[Bug debug/86457] New: [8/9 Regression] ICE in add_dwarf_attr, at dwarf2out.c:4405 since r251448

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86457 Bug ID: 86457 Summary: [8/9 Regression] ICE in add_dwarf_attr, at dwarf2out.c:4405 since r251448 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug lto/86458] New: [8/9 Regression] ICE: tree code ‘template_parm_index’ is not supported in LTO streams

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86458 Bug ID: 86458 Summary: [8/9 Regression] ICE: tree code ‘template_parm_index’ is not supported in LTO streams Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug lto/86453] [8/9 Regression] error: type variant differs by TYPE_PACKED in free_lang_data since r255469

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86453 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/86453] [8/9 Regression] error: type variant differs by TYPE_PACKED in free_lang_data since r255469

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86453 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 44374 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44374=edit run verify_types unconditionally With this patch -flto isn't needed to trigger the bug.

[Bug debug/86459] [9 Regression] ICE in output_macinfo_op, at dwarf2out.c:28095 since r260297

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86459 --- Comment #1 from Mark Wielaard --- Sorry I missed that testcase starting to fail. I don't currently have it in my tree, so I assume it was added after this commit? svn r260297 is: commit 35a499265a9b4b31277fc540ddfbeb63fb361649 Author: mark

[Bug debug/86457] [8/9 Regression] ICE in add_dwarf_attr, at dwarf2out.c:4405 since r251448

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86457 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/86458] [8/9 Regression] ICE: tree code ‘template_parm_index’ is not supported in LTO streams

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86458 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug debug/86459] [9 Regression] ICE in output_macinfo_op, at dwarf2out.c:28095 since r260297

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86459 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0

[Bug testsuite/78544] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/section-attr-*.c compilation, -fprofile-generate -D_PROFILE_GENERATE on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78544 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #40164|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug debug/86455] var-tracking mishandled pre_dec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86455 --- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries --- Created attachment 44373 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44373=edit Tentative patch Using this tentative patch, I get the correct updated insn 132: ... (insn/f 132 4 133 2 (parallel [

[Bug debug/86456] New: [8/9 Regression] Segfault in switch_to_section at gcc/varasm.c:7353 since r259317

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86456 Bug ID: 86456 Summary: [8/9 Regression] Segfault in switch_to_section at gcc/varasm.c:7353 since r259317 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug debug/86459] New: [9 Regression] ICE in output_macinfo_op, at dwarf2out.c:28095 since r260297

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86459 Bug ID: 86459 Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in output_macinfo_op, at dwarf2out.c:28095 since r260297 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug debug/78685] -Og generates too many ""s

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78685 --- Comment #13 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #12) > Created attachment 44343 [details] > [debug] Add fkeep-vars-live > Guality testing status: Og -fkeep-vars-live gives better results than Og for > pr54200.c and

[Bug debug/86456] [8/9 Regression] Segfault in switch_to_section at gcc/varasm.c:7353 since r259317

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86456 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC|

[Bug c++/86458] [8/9 Regression] ICE: tree code ‘template_parm_index’ is not supported in LTO streams

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86458 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Isn't this a dup of PR83997?

Re: [Bug target/86383] [9 Regression] arm-netbsdelf cross compiler fails in selftests

On 06.07.2018 15:26, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > On 06/07/18 12:11, Kamil Rytarowski wrote: >> On 06.07.2018 12:38, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: >>> On 06/07/18 11:32, Kamil Rytarowski wrote: On 04.07.2018 20:55, rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: >

[Bug fortran/86277] Presence of optional arguments not recognized for zero length arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86277 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug lto/86453] New: [8/9 Regression] error: type variant differs by TYPE_PACKED in free_lang_data since r255469

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86453 Bug ID: 86453 Summary: [8/9 Regression] error: type variant differs by TYPE_PACKED in free_lang_data since r255469 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/81685] [7/8/9 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline-ns-2.C -std=gnu++* (internal compiler error) on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81685 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug libstdc++/86450] Bootstrap failure due to -Wabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86450 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Component|bootstrap

[Bug debug/86452] ICE in force_decl_die, at dwarf2out.c:25922 with -g1 and -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86452 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Ever confirmed|0

