[Bug c++/77540] Confusing diagnostics due to stray comma in ctor-init-list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77540 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/18501] [6/7/8/9 Regression] Missing 'used uninitialized' warning (CCP)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gcc at cookiesoft dot de ---

[Bug c/87365] Uninitiliazed variable detection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87365 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/87363] Duplicate and bogus -Wstringop-overflow warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87363 --- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- I think the *member* of the union here (the one that is active after the initialization) is the anonymous struct containing x and y. That would surely be the case if you named the two

[Bug fortran/87359] [9 regression] pointer being freed was not allocated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87359 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug libstdc++/67843] experimental/filesystem/iterators/directory_iterator.cc fails on armv5t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67843 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/87363] Duplicate and bogus -Wstringop-overflow warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87363 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- If u's initialization is viewed as a single assignment then you're right. If the initialization of u is viewed as two separate assignments: u.x = "1234"; u.y = "567"; then strictly speaking, after the

[Bug c/87365] New: Uninitiliazed variable detection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87365 Bug ID: 87365 Summary: Uninitiliazed variable detection Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug middle-end/87363] Duplicate and bogus -Wstringop-overflow warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87363 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug target/86877] ICE in vectorizable_load, at tree-vect-stmts.c:8038

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86877 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c/87365] Uninitiliazed variable detection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87365 --- Comment #1 from gcc at cookiesoft dot de --- The volatile doesn't Change anything. I guess the combination of if and Else-while confuses him

[Bug target/86877] ICE in vectorizable_load, at tree-vect-stmts.c:8038

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86877 --- Comment #1 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 87196 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug target/87196] ICE in vectorizable_load, at tree-vect-stmts.c:8043

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87196 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/87196] ICE in vectorizable_load, at tree-vect-stmts.c:8043

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87196 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug target/87288] [8/9 Regression] Segfault after const_cast with "-O2 -ftree-loop-vectorize" but _without_ "-mavx"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87288 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug rtl-optimization/87361] [9 regression] gcc.target/sparc/20161111-1.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87361 --- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool --- I think nonzero_bits should use SUBREG_PROMOTED_VAR_P and SUBREG_PROMOTED_UNSIGNED_P for REGs, not LOAD_EXTEND_OP, which is only for MEMs.

[Bug fortran/87359] [9 regression] pointer being freed was not allocated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87359 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig --- After generating a lot of module files with -fsyntax-only so make succeeds, and then running "make check" on the reproducer, I get

[Bug fortran/87359] [9 regression] pointer being freed was not allocated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87359 --- Comment #5 from Jürgen Reuter --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #4) > After generating a lot of module files with -fsyntax-only > so make succeeds, and then running "make check" on the > reproducer, I get ** > *

[Bug fortran/20585] [meta-bug] Fortran 2003 support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20585 Bug 20585 depends on bug 25829, which changed state. Bug 25829 Summary: [F03] Asynchronous IO support https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25829 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/25829] [F03] Asynchronous IO support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25829 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/86941] ICE in i386/winnt.c:1258 in i386_pe_seh_unwind_emit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86941 nightstrike changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/87359] [9 regression] pointer being freed was not allocated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87359 --- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #7) > Well, I can confirm this. Output from valgrind shows as the first error: > > Running test: event_transforms_1| Process library 'event_transforms_1_lib': >

[Bug rtl-optimization/87361] [9 regression] gcc.target/sparc/20161111-1.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87361 --- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou --- > Ugh, I'm very sorry. I still think that patch is correct, but I didn't > intend to commit it. Thanks for catching it. No problem. I don't disagree with the correctness but it will bring back a lot of

[Bug tree-optimization/87360] [8/9 Regression] ICE in remove_redundant_iv_tests at gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.c:571 since r255467

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87360 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug debug/87362] GCC produces with LTO debug info with which gdb is not happy about

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87362 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- For the record: $ gdb --version GNU gdb (GDB; openSUSE Tumbleweed) 8.2 Copyright (C) 2018 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later This is

[Bug debug/87362] GCC produces with LTO debug info with which gdb is not happy about

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87362 --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka --- backtracing with GNU gdb (Debian 7.12-6) 7.12.0.20161007-git works for me, but it takes 20GB and 5 minutes to print a backtrace: (gdb) bt #0 0x77bc915f in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () from

[Bug debug/87362] GCC produces with LTO debug info with which gdb is not happy about

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87362 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- Before I see the assert, gdb consumes ~8GB of memory and it takes about 1 minute before the assert is triggered.

