PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84317
--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva ---
> The corrected patch, that I emailed you just after I got your email and
> realized I'd posted the patch without that fix, has been in the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84322
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83965
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83723
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84363
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84342
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84377
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84375
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84376
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84317
--- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva ---
The corrected patch, that I emailed you just after I got your email and
realized I'd posted the patch without that fix, has been in the trunk since
yesterday, FWIW.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84342
--- Comment #7 from Tamar Christina ---
Jeff: ccfsm is indeed the problem here, as it does indeed decide quite late to
remove a branch. Though we've tried emitting a nop instead of nothing just to
test and this fixes the branch but causes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84350
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84037
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84037
--- Comment #30 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Is this fixed now or is there more work to do?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84350
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |paolo.carlini at oracle
dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84368
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84342
--- Comment #8 from Alexandre Oliva ---
That's the hook, yes. But if you return 1, then the view-computing logic will
behave just as if it noticed a nonzero length for the insn. If the branch is
eliminated and no code it generated for that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82368
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 14 14:19:36 2018
New Revision: 257658
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257658=gcc=rev
Log:
PR other/82368
* elf.c (EM_PPC64, EF_PPC64_ABI): Undefine and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84220
--- Comment #2 from Will Schmidt ---
Author: willschm
Date: Wed Feb 14 15:32:02 2018
New Revision: 257662
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257662=gcc=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2018-02-14 Will Schmidt
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84381
Bug ID: 84381
Summary: replace non-std 'call abort' by 'stop 1' in gfortran
testsuite
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80945
--- Comment #8 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com ---
Hi Thomas,
It doesn't just ring bells, it lets off sirens and sets the marching
bands to marching!
I can only find rather old sources on the web but I seem to remember
that the new
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84368
--- Comment #3 from Benjamin Buch ---
I'm on git commit a5283f322810189a156a0fb080bf6d65e6f7970e which should be
R257627.
I used:
$ git svn find-rev $(git log --max-count 1 --pretty=format:%H)
Migrating from a git-svn v1 layout...
Data from a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84288
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> * If DejaGnu is installed into a non-system directory, dejagnu.h isn't found
> compiling the tests. I've hacked around this by hardcoding a matching -I
> option in jit.exp.
I
'void foo(T ...) [with T = {int}]'
main.cpp:13:10: required from here
main.cpp:8:17: error: use of 'bar' before deduction of 'auto'
sink(bar(v, T{}) ...);
~~~^~~~
$ g++ --version
g++ (GCC) 8.0.1 20180214 (experimental)
Copyright (C) 2018 Free Software Foundatio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84383
Bug ID: 84383
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in maybe_diag_stxncpy_trunc
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84383
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84368
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82368
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84379
Bug ID: 84379
Summary: Problems with sol2.c GTY handling
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84197
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84380
Bug ID: 84380
Summary: No GTY handling for language-specific target files
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84239
--- Comment #1 from itsimbal at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: itsimbal
Date: Wed Feb 14 15:06:21 2018
New Revision: 257660
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257660=gcc=rev
Log:
Reimplement CET intrinsics for rdssp/incssp insn.
Introduce a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84279
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #10 from Peter
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83990
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84382
Bug ID: 84382
Summary: add command-line options -std=gnu2003 and -std=gnu2008
for gfortran
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62234
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84100
--- Comment #11 from Chris Hall ---
FWIW: __attribute__((aligned(32))) works nicely for functions.
Generally there is little to be gained from aligning all loops/jumps/labels in
a given function or group of functions.
Further, when code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81652
Bug 81652 depends on bug 84239, which changed state.
Bug 84239 Summary: Reimplement rdssp[d|q] and incssp[d|q] CET intrinsics
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84239
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84239
igor.v.tsimbalist at intel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84279
--- Comment #9 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Wed Feb 14 15:17:04 2018
New Revision: 257661
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257661=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/
Back port from mainline
2018-02-13 Peter Bergner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84357
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84383
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84383
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84383
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 43415
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43415=edit
gcc8-pr84383.patch
Untested fix.
BTW, the code is still problematic, e.g. the:
if (code == ARRAY_REF || code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84384
Bug ID: 84384
Summary: new test case
gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-4-int128-runnable.c fails
on power7
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84384
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||meissner at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84372
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84350
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[7/8 Regression] ICE with |[7 Regression] ICE with new
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52899
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84372
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84384
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84350
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Feb 14 17:59:29 2018
New Revision: 257666
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257666=gcc=rev
Log:
/cp
2018-02-14 Paolo Carlini
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82005
--- Comment #26 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #25)
> On February 13, 2018 5:35:22 PM GMT+01:00, simon at pushface dot org
> wrote:
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84391
Bug ID: 84391
Summary: External specs file misinterpreted, unless read twice
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82368
--- Comment #14 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #10)
> Jakub had it correct in comment #8.
Yeah, I have no idea how I got that completely wrong notion. Sorry all.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83984
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin ---
Author: danglin
Date: Wed Feb 14 21:13:26 2018
New Revision: 257672
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257672=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/83984
* config/pa/pa.md: Load address of PIC label
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79361
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84392
Bug ID: 84392
Summary: test case gcc.dg/graphite/uns-interchange-9.c and 3
others fail on power9
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84393
Bug ID: 84393
Summary: "make install" omits gfortran modules, following
cross-native build
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52277
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67613
Bug 67613 depends on bug 52277, which changed state.
Bug 52277 Summary: spell corrector for misspelled identifiers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52277
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83789
--- Comment #11 from Peter Bergner ---
Ah, testing my patch, we're getting duplicate named patterns. I'll have to
think about this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84381
Neil Carlson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83698
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Wed Feb 14 23:22:15 2018
New Revision: 257676
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257676=gcc=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/83698 - bogus offset in -Wrestrict messages for strcat of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83698
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84395
Bug ID: 84395
Summary: -Wstringop-truncation where -Wstringop-overflow is
expected
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84384
Carl Love changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #5 from Carl Love ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84396
Bug ID: 84396
Summary: missing -Wstringop-truncation with non-nul assignment
to destination
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84383
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83984
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84218
--- Comment #3 from G. Steinmetz ---
Some working variants/extentions with substring "x(i:i)" :
$ cat z2.f90
program p
integer :: i
character(3) :: x
data (x(i:i), i=1,3) /'a', 'b', 'c'/
print *, x
end
$
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84371
--- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
In addition to trunk this also fails with gcc 7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84385
Bug ID: 84385
Summary: [F03] Reject invalid SELECT TYPE selector
(allocate_with_source_22.f03)
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84390
--- Comment #3 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Wed Feb 14 20:03:21 2018
New Revision: 257671
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257671=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport from GCC 7 branch
2018-02-14 Peter Bergner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84390
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84360
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
As I understand it, "using" is a more modern form of typedef (e.g. with
template support).
So should this ideally read:
return type ‘T’ {aka ‘class std::tuple’} is incomplete
to express
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84390
--- Comment #2 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Wed Feb 14 19:56:25 2018
New Revision: 257670
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257670=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/84390
* gcc.target/powerpc/vsxcopy.c: Also match lxv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84390
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.5
--- Comment #5 from Peter Bergner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84390
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82939
--- Comment #8 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #7)
> It works when I use a previous version of gcc I built myself though. (8.0
> from 20170525)
Regardless of the fact that I was able to work around this bug, I'm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79242
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
CC|
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo