[Bug target/84521] [8 Regression] aarch64: Frame-pointer corruption with __builtin_setjmp/__builtin_longjmp and -fomit-frame-pointer

2018-03-06 Thread sudi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84521 --- Comment #16 from sudi at gcc dot gnu.org --- So I think I would go with Jakub's suggestion of defining calls_builtin_setjmp and use that in aarch64_layout_frame for cfun->machine->frame.emit_frame_chain. I am still investigating Wilco's

[Bug rtl-optimization/82982] [8 Regression] ICE: qsort checking failed (error: qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 5) in ready_sort_real in haifa scheduler

2018-03-06 Thread willschm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82982 --- Comment #8 from Will Schmidt --- (In reply to Will Schmidt from comment #6) > (In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #5) > > (In reply to Will Schmidt from comment #4) > > > Tried to re-create locally, I've gotten two ICE's using the

[Bug target/83748] Local variables not aligned to word boundary

2018-03-06 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83748 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/84739] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE in get_value_for_expr, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:649

2018-03-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84739 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Component|c

[Bug c++/79937] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE in replace_placeholders_r

2018-03-06 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79937 --- Comment #16 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #13) > E.g. could we walk into TARGET_EXPRs that have TARGET_EXPR_INITIAL > AGGR_INIT_EXPR, but avoid those that have TARGET_EXPR_INITIAL a CONSTRUCTOR, > or a

[Bug fortran/56667] Syntax error causes misleading message: "Expected PARAMETER symbol in complex constant"

2018-03-06 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56667 --- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Tue Mar 6 19:27:48 2018 New Revision: 258282 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258282=gcc=rev Log: 2018-03-06 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug target/84743] New: default widths for parallel reassociation now hurt rather than help

2018-03-06 Thread acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84743 Bug ID: 84743 Summary: default widths for parallel reassociation now hurt rather than help Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/79455] c-c++-common/tsan/race_on_mutex.c fails on powerpcle starting with r244854 (where it was activated)

2018-03-06 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79455 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Tue Mar 6 20:05:52 2018 New Revision: 258293 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258293=gcc=rev Log: Backport r247342 2018-03-06 Martin Liska Backport from

[Bug rtl-optimization/82675] ICE in duplicate_loop_to_header_edge at gcc/cfgloopmanip.c:1207

2018-03-06 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82675 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Tue Mar 6 20:06:10 2018 New Revision: 258294 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258294=gcc=rev Log: Backport r255818 2018-03-06 Martin Liska Backport from

[Bug target/84743] default widths for parallel reassociation now hurt rather than help

2018-03-06 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84743 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 CC|

[Bug lto/81004] [7 Regression] linking failed with -flto and static libboost_program_options

2018-03-06 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81004 --- Comment #27 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Tue Mar 6 20:02:22 2018 New Revision: 258287 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258287=gcc=rev Log: Backport r257412 2018-03-06 Martin Liska Backport

[Bug c/84741] New: [7/8 Regression] ICE in ix86_expand_prologue, at config/i386/i386.c:13893

2018-03-06 Thread gs...@t-online.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84741 Bug ID: 84741 Summary: [7/8 Regression] ICE in ix86_expand_prologue, at config/i386/i386.c:13893 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/56667] Syntax error causes misleading message: "Expected PARAMETER symbol in complex constant"

2018-03-06 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56667 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/56667] Syntax error causes misleading message: "Expected PARAMETER symbol in complex constant"

2018-03-06 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56667 --- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Tue Mar 6 19:30:41 2018 New Revision: 258283 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258283=gcc=rev Log: 2018-03-06 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug lto/83954] [6/7 Regression] LTO: Bogus -Wlto-type-mismatch warning for array of pointer to incomplete type

2018-03-06 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83954 --- Comment #15 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Tue Mar 6 20:02:03 2018 New Revision: 258286 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258286=gcc=rev Log: Backport r257343 2018-03-06 Martin Liska Backport

[Bug lto/83954] [6/7 Regression] LTO: Bogus -Wlto-type-mismatch warning for array of pointer to incomplete type

2018-03-06 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83954 --- Comment #14 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Tue Mar 6 20:01:44 2018 New Revision: 258285 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258285=gcc=rev Log: Backport r257183 2018-03-06 Martin Liska Backport

[Bug libstdc++/84738] New: stack-overflow in regex_match

2018-03-06 Thread jr98 at hotmail dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84738 Bug ID: 84738 Summary: stack-overflow in regex_match Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug c/84739] New: [6/7/8 Regression] ICE in get_value_for_expr, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:649

2018-03-06 Thread gs...@t-online.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84739 Bug ID: 84739 Summary: [6/7/8 Regression] ICE in get_value_for_expr, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:649 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/84739] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE in get_value_for_expr, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:649

2018-03-06 Thread gs...@t-online.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84739 --- Comment #1 from G. Steinmetz --- Configured with --enable-checking=yes : $ gcc-8-20180304 -O2 -c z1.c z1.c:1:13: warning: 'baz' alias between functions of incompatible types 'void(void)' and 'void(int, int)'

[Bug fortran/56667] Syntax error causes misleading message: "Expected PARAMETER symbol in complex constant"

2018-03-06 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56667 --- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Tue Mar 6 19:05:48 2018 New Revision: 258281 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258281=gcc=rev Log: 2018-03-06 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug gcov-profile/83879] __gcov_dump doesn't work with dlopen-ed libraries

2018-03-06 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83879 --- Comment #8 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Tue Mar 6 20:06:45 2018 New Revision: 258296 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258296=gcc=rev Log: Backport r257383 2018-03-06 Martin Liska Backport from

[Bug gcov-profile/84137] Typo in gcov online documentation

2018-03-06 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84137 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Tue Mar 6 20:06:56 2018 New Revision: 258297 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258297=gcc=rev Log: Backport r257384 2018-03-06 Martin Liska Backport from

[Bug lto/81440] -Wlto-type-mismatch warning with flexible array in struct

2018-03-06 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81440 --- Comment #10 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Tue Mar 6 20:06:29 2018 New Revision: 258295 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258295=gcc=rev Log: Backport r256989 2018-03-06 Martin Liska Backport

[Bug target/84371] test case gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-3.c fails on power9

2018-03-06 Thread willschm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84371 Will Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/84310] -falign-{labels,loops,jumps} with value >= 32768+1 cause a segfault

2018-03-06 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84310 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Tue Mar 6 20:07:38 2018 New Revision: 258299 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258299=gcc=rev Log: Backport r257842 2018-03-06 Martin Liska Backport from

[Bug target/79747] Missing documentation for -malign-{jumps,label,loops,functions}= and strange value range limitation

2018-03-06 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79747 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Tue Mar 6 20:07:38 2018 New Revision: 258299 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258299=gcc=rev Log: Backport r257842 2018-03-06 Martin Liska Backport from

[Bug other/80589] Typing mistakes in two messages

2018-03-06 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80589 --- Comment #12 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Tue Mar 6 20:07:18 2018 New Revision: 258298 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258298=gcc=rev Log: Backport r257803 2018-03-06 Martin Liska Backport

[Bug testsuite/80551] c-c++-common/tsan/race_on_mutex.c fails on powerpc

2018-03-06 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80551 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/80551] c-c++-common/tsan/race_on_mutex.c fails on powerpc

2018-03-06 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80551 --- Comment #20 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Tue Mar 6 20:07:49 2018 New Revision: 258300 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258300=gcc=rev Log: Backport r257932 2018-03-06 Martin Liska Backport

[Bug ipa/81360] [8 Regression] ice in estimate_edge_growth, at ipa-inline.h:86

2018-03-06 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81360 --- Comment #17 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Tue Mar 6 20:04:20 2018 New Revision: 258289 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258289=gcc=rev Log: Backport r257490 2018-03-06 Martin Liska Backport

[Bug c/84229] A valid code rejected with -flto

2018-03-06 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84229 --- Comment #11 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Tue Mar 6 20:04:36 2018 New Revision: 258290 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258290=gcc=rev Log: Backport r257877 2018-03-06 Martin Liska Backport

[Bug tree-optimization/84740] [8 Regression] ICE in build_constructors, at tree-switch-conversion.c:965

2018-03-06 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84740 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/84740] New: [8 Regression] ICE in build_constructors, at tree-switch-conversion.c:965

2018-03-06 Thread gs...@t-online.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84740 Bug ID: 84740 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in build_constructors, at tree-switch-conversion.c:965 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug inline-asm/84742] New: internal compiler error: in process_alt_operands, at lra-constraints.c:2112

2018-03-06 Thread vegard.nossum at gmail dot com
/home/vegard/git/gcc/gcc/ira.c:5649 $ xgcc --version xgcc (GCC) 8.0.1 20180306 (experimental) Built from git 11a93d7a09b871b3b9a2eb108eb91ad83d94e070 (r258271). This one is a bit of a weird one. It doesn't reproduce with "trunk" on godbolt.org for me and the crash itself is indeterm

[Bug target/84710] [8 Regression] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'subreg' in rhs_regno, at rtl.h:1896 with -O -fno-forward-propagate

2018-03-06 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84710 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Mar 6 20:41:37 2018 New Revision: 258301 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258301=gcc=rev Log: PR target/84710 * combine.c (try_combine): Use reg_or_subregno

[Bug tree-optimization/84740] [8 Regression] ICE in build_constructors, at tree-switch-conversion.c:965

2018-03-06 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84740 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/83969] [8 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2997 (error: could not split insn) for powerpc targets

2018-03-06 Thread bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83969 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|segher at gcc dot gnu.org |bergner at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/84684] inserting random code / flags produces wrong code

2018-03-06 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84684 --- Comment #17 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Tue Mar 6 21:11:46 2018 New Revision: 258303 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258303=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/84684 * constexpr.c (cxx_bind_parameters_in_call):

[Bug c++/79937] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE in replace_placeholders_r

2018-03-06 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79937 --- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #16) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #13) > > E.g. could we walk into TARGET_EXPRs that have TARGET_EXPR_INITIAL > > AGGR_INIT_EXPR, but avoid those that

[Bug fortran/84697] [8 Regression] minloc/maxloc not simplified with zero size

2018-03-06 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84697 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/66128] ICE for some intrinsics with zero sized array parameter

2018-03-06 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66128 Bug 66128 depends on bug 84697, which changed state. Bug 84697 Summary: [8 Regression] minloc/maxloc not simplified with zero size https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84697 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/64107] [F95] Pure function as array size

2018-03-06 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64107 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 CC|

[Bug libstdc++/84601] [8 Regression] std::optional<std::pair<int, int>> is not assignment copyable

2018-03-06 Thread ville at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84601 --- Comment #3 from ville at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ville Date: Tue Mar 6 21:43:03 2018 New Revision: 258304 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258304=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/84601 * include/std/optional (_Optional_payload): Split into

[Bug c++/84744] cannot use glibc 2.27 with gcc 7.3

2018-03-06 Thread developm...@faf-ltd.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84744 --- Comment #3 from Peter VARGA --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > >-I /FaF/glibc/include > > Use -isystem instead or a true sysroot instead. Sorry, but this does not help.

[Bug c++/84744] cannot use glibc 2.27 with gcc 7.3

2018-03-06 Thread developm...@faf-ltd.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84744 --- Comment #4 from Peter VARGA --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > >-I /FaF/glibc/include > > Use -isystem instead or a true sysroot instead. Can you post the full g++ command line options how you mean

[Bug c/84721] [8 Regression] ICE in c_push_function_context, at c-decl.c:9667

2018-03-06 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84721 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Mar 6 20:57:30 2018 New Revision: 258302 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258302=gcc=rev Log: PR c/84721 * c-parser.c (add_debug_begin_stmt): Don't add

[Bug inline-asm/84677] internal compiler error: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2205

2018-03-06 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84677 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug debug/84550] [8 Regression] stepping through gcc does not work with gdb 8.0.1

2018-03-06 Thread kevinb at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84550 --- Comment #11 from Kevin Buettner --- I've simplified Jakub's example slightly: --- vau2.c --- struct A { int a; }; struct B { struct A *b; }; struct C { struct B *c; }; __attribute__((noipa)) bool foo (struct A *p) { return false; }

[Bug debug/84550] [8 Regression] stepping through gcc does not work with gdb 8.0.1

2018-03-06 Thread kevinb at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84550 --- Comment #12 from Kevin Buettner --- I'll note, too, that just setting a breakpoint on qux and then looking at the locations reveals another problem... (gdb) b qux Breakpoint 1 at 0x400460: qux. (2 locations) (gdb) info break Num Type

[Bug fortran/64107] [F95] Pure function as array size

2018-03-06 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64107 --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Wed Mar 7 00:25:30 2018 New Revision: 258311 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258311=gcc=rev Log: 2018-03-06 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug fortran/32834] [Meta-bug] 'Fortran 95'-only failures

2018-03-06 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834 Bug 32834 depends on bug 64107, which changed state. Bug 64107 Summary: [F95] Pure function as array size https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64107 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/64107] [F95] Pure function as array size

2018-03-06 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64107 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/84710] [8 Regression] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'subreg' in rhs_regno, at rtl.h:1896 with -O -fno-forward-propagate

2018-03-06 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84710 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/84744] New: cannot use glibc 2.27 with gcc 7.3

2018-03-06 Thread developm...@faf-ltd.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84744 Bug ID: 84744 Summary: cannot use glibc 2.27 with gcc 7.3 Product: gcc Version: 7.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug fortran/66128] ICE for some intrinsics with zero sized array parameter

2018-03-06 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66128 --- Comment #15 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Tue Mar 6 23:50:01 2018 New Revision: 258305 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258305=gcc=rev Log: 2017-03-06 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/84697

[Bug fortran/84697] [8 Regression] minloc/maxloc not simplified with zero size

2018-03-06 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84697 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Tue Mar 6 23:50:01 2018 New Revision: 258305 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258305=gcc=rev Log: 2017-03-06 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/84697

[Bug debug/84550] [8 Regression] stepping through gcc does not work with gdb 8.0.1

2018-03-06 Thread kevinb at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84550 --- Comment #13 from Kevin Buettner --- (In reply to Kevin Buettner from comment #11) > This code, which is in find_pc_partial_function_gnu_ifunc(), incorrectly > identifies this address, 0x400590, as belonging to qux: > > if (mapped_pc >=

[Bug libstdc++/84601] [8 Regression] std::optional<std::pair<int, int>> is not assignment copyable

2018-03-06 Thread ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84601 Ville Voutilainen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/84739] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE in get_value_for_expr, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:649

2018-03-06 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84739 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug debug/84550] [8 Regression] stepping through gcc does not work with gdb 8.0.1

2018-03-06 Thread palves at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84550 --- Comment #10 from Pedro Alves --- It sounds that way, but I haven't verified, e.g., by trying older versions of gdb, and/or bisecting. Kevin, in addition to trying older versions of gdb with freorder-blocks-and-partition, I'm curious about

[Bug fortran/64124] [F95] Valid constant expr rejected

2018-03-06 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64124 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug c++/84744] cannot use glibc 2.27 with gcc 7.3

2018-03-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84744 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- >-I /FaF/glibc/include Use -isystem instead or a true sysroot instead.

[Bug c++/84744] cannot use glibc 2.27 with gcc 7.3

2018-03-06 Thread developm...@faf-ltd.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84744 --- Comment #2 from Peter VARGA --- Sorry, but this does not help.

[Bug c/84721] [8 Regression] ICE in c_push_function_context, at c-decl.c:9667

2018-03-06 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84721 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/84739] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE in get_value_for_expr, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:649

2018-03-06 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84739 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/57197] [Fortran-Dev][Regression] ICE in record_reference, at cgraphbuild.c:66

2018-03-06 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57197 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug fortran/56818] [meta-bug] fortran-dev bugs

2018-03-06 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56818 Bug 56818 depends on bug 57197, which changed state. Bug 57197 Summary: [Fortran-Dev][Regression] ICE in record_reference, at cgraphbuild.c:66 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57197 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/57197] [Fortran-Dev][Regression] ICE in record_reference, at cgraphbuild.c:66

2018-03-06 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57197 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Blocks|

[Bug c++/84745] New: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (main_block_label())

2018-03-06 Thread vegard.nossum at gmail dot com
/vegard/git/gcc/gcc/tree-cfg.c:1679 0x32f0b70 build_gimple_cfg /home/vegard/git/gcc/gcc/tree-cfg.c:240 0x32f0b70 execute_build_cfg /home/vegard/git/gcc/gcc/tree-cfg.c:410 0x32f0b70 execute /home/vegard/git/gcc/gcc/tree-cfg.c:446 $ xgcc --version xgcc (GCC) 8.0.1 20180306

[Bug c++/84744] cannot use glibc 2.27 with gcc 7.3

2018-03-06 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84744 --- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse --- That's not how you use a different glibc. If you look at the include order printed by -v, it has to remain in that order (libstdc++ before glibc, in particular), whereas you are adding your glibc in front.

[Bug c++/70431] [C++11] Out of line defaulted copy constructor of a union does not compile.

2018-03-06 Thread raphael.kubo.da.costa at intel dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70431 Raphael Kubo da Costa changed: What|Removed |Added CC||raphael.kubo.da.costa@intel

[Bug c++/70431] [C++11] Out of line defaulted copy constructor of a union does not compile.

2018-03-06 Thread ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70431 Ville Voutilainen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/84746] New: ICE on valid code at -O2 and -O3: Segmentation fault

2018-03-06 Thread su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84746 Bug ID: 84746 Summary: ICE on valid code at -O2 and -O3: Segmentation fault Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/84684] inserting random code / flags produces wrong code

2018-03-06 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84684 --- Comment #18 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Wed Mar 7 07:50:57 2018 New Revision: 258313 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258313=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/84684 * constexpr.c (cxx_bind_parameters_in_call):

[Bug target/84710] [8 Regression] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'subreg' in rhs_regno, at rtl.h:1896 with -O -fno-forward-propagate

2018-03-06 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84710 --- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool --- Well, yuck, I missed that part of rtl.texi (or somehow I thought this RTL would be refused earlier). Please use reg_or_subregno in the patch though?

[Bug c/84721] [8 Regression] ICE in c_push_function_context, at c-decl.c:9667

2018-03-06 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84721 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/84710] [8 Regression] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'subreg' in rhs_regno, at rtl.h:1896 with -O -fno-forward-propagate

2018-03-06 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84710 --- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool --- Ah right, I had checking disabled. Need more coffee I guess. The insns I see are different: Trying 19, 20 -> 21: 19: r106:SI#0=0 20: r108:SI=zero_extend(r106:SI#0) 21: r109:SI=r108:SI 0>>0x8

[Bug target/84710] [8 Regression] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'subreg' in rhs_regno, at rtl.h:1896 with -O -fno-forward-propagate

2018-03-06 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84710 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #8) > Ah right, I had checking disabled. Need more coffee I guess. You don't really need to build the checking compiler for this though, it is enough to put a

[Bug tree-optimization/83325] Compile time hog w/ -Os -fwrapv

2018-03-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83325 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Got distracted by analysis... we don't do anything "wrong" but hit the latent issue that we're allowing x_1 -> y_3 lattice transitions. Those are unfortunately required by the redundant IV removal

[Bug target/84710] [8 Regression] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'subreg' in rhs_regno, at rtl.h:1896 with -O -fno-forward-propagate

2018-03-06 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84710 --- Comment #7 from Zdenek Sojka --- Created attachment 43573 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43573=edit original testcase Unreduced testcase; needs additional -fkeep-inline-functions: $ aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -O

[Bug tree-optimization/84486] [7 Regression] code hoisting removes alignment assumption

2018-03-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84486 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/84723] [8 Regression] ICE in create_target_clone, at multiple_target.c:275

2018-03-06 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84723 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/84730] New: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (build_class_member_access_expr)