[Bug rtl-optimization/87361] [9 regression] gcc.target/sparc/20161111-1.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87361 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug middle-end/63155] [6/7/8/9 Regression] memory hog

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63155 --- Comment #29 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #28) > Created attachment 44724 [details] > patch for the SSA propagator issue > > Using an sbitmap helps. I am testing the attached. Note there's void

[Bug fortran/87359] [9 regression] pointer being freed was not allocated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87359 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Summary|[9.0 regression]

[Bug middle-end/63155] [6/7/8/9 Regression] memory hog

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63155 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #44724|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug rtl-optimization/67449] Branch elimination problem on x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67449 Kamlesh Kumar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kamleshbhalui at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/87364] New: Pretty print of enumerator never prints the id, always falls back to C-style cast output

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87364 Bug ID: 87364 Summary: Pretty print of enumerator never prints the id, always falls back to C-style cast output Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/87357] Bogus conversion with conversion function not detected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87357 --- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Wed Sep 19 16:59:51 2018 New Revision: 264425 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264425=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/87357 - missing -Wconversion warning * decl.c

[Bug c++/59480] Missing error diagnostic: friend declaration specifying a default argument must be a definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59480 Volker Reichelt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rafael.espindola at ic dot unicamp

[Bug c++/13166] [DR136] not implemented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13166 Volker Reichelt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/87363] Duplicate and bogus -Wstringop-overflow warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87363 --- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Wed, 19 Sep 2018, msebor at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Other than that, since > > When a value is stored in a member of an object of union type, the bytes of > the object representation

[Bug rtl-optimization/86902] [9 Regression] ICE: in as_a, at machmode.h:356 at -O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86902 --- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Wed Sep 19 17:38:11 2018 New Revision: 264426 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264426=gcc=rev Log: combine: Use correct mode in new comparison (PR86902) This code in

[Bug c++/68429] [concepts] ICE in in placeholder_extract_concept_and_args, at cp/constraint.cc:1401

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68429 --- Comment #3 from Volker Reichelt --- Btw, the code snippet from comment #1 is accepted on trunk.

[Bug fortran/84109] ICE in adjustl on allocatable array of strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84109 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Wed Sep 19 17:44:36 2018 New Revision: 264427 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264427=gcc=rev Log: 2018-09-19 Paul Thomas PR fortran/84109 * trans-expr.c

[Bug c++/87357] Bogus conversion with conversion function not detected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87357 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/65608] [meta-bug] friend issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65608 Bug 65608 depends on bug 13166, which changed state. Bug 13166 Summary: [DR136] not implemented https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13166 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/87366] New: SFINAE trait as template parameter causes incorrect application of trait to other areas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87366 Bug ID: 87366 Summary: SFINAE trait as template parameter causes incorrect application of trait to other areas Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/86902] [9 Regression] ICE: in as_a, at machmode.h:356 at -O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86902 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/68429] [concepts] ICE in in placeholder_extract_concept_and_args, at cp/constraint.cc:1401

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68429 Volker Reichelt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---

[Bug debug/87362] GCC produces with LTO debug info with which gdb is not happy about

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87362 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- @Tom: I've got built openSUSE RPM package here: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:marxin:branches:mozilla:Factory/MozillaFirefox One can install MozillaFirefox MozillaFirefox-debuginfo

[Bug fortran/87359] [9 regression] pointer being freed was not allocated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87359 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #5) > (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #4) > > After generating a lot of module files with -fsyntax-only > > so make succeeds, and then running "make check" on

[Bug fortran/87359] [9 regression] pointer being freed was not allocated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87359 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig --- Well, I can confirm this. Output from valgrind shows as the first error: Running test: event_transforms_1| Process library 'event_transforms_1_lib': initialized ==23957== Invalid read of size 8 ==23957==

[Bug rtl-optimization/87361] [9 regression] gcc.target/sparc/20161111-1.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87361 --- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou --- > I think nonzero_bits should use SUBREG_PROMOTED_VAR_P and > SUBREG_PROMOTED_UNSIGNED_P for REGs, not LOAD_EXTEND_OP, which is > only for MEMs. I don't see how

[Bug fortran/87359] [9 regression] pointer being freed was not allocated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87359 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig --- Created attachment 44728 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44728=edit Makefile for the shortened reproducer Hi, if you want to compile the reproducer, you can use this Makefile, it

[Bug c++/87324] g++ ICE with overriding initializers: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87324 --- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Sep 19 19:35:19 2018 New Revision: 264428 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264428=gcc=rev Log: /cp 2018-09-19 Paolo Carlini PR c++/87324 * parser.c

[Bug c++/87324] g++ ICE with overriding initializers: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87324 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/63155] [6/7/8/9 Regression] memory hog

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63155 --- Comment #28 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 44724 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44724=edit patch for the SSA propagator issue Using an sbitmap helps. I am testing the attached.

[Bug tree-optimization/87349] [9 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in useless_type_conversion_p or is_gimple_reg_type)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87349 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/87342] [9 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block 10 does not dominate use in block 8)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87342 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/87356] Enum members are missing in std::filesystem::perms

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87356 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID

[Bug bootstrap/87338] gcc 8.2 fails to bootstrap on ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87338 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab --- I cannot reproduce that with the current 8.2 branch.

