[Bug tree-optimization/85157] New: [parloops] Prevent canonicalize_loop_ivs failure in

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85157 Bug ID: 85157 Summary: [parloops] Prevent canonicalize_loop_ivs failure in Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/83822] trunk/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-string.c:970]: (style) Redundant condition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83822 acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug other/63426] [meta-bug] Issues found with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426 Bug 63426 depends on bug 61910, which changed state. Bug 61910 Summary: undefined computation in trans-expr.c gfc_conv_cst_int_power https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61910 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/50550] does not recognize pointer variable at initialization (r178939)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50550 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Bug still present in 7.3.0 and trunk 258946. While closing PRs that have been fixed is very useful, making noise about PRs marked as NEW is a waste of time for everybody.

[Bug c++/85155] New: Suboptimal error messages when using noexcept(false) on defaulted dtor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85155 Bug ID: 85155 Summary: Suboptimal error messages when using noexcept(false) on defaulted dtor Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/78352] GCC lacks support for the Apple "blocks" extension to the C family of languages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78352 René J.V. Bertin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rjvbertin at gmail dot com ---

[Bug tree-optimization/83126] [8 Regression] ICE in transform_to_exit_first_loop_alt, at tree-parloops.c:1713

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83126 --- Comment #13 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #12) > I suppose it is fixed. Filed PR85157 - "[parloops] Prevent canonicalize_loop_ivs failure in gen_parallel_loop" to fix this in an optimal way.

[Bug target/81143] New test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr79799-2.c fails on powerpc BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81143 --- Comment #5 from Peter Bergner --- Author: bergner Date: Mon Apr 2 15:24:01 2018 New Revision: 259011 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259011=gcc=rev Log: Backport from mainline 2018-02-08 Peter Bergner

[Bug fortran/72709] Incorrect assignment of allocatable character array used as component of derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72709 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig --- This works: program show_problem implicit none character(len=:), dimension(:), allocatable :: text allocate(character(len=3) :: text(3)) text(1) = 'abc' text(2) = '123' print

Bug Report Duplication Problem - Help !

I've invited you to fill out the following form: Professional Profile To fill it out, visit: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfQTZkrylE1t49gjzewPQSPWHFnPtGCZfRujg_G8VTwqGrbHg/viewform?c=0w=1usp=mail_form_link Dear friend, I am a masters student in Computer Science at the Federal

[Bug target/84912] __builtin_divde* produce Internal Compiler Error when compiled -m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84912 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.4 --- Comment #9 from Peter Bergner

[Bug tree-optimization/85157] [parloops] Prevent canonicalize_loop_ivs failure in gen_parallel_loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85157 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Summary|[parloops] Prevent

[Bug c++/85156] New: -O1 -g internal compiler error: gimplification failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85156 Bug ID: 85156 Summary: -O1 -g internal compiler error: gimplification failed Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/80546] [7/8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/bool3-p[78].c scan-assembler-not

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80546 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #15 from Peter

[Bug testsuite/80546] [7/8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/bool3-p[78].c scan-assembler-not

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80546 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/80546] [7/8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/bool3-p[78].c scan-assembler-not

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80546 --- Comment #13 from Peter Bergner --- Author: bergner Date: Mon Apr 2 14:35:07 2018 New Revision: 259009 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259009=gcc=rev Log: Backport from mainline 2018-03-30 Peter Bergner

[Bug fortran/50541] gfortran should not accept a pointer as a generic-name (r178939)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50541 --- Comment #6 from Vittorio Zecca --- Bug still there in 7.3.0 and trunk 258946.

[Bug fortran/50550] does not recognize pointer variable at initialization (r178939)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50550 --- Comment #7 from Vittorio Zecca --- Sorry about that, long time I did not blush, I'll try to remember the lesson.

[Bug fortran/61907] load of invalid value for 'bool' in trans-array.c trans_array_constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61907 Vittorio Zecca changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/63426] [meta-bug] Issues found with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426 Bug 63426 depends on bug 61907, which changed state. Bug 61907 Summary: load of invalid value for 'bool' in trans-array.c trans_array_constructor https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61907 What|Removed

[Bug target/85100] __builtin_cpu_supports avx does not verify OS supports it

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85100 --- Comment #10 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Mon Apr 2 12:03:16 2018 New Revision: 259006 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259006=gcc=rev Log: i386: Enable AVX/AVX512 features only if supported by OSXSAVE Enable AVX

[Bug target/85100] __builtin_cpu_supports avx does not verify OS supports it

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85100 --- Comment #11 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Mon Apr 2 12:09:48 2018 New Revision: 259007 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259007=gcc=rev Log: i386: Enable AVX/AVX512 features only if supported by OSXSAVE Enable AVX

[Bug target/85100] __builtin_cpu_supports avx does not verify OS supports it

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85100 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/70870] Segmentation violation in gfc_assign_data_value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70870 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/85149] [8 Regression] False branch of if constexpr instantiated in generic lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85149 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/70870] Segmentation violation in gfc_assign_data_value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70870 --- Comment #5 from Vittorio Zecca --- After applying the fix in comment 3 to trunk 258946 the ICE disappears and an error message appears, as it should be.

[Bug fortran/61910] undefined computation in trans-expr.c gfc_conv_cst_int_power

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61910 Vittorio Zecca changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/85138] [8 regression] ICE with generic function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85138 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig --- OK, so I am beginning to understand... Part of the problem seems that, in check_pure_function, else if (gfc_pure (NULL)) { gfc_error ("Reference to impure function %qs at %L "

[Bug fortran/85102] ICE in gfc_conv_intrinsic_dot_product, at fortran/trans-intrinsic.c:4464

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85102 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/64095] [C++14] Ellipsis at end of generic lambda parameter-declaration-clause should be parsed as a parameter pack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64095 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug fortran/85138] [8 regression] ICE with generic function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85138 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/85138] [8 regression] ICE with generic function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85138 --- Comment #8 from kargl at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 05:50:30PM +, tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > --- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig --- > First, I have renamed the function "len" to "llen" in the

[Bug fortran/85102] ICE in gfc_conv_intrinsic_dot_product, at fortran/trans-intrinsic.c:4464

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85102 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Mon Apr 2 16:47:48 2018 New Revision: 259014 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259014=gcc=rev Log: 2018-04-02 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/85102

[Bug c/85158] New: ubsan and -O3 finds a problem

-multilib --disable-werror --enable-checking=df,extra,fold,rtl,yes --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran Thread model: posix gcc version 8.0.1 20180402 (experimental) (GCC) $ Then I get: $ ~/gcc/results/bin/gcc -c -w -O3 bug424.c ../../trunk/gcc/tree-data-ref.c:3758:26: runtime error: signed integer

[Bug c++/64095] [C++14] Ellipsis at end of generic lambda parameter-declaration-clause should be parsed as a parameter pack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64095 --- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Apr 2 18:20:04 2018 New Revision: 259015 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259015=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/64095 - auto... parameter pack. * parser.c

[Bug target/84912] __builtin_divde* produce Internal Compiler Error when compiled -m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84912 --- Comment #10 from Peter Bergner --- Author: bergner Date: Mon Apr 2 19:19:37 2018 New Revision: 259016 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259016=gcc=rev Log: gcc/ Backport from mainline 2018-03-28 Peter Bergner

[Bug target/85142] Wrong -print-multi-os-directory & -print-multi-lib output for riscv64 + multilib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85142 Jim Wilson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/85159] New: if constexpr error about goto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85159 Bug ID: 85159 Summary: if constexpr error about goto Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug middle-end/85160] New: GCC generates mvn/and instructions instead of bic on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85160 Bug ID: 85160 Summary: GCC generates mvn/and instructions instead of bic on aarch64 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug other/85161] New: [8 regression] Test case failures in libbacktrace on powerpc64 BE starting with r253456

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85161 Bug ID: 85161 Summary: [8 regression] Test case failures in libbacktrace on powerpc64 BE starting with r253456 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/64095] [C++14] Ellipsis at end of generic lambda parameter-declaration-clause should be parsed as a parameter pack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64095 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/85149] [8 Regression] False branch of if constexpr instantiated in generic lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85149 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug rtl-optimization/84660] Combine doing wrong optimization for 64 bits with SHIFT_COUNT_TRUNCATED target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84660 Jim Wilson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/67400] -fno-plt doesn't work with function pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67400 Romain Geissler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||romain.geissler at amadeus dot com

[Bug target/84912] __builtin_divde* produce Internal Compiler Error when compiled -m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84912 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #12 from Peter

[Bug rtl-optimization/84660] Combine doing wrong optimization for 64 bits with SHIFT_COUNT_TRUNCATED target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84660 --- Comment #8 from Jim Wilson --- Author: wilson Date: Mon Apr 2 22:37:21 2018 New Revision: 259019 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259019=gcc=rev Log: RISC-V: Fix for combine bug with shift and AND operations. PR

[Bug target/85142] Wrong -print-multi-os-directory & -print-multi-lib output for riscv64 + multilib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85142 --- Comment #8 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- "." is correct for the default multilib in the non-OS directory arrangements, just not in the OS directory arrangements.

[Bug target/84912] __builtin_divde* produce Internal Compiler Error when compiled -m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84912 --- Comment #11 from Peter Bergner --- Author: bergner Date: Mon Apr 2 23:54:20 2018 New Revision: 259021 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259021=gcc=rev Log: gcc/ Backport from mainline 2018-03-28 Peter Bergner

[Bug tree-optimization/85162] New: Vector extensions generating incorrect assembly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85162 Bug ID: 85162 Summary: Vector extensions generating incorrect assembly Product: gcc Version: 6.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/85142] Wrong -print-multi-os-directory & -print-multi-lib output for riscv64 + multilib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85142 --- Comment #9 from Jim Wilson --- On Mon, 2018-04-02 at 23:50 +, joseph at codesourcery dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85142 > > --- Comment #8 from joseph at codesourcery dot com codesourcery dot com> --- >

[Bug gcov-profile/85163] New: [GCOV] A call statement with '==' , '||', and '&&' operators is wrongly marked as executed twice

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85163 Bug ID: 85163 Summary: [GCOV] A call statement with '==' , '||', and '&&' operators is wrongly marked as executed twice Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/50550] does not recognize pointer variable at initialization (r178939)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50550 --- Comment #5 from Vittorio Zecca --- Bug still present in 7.3.0 and trunk 258946.

[Bug tree-optimization/85162] Vector extensions generating incorrect assembly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85162 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- If you believe this is incorrect, you should be able to extend the testcase with an assert somewhere showing that the result is wrong. For vectors, as documented, comparisons return a vector of 0 (false) and

[Bug middle-end/64327] ../../gcc/gcc/rtlanal.c:4881:48: runtime error: shift exponent 4294967295 is too large for 64-bit type 'long unsigned int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64327 --- Comment #9 from Vittorio Zecca --- Sorry for the delay in answering but I was traveling. I cannot reproduce on version 7, while it reproduces on 6.4.0.