https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52991
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yellowriver2010 at hotmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87335
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87340
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87333
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87340
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
No. None of them look valid.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87340
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87339
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87335
--- Comment #2 from Cheng Wen ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> Is the input a valid C++ mangled name of not?
Hi,
This input is obtained through fuzzing technology. Our fuzzer get some test
cases by mutating a valid input. This
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87349
Bug ID: 87349
Summary: [9 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in
useless_type_conversion_p or is_gimple_reg_type)
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87333
--- Comment #2 from Cheng Wen ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> Is the input a valid C++ mangled name of not?
Hi,
This input is obtained through fuzzing technology. Our fuzzer get some test
cases by mutating a valid input. This
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87335
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
No, it's not a valid name. I can't reproduce a crash using the latest code from
GCC though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85871
--- Comment #13 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Sep 18 09:32:09 2018
New Revision: 264387
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264387=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport r264363
2018-09-18 Martin Liska
Backport from mainline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87347
--- Comment #1 from Martin Jambor ---
Bah, I should have thought about this. The following will fix it, I'll
properly test it and submit a patch later this week.
diff --git a/gcc/c/c-parser.c b/gcc/c/c-parser.c
index 1766a256633..a96d15fef1d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87350
Bug ID: 87350
Summary: NULL-Pointer problem in cplus-dem.c when executing
program c++filt
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87335
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87335
--- Comment #5 from Cheng Wen ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4)
> Are you sure you attached the right file? When I try to demangle the
> attachment it doesn't crash, the __cxa_demangle file returns -2, meaning the
> name is not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80635
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87333
--- Comment #4 from Cheng Wen ---
Created attachment 44717
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44717=edit
POC2
I have the new POC to add.
Please use the “c++filt < $POC ” to reproduce the bug.
Please check it and debug it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87333
--- Comment #3 from Cheng Wen ---
Created attachment 44716
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44716=edit
POC1
I have the new POC to add.
Please use the “c++filt < $POC ” to reproduce the bug.
Please check it and debug it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87335
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Cheng Wen from comment #5)
> (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4)
> > Are you sure you attached the right file? When I try to demangle the
> > attachment it doesn't crash, the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67513
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87348
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87348
Bug ID: 87348
Summary: Implement -Watomic-implicit-seq-cst
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55588
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2017-08-21 00:00:00 |2018-9-18
--- Comment #5 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81880
Latimerius changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||latimerius at seznam dot cz
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87340
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Then it would deserve something like segfault-on-invalid-input :)
Or should I use ice-on-invalid-code?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87350
--- Comment #1 from Cheng Wen ---
Created attachment 44714
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44714=edit
POC1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87350
--- Comment #2 from Cheng Wen ---
Created attachment 44715
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44715=edit
POC2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85871
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87350
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87335
--- Comment #7 from Cheng Wen ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #6)
Considering the memory size of different machines, maybe more 'P' is needed to
trigger this bug in the input.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87345
Bug ID: 87345
Summary: The compiler of the old version (for example: 4.9.3
version or 6.3.0 version) can stop the infinite
cross-border loop, but the new version does not work.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87288
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||7.3.1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87336
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87344
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87344
--- Comment #2 from Wen Yang ---
Created attachment 44712
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44712=edit
decompress_gunzip.i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87325
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 18 Sep 2018, amker at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87325
>
> --- Comment #2 from bin cheng ---
> Seems alloc_iv doesn't infer base object
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87346
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87342
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87345
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 87346 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87338
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87344
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ABI
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87318
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #4)
> (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #3)
> > Created attachment 44700 [details]
> > Revised dtio_1.f90
> >
> > Will this attached version suffice?
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87196
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
May I please ping this, can anybody reproduce that?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87336
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87344
Bug ID: 87344
Summary: archival/libarchive/decompress_gunzip.c:1139:2: error:
size of unnamed array is negative
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87318
--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #5)
> > Do you think it's feasible to add some sort of diagnostics for this problem?
> > Or should we rather follow ifort's approach and enforce this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87347
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87347
Bug ID: 87347
Summary: ICE in warn_for_abs at gcc/c/c-parser.c:9226 since
r264368
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87341
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to mi+gcc from comment #4)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> > This is a binutils bug, in gold.
> > --enable-gold
> >
> > Please report this to binutils instead.