[Bug target/87288] [8/9 Regression] Segfault after const_cast with "-O2 -ftree-loop-vectorize" but _without_ "-mavx"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87288 --- Comment #6 from bin cheng --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) > it's set here: > > if (!is_gimple_val (niters_vector)) > { > var = create_tmp_var (type, "bnd"); > gimple_seq stmts = NULL; > niters_vector

[Bug testsuite/87339] [9 Regression] gcc.dg/warn-abs-1.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87339 --- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor --- My intention is to move the _Float128 bits a to a special test for x86_64... on Friday.

[Bug fortran/87359] [9.0 regression] pointer being freed was not allocated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87359 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/87361] New: [9 regression] gcc.target/sparc/20161111-1.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87361 Bug ID: 87361 Summary: [9 regression] gcc.target/sparc/2016-1.c FAILs Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/87361] [9 regression] gcc.target/sparc/20161111-1.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87361 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0

[Bug tree-optimization/87361] [9 regression] gcc.target/sparc/20161111-1.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87361 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug debug/87362] New: GCC produces with LTO debug info with which gdb is not happy about

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87362 Bug ID: 87362 Summary: GCC produces with LTO debug info with which gdb is not happy about Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/87355] missed comparison optimizations (grep DFA, x86-64)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87355 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug rtl-optimization/87361] [9 regression] gcc.target/sparc/20161111-1.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87361 --- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Wed Sep 19 10:12:04 2018 New Revision: 264420 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264420=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/87361 * rtlanal.c (nonzero_bits1): Revert

[Bug libstdc++/87135] [C++17] unordered containers violate iterator validity requirements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87135 François Dumont changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0

[Bug tree-optimization/87349] [9 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in useless_type_conversion_p or is_gimple_reg_type)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87349 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Sep 19 07:10:42 2018 New Revision: 264419 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264419=gcc=rev Log: 2018-09-19 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/87349 PR

[Bug tree-optimization/87342] [9 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block 10 does not dominate use in block 8)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87342 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Sep 19 07:10:42 2018 New Revision: 264419 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264419=gcc=rev Log: 2018-09-19 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/87349 PR

[Bug middle-end/63155] [6/7/8/9 Regression] memory hog

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63155 --- Comment #27 from Richard Biener --- TOT now for the alternate testcase at -O1+ exhibits Time variable usr sys wall GGC ... tree CCP : 9.21 (

[Bug tree-optimization/87360] New: [8/9 Regression] ICE in remove_redundant_iv_tests at gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.c:571 since r255467

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87360 Bug ID: 87360 Summary: [8/9 Regression] ICE in remove_redundant_iv_tests at gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.c:571 since r255467 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/87360] [8/9 Regression] ICE in remove_redundant_iv_tests at gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.c:571 since r255467

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87360 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/87361] [9 regression] gcc.target/sparc/20161111-1.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87361 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/87359] [9.0 regression] pointer being freed was not allocated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87359 --- Comment #2 from Jürgen Reuter --- Created attachment 44725 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44725=edit First (lengthy) reproducer for the pointer issue

[Bug fortran/87359] [9.0 regression] pointer being freed was not allocated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87359 --- Comment #3 from Jürgen Reuter --- This is a first (rather lengthy) reproducer. I still try to cut it out further.

[Bug c++/86881] [8, 9 regression] tree check fail with flag Wshadow-compatible-local

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86881 --- Comment #7 from Nathan Sidwell --- Thanks Christophe, I noticed that when checking the 8 backport and committed a fix, so updating should make it work.

[Bug target/87288] [8/9 Regression] Segfault after const_cast with "-O2 -ftree-loop-vectorize" but _without_ "-mavx"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87288 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 19 Sep 2018, amker at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87288 > > --- Comment #6 from bin cheng --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) >

[Bug tree-optimization/87309] [9 Regression] Spurious note: messages when building with -fopt-info-vec-optimized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87309 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #3 from David Malcolm

[Bug debug/87362] GCC produces with LTO debug info with which gdb is not happy about

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87362 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Indeed hard to say w/o a testcase.

[Bug tree-optimization/87309] [9 Regression] Spurious note: messages when building with -fopt-info-vec-optimized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87309 --- Comment #4 from Ilya Leoshkevich --- Do we also need to test m_test_pp_flags? At least dump_context::emit_item does it.

[Bug c++/87324] g++ ICE with overriding initializers: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87324 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/87359] [9.0 regression] pointer being freed was not allocated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87359 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0

[Bug fortran/86576] [F03][OOP] Sourced allocation of object array fails with SEGFAULT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86576 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug middle-end/87363] New: Duplicate and bogus -Wstringop-overflow warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87363 Bug ID: 87363 Summary: Duplicate and bogus -Wstringop-overflow warning Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: