[Bug libstdc++/87641] std::valarray::sum() fails for types where T() is not a neutral element for addition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87641 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Thu Oct 18 15:38:50 2018 New Revision: 265270 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265270=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/87641 correctly initialize accumulator in valarray::sum() Use the

[Bug middle-end/81376] unnecessary cast before comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81376 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/87633] [9 Regression] ice in compare_range_wit h_value, at vr-values.c:1702

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87633 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ygribov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/87645] New: gcc hangs up on vr_values::vrp_visit_assignment_or_call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87645 Bug ID: 87645 Summary: gcc hangs up on vr_values::vrp_visit_assignment_or_call Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/86677] popcount builtin detection is breaking some kernel build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86677 Will Deacon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||will.deacon at arm dot com --- Comment #8

[Bug c++/87643] New: [9 regression] ICE at dbxout.c:508:1: linemap_position_for_line_and_column starting with r264887

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87643 Bug ID: 87643 Summary: [9 regression] ICE at dbxout.c:508:1: linemap_position_for_line_and_column starting with r264887 Product: gcc Version: 9.0

[Bug middle-end/87623] bytes swapped in register when comparing cause fail when compiled with -O1 or higher

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87623 --- Comment #9 from George Thopas --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #8) > Thanks for reporting the problem. And thanks for the swift resolution !

[Bug tree-optimization/87562] [9 Regression] ICE in in linemap_position_for_line_and_column, at libcpp/line-map.c:848

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87562 --- Comment #8 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Build successes for intrate: 502.gcc_r(base) Build errors for intrate: None It now works with your fix, thanks!

[Bug c++/87643] [9 regression] ICE at dbxout.c:508:1: linemap_position_for_line_and_column starting with r264887

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87643 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/65461] -Warray-bounds warnings in the linux kernel (free_area_init_nodes)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65461 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.5.3 Known to fail|

[Bug fortran/87644] ICE due to variable named "parameters"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87644 --- Comment #1 from Matt Thompson --- Further update from a colleague: Some observations: * The function result having the name 'parameters' has no effect. It's from this line "parameters = get()". * The 'public :: get' must be present in the

[Bug c++/87643] [9 regression] ICE at dbxout.c:508:1: linemap_position_for_line_and_column starting with r264887

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87643 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Sorry for the duplicate. I am not having much success with searches lately...

[Bug fortran/87644] New: ICE due to variable named "parameters"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87644 Bug ID: 87644 Summary: ICE due to variable named "parameters" Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug libstdc++/87641] std::valarray::sum() fails for types where T() is not a neutral element for addition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87641 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Thu Oct 18 17:40:29 2018 New Revision: 265275 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265275=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/87641 correctly initialize accumulator in valarray::sum() Use the

[Bug tree-optimization/87562] [9 Regression] ICE in in linemap_position_for_line_and_column, at libcpp/line-map.c:848

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87562 --- Comment #6 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Thu Oct 18 15:44:39 2018 New Revision: 265271 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265271=gcc=rev Log: Fix ICE in substring-handling building 502.gcc_r (PR 87562) In r264887 I broke

[Bug tree-optimization/87562] [9 Regression] ICE in in linemap_position_for_line_and_column, at libcpp/line-map.c:848

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87562 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/87633] [9 Regression] ice in compare_range_wit h_value, at vr-values.c:1702

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87633 Yury Gribov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug fortran/87625] [OOP] (re)allocate on assignment fails for polymorphic array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87625 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus --- Author: burnus Date: Thu Oct 18 19:35:34 2018 New Revision: 265283 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265283=gcc=rev Log: Fix (re)alloc of polymorphic arrays PR fortran/87625 *

[Bug fortran/70914] ICE in gfc_get_symbol_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:1655