[Bug debug/86452] ICE in force_decl_die, at dwarf2out.c:25922 with -g1 and -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86452 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Well, what flags do you use? (-g1?) Any CUs with differing flags? Yes, it's w/ -g1. I was also reproduce that on libxul.so with -g1. So that I can confirm that

[Bug debug/86452] ICE in force_decl_die, at dwarf2out.c:25922 with -g1 and -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86452 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 10 Jul 2018, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86452 > > --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment

[Bug lto/86454] New: [8/9 Regression] error: type variant differs by TYPE_PACKED in free_lang_data since r255469

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86454 Bug ID: 86454 Summary: [8/9 Regression] error: type variant differs by TYPE_PACKED in free_lang_data since r255469 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug debug/86455] New: var-tracking mishandled pre_dec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86455 Bug ID: 86455 Summary: var-tracking mishandled pre_dec Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug

[Bug target/81685] [7/8/9 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline-ns-2.C -std=gnu++* (internal compiler error) on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81685 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Target|x86_64-apple-darwin16 |*-apple-darwin*

[Bug c++/86458] [8/9 Regression] ICE: tree code ‘template_parm_index’ is not supported in LTO streams

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86458 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/83997] ICE with alias template and attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83997 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- *** Bug 86458 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/86328] [8/9 Regression] Runtime segfault reading an allocatable class(*) object in allocate statements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86328 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/55606] sorry, unimplemented: non-trivial designated initializers not supported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55606 --- Comment #11 from nightstrike --- This now works with gcc 8. I haven't tried other versions.

[Bug fortran/86328] [8/9 Regression] Runtime segfault reading an allocatable class(*) object in allocate statements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86328 --- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #4) > Bisection shows that this regression was introduced by Paul's r251949 on > 2017-09-10. I could verify that reverting the expr.c part of that commit does not

[Bug c++/55606] sorry, unimplemented: non-trivial designated initializers not supported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55606 --- Comment #12 from nightstrike --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #9) > A similar test case not involving arrays: > > $ cat z.c && /build/gcc-trunk-svn/gcc/xgcc -B /build/gcc-trunk-svn/gcc -S > -Wall -Wextra -o/dev/null -xc++ z.c >

[Bug fortran/86328] [8/9 Regression] Runtime segfault reading an allocatable class(*) object in allocate statements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86328 --- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 44375 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44375=edit dump of old (correct) version I also tried to look at the output of -fdump-tree-original for the code in

[Bug c++/86443] ICEs on #pragma omp distribute parallel for with class iterators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86443 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jul 10 07:12:37 2018 New Revision: 262534 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262534=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/86443 * gimplify.c (find_combined_omp_for): Add DATA

[Bug testsuite/86446] 'gmake check-fortran' broken in libgomp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86446 --- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou --- > So, instead of using -k to pape over an error in the Makefile, > what is wrong with the lines > > check-DEJAGNU: site.exp > srcdir='$(srcdir)'; export srcdir; \ > EXPECT=$(EXPECT); export

[Bug sanitizer/86406] [8/9 Regression][UBSAN] -fcompare-debug failure with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86406 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jul 10 08:15:15 2018 New Revision: 262537 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262537=gcc=rev Log: PR sanitizer/86406 * cp-gimplify.c (cp_maybe_instrument_return):

[Bug c/86451] Incorrect "is used uninitialized"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86451 Jan Wielemaker changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/86421] OpenMP declare simd linear ref in module causes gfortran to bail out

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86421 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jul 10 07:27:37 2018 New Revision: 262535 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262535=gcc=rev Log: PR fortran/86421 * module.c (omp_declare_simd_clauses): Add LINEAR

[Bug c/86451] New: Incorrect "is used uninitialized"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86451 Bug ID: 86451 Summary: Incorrect "is used uninitialized" Product: gcc Version: 8.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c/86451] Incorrect "is used uninitialized"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86451 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Try with -fno-strict-aliasing because I suspect you are violating the c/c++ aliasing rules in that you access a double as an unsigned long.

