[Bug tree-optimization/85315] missed range optimisation opportunity for derefences where index must be 0 or otherwise constrained

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85315 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/85238] [8 Regression] lto-wrapper: fatal error: simple_object_copy_lto_debug_sections not implemented: Invalid argument on Cygwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85238 --- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou --- There are still debuglto sections in the primary object file: 3 .gnu.debuglto_.debug_info 0094 026c 2**2 CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, RELOC,

[Bug c/85320] New: Segmentation fault when building XKAAPI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85320 Bug ID: 85320 Summary: Segmentation fault when building XKAAPI Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug fortran/85314] gcc/fortran/resolve.c:9222: unreachable code ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85314 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug target/85238] [8 Regression] lto-wrapper: fatal error: simple_object_copy_lto_debug_sections not implemented: Invalid argument on Cygwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85238 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- So I guess for darwin we're confused by lto-wrapper.c:debug_objcopy using simple_object_read *inobj = simple_object_start_read (infd, inoff,

[Bug libstdc++/85319] New: std::char_traits::length does not always function in constexpr context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85319 Bug ID: 85319 Summary: std::char_traits::length does not always function in constexpr context Product: gcc Version: 7.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/85173] ICE in in extract_insn, at recog.c:2304 for -fstack-clash-protection on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85173 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/78715] [concepts] Access specifiers ignored after concept declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78715 vopl at bk dot ru changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vopl at bk dot ru --- Comment #2

[Bug tree-optimization/85286] [8 Regression] ICE in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2139

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85286 --- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rsandifo Date: Tue Apr 10 10:28:33 2018 New Revision: 259268 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259268=gcc=rev Log: Add missing cases to vect_get_smallest_scalar_type (PR 85286) In

[Bug c++/85312] trunk/gcc/cp/parser.c:12041: poor error checking ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85312 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 43895 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43895=edit gcc8-pr85312.patch Untested fix.

[Bug lto/81968] [8 regression] early lto debug objects make Solaris ld SEGV

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target|x86-*-solaris2 |*-*-solaris2.11 --- Comment #76 from

[Bug target/85173] ICE in in extract_insn, at recog.c:2304 for -fstack-clash-protection on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85173 --- Comment #9 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Tue Apr 10 09:58:57 2018 New Revision: 259266 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259266=gcc=rev Log: [explow] PR target/85173: validize memory before passing it on to

[Bug target/85075] powerpc: ICE in iszero testcase

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85075 --- Comment #4 from Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho --- (In reply to Ulrich Weigand from comment #3) > Maybe I'm confused, but: How does this even build? It does not. There is an ICE before the build error message appears. > _Float128 is a

[Bug target/84490] [8 regression] 436.cactusADM regressed by 6-8% percent with -Ofast on Zen and Haswell, compared to gcc 7.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84490 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Actually r253993 was just the changelog part, r253975 was the actual change. So I'm doing r254012 vs r254011 instead.

[Bug tree-optimization/85316] [meta-bug] VRP range propagation missed cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85316 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||meta-bug, |

[Bug target/85317] New: missing constant propagation on _mm(256)_movemask_*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85317 Bug ID: 85317 Summary: missing constant propagation on _mm(256)_movemask_* Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c/85318] New: -Wc90-c99-compat does not warn about for loop initial declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85318 Bug ID: 85318 Summary: -Wc90-c99-compat does not warn about for loop initial declarations Product: gcc Version: 7.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/85238] [8 Regression] lto-wrapper: fatal error: simple_object_copy_lto_debug_sections not implemented: Invalid argument on Cygwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85238 --- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou --- This doesn't seem to work: (gdb) run The program being debugged has been started already. Start it from the beginning? (y or n) [answered Y; input not from terminal] Starting program:

[Bug fortran/85313] gcc/fortran/openmp.c: 2 * confused logic ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85313 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug fortran/85313] gcc/fortran/openmp.c: 2 * confused logic ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85313 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug sanitizer/84428] ==7122==AddressSanitizer CHECK failed: ../../../sanitizer/asan/asan_interceptors.cc:384 "((__interception::real___cxa_throw)) != (0)" (0x0, 0x0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84428 --- Comment #23 from Peter Rabbitson --- Could you please link the upstream issue you are referring to?