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70914 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/87650] New: suboptimal codegen for testing low bit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87650 Bug ID: 87650 Summary: suboptimal codegen for testing low bit Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug libgomp/87649] New: ICE in OpenMP doacross (ordered) loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87649 Bug ID: 87649 Summary: ICE in OpenMP doacross (ordered) loop Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libgomp

[Bug libstdc++/87641] std::valarray::sum() fails for types where T() is not a neutral element for addition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87641 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/87646] New: Wrong code at -O3 and above (but not at -O2 and below)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87646 Bug ID: 87646 Summary: Wrong code at -O3 and above (but not at -O2 and below) Product: gcc Version: 4.8.5 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/87647] New: ICE on valid code in decode_addr_const, at varasm.c:2958

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87647 Bug ID: 87647 Summary: ICE on valid code in decode_addr_const, at varasm.c:2958 Product: gcc Version: 8.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/87642] Cannot handle fr_FR.UTF8 thousands separator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87642 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libgomp/87649] ICE in OpenMP doacross (ordered) loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87649 --- Comment #1 from omrimor2 at illinois dot edu --- Duplicate of #85488, but has more information.

[Bug middle-end/87647] [6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE on valid code in decode_addr_const, at varasm.c:2958

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87647 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/87641] std::valarray::sum() fails for types where T() is not a neutral element for addition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87641 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Thu Oct 18 21:41:01 2018 New Revision: 265291 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265291=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/87641 correctly initialize accumulator in valarray::sum() Use the

[Bug middle-end/58245] -fstack-protector[-all] does not protect functions that call noreturn functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58245 --- Comment #10 from Rich Felker --- Since musl 1.1 introduced unconditional setup of thread pointer, the previously-reported consequence is no longer relevant with modern versions. However it's still either a missed optimization (emitting

[Bug target/66389] sh2eb-linux-* is not recognized by configure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66389 Rich Felker changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/87646] Wrong code at -O3 and above (but not at -O2 and below)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87646 --- Comment #1 from Vadim Sukhov --- Created attachment 44853 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44853=edit Test case (compile with -std=c++11 -O3)

[Bug tree-optimization/87633] [9 Regression] ice in compare_range_wit h_value, at vr-values.c:1702

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87633 --- Comment #5 from Yury Gribov --- Created attachment 44854 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44854=edit Draft fix So my commit caused unordered comparison to be generated for integer operands which upsetted vrange pass.

[Bug target/87646] Wrong code at -O3 and above (but not at -O2 and below)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87646 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE --- Comment #5 from Jakub

[Bug rtl-optimization/69891] wrong code with -mstringop-strategy=libcall @ i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69891 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sukhovvl at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/87646] Wrong code at -O3 and above (but not at -O2 and below)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87646 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Component|c++

[Bug fortran/77643] ICE with "character(len=:), pointer :: p => null()"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77643 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug c++/87646] Wrong code at -O3 and above (but not at -O2 and below)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87646 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug libstdc++/87642] Cannot handle fr_FR.UTF8 thousands separator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87642 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Thu Oct 18 19:57:25 2018 New Revision: 265286 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265286=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/87642 handle multibyte thousands separators from libc If a locale's

[Bug libstdc++/87641] std::valarray::sum() fails for types where T() is not a neutral element for addition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87641 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Thu Oct 18 19:38:56 2018 New Revision: 265285 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265285=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/87641 correctly initialize accumulator in valarray::sum() Use the

[Bug c++/87646] Wrong code at -O3 and above (but not at -O2 and below)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87646 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Testcase without headers in C: typedef __SIZE_TYPE__ size_t; __attribute__((noinline, noclone)) void foo (size_t x, int *y) { if (x % 8) { int l[8] = { 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 }, i; for (i

[Bug fortran/87648] New: Clobber some variables on entry to DO CONCURRENT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87648 Bug ID: 87648 Summary: Clobber some variables on entry to DO CONCURRENT Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3

[Bug target/72782] AVX512: No support for scalar broadcasts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72782 --- Comment #4 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Thu Oct 18 20:38:41 2018 New Revision: 265288 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265288=gcc=rev Log: i386: Enable AVX512 memory broadcast for FMA Many AVX512 vector operations

[Bug fortran/71880] pointer to allocatable character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71880 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/69179] undocumented darwin attributes "apple_kext_compatibility" and "weak_import"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69179 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||geoffk at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/25814] Request for warning for parser ambiguity of function declarations and variable declarations with initializations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25814 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Blocks|

[Bug c/60440] Bogus -Wreturn-type warning after error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60440 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||joseph at codesourcery dot com ---

[Bug c++/87652] New: inner class template of outer class template can't access friend's protected data member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87652 Bug ID: 87652 Summary: inner class template of outer class template can't access friend's protected data member Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/62273] doc: Invoke.texi -mkernel mentions undocumented option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62273 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c/61579] -Wwrite-strings does not behave as a warning option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61579 --- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #4) > Wow, how has it been 4 years already? Maybe this time around then. :) Hopefully! I keep seeing it come up places...

[Bug other/79543] Inappropriate "ld --version" checking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79543 --- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #2) > (In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #1) > > . > > This link doesn't work for me.

[Bug c++/87651] New: inner class with template template friend declaration of same name fails to compile in gcc 8.1, 8.2, and 9.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87651 Bug ID: 87651 Summary: inner class with template template friend declaration of same name fails to compile in gcc 8.1, 8.2, and 9.0 Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status:

[Bug c++/87652] inner class template of outer class template can't access friend's protected data member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87652 --- Comment #1 from Ryan R Haining --- ugh, very sorry, I copied the version with private: instead of protected. The example program should be: template struct Outer { template class Inner { template friend class Inner; // All

[Bug bootstrap/87640] New: [9 regression] internal compiler error: in check, at tree-vrp.c:155

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87640 Bug ID: 87640 Summary: [9 regression] internal compiler error: in check, at tree-vrp.c:155 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/87640] [9 regression] internal compiler error: in check, at tree-vrp.c:155

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87640 --- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- r265184 PASS

[Bug libstdc++/87641] std::valarray::sum() fails for types where T() is not a neutral element for addition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87641 --- Comment #1 from Frederic Jardon --- Created attachment 44852 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44852=edit Full preprocessed sources (-save-temps) compressed with gzip

[Bug fortran/87632] [9 regression] ICE segmentation fault in f951

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87632 Jürgen Reuter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/87641] New: std::valarray::sum() fails for types where T() is not a neutral element for addition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87641 Bug ID: 87641 Summary: std::valarray::sum() fails for types where T() is not a neutral element for addition Product: gcc Version: 7.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/87629] function template parameter deduction succeeds but parameter and deduced arg does not match.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87629 --- Comment #1 from Olivier Kannengieser --- This is maybe not a compiler bug, to be confirmed/unconfirmed by an expert of the standard.

[Bug libstdc++/87641] std::valarray::sum() fails for types where T() is not a neutral element for addition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87641 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/87087] [8 Regression] Optimization hangs up and consumes over 15Gb of memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87087 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Oct 18 08:40:54 2018 New Revision: 265261 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265261=gcc=rev Log: 2018-10-18 Richard Biener PR middle-end/87087 Revert

[Bug tree-optimization/84204] [8 Regression] [graphite] ICE in set_codegen_error, at graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:206

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84204 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Oct 18 08:40:54 2018 New Revision: 265261 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265261=gcc=rev Log: 2018-10-18 Richard Biener PR middle-end/87087 Revert

[Bug tree-optimization/84204] [8 Regression] [graphite] ICE in set_codegen_error, at graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:206

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84204 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||xfail Status|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/86969] [8/9 Regression] ICE (in tsubst_copy) for a generic recursive lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86969 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini --- Closely related to PR86740.