[Bug sanitizer/86406] [8/9 Regression][UBSAN] -fcompare-debug failure with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86406 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug debug/86452] New: ICE in force_decl_die, at dwarf2out.c:25922 with -g1 and -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86452 Bug ID: 86452 Summary: ICE in force_decl_die, at dwarf2out.c:25922 with -g1 and -flto Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code

[Bug sanitizer/86406] [8/9 Regression][UBSAN] -fcompare-debug failure with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86406 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/86443] ICEs on #pragma omp distribute parallel for with class iterators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86443 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/86421] OpenMP declare simd linear ref in module causes gfortran to bail out

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86421 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Fixed for 9+ so far.

[Bug c/86407] Ignore function attributes in function type declarations?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86407 --- Comment #4 from Zebediah Figura --- So is there any sensible way to make this attribute a type attribute instead of a function attribute? Or is this not desirable?

[Bug target/81084] [8 Regression] powerpcspe port full of confusing configury / command-line options not related to SPE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084 --- Comment #62 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to Andrew Jenner from comment #61) > Sorry, once again I have been totally swamped by other work. It's now > looking like I should have some time to work on this in early July. Ok,

[Bug testsuite/86445] [9 regression] Missing warning for test case gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr84100.c starting with r262513

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86445 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0

[Bug fortran/86328] [8/9 Regression] Runtime segfault reading an allocatable class(*) object in allocate statements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86328 --- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 44376 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44376=edit dump of new (buggy) version

[Bug fortran/86417] [9 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/alloc-comp-3.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86417 --- Comment #12 from Fritz Reese --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #11) > (In reply to janus from comment #10) ... > > If possible, I would prefer to set the locus where it is generated, > not conditionally later. > > Unfortunately,

[Bug middle-end/86461] New: [9 regression] test case gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/strlen-3.c fails starting with r262522

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86461 Bug ID: 86461 Summary: [9 regression] test case gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/strlen-3.c fails starting with r262522 Product: gcc Version: 9.0

[Bug c/86460] New: GCC 8.1 cross-compiler fails to compile linux kernel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86460 Bug ID: 86460 Summary: GCC 8.1 cross-compiler fails to compile linux kernel Product: gcc Version: 8.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libstdc++/86450] Bootstrap failure due to -Wabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86450 --- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl --- On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 09:55:15AM +, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86450 > > --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- > Can you check whether removing

[Bug testsuite/86445] [9 regression] Missing warning for test case gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr84100.c starting with r262513

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86445 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Tue Jul 10 14:50:28 2018 New Revision: 262540 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262540=gcc=rev Log: Change dg-warning to db-bogus in a test-case (PR testsuite/86445). 2018-07-10

[Bug testsuite/86445] [9 regression] Missing warning for test case gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr84100.c starting with r262513

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86445 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/86328] [8/9 Regression] Runtime segfault reading an allocatable class(*) object in allocate statements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86328 --- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Reducing the test case slightly more: program ptr_alloc type :: t class(*), allocatable :: val end type type :: list type(t), dimension(:), pointer :: ll end type

[Bug debug/86462] New: [9 Regression] Quite huge debug info size increase introduced in r262511

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86462 Bug ID: 86462 Summary: [9 Regression] Quite huge debug info size increase introduced in r262511 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/86461] [9 regression] test case gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/strlen-3.c fails starting with r262522

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86461 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/82711] -Wignored-qualifiers could be moved into -Wextra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82711 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug fortran/86468] New: [9.0 regression] ICE verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86468 Bug ID: 86468 Summary: [9.0 regression] ICE verify_gimple failed Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug c++/81513] __has_cpp_attribute returns non-zero in C++03 mode, but attributes don't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81513 Pavel Roskin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/86467] New: inlining strcmp with small known length array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86467 Bug ID: 86467 Summary: inlining strcmp with small known length array Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

Re: [Bug target/86383] [9 Regression] arm-netbsdelf cross compiler fails in selftests

On 10.07.2018 19:49, richard.earnshaw at arm dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86383 > > --- Comment #7 from richard.earnshaw at arm dot com --- > On 10/07/18 10:57, Kamil Rytarowski wrote: >> On 06.07.2018 15:26, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: >>> On 06/07/18 12:11,

[Bug c/86460] GCC 8.1 cross-compiler fails to compile linux kernel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86460 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/86460] GCC 8.1 cross-compiler fails to compile linux kernel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86460 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- The warning/error message seems clear to me that this is a bug inside the Linux kernel and should be reported to them instead.

