[Bug target/86677] New: popcount builtin detection is breaking some kernel build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86677 Bug ID: 86677 Summary: popcount builtin detection is breaking some kernel build Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/86678] New: constexpr evaluation incorrectly diagnoses unevaluated call to non-constexpr function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86678 Bug ID: 86678 Summary: constexpr evaluation incorrectly diagnoses unevaluated call to non-constexpr function Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

Submitting Your Manuscripts _ Dear bug-gcc _ 3206753

Dear Author/Researcher, For the purpose of supplying a better platform for you authors to publish papers, we sincerely invite scholars and researchers to submit papers to the journals or to join in the editorial board/reviewer team. To Become One of the Editorial

Is branding your concern?

Is branding your concern? Most companies are thinking which way is the most effective yet affordable way to reach customers or clients? Having difficulty to reach the person that make it happen? We are the solution! Big data is the

[Bug libstdc++/86676] 20_util/monotonic_buffer_resource/release.cc FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86676 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed Jul 25 23:38:17 2018 New Revision: 262984 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262984=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/86676 another alignment fix for test PR libstdc++/86676

[Bug c/39117] missed strict-aliasing warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39117 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/39322] Missed aliasing warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39322 Bug 39322 depends on bug 39117, which changed state. Bug 39117 Summary: missed strict-aliasing warning https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39117 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/86669] New: [5/6/7/8/9 regression] Complete object constructor clone omits length for a c++11 braced initialiser

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86669 Bug ID: 86669 Summary: [5/6/7/8/9 regression] Complete object constructor clone omits length for a c++11 braced initialiser Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug lto/86654] [9 Regression] ICE in gen_member_die, at dwarf2out.c:24933

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86654 --- Comment #12 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #11) > OK, so patch at least regresses > > FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/lambda1.C -std=gnu++11 scan-assembler-times > DW_TAG_variable[^.]*.ascii "this.0" 2 > FAIL:

[Bug c/86668] mixing ansi prototype with K definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86668 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/79635] Explain to translators what "asan" means

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79635 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Wed Jul 25 08:02:53 2018 New Revision: 262959 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262959=gcc=rev Log: Explain asan parameters in params.def (PR sanitizer/79635). 2018-07-25 Martin

[Bug middle-end/86645] [9 Regression] UBSAN error: tree-cfg.c:7874:26: runtime error: load of value 4293224825, which is not a valid value for type 'dump_flag'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86645 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Wed Jul 25 08:04:15 2018 New Revision: 262960 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262960=gcc=rev Log: Limit dump_flag enum values range (PR middle-end/86645). 2018-07-25 Martin Liska

[Bug sanitizer/79635] Explain to translators what "asan" means

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79635 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug objc/80798] Dynamic stack buffer (alloca) overflow in ObjC compiler.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80798 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- Thanks Max.

[Bug other/63426] [meta-bug] Issues found with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426 Bug 63426 depends on bug 86645, which changed state. Bug 86645 Summary: [9 Regression] UBSAN error: tree-cfg.c:7874:26: runtime error: load of value 4293224825, which is not a valid value for type 'dump_flag'

[Bug middle-end/86645] [9 Regression] UBSAN error: tree-cfg.c:7874:26: runtime error: load of value 4293224825, which is not a valid value for type 'dump_flag'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86645 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/84758] Wrong coverage for quite simple CFG

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84758 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Martin

[Bug gcov-profile/83813] [GCOV] unsigned char in a union lead to incorrect coverage in gcov

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83813 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- I've got patch candidate for that.

[Bug c++/84589] Failure to diagnose conflicting declaration of struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84589 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- *** Bug 86665 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/86665] declaration conflicts with target of using declaration already in scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86665 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/60330] Licensed an unlicensed file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- I think this can just be closed as INVALID.