[Bug target/85238] [8 Regression] lto-wrapper: fatal error: simple_object_copy_lto_debug_sections not implemented: Invalid argument on Cygwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85238 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/78715] [concepts] Access specifiers ignored after concept declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78715 --- Comment #3 from vopl at bk dot ru --- probably the same https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67225 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78955 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80962

[Bug target/85238] [8 Regression] lto-wrapper: fatal error: simple_object_copy_lto_debug_sections not implemented: Invalid argument on Cygwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85238 --- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou --- Created attachment 43893 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43893=edit Darwin-ish tentative fix

[Bug sanitizer/84428] ==7122==AddressSanitizer CHECK failed: ../../../sanitizer/asan/asan_interceptors.cc:384 "((__interception::real___cxa_throw)) != (0)" (0x0, 0x0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84428 --- Comment #24 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Peter Rabbitson from comment #23) > Could you please link the upstream issue you are referring to? It's written in URL of this bug, take a look at top of the page.

[Bug fortran/85307] Consistent handling of out-of-bounds access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85307 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/85238] [8 Regression] lto-wrapper: fatal error: simple_object_copy_lto_debug_sections not implemented: Invalid argument on Cygwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85238 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #7) > This doesn't seem to work: > > (gdb) run > The program being debugged has been started already. > Start it from the beginning? (y or n) [answered Y; input not

[Bug target/84490] [8 regression] 436.cactusADM regressed by 6-8% percent with -Ofast on Zen and Haswell, compared to gcc 7.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84490 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > Actually r253993 was just the changelog part, r253975 was the actual change. > > So I'm doing r254012 vs r254011 instead. Base = r254011, Peak = r254012

[Bug target/85075] powerpc: ICE in iszero testcase

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85075 --- Comment #3 from Ulrich Weigand --- Maybe I'm confused, but: How does this even build? _Float128 is a C-only extension, this type is not supposed to be available at all in C++ mode as far as I know.

[Bug c++/85312] trunk/gcc/cp/parser.c:12041: poor error checking ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85312 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/85286] [8 Regression] ICE in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2139

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85286 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/85295] ICE in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2205

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85295 Andreas Krebbel changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug tree-optimization/85315] missed range optimisation opportunity for derefences where index must be 0 or otherwise constrained

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85315 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Note for int x; ... *( + (a + b)) if x is common we need to take -funconstrained-commons into account, similarly for vars that end with flexible array members or similar arrays.

[Bug tree-optimization/85316] New: [meta-bug] VRP range propagation missed cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85316 Bug ID: 85316 Summary: [meta-bug] VRP range propagation missed cases Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug libgomp/85129] [openacc] Document GOMP_OPENACC_DIM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85129 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/85323] SSE/AVX/AVX512 shift by 0 not optimized away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85323 --- Comment #1 from Matthias Kretz --- Created attachment 43898 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43898=edit idea for a partial solution Constant propagation works using the built in shift operators. At least for the shifts

[Bug fortran/85313] gcc/fortran/openmp.c: 2 * confused logic ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85313 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 10 14:04:37 2018 New Revision: 259275 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259275=gcc=rev Log: PR fortran/85313 * openmp.c (resolve_omp_do): Remove bogus if (j <

[Bug debug/65821] [6/7/8 regression] incorrect debug line # info for main

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65821 --- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue Apr 10 14:24:00 2018 New Revision: 259278 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259278=gcc=rev Log: PR debug/65821 - wrong location for main(). * call.c

[Bug debug/65821] [6/7 regression] incorrect debug line # info for main

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65821 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6/7/8 regression] |[6/7 regression] incorrect

[Bug c++/85285] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with flexible array in union

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85285 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue Apr 10 14:23:54 2018 New Revision: 259277 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259277=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/85285 - ICE with flexible array after substitution. * pt.c

[Bug bootstrap/85322] [8 Regression] profiledbootstrap failured

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85322 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/85324] New: missing constant propagation on SSE/AVX conversion intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85324 Bug ID: 85324 Summary: missing constant propagation on SSE/AVX conversion intrinsics Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ipa/85051] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE: in edge_badness, at ipa-inline.c:1035 with flattening recursive calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85051 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- This time it's probably not a round off: (gdb) p callee_info->time $1 = {m_sig = 1174405118, m_exp = -25} (gdb) p callee_info->time.to_double() $2 = 34.99940395355 (gdb) p edge_time.to_double() $3 =

[Bug target/85321] Missing documentation and option misc for ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85321 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc64le |powerpc*-*-*

[Bug target/85323] New: SSE/AVX/AVX512 shift by 0 not optimized away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85323 Bug ID: 85323 Summary: SSE/AVX/AVX512 shift by 0 not optimized away Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/84748] [6/7 Regression] wrong code with u128 at aarch64 at -O and and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84748 --- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Tue Apr 10 13:05:24 2018 New Revision: 259271 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259271=gcc=rev Log: [AArch64] PR target/84748: Mark *compare_cstore_insn as clobbering