[Bug fortran/86328] [8/9 Regression] Runtime segfault reading an allocatable class(*) object in allocate statements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86328 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to janus from comment #8) > Reducing the test case slightly more: > > > program ptr_alloc > >type :: t > class(*), allocatable :: val >end type > >type :: list > type(t),

[Bug target/86466] New: [X86] gcc checks the range of the immediate to _mm_blend_ps, but not _mm_blend_epi32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86466 Bug ID: 86466 Summary: [X86] gcc checks the range of the immediate to _mm_blend_ps, but not _mm_blend_epi32 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

Re: [Bug target/86383] [9 Regression] arm-netbsdelf cross compiler fails in selftests

On 10/07/18 10:57, Kamil Rytarowski wrote: > On 06.07.2018 15:26, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: >> On 06/07/18 12:11, Kamil Rytarowski wrote: >>> On 06.07.2018 12:38, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: On 06/07/18 11:32, Kamil Rytarowski wrote: > On 04.07.2018 20:55, rearnsha at gcc dot

[Bug c++/82711] -Wignored-qualifiers could be moved into -Wextra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82711 --- Comment #6 from nightstrike --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #5) > -Wignored-qualifiers has been in -Wextra since r131499. Based on the > Firefox review I think the request is actually to remove the warning from > -Wextra (or they

[Bug target/86383] [9 Regression] arm-netbsdelf cross compiler fails in selftests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86383 --- Comment #6 from Richard Earnshaw --- (In reply to coypu from comment #5) > (In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #2) > > I'm not sure how relevant the netbsd-elf port is these days. I believe > > they've now moved onto an EABI based

[Bug c++/86469] New: Dwarf Error: Offset (1678049557) greater than or equal to .debug_str size (5846).

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86469 Bug ID: 86469 Summary: Dwarf Error: Offset (1678049557) greater than or equal to .debug_str size (5846). Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/82711] -Wignored-qualifiers could be moved into -Wextra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82711 Sylvestre Ledru changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/86462] [9 Regression] Quite huge debug info size increase introduced in r262511

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86462 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug debug/86462] [9 Regression] Quite huge debug info size increase introduced in r262511

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86462 --- Comment #1 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On July 10, 2018 5:15:08 PM GMT+02:00, "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86462 > >Bug ID: 86462 > Summary: [9 Regression]

[Bug libstdc++/86450] Bootstrap failure due to -Wabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86450 --- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl --- On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 09:55:15AM +, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86450 > > Richard Biener changed: > >What|Removed

[Bug target/86383] [9 Regression] arm-netbsdelf cross compiler fails in selftests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86383 --- Comment #7 from richard.earnshaw at arm dot com --- On 10/07/18 10:57, Kamil Rytarowski wrote: > On 06.07.2018 15:26, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: >> On 06/07/18 12:11, Kamil Rytarowski wrote: >>> On 06.07.2018 12:38, Richard Earnshaw

[Bug fortran/86463] New: Slow compile with -ggdb and optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86463 Bug ID: 86463 Summary: Slow compile with -ggdb and optimizations Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/86464] New: Delegating constructor causes error if parameter has same name as class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86464 Bug ID: 86464 Summary: Delegating constructor causes error if parameter has same name as class Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/86465] New: C++17 triggers: ‘’ may be used uninitialized in this function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86465 Bug ID: 86465 Summary: C++17 triggers: ‘’ may be used uninitialized in this function Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/86450] Bootstrap failure due to -Wabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86450 --- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl --- On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 06:46:33PM +, sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu wrote: > > % find . -type f | xargs grep Wabi > ... > ./libstdc++-v3/acinclude.m4: WARN_FLAGS='-Wall -Wextra -Wwrite-strings

[Bug c++/66586] Template backtrace is truncated/absent after 'template argument deduction/substitution failed:'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66586 Michał Mirosław changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mirq-gccboogs at rere dot qmqm.pl

