[Bug tree-optimization/85834] [9 regression] ice in set_ssa_val_to, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:3396

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85834 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Richard Biener

[Bug fortran/85836] [meta-bug] Fortran 2018 support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85836 Bug 85836 depends on bug 85841, which changed state. Bug 85841 Summary: [F2018] reject deleted features https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85841 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/85841] [F2018] reject deleted features

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85841 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug tree-optimization/85863] [9 Regression] ICE in compiling spec2006 fortran test case solib.fppized.f starting with r260283

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85863 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug tree-optimization/85853] [9 Regression] ICE in vect_is_simple_use, at tree-vect-stmts.c:10233 on ppc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85853 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/85858] -Weffc++ should not require copy ctor for const pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85858 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- That's not how C++ works.

[Bug c++/85867] Subscript operator applied to an temporary array results in an lvalue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85867 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- I'm pretty sure this is a dup of an existing bug.

[Bug c++/85858] -Weffc++ should not require copy ctor for const pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85858 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Mike Sharov from comment #8) > My mental model here is actually of const correctness, not C++ specifically. > When I pass around a const object I expect it to stay unmodified. Consider a > fun

[Bug c++/85861] g++ -Wconversion misses int to size_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85861 --- Comment #6 from Jonny Grant --- Hi Eric Apologies my message was not clear. Yes you are right Eric, could -Wconversion also turn on -Wsign-conversion for C++ code. Does anyone know the history -Wconversion does not already turn on sign-conv

[Bug c++/85858] -Weffc++ should not require copy ctor for const pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85858 --- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #10) > (In reply to Mike Sharov from comment #8) > > My mental model here is actually of const correctness, not C++ specifically. > > When I pass around a const ob

[Bug fortran/85868] New: Subarray of a pointer array associated with a pointer dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85868 Bug ID: 85868 Summary: Subarray of a pointer array associated with a pointer dummy argument Product: gcc Version: 7.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/78290] Gfortran incorrectly creates a copy of an array passed to an array pointer dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78290 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Any need for a new test on top of those included in the revision? PING!

[Bug fortran/85841] [F2018] reject deleted features

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85841 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug fortran/85868] Subarray of a pointer array associated with a pointer dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85868 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/85863] [9 Regression] ICE in compiling spec2006 fortran test case solib.fppized.f starting with r260283

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85863 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue May 22 09:55:49 2018 New Revision: 260501 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260501&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-05-22 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/85863

[Bug tree-optimization/85863] [8 Regression] ICE in compiling spec2006 fortran test case solib.fppized.f starting with r260283

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85863 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/80155] [7/8/9 regression] Performance regression with code hoisting enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155 bin cheng changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #35 fro

[Bug tree-optimization/80155] [7/8/9 regression] Performance regression with code hoisting enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155 --- Comment #36 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 22 May 2018, amker at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155 > > bin cheng changed: > >What|Removed |Added > --

[Bug tree-optimization/80155] [7/8/9 regression] Performance regression with code hoisting enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155 --- Comment #37 from bin cheng --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #36) > On Tue, 22 May 2018, amker at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155 > > > > bin cheng changed: > > > >

[Bug ipa/85607] [9 Regression] ice in add_type, at ipa-icf.c:1583

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85607 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Tue May 22 10:50:43 2018 New Revision: 260502 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260502&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Do not ICE for incomplete types in ICF (PR ipa/85607). 2018-05-22 Martin

[Bug ipa/85607] [9 Regression] ice in add_type, at ipa-icf.c:1583

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85607 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libgcc/85869] New: libgcc fails to build in canadian cross: cet.h not found

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85869 Bug ID: 85869 Summary: libgcc fails to build in canadian cross: cet.h not found Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug fortran/85841] [F2018] reject deleted features

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85841 --- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hi Christophe, > Since this change (r260433), I've noticed that: > UNRESOLVED: gfortran.dg/vect/pr52580.f -O scan-tree-dump-times vect > "LOOP VECTORIZED" 1 > > on aarch64-linux-gnu. sorry th

[Bug tree-optimization/85834] [9 regression] ice in set_ssa_val_to, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:3396

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85834 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue May 22 11:25:14 2018 New Revision: 260503 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260503&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-05-22 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/85834

[Bug tree-optimization/85834] [9 regression] ice in set_ssa_val_to, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:3396

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85834 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/25290] PHI-OPT could be rewritten so that is uses fold

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25290 --- Comment #14 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #12) > (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #11) > > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #10) > > > Note this needs at least: > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p

[Bug c++/85861] g++ -Wconversion misses int to size_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85861 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7 f

[Bug target/85829] [8/9 Regression] PARTIAL_REG_DEPENDENCY and MOVX were disabled for Haswell and newer processors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85829 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Target Milestone|

[Bug libgcc/85869] libgcc fails to build in canadian cross: cet.h not found

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85869 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- I think your cross compiler needs to be built from the same sources as the canadian cross build.

