https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86046
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86008
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Thanks for checking! For now I'll just keep the same _Quoted_string definition
so it stores a reference to a basic_string_view. We can reconsider before the
GCC 9 release if needed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86047
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78870
--- Comment #28 from Jonathan Wakely ---
We might want to mark some tests as XFAIL for *-*-mingw* targets.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47805
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #4)
> Updated version: F08/0052 at
> ftp://ftp.nag.co.uk/sc22wg5/N1901-N1950/N1907.txt
> (incorporated in Corrigendum 1 to F2008).
Updated link for this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86048
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86049
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86051
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12595
Karsten Burger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||karsten_burger at gmx dot de
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84846
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Jun 5 08:11:52 2018
New Revision: 261188
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261188=gcc=rev
Log:
Print working directory only in intermediate format (PR gcov-profile/84846).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86042
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86008
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86050
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86053
Bug ID: 86053
Summary: Builtin fwrite arguments have non_null attribute and
builtin function declaration not overloaded
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86052
--- Comment #3 from Jürgen Reuter ---
Paul, it is not my example, it was posted by Alberto Fco. Martín-Huertas in
December 2015 on c.l.f., and you commented at that time that you were
contemplating on how to implement PDTs together with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86054
Bug ID: 86054
Summary: [8.1/9 Regression] SPEC CPU2006 416.gamess miscompare
after r259592 with march=skylake-avx512
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86054
--- Comment #2 from Alexander Nesterovskiy ---
Thanks, "-fno-aggressive-loop-optimizations" helps.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86052
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86052
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85731
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jun 5 11:27:12 2018
New Revision: 261196
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261196=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/85731 - wrong error with qualified-id in template.
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85731
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jun 5 11:27:15 2018
New Revision: 261197
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261197=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/85731 - wrong error with qualified-id in template.
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85731
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85976
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60243
--- Comment #22 from Jan Hubicka ---
> The IPA SRA time is all spent in compute_fn_summary via convert_callers.
> Not sure why that's necessary here? Martin, in r152368 you reduced those
> to once-per-caller but obviously if each function calls
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86046
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86046
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jun 5 10:02:50 2018
New Revision: 261193
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261193=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-06-05 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/86046
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618
--- Comment #21 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Jun 5 12:10:22 2018
New Revision: 261199
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261199=gcc=rev
Log:
Support variables in expansion of -fprofile-generate option (PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86054
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86047
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jun 5 10:01:49 2018
New Revision: 261192
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261192=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-06-05 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/86047
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86047
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32957
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> So is this fixed now?
I have spotted some new tests requiring c_int:
--- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bind_c_usage_24.f90 2018-02-18
00:40:36.0 +0100
+++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84846
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47805
--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Another very related case that gfortran currently accepts, although it is
invalid according to the interpretation request:
module m1
implicit none
type, abstract :: t1
contains
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86052
Bug ID: 86052
Summary: ICE with parameterized derived types
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81497
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81497
--- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Tue Jun 5 09:50:16 2018
New Revision: 261191
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261191=gcc=rev
Log:
[arm] PR target/81497: Fix arm_acle.h for C++
When trying to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86013
--- Comment #8 from Jan Kratochvil ---
Created attachment 44236
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44236=edit
incredibleshrinkingvector.C
What's wrong with this implementation? The permitted operator new symbols
interposition
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85976
--- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Jun 5 13:11:00 2018
New Revision: 261200
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261200=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/85976
* tree.c (cp_tree_equal): Handle USING_DECL.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60243
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85925
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|segher at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85925
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86039
--- Comment #2 from Samuel Hultgren ---
(In reply to Jim Wilson from comment #1)
> Windows has a 260 character default maximum path length. See for instance
> https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa365247(v=vs.85).