[Bug middle-end/58479] [6/7/8 Regression] slow var-tracking on x86_64-linux at -O1 (and above) with -g, but checking disabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58479 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek --- Even with LVUs if I try the #c0 testcase with outer 3 loops commented out (so only 8x8 unrolling) and with a single dimension array rather than 3 dimensional one, i.e.: int d, e, f; int main () { for (d

[Bug target/85323] SSE/AVX/AVX512 shift by 0 not optimized away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85323 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/85285] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with flexible array in union

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85285 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/85279] [6/7 Regression] Broken diagnostic for decltype

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85279 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue Apr 10 14:29:52 2018 New Revision: 259280 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259280=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/85279 - dump_expr doesn't understand decltype. * error.c

[Bug c++/85262] [6/7/8 Regression] Trouble with constructor and -fpermissive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85262 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/85321] Missing documentation and option misc for ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85321 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/85110] Missing underlines for some bad arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85110 --- Comment #5 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Tue Apr 10 14:37:09 2018 New Revision: 259282 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259282=gcc=rev Log: Show pertinent parameter (PR c++/85110) gcc/cp/ChangeLog: PR c++/85110

[Bug tree-optimization/85315] missed range optimisation opportunity for derefences where index must be 0 or otherwise constrained

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85315 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug c++/24314] Extra "template<>" in partial specialization is compiled successfuly.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24314 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug ipa/85051] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE: in edge_badness, at ipa-inline.c:1035 with flattening recursive calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85051 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Honza, could you please have a look once you are done with the P1s?

[Bug libstdc++/66145] [5/6/7 Regression] std::ios_base::failure objects thrown from libstdc++.so use old ABI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66145 --- Comment #36 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #35) > I have opened a new bug for the ABI regression. That's PR 85222 and is now fixed on trunk, so comment 32 works again.

[Bug target/85321] New: Missing documentation and option misc for ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85321 Bug ID: 85321 Summary: Missing documentation and option misc for ppc64le Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: documentation Severity: normal

[Bug target/84748] wrong code with u128 at aarch64 at -O and and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84748 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug lto/85248] [6/7 Regression] Miscompilation when using error function that returns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85248 --- Comment #11 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Tue Apr 10 13:52:23 2018 New Revision: 259274 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259274=gcc=rev Log: Fix obvious error in handling of error attribute (PR lto/85248). 2018-04-10

[Bug c++/85312] trunk/gcc/cp/parser.c:12041: poor error checking ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85312 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 10 14:28:54 2018 New Revision: 259279 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259279=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/85312 - P0962 cleanup * parser.c

[Bug tree-optimization/81184] [8 regression] gcc.dg/pr21643.c and gcc.dg/tree-ssa/phi-opt-11.c fail starting with r249450

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81184 Andreas Krebbel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/84490] [8 regression] 436.cactusADM regressed by 6-8% percent with -Ofast on Zen and Haswell, compared to gcc 7.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84490 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 43896 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43896=edit r254011 with peeling disabled The other differences look like RA/scheduling in the end the stack frame in the new

[Bug target/85255] [8 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -fno-tree-fre -mavx512f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85255 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 10 12:37:36 2018 New Revision: 259269 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259269=gcc=rev Log: PR target/85177 PR target/85255 * config/i386/sse.md

[Bug target/85177] [8 Regression] wrong code with -O -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-sra -mavx512f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85177 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/85177] [8 Regression] wrong code with -O -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-sra -mavx512f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85177 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 10 12:37:36 2018 New Revision: 259269 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259269=gcc=rev Log: PR target/85177 PR target/85255 * config/i386/sse.md

[Bug target/85204] [nvptx] infinite loop generated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85204 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||openacc

[Bug bootstrap/85322] New: [8 Regression] profiledbootstrap failured

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85322 Bug ID: 85322 Summary: [8 Regression] profiledbootstrap failured Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/24314] Extra "template<>" in partial specialization is compiled successfuly.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24314 --- Comment #9 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Tue Apr 10 13:40:35 2018 New Revision: 259273 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259273=gcc=rev Log: 2018-04-10 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug fortran/85313] gcc/fortran/openmp.c: 2 * confused logic ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85313 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/85080] [8 regression] gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-pr37194.c fails starting with r248678

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85080 --- Comment #3 from Bill Schmidt --- I'll see if I can make time to look at this one soon. I suspect the new peeling costs check from Robin just made this test invalid.