[Bug web/85837] Listing of all error and warning messages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85837 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- Usually diagnostics include the option that enables/disables them in [] brackets. The documentation for this option should explain things.

[Bug c++/85842] [8/9 Regression] Bogus -Wreturn-type with generic lambda and constexpr if

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85842 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/85847] unexpected expression of kind template_id_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85847 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Status|UN

[Bug c++/85847] [6/7/8/9 Regression] unexpected expression of kind template_id_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85847 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Known to work|

[Bug bootstrap/85850] [9 Regression] gcc 9.0 doesn't compile with Xcode 9.3.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85850 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-darwin Priority|P3

[Bug rtl-optimization/85852] [9 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in contains_struct_check)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85852 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0

[Bug c/85870] New: [6/7/8/9 Regression][LTO1] ICE in linemap_line_start, at libcpp/line-map.c:794

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85870 Bug ID: 85870 Summary: [6/7/8/9 Regression][LTO1] ICE in linemap_line_start, at libcpp/line-map.c:794 Product: gcc Version: lto Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug rtl-optimization/85862] infinite loop in find_base_term()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85862 --- Comment #1 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rsandifo Date: Tue May 22 12:25:44 2018 New Revision: 260504 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260504&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Handle a null lhs in expand_direct_optab_fn (PR85862) T

[Bug gcov-profile/85871] New: g++.dg/gcov/gcov-8.C random failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85871 Bug ID: 85871 Summary: g++.dg/gcov/gcov-8.C random failures Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: gcov-profile

[Bug target/85216] Performance issue with PHP on ppc64 systems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85216 --- Comment #18 from Bill Schmidt --- I asked around a bit. On x86, user-user attacks are not mitigated by default. To enable user-user mitigation: echo 2 > /sys/kernel/debug/x86/ibrs_enabled My source tells me: 8<--- Red Hat explai

[Bug c/85870] [6/7/8/9 Regression][LTO1] ICE in linemap_line_start, at libcpp/line-map.c:794

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85870 Vidya Praveen changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||lto Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/85858] -Weffc++ should not require copy ctor for const pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85858 --- Comment #12 from Mike Sharov --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #10) > It's simply not how C++ works. Quite right. I already agreed with you here; we are arguing about whether it /should/ work this way :) > An object's lifetime i

[Bug tree-optimization/85853] [9 Regression] ICE in vect_is_simple_use, at tree-vect-stmts.c:10233 on ppc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85853 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug target/81084] [8 Regression] powerpcspe port full of confusing configury / command-line options not related to SPE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084 --- Comment #58 from Andrew Jenner --- (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #57) > Andrew, could you refresh your patch for the current trunk branch? > > It doesn't fully apply for me. Acknowledged. I will try to get to that late

[Bug tree-optimization/70754] [6 Regression] ICE during predictive commoning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70754 bin cheng changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/85855] [7/8/9 Regression] (Maybe) uninitialized descriptor fields of an allocatable array component of a function result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85855 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/82726] ICE in verify_ssa during GIMPLE pass: pcom

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82726 bin cheng changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/85857] configure problem using local mpfr and gmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85857 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- So it looks like mpfr uses internal interfaces for DFP? --with-gmp-build was stronly discouraged back in time... Also in-tree mpfr and system gmp is a combination that currently works (but not with DFP the

[Bug gcov-profile/85871] g++.dg/gcov/gcov-8.C random failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85871 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/85859] [6/7/8/9 Regression] wrong code with -fno-isolate-erroneous-paths-dereference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85859 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/85859] [6/7/8/9 Regression] wrong code with -fno-isolate-erroneous-paths-dereference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85859 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 CC|

[Bug target/85860] [8/9 Regression] ICE: in lra_split_hard_reg_for, at lra-assigns.c:1810: unable to find a register to spill with -flive-range-shrinkage -mbmi2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85860 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ra Priority|P3