2018-03-06 Thread vegard.nossum at gmail dot com
/vegard/git/gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:22715 0xf231cb cp_parser_class_specifier /home/vegard/git/gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:22768 $ xgcc --version xgcc (GCC) 8.0.1 20180306 (experimental) Built from git 11a93d7a09b871b3b9a2eb108eb91ad83d94e070 (r258271). 7.3.0 gives: :5:9: error: redeclaration of 'int

[Bug c++/84730] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (build_class_member_access_expr)

2018-03-06 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84730 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug inline-asm/71572] ICE with VLA and "+g" inline-asm in force_constant_size, at gimplify.c:671

2018-03-06 Thread vegard.nossum at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71572 Vegard Nossum changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vegard.nossum at gmail dot com ---

[Bug inline-asm/84683] [6/7 Regression] internal compiler error: in move_for_stack_reg, at reg-stack.c:1173

2018-03-06 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84683 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] internal |[6/7 Regression] internal

[Bug inline-asm/84683] [6/7/8 Regression] internal compiler error: in move_for_stack_reg, at reg-stack.c:1173

2018-03-06 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84683 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Mar 6 09:23:36 2018 New Revision: 258273 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258273=gcc=rev Log: PR inline-asm/84683 * reg-stack.c (move_for_stack_reg): If

[Bug target/84710] [8 Regression] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'subreg' in rhs_regno, at rtl.h:1896 with -O -fno-forward-propagate

2018-03-06 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84710 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #4) > The testcase does not crash for me; does it need more non-default options? > > The testcase has UB of course (d is undefined). The compiler needs to be

[Bug c/84721] [8 Regression] ICE in c_push_function_context, at c-decl.c:9667

2018-03-06 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84721 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c/84607] [6/7 Regression] Side effects discarded in address computation inside 'if'

2018-03-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84607 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Mar 6 10:01:52 2018 New Revision: 258274 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258274=gcc=rev Log: 2018-03-06 Richard Biener Backport from mainline

[Bug tree-optimization/84486] [7 Regression] code hoisting removes alignment assumption

2018-03-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84486 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Mar 6 10:01:52 2018 New Revision: 258274 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258274=gcc=rev Log: 2018-03-06 Richard Biener Backport from mainline

[Bug target/84521] [8 Regression] aarch64: Frame-pointer corruption with __builtin_setjmp/__builtin_longjmp and -fomit-frame-pointer

2018-03-06 Thread sudi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84521 sudi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/83325] Compile time hog w/ -Os -fwrapv

2018-03-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83325 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc-linux |x86_64-*-* Last

[Bug driver/84731] New: -Bsymbolic switch ignored

2018-03-06 Thread stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84731 Bug ID: 84731 Summary: -Bsymbolic switch ignored Product: gcc Version: 7.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: driver

[Bug c++/71832] [7/8 Regression] ICE on invalid C++11 code with incorrect decltype use for non-type template parameter: Segmentation fault

2018-03-06 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71832 --- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini --- Skipping completely the body works for this testcase, isn't that difficult to do, but goes too far, the template completely disappears and we end up with bad error recovery for anything referring to it

[Bug target/84719] gcc's __builtin_memcpy performance with certain number of bytes is terrible compared to clang's

2018-03-06 Thread gpnuma at centaurean dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84719 --- Comment #11 from gpnuma at centaurean dot com --- Yes it's not the init loop the problem. Just to make sure, with the following code : #include #include #include #include #include #include #include int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {

[Bug c++/84744] cannot use glibc 2.27 with gcc 7.3

2018-03-06 Thread developm...@faf-ltd.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84744 --- Comment #6 from Peter VARGA --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #5) > That's not how you use a different glibc. If you look at the include order > printed by -v, it has to remain in that order (libstdc++ before

[Bug debug/63572] [6/7/8 Regression] ICF breaks user debugging experience

2018-03-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63572 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.5

[Bug c++/81764] [6/7/8 Regression] Visibility attributes for explicitly instantiated template class get warned if it has been implicitly instantiated

2018-03-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81764 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.5

[Bug c++/83268] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: in lambda_expr_this_capture, at cp/lambda.c:785

2018-03-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83268 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Target Milestone|---

  1   2   >