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86055
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85701
--- Comment #3 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Tue Jun 5 13:58:50 2018
New Revision: 261202
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261202=gcc=rev
Log:
PR fortran/85701
gcc/fortran/
* openmp.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66146
Jon Cohen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cohenjon at google dot com
--- Comment #21
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86055
Bug ID: 86055
Summary: Bitshifts temporarly change uint32_t to int32_t on
x86_64 Mac OS
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86053
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85847
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Jun 5 15:33:51 2018
New Revision: 261205
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261205=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/85847
* init.c (build_new_1): Use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85976
--- Comment #10 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Jun 5 15:41:34 2018
New Revision: 261206
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261206=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/85976
* tree.c (cp_tree_equal): Handle USING_DECL.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86056
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |middle-end
--- Comment #1 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86056
Bug ID: 86056
Summary: Codegen can result in multiple sequential mfence
instructions
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85847
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86057
Bug ID: 86057
Summary: Use of mempcpy in libgcc/ libgcov-driver-system.c
breaks bootstrap
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86057
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86059
Bug ID: 86059
Summary: ICE in reduce_binary_ac, at fortran/arith.c:1308 (and
others)
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86057
--- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl ---
On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 06:21:29PM +, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
> mempcpy is in libiberty but we don't compile a target version of libiberty.
>
Looking
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86057
--- Comment #2 from Steve Kargl ---
On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 05:25:12PM +, ro at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> --- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ---
> Affects Solaris, too (and almost certainly macOS as well).
>
mempcpy seems to be a glibc 2.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86045
--- Comment #4 from G. Steinmetz ---
> There's a are different issue than the one involving MOD().
Cases from comment 1 are now separated as pr86059.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86045
--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl ---
On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 06:02:47PM +, gs...@t-online.de wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86045
>
> --- Comment #4 from G. Steinmetz ---
> > There's a are different issue than the one
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86058
Bug ID: 86058
Summary: TARGET_MEM_REF causing incorrect message for
-Wmaybe-uninitialized warning
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77703
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gs...@t-online.de
--- Comment #4 from G.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85942
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gs...@t-online.de
--- Comment #4 from G.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86056
--- Comment #2 from Mathias Stearn ---
Oh, I agree that this optimization must be permitted. I was using this example
to prove this to someone else who didn't believe that. I only mentioned that to
explain how that weird source code came to be.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86049
Richard Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||richard-gccbugzilla@metafoo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86057
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86057
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85976
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86058
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Burgess ---
Sorry, this is on x86-64/GNU-Linux
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85701
cesar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86058
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
--- Comment #1 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86060
Bug ID: 86060
Summary: g++ ICE at on with "c++03" in tsubst_copy, at
cp/pt.c:15459
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86061
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86061
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86061
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|missed-optimization |
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86061
Bug ID: 86061
Summary: dead memset followed by strncpy and assignment not
eliminated
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81384
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86060
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|g++ ICE at on with "c++03" |[6/7/8/9 Regression] g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86060
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79924
--- Comment #2 from Steve Ellcey ---
Author: sje
Date: Tue Jun 5 22:21:36 2018
New Revision: 261218
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261218=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-06-05 Steve Ellcey
PR target/79924
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66146
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
--- Comment #22 from Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86064
Bug ID: 86064
Summary: [8 Regression] compiling Linux kernel: Error: can't
resolve `.text.unlikely' {.text.unlikely section} -
`.LVL43x' {.text section}
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86065
Bug ID: 86065
Summary: gfortran NAMELIST improperly reads arrays that span
more than one line.
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86065
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86065
--- Comment #2 from Charlie ---
Thank You
-Original Message-
From: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org [mailto:gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org]
Sent: Tuesday, June 5, 2018 7:26 PM
To: char...@sallyandcharlie.com
Subject: [Bug fortran/86065] gfortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86015
--- Comment #8 from Josh Marshall ---
If this code is to work, given that this is the only way to track in detail use
of various stdlib internals, one of two things need to change. Either all
assignments to _Distance need to be explicitly
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86062
Bug ID: 86062
Summary: Missed redundancy elimination with struct and array
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86042
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86042
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
The strcpy() calls are first transformed into
MEM[(char * {ref-all})] = MEM[(char * {ref-all})"12"];
In GCC 7, the above is then transformed into
MEM[(char * {ref-all})] = "12";
(I'm not sure what the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79924
--- Comment #1 from Steve Ellcey ---
Author: sje
Date: Tue Jun 5 22:20:13 2018
New Revision: 261217
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261217=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-06-05 Steve Ellcey
PR target/79924
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86063
Bug ID: 86063
Summary: g++ ICE at tree check: expected tree_list, have
expr_pack_expansion in cp_check_const_attributes, at
cp/decl2.c:1391
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86063
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86057
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Confirmed on darwin too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86066
Bug ID: 86066
Summary: wrong code at -Os and above on x86-64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
94 matches
Mail list logo