[Bug c/85872] New: False positive for -Wmaybe-unitialized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85872 Bug ID: 85872 Summary: False positive for -Wmaybe-unitialized Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug rtl-optimization/85862] infinite loop in find_base_term()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85862 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/85180] Infinite loop in RTL DSE optimizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85180 --- Comment #21 from Richard Biener --- *** Bug 85862 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/85864] [8/9 Regression] template argument string literal operator with default argument doesnt work in templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85864 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/85866] [8/9 Regression] too few arguments to function when sfinae on calling pointer to member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85866 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/85847] [6/7/8/9 Regression] unexpected expression of kind template_id_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85847 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug gcov-profile/85871] g++.dg/gcov/gcov-8.C random failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85871 --- Comment #2 from Christophe Lyon --- Yes I had spotted this part of gcov.exp, but saw nothing in the logs. As I put in the title, it happens randomly, and this is automated testing. And it seems there is no way increasing verbosity will prin

[Bug middle-end/85872] False positive for -Wmaybe-unitialized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85872 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gcov-profile/85871] g++.dg/gcov/gcov-8.C random failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85871 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #2) > Yes I had spotted this part of gcov.exp, but saw nothing in the logs. > > As I put in the title, it happens randomly, and this is automated testing. > > And it

[Bug c++/85866] [8/9 Regression] too few arguments to function when sfinae on calling pointer to member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85866 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/85866] [8/9 Regression] too few arguments to function when sfinae on calling pointer to member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85866 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Reduced: template _Up __declval(int); template _Tp __declval(long); template auto declval() noexcept -> decltype(__declval<_Tp>(0)); template using void_t = void;

[Bug c++/79832] [C++14/17] result of subscripting non lvalue array should be xvalue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79832 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/85870] [6/7/8/9 Regression][LTO1] ICE in linemap_line_start, at libcpp/line-map.c:794

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85870 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-reduction CC|

[Bug c++/85867] Subscript operator applied to an temporary array results in an lvalue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85867 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/79832] [C++14/17] result of subscripting non lvalue array should be xvalue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79832 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yaghmour.shafik at gmail dot com ---

[Bug gcov-profile/85871] g++.dg/gcov/gcov-8.C random failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85871 --- Comment #4 from Christophe Lyon --- I'll try to see if I can isolate that. We run the tests on arm, aarch64, x86_32 and x86_64 all native targets. We post the results to https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/ as "LINARO TCWG"

[Bug c/85870] [6/7/8/9 Regression][LTO1] ICE in linemap_line_start, at libcpp/line-map.c:794

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85870 sudi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code --- Comment #

[Bug libgcc/85869] libgcc fails to build in canadian cross: cet.h not found

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85869 Arnd Bergmann changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|build | Target|x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*

[Bug c++/61806] [C++11] Expression sfinae w/o access gives hard error in partial template specializations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61806 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2017-09-25 00:00:00 |2018-5-22 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan

[Bug tree-optimization/85712] [8/9 Regression] ICE in all_phi_incrs_profitable_1 at gcc/gimple-ssa-strength-reduction.c:3479

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85712 --- Comment #3 from Bill Schmidt --- There are six vulnerabilities like this in the SLSR code: replace_mult_candidate (2) replace_rhs_if_not_dup (1) replace_one_candidate (3) I'll work on a fix.

[Bug fortran/85841] [F2018] reject deleted features

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85841 --- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #8) > UNRESOLVED: gfortran.dg/vect/pr52580.f -O scan-tree-dump-times vect > "LOOP VECTORIZED" 1 In addition to this one, I also see: UNRESOLVED: gfor

[Bug c++/61806] [C++11] Expression sfinae w/o access gives hard error in partial template specializations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61806 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-gcc-tot-latest-std/builds/310/steps/test.libcxx/logs/FAIL%3A%20libc%2B%2B%3A%3Adeduct.pass.cpp

[Bug tree-optimization/85853] [9 Regression] ICE in vect_is_simple_use, at tree-vect-stmts.c:10233 on ppc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85853 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assigne

[Bug rtl-optimization/85852] [9 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in contains_struct_check)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85852 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolutio

[Bug tree-optimization/85826] [9 Regression] ICE in gimple-ssa-warn-restrict on a variable-length struct starting with r260280

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85826 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- Fixed via r260537.

[Bug tree-optimization/85826] [9 Regression] ICE in gimple-ssa-warn-restrict on a variable-length struct starting with r260280

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85826 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Tue May 22 15:22:16 2018 New Revision: 260537 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260537&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/85826 - ICE in gimple-ssa-warn-restruct on a varia

[Bug tree-optimization/85826] [9 Regression] ICE in gimple-ssa-warn-restrict on a variable-length struct starting with r260280

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85826 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/85873] New: [8 regression] GCC omits array constant in .rodata causing a segmentation fault.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85873 Bug ID: 85873 Summary: [8 regression] GCC omits array constant in .rodata causing a segmentation fault. Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity

[Bug tree-optimization/85697] At -Os nontrivial ctor does not use SSE to zero

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85697 --- Comment #2 from Mike Sharov --- I previously filed bug #49127 about the non-SSE version of the same xor/mov optimization. Perhaps both could be addressed in the same manner with a more general capability of zeroing with a register when doing

[Bug c/85874] New: gcc points to wrong location when displaying error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85874 Bug ID: 85874 Summary: gcc points to wrong location when displaying error Product: gcc Version: 8.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug c/85874] gcc points to wrong location when displaying error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85874 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- Does that change if you use -Wsystem-headers?

[Bug rtl-optimization/80318] GCC takes too much RAM and time compiling a template file (var-tracking)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80318 benjamin.redelings at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Version|7.0.1 |8.1.0 --- Comment #

[Bug c/85874] gcc points to wrong location when displaying error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85874 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schneider --- If I add -Wsystem-headers I get: In file included from /usr/include/stdlib.h:822, from ../lib/replace/replace.h:40, from ../lib/util/debug.c:22: /usr/include/bits/stdlib

[Bug c/85874] gcc points to wrong location when displaying error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85874 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Strict overflow warnings are just so badly implemented ...

[Bug rtl-optimization/80318] GCC takes too much RAM and time compiling a template file (var-tracking)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80318 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug c++/85875] New: -Weffc++ can't understand auto return values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85875 Bug ID: 85875 Summary: -Weffc++ can't understand auto return values Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug tree-optimization/85814] [8 Regression] ICE Segmentation fault during GIMPLE pass: strlen -O3 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85814 --- Comment #9 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rsandifo Date: Tue May 22 17:32:37 2018 New Revision: 260540 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260540&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix tree-ssa-strlen handling of partial clobbers (PR8581

[Bug c++/85875] -Weffc++ can't understand auto return values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85875 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug c/85623] strncmp() warns about attribute 'nonstring' incorrectly in -Wstringop-overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85623 --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Tue May 22 17:45:35 2018 New Revision: 260541 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260541&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/85623 - strncmp() warns about attribute 'nonstring' incorrectly in -W

[Bug c/85623] strncmp() warns about attribute 'nonstring' incorrectly in -Wstringop-overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85623 --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor --- Patch committed to trunk in r260541.

[Bug rtl-optimization/85876] New: ICE in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6164

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85876 Bug ID: 85876 Summary: ICE in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6164 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/85544] [6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_scalarized_array_ref, at fortran/trans-array.c:3385

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85544 --- Comment #3 from G. Steinmetz --- For special case +-1 : $ cat zz1.f90 program p integer, parameter :: na = -3, ne = 10 integer :: i, a(na:ne), b(na:ne) a = [(i, i=na, ne)] b = [1**a] end $ gfortran-9-20180520 -c zz1.f90 -O2 zz1

[Bug fortran/85877] New: [6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2449

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85877 Bug ID: 85877 Summary: [6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2449 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/85878] New: [6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE in convert_mode_scalar, at expr.c:287

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85878 Bug ID: 85878 Summary: [6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE in convert_mode_scalar, at expr.c:287 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug fortran/85879] New: [6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE in expand_debug_locations, at cfgexpand.c:5405

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85879 Bug ID: 85879 Summary: [6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE in expand_debug_locations, at cfgexpand.c:5405 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/85880] New: Different code generation for uninitialized variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85880 Bug ID: 85880 Summary: Different code generation for uninitialized variables Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Comp

[Bug c/85880] Different code generation for uninitialized variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85880 --- Comment #1 from Fredrik Hederstierna --- Created attachment 44165 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44165&action=edit Makefile

[Bug middle-end/85880] Different code generation for uninitialized variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85880 --- Comment #2 from Fredrik Hederstierna --- All old GCC < 8 --- Disassembly of section .text: : 0: 2000movsr0, #0 2: 4770bx lr 0004 : 4: b500push{lr}

[Bug fortran/85841] [F2018] reject deleted features

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85841 --- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Tue May 22 18:22:29 2018 New Revision: 260544 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260544&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-05-22 Janus Weil PR fortran/85841 * gf

  1   2   >