>
> Is there a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87344
--- Comment #1 from Wen Yang ---
Created attachment 44711
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44711=edit
decompress_gunzip.i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87345
--- Comment #4 from jingtian at loongson dot cn ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> *** Bug 87346 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
It might be because of the network, I submitted twice, sorry
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87344
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87355
Bug ID: 87355
Summary: missed comparison optimizations (grep DFA, x86-64)
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87355
--- Comment #1 from eggert at cs dot ucla.edu ---
Created attachment 44721
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44721=edit
Assembly-language output of 'gcc -O2 -S t.c'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87355
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86830
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Tue Sep 18 19:16:24 2018
New Revision: 264407
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264407=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-09-18 Janus Weil
Backport from trunk
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86830
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87356
Bug ID: 87356
Summary: Enum members are missing in std::filesystem::perms
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87356
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87356
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
See http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2017/p0492r2.html#Late37
for the change to the spec that happened post-P0218R1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87356
Christian Hoff changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from Christian
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87239
--- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Tue Sep 18 19:35:53 2018
New Revision: 264409
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264409=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-09-18 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/87239
* trans-expr.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85395
--- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Tue Sep 18 19:50:17 2018
New Revision: 264410
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264410=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-09-18 Janus Weil
Backport from trunk
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85395
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29550
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37131
Bug 37131 depends on bug 29550, which changed state.
Bug 29550 Summary: Optimize -fexternal-blas calls for conjg()
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29550
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36854
Bug 36854 depends on bug 29550, which changed state.
Bug 29550 Summary: Optimize -fexternal-blas calls for conjg()
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29550
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29550
--- Comment #14 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Tue Sep 18 19:59:46 2018
New Revision: 264411
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264411=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-09-18 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/29550
* gfortran.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87239
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #5)
> (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #4)
> > Duplicate of/ related to pr77325 and pr84109.
>
> PR84109 is completely different. The array descriptor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87341
--- Comment #14 from mi+gcc at aldan dot algebra.com ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #13)
> Please try binutils 2.31 branch from:
>
> https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/
> binutils-2_31-branch
I'm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86882
--- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Sep 18 16:24:58 2018
New Revision: 264401
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264401=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport PR86882 fix to 8
PR rtl-optimization/86882
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87341
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86882
--- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Sep 18 16:19:56 2018
New Revision: 264400
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264400=gcc=rev
Log:
Handle CLOBBER in reg_overlap_mentioned_p (PR86882)
Combine will put CLOBBER
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86882
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 85065, which changed state.
Bug 85065 Summary: [concepts] ICE with invalid use of a concept
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85065
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85065
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85065
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Sep 18 16:35:27 2018
New Revision: 264402
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264402=gcc=rev
Log:
/cp
2018-09-18 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/85065
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85954
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Tue Sep 18 17:54:20 2018
New Revision: 264404
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264404=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-09-18 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/85954
* resolve.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87336
--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Tue Sep 18 17:58:20 2018
New Revision: 264405
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264405=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-09-18 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/87336
* trans-array.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85954
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29550
--- Comment #16 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Tue Sep 18 20:18:09 2018
New Revision: 264412
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264412=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-09-18 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/29550
* gfortran.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84109
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87339
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> Fixed on arm and aarch64 with r264392.
> If you can confirm this fixes the other platforms please close this off.
This didn't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87135
--- Comment #2 from François Dumont ---
Author: fdumont
Date: Tue Sep 18 20:36:16 2018
New Revision: 264413
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264413=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-09-18 François Dumont
PR libstdc++/87135
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67202
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87355
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse ---
For f, this is a classic case where gcc canonicalizes n>=100 as n>99, and thus
cannot as easily merge it with the other comparison n==100.
For g, n >= 103 || n == 100 || n == 101 || n == 102 is replaced in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86902
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87357
Bug ID: 87357
Summary: Bogus conversion with conversion function not detected
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87357
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87309
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86902
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87359
Bug ID: 87359
Summary: [9.0 regression] pointer being freed was not allocated
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87358
Lijian Zhang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Lijian.Zhang at arm dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87339
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87358
Bug ID: 87358
Summary: ICE when -mtune=thunderx2t99 applied
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86881
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87135
François Dumont changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87350
--- Comment #4 from Cheng Wen ---
Yes.
One input test case is "_GLOBAL_$D$__tf30___0__".
Another input test case is "__thunk_0__0__$__H1".
I see that you can you can reproduce this error. Do you know the reason for
this bug?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54052
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2017-08-22 00:00:00 |2018-9-18
CC|redi at
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