[Bug libstdc++/86450] Bootstrap failure due to -Wabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86450 --- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely --- Because we haven't decided what the fix is. Something like this seems better than dealing with each warning one by one every time this happens: --- a/libstdc++-v3/acinclude.m4 +++

[Bug c++/86473] New: a problem in member lookup?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86473 Bug ID: 86473 Summary: a problem in member lookup? Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug testsuite/86461] [9 regression] test case gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/strlen-3.c fails starting with r262522

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86461 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Tue Jul 10 20:21:38 2018 New Revision: 262543 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262543=gcc=rev Log: PR testsuite/86461 - test case gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/strlen-3.c fails

[Bug c++/82711] -Wignored-qualifiers could be moved into -Wextra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82711 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- There was no change. r131499 was done more than a decade ago.

[Bug c++/82711] -Wignored-qualifiers could be moved into -Wextra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82711 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |WORKSFORME

[Bug libstdc++/86450] Bootstrap failure due to -Wabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86450 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7) > These warnings have been present for weeks - the idea that they're suddenly > preventing anybody from working on gfortran is odd. Why can't you use > autoconf

[Bug c++/86464] Delegating constructor causes error if parameter has same name as class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86464 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug libstdc++/86450] Bootstrap failure due to -Wabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86450 --- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #10) > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 08:35:48PM +, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > > See https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-06/msg01923.html > > and

[Bug libstdc++/86450] Bootstrap failure due to -Wabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86450 --- Comment #17 from Jonathan Wakely --- The problem is that gfortran development is dependent on a gcc-wide build mode which affects more than just gfortran. There's no good reason that libstdc++ should be a blocker for you (for the record, the

[Bug debug/86459] [9 Regression] ICE in output_macinfo_op, at dwarf2out.c:28095 since r260297

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86459 --- Comment #3 from Mark Wielaard --- Author: mark Date: Tue Jul 10 22:44:30 2018 New Revision: 262545 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262545=gcc=rev Log: PR debug/86459 - Fix -gsplit-dwarf -g3 gcc_assert There was a typo in the

[Bug libstdc++/86450] Bootstrap failure due to -Wabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86450 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #3) > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 09:55:15AM +, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86450 > > > > --- Comment #2 from

[Bug libstdc++/86450] Bootstrap failure due to -Wabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86450 --- Comment #10 from Steve Kargl --- On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 08:35:48PM +, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > See https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-06/msg01923.html > and https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-07/msg00059.html >

[Bug libstdc++/86450] Bootstrap failure due to -Wabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86450 --- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #9) > (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7) > > These warnings have been present for weeks - the idea that they're suddenly > > preventing anybody from

[Bug middle-end/86471] GCC/libstdc++ outputs inferior code for std::fill and std::fill_n vs std::memset on c-style arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86471 --- Comment #2 from Matt Bentley --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Does -O3 bring the performance back? -O3 enables loop distrubtion which > should be able to detect these loops. Just tested - yes. However this is a fairly

[Bug fortran/86472] New: allocatable array, bound-procedure, submodule

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86472 Bug ID: 86472 Summary: allocatable array, bound-procedure, submodule Product: gcc Version: 8.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug testsuite/86461] [9 regression] test case gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/strlen-3.c fails starting with r262522

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86461 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc64*-*-* |powerpc64*-*-*, sparc*-*-*,

[Bug libstdc++/86450] Bootstrap failure due to -Wabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86450 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- These warnings have been present for weeks - the idea that they're suddenly preventing anybody from working on gfortran is odd. Why can't you use autoconf or autoreconf like everybody else?

[Bug libstdc++/86450] Bootstrap failure due to -Wabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86450 --- Comment #16 from Steve Kargl --- On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 09:40:16PM +, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > There is an obvious patch. > > I will commit my patch by the end of the day, > > or revert the patch causing the problem. > >

[Bug libstdc++/86471] GCC/libstdc++ outputs inferior code for std::fill and std::fill_n vs std::memset on c-style arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86471 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Does -O3 bring the performance back? -O3 enables loop distrubtion which should be able to detect these loops.

  1   2   >