[Bug other/60330] Licensed an unlicensed file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/86661] [9 Regression] g++ ICE:tree check: expected tree that contains ‘decl minimal’ structure, have ‘overload’ in note_name_declared_in_class, at cp/class.c:8288

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86661 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2018-7-25 CC|

[Bug c++/86663] g++ ICE with -std=c++11: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86663 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/86667] [7/8/9 Regression] can no longer traverse environment table

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86667 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug c++/86669] [6/7/8/9 regression] Complete object constructor clone omits length for a c++11 braced initialiser

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86669 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/82005] Early lto debug not implemented on Darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82005 --- Comment #43 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #42) > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #40) > > Created attachment 44417 [details] > > Patch series to enable copying of early debug data. < snip> (not ignoring

[Bug other/63426] [meta-bug] Issues found with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426 Bug 63426 depends on bug 86618, which changed state. Bug 86618 Summary: tree-vect-stmts.c:3340: ubsan error https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86618 What|Removed |Added

[Bug gcov-profile/85367] [GCOV] A call to the _subborrow_u64 builtin-function is wrongly marked as executed twice

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85367 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/86618] tree-vect-stmts.c:3340: ubsan error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86618 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/86644] [9 Regression] UBSAN error: tree-vect-patterns.c:225:17: runtime error: shift exponent 64 is too large for 32-bit type 'int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86644 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug gcov-profile/85178] [GCOV] for(;;) statement is wrongly marked as not executed when there is a int array in its body in Gcov

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85178 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/63426] [meta-bug] Issues found with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426 Bug 63426 depends on bug 86644, which changed state. Bug 86644 Summary: [9 Regression] UBSAN error: tree-vect-patterns.c:225:17: runtime error: shift exponent 64 is too large for 32-bit type 'int'

[Bug c/86667] [7/8/9 Regression] can no longer traverse environment table

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86667 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Component|fortran |c --- Comment #4 from Dominique

[Bug rtl-optimization/80818] LRA clobbers live hard reg clobbered during rematerialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80818 Andreas Krebbel changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/86654] [9 Regression] ICE in gen_member_die, at dwarf2out.c:24933

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86654 --- Comment #13 from Martin Liška --- Just for record, building Firefox w/ GCC 8.1 w/o LTO produces: VM SIZE FILE SIZE -- -- 0.0% 0 .debug_info 978Mi 48.5%

[Bug libstdc++/86655] std::assoc_legendre should not constrain the value of m

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86655 --- Comment #2 from Matthias Kretz --- http://eel.is/c++draft/c.math#sf.cmath-1.3 might be the reason why `m <= l` is enforced. But unless I'm confused the footnote on "mathematically defined" tells us it should work: - "(a) if it is explicitly

[Bug fortran/80645] FAIL: gfortran.dg/elemental_subroutine_3.f90 -O1 (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80645 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Target|m68k-*-*, ia64-*-*, |m68k-*-*, ia64-*-*,

[Bug c/86670] New: unsized static array var is removed but still accessed.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86670 Bug ID: 86670 Summary: unsized static array var is removed but still accessed. Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug gcov-profile/85338] [GCOV] Type conversion leads to incorrect coverage in printf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85338 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- I've got patch candidate for that.

[Bug testsuite/86671] New: Many testsuite failures due to -latomic not found

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86671 Bug ID: 86671 Summary: Many testsuite failures due to -latomic not found Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug gcov-profile/85350] [GCOV] wrong coverage when using constant variable in struct declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85350 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- I've got patch candidate for that.

[Bug gcov-profile/85372] [GCOV] Wrong coverage with setjmp and longjmp function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85372 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- I've got patch for that.