[Bug target/84748] [6/7 Regression] wrong code with u128 at aarch64 at -O and and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84748 --- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Tue Apr 10 12:59:08 2018 New Revision: 259270 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259270=gcc=rev Log: [AArch64] PR target/84748: Mark *compare_cstore_insn as clobbering

[Bug c++/85110] Missing underlines for some bad arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85110 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/84490] [8 regression] 436.cactusADM regressed by 6-8% percent with -Ofast on Zen and Haswell, compared to gcc 7.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84490 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 43897 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43897=edit r254012 with peeling disabled

[Bug c/85320] Segmentation fault when building XKAAPI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85320 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug testsuite/85190] [8 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/pr81196.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85190 --- Comment #8 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: amker Date: Tue Apr 10 13:11:40 2018 New Revision: 259272 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259272=gcc=rev Log: gcc/testsuite PR testsuite/85190 *

[Bug c++/85312] trunk/gcc/cp/parser.c:12041: poor error checking ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85312 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/85103] [8 Regression] Performance regressions on SPEC with r257582

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85103 --- Comment #5 from Pat Haugen --- A little more detail. 48t.fnsplit splits mainGtU() into 2 functions: mainGtU(): which contains a few early exit tests and then a call to mainGtU.part.0() mainGtU.part.0(): contains the remainder of mainGtU(),

[Bug rtl-optimization/85300] [6/7 Regression] ICE in exact_int_to_float_conversion_p, at simplify-rtx.c:895

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85300 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] ICE in |[6/7 Regression] ICE in

[Bug c++/85325] New: ICE on class template partial specialization for c++17

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85325 Bug ID: 85325 Summary: ICE on class template partial specialization for c++17 Product: gcc Version: 7.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug ipa/85103] [8 Regression] Performance regressions on SPEC with r257582

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85103 --- Comment #7 from Pat Haugen --- Created attachment 43901 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43901=edit inline dump Prior attachment was r257581 dump. This is r257582 dump.

[Bug c/85320] Segmentation fault when building XKAAPI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85320 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/85311] const& aggregate parameter with empty default brace initializer results in undefined references to std containers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85311 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/82336] [6 Regression] GCC requires but does not emit defaulted constructors in certain cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82336 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vis...@royal-caliber.com --- Comment

[Bug libstdc++/85222] [7/8 Regression] ABI breakage of __throw_ios_failure by r244498

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85222 --- Comment #21 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Tue Apr 10 14:36:09 2018 New Revision: 259281 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259281=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/85222 allow catching iostream errors as gcc4-compatible ios::failure

[Bug rtl-optimization/85300] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE in exact_int_to_float_conversion_p, at simplify-rtx.c:895

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85300 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 10 15:31:57 2018 New Revision: 259285 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259285=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/85300 * combine.c (subst): Handle subst of

[Bug fortran/85314] gcc/fortran/resolve.c:9222: unreachable code ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85314 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P4 |P5 Severity|normal

[Bug ipa/85103] [8 Regression] Performance regressions on SPEC with r257582

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85103 --- Comment #6 from Pat Haugen --- Created attachment 43900 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43900=edit inline dump

[Bug target/85238] [8 Regression] lto-wrapper: fatal error: simple_object_copy_lto_debug_sections not implemented: Invalid argument on Cygwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85238 --- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou --- > So we in additional to that require a target hook that can be queried > from dwarf2out_early_finish () to disable the output of the sections. > Or somehow query the simple-object capability there. Can't

[Bug sanitizer/85230] asan: false positives in kernel on allocas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85230 chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/70808] Spurious -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant for nullptr_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70808 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini --- In fact, there is sort-of an inconsistency in build_zero_init_1 which explains the inconsistency in the original testcase: else if (TYPE_PTR_OR_PTRMEM_P (type)) init = fold (convert (type,

[Bug target/85329] New: [8 Regression] ICE in add_to_same_comdat_group, at symtab.c:460

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85329 Bug ID: 85329 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in add_to_same_comdat_group, at symtab.c:460 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/85328] accessing ymm16 with non-avx512 instruction form

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85328 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/85326] New: `make check` fails with `--disable-bootstrap` and `--enable-languages=c`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85326 Bug ID: 85326 Summary: `make check` fails with `--disable-bootstrap` and `--enable-languages=c` Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/70808] Spurious -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant for nullptr_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70808 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/85328] New: accessing ymm16 with non-avx512 instruction form

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85328 Bug ID: 85328 Summary: accessing ymm16 with non-avx512 instruction form Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/85321] Missing documentation and option misc for ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85321 --- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Tue Apr 10 18:54:08 2018 New Revision: 259296 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259296=gcc=rev Log: rs6000: Improve --help=target (PR85321) This updates the help text for some

[Bug other/85327] [8 regression] experimental/source_location/1.cc began failing with r259278

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85327 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/85327] New: [8 regression] experimental/source_location/1.cc began failing with r259278

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85327 Bug ID: 85327 Summary: [8 regression] experimental/source_location/1.cc began failing with r259278 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug testsuite/85326] `make check` fails with `--disable-bootstrap` and `--enable-languages=c`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85326 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

  1   2   >