[Bug target/82005] Early lto debug not implemented on Darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82005 --- Comment #44 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 25 Jul 2018, iains at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82005 > > --- Comment #43 from Iain Sandoe --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment

[Bug lto/86654] [9 Regression] ICE in gen_member_die, at dwarf2out.c:24933

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86654 --- Comment #14 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 25 Jul 2018, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86654 > > --- Comment #13 from Martin Liška --- > Just for record, building Firefox w/ GCC

[Bug target/82005] Early lto debug not implemented on Darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82005 --- Comment #45 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #44) > On Wed, 25 Jul 2018, iains at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82005 > > > > --- Comment #43 from Iain Sandoe ---

[Bug other/60330] Licensed an unlicensed file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- https://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/maintain.html#Copyright-Notices "You should maintain a proper copyright notice and a license notice in each nontrivial file in the package. (Any file more than ten lines

[Bug gcov-profile/85351] [GCOV] Wrong coverage with exit() executed in a if statement within a called function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85351 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Assignee|marxin at gcc dot

[Bug testsuite/86660] libgomp.c++/for-15.C ICEs with nvptx offloading

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86660 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 44437 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44437=edit gcc9-pr86660.patch Untested patch. Does this fix it?

[Bug testsuite/86660] libgomp.c++/for-15.C ICEs with nvptx offloading

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86660 --- Comment #3 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > Created attachment 44437 [details] > gcc9-pr86660.patch > > Untested patch. Does this fix it? I'll try it out.

[Bug c/86670] unsized static array var is removed but still accessed.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86670 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gcov-profile/85370] [GCOV] Wrong coverage with the target_clones attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85370 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- I've got patch candidate for that prints following: -:0:Source:pr85370.c -:0:Graph:pr85370.gcno -:0:Data:pr85370.gcda -:0:Runs:1 -:0:Programs:1

[Bug gcov-profile/85337] [GCOV] inconsistent coverage in switch-case statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85337 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug gcov-profile/85332] [GCOV] wrong coverage with do-while in switch-case statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85332 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- I've got patch candidate for that.

[Bug gcov-profile/83505] [GCOV] a pointer assignment before a dead return statment lead to incorrect coverage in gcov

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83505 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Assignee|marxin at gcc dot

[Bug gcov-profile/83678] [GCOV] a pointer assignment before a break statment lead to incorrect coverage in gcov

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83678 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/85197] [GCOV] The main function is wrongly marked as executed twice in gcov

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85197 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/85349] [GCOV] struct varaible definition in while(1) will cause incorrect coverage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85349 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug testsuite/86660] libgomp.c++/for-15.C ICEs with nvptx offloading

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86660 --- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #3) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > > Created attachment 44437 [details] > > gcc9-pr86660.patch > > > > Untested patch. Does this fix it? > > I'll try

[Bug gcov-profile/85276] [GCOV] A comparative statement with '=', '&&' , '||', and '==' operators is wrongly marked as executed twice in gcov

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85276 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug gcov-profile/85217] [GCOV] A no side effect statement between a break statement and a continue statement will lead to incorrect code coverage in gcov

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85217 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- I've got patch candidate for that.

[Bug gcov-profile/85201] [GCOV] A statement with two && operators and a comma operator in the for loop body is wrongly marked in gcov

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85201 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug testsuite/86660] libgomp.c++/for-15.C ICEs with nvptx offloading

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86660 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- So a nvptx backend bug? Does ptxas require only decimal constants and not hexadecimal, or require 64-bit load from something that needs to be initialized with 64-bit initializer rather than series of bytes,

[Bug gcov-profile/85336] [GCOV] wrong coverage for builtin functions and "||" logic operators in return statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85336 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug testsuite/86660] libgomp.c++/for-15.C ICEs with nvptx offloading

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86660 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- LLSDA labels are for EH support, this testcase doesn't really use exceptions in any way, but it isn't compiled with -fno-exceptions; but that is the case of most of the C++ tests in libgomp (I see only 6

[Bug c++/86672] New: Facing issue with gcc-4.9.0 while using with llvm-6.0.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86672 Bug ID: 86672 Summary: Facing issue with gcc-4.9.0 while using with llvm-6.0.1 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ada/86659] [9 regression] gnat.dg/sso/q[23].adb FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86659 --- Comment #1 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- A reghunt now identified this patch as the culprit: 2018-07-24 Richard Biener * match.pd: Add BIT_FIELD_REF canonicalizations. Comparing the assembler output, I find ---

[Bug c++/86672] Facing issue with gcc-4.9.0 while using with llvm-6.0.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86672 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/86654] [9 Regression] ICE in gen_member_die, at dwarf2out.c:24933

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86654 --- Comment #15 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jul 25 12:10:13 2018 New Revision: 262965 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262965=gcc=rev Log: 2018-07-25 Richard Biener PR debug/86654 * dwarf2out.c

[Bug target/86673] New: inline asm sometimes ignores 'register asm("reg")' declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86673 Bug ID: 86673 Summary: inline asm sometimes ignores 'register asm("reg")' declarations Product: gcc Version: 8.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/86651] [8/9 Regression] lto-wrapper.exe: fatal error: simple_object_copy_lto_debug_sections not implemented: Invalid argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86651 --- Comment #4 from jwjagersma at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 44439 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44439=edit Proposed patch I cloned the fix that was applied to cygwin/mingw targets in SVN r259347. There didn't

[Bug lto/86654] [9 Regression] ICE in gen_member_die, at dwarf2out.c:24933

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86654 --- Comment #16 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #13) > Just for record, building Firefox w/ GCC 8.1 w/o LTO produces: > > VM SIZE FILE SIZE > -- --

[Bug testsuite/86660] libgomp.c++/for-15.C ICEs with nvptx offloading

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86660 --- Comment #7 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6) > LLSDA labels are for EH support, this testcase doesn't really use exceptions > in any way, but it isn't compiled with -fno-exceptions; but that is the case > of

[Bug target/86673] inline asm sometimes ignores 'register asm("reg")' declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86673 --- Comment #1 from Arnd Bergmann --- Further inspection shows that this happens for the cases where the input argument to the inline asm is a compile-time constant, but not for those that are variables.

[Bug target/86651] [8/9 Regression] lto-wrapper.exe: fatal error: simple_object_copy_lto_debug_sections not implemented: Invalid argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86651 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/86673] inline asm sometimes ignores 'register asm("reg")' declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86673 Arnd Bergmann changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/86651] [8/9 Regression] lto-wrapper.exe: fatal error: simple_object_copy_lto_debug_sections not implemented: Invalid argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86651 --- Comment #6 from jwjagersma at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) After building a more complex program with the above patch (applied to gcc 8.1.0 release sources), this ICE appears during linking: lto1.exe:

[Bug c/86667] [7/8/9 Regression] can no longer traverse environment table

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86667 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The test works as expected if I replace *ep=*ep++; with *ep++; in the C file.

[Bug target/86673] [8/9 regression] inline asm sometimes ignores 'register asm("reg")' declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86673 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Target||arm-none-linux-gnueabi ,

[Bug target/86673] [8/9 regression] inline asm sometimes ignores 'register asm("reg")' declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86673 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab --- Why are you using empty constraints when a register is required?

[Bug c/86667] [7/8/9 Regression] can no longer traverse environment table

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86667 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/86673] [8/9 regression] inline asm sometimes ignores 'register asm("reg")' declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86673 --- Comment #5 from Arnd Bergmann --- (In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #4) > Why are you using empty constraints when a register is required? creduce did that, it had no effect on the result. The original source looks like: #define

[Bug target/86651] [8/9 Regression] lto-wrapper.exe: fatal error: simple_object_copy_lto_debug_sections not implemented: Invalid argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86651 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 25 Jul 2018, jwjagersma at gmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86651 > > --- Comment #6 from jwjagersma at gmail dot com --- > (In reply to Richard Biener

[Bug fortran/86599] Problems building libgfortran from 7.2.0 on HP-UX 11.31/PA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86599 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/86672] Facing issue with gcc-4.9.0 while using with llvm-6.0.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86672 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- What possible reason could you have to use gcc-4.9.0 instead of gcc-4.9.4? Anyway this seems to be a duplicate of PR 66426 which is fixed in gcc-5

[Bug fortran/86599] Problems building libgfortran from 7.2.0 on HP-UX 11.31/PA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86599 --- Comment #7 from The Written Word --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #6) > This looks like a target issue. Have you ever build gcc on HP-UX 11.31/PA? Definitely a target issue. With some patches I can build gcc 4.x on

[Bug pch/86674] New: -W(no)-error=invalid-pch does not affect incorrect language warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86674 Bug ID: 86674 Summary: -W(no)-error=invalid-pch does not affect incorrect language warning Product: gcc Version: 8.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/86673] [8/9 regression] inline asm sometimes ignores 'register asm("reg")' declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86673 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Preud'homme --- The following simpler testcase also shows the problem: void fn1() { register const int h asm("r2") = 1; __asm__(".ifnc %0,r2; .err; .endif\n\t" "bl __put_user_4" :: "r"(h)); }

[Bug target/86673] [8/9 regression] inline asm sometimes ignores 'register asm("reg")' declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86673 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Preud'homme --- (In reply to Thomas Preud'homme from comment #6) > The following simpler testcase also shows the problem: > > void fn1() { > register const int h asm("r2") = 1; > __asm__(".ifnc %0,r2; .err;

[Bug target/86673] [8/9 regression] inline asm sometimes ignores 'register asm("reg")' declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86673 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Preud'homme --- (In reply to Thomas Preud'homme from comment #7) > (In reply to Thomas Preud'homme from comment #6) > > The following simpler testcase also shows the problem: > > > > void fn1() { > > register const

[Bug target/86673] [8/9 regression] inline asm sometimes ignores 'register asm("reg")' declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86673 --- Comment #9 from Arnd Bergmann --- Reproduced on arm64 and x86 as well, see x86 version: void fn1() { register const int h asm("edx") = 1; __asm__(".ifnc %0,edx; .err; .endif" :: "r"(h)); }

[Bug target/86673] [8/9 regression] inline asm sometimes ignores 'register asm("reg")' declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86673 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug testsuite/86660] libgomp.c++/for-15.C ICEs with nvptx offloading

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86660 --- Comment #8 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #7) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6) > > LLSDA labels are for EH support, this testcase doesn't really use exceptions > > in any way, but it isn't compiled

[Bug testsuite/86660] libgomp.c++/for-15.C ICEs with nvptx offloading

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86660 --- Comment #9 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #8) > Hmm, for me that minimizes to: > ... > extern "C" void abort (); > > #pragma omp declare target > int results[2000]; > #pragma omp end declare target

[Bug debug/86675] New: C++ lambdas are not debugable with -std=c++17 (or above) and -Og

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86675 Bug ID: 86675 Summary: C++ lambdas are not debugable with -std=c++17 (or above) and -Og Product: gcc Version: 8.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug debug/86675] C++ lambdas are not debugable with -std=c++17 (or above) and -Og

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86675 --- Comment #1 from Bernd Amend --- Created attachment 1 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1=edit Script to test the compiler with different command line args

[Bug testsuite/86660] libgomp.c++/for-15.C ICEs with nvptx offloading

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86660 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Indeed, lowering ignores map clauses for declare target to global vars, but it can do that only if always is not present. Will have a look.

[Bug c/86670] unsized static array var is removed but still accessed.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86670 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/19315] document undocumented extension that allows code where variable is not emitted in the asm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19315 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug target/86651] [8/9 Regression] lto-wrapper.exe: fatal error: simple_object_copy_lto_debug_sections not implemented: Invalid argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86651 --- Comment #8 from jwjagersma at gmail dot com --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #7) > There are latent bugs that now affect darwin, mingw and djgpp (after your > patch) by default when compiling with -g0 and linking with -g >

  1   2   >