[Bug bootstrap/87640] [9 regression] internal compiler error: in check, at tree-vrp.c:155

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87640 --- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- r265259 FAIL /home/dimhen/src/gcc_current/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc_current --enable-checking=release --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --disable-multilib --with-isl

[Bug tree-optimization/87087] [8 Regression] Optimization hangs up and consumes over 15Gb of memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87087 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/84204] [8 Regression] [graphite] ICE in set_codegen_error, at graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:206

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84204 Bug 84204 depends on bug 87087, which changed state. Bug 87087 Summary: [8 Regression] Optimization hangs up and consumes over 15Gb of memory https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87087 What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/85935] [8 Regression] [graphite] ICE in extract_affine, at graphite-sese-to-poly.c:287

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85935 Bug 85935 depends on bug 87087, which changed state. Bug 87087 Summary: [8 Regression] Optimization hangs up and consumes over 15Gb of memory https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87087 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/87127] External function not recognised from within an associate block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87127 --- Comment #4 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com --- Hi Tobias, I have been looking at this one on and off. I think that blocks should be resolved in the same way as contained procedures; I tried adding them to the parent contained list

[Bug target/87537] Redundant vmovaps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87537 --- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Thu Oct 18 08:18:42 2018 New Revision: 265260 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265260=gcc=rev Log: Simplify subreg of vec_merge of vec_duplicate We can simplify (subreg

[Bug c++/77655] [6/7 Regression]ICE on invalid c++ code on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77655 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|paolo at

[Bug tree-optimization/84204] [8 Regression] [graphite] ICE in set_codegen_error, at graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:206

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84204 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Oct 18 08:51:32 2018 New Revision: 265262 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265262=gcc=rev Log: 2018-10-18 Richard Biener PR middle-end/87087 Revert

[Bug tree-optimization/87087] [8 Regression] Optimization hangs up and consumes over 15Gb of memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87087 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Oct 18 08:51:32 2018 New Revision: 265262 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265262=gcc=rev Log: 2018-10-18 Richard Biener PR middle-end/87087 Revert

[Bug c++/87637] Unwinding does not destroy constructed subobject of brace-initialized temporary

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87637 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/57510] subobjects not destroyed when exception thrown during list-initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57510 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|initializer_list memory |subobjects not destroyed

[Bug c++/57510] subobjects not destroyed when exception thrown during list-initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57510 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|initializer_list memory |subobjects not destroyed

[Bug bootstrap/87640] [9 regression] internal compiler error: in check, at tree-vrp.c:155

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87640 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug rtl-optimization/87639] GCC fails to consider end of automatic object lifetime when determining sibcall eligibility

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87639 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug fortran/58618] Wrong code with character substring and ASSOCIATE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58618 --- Comment #12 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Thu Oct 18 10:37:39 2018 New Revision: 265264 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265264=gcc=rev Log: 2018-10-18 Paul Thomas PR fortran/58618 * trans-stmt.c

[Bug libstdc++/54005] Use __atomic_always_lock_free in libstdc++ is_lock_free instead of __atomic_is_lock_free

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54005 --- Comment #33 from Jonathan Wakely --- std::atomic already meets the "same for all objects of the type" guarantee by fixing the alignment of its member and by using a fake pointer that has the same value for all objects of the type.

[Bug c++/83083] c++2a concepts without -fconcepts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83083 --- Comment #1 from Hannes Hauswedell --- *polite ping* Any chance this will change for gcc9? I know some changes are pending for the San Diego WG21 meeting, but these are only additions to what is already merged in the DS. It would be great to

[Bug fortran/58618] Wrong code with character substring and ASSOCIATE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58618 --- Comment #13 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #11) > Author: pault > Date: Thu Oct 18 10:33:25 2018 > New Revision: 265263 > > URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265263=gcc=rev > Log: > 2018-10-18 Paul Thomas >

[Bug libstdc++/54005] Use __atomic_always_lock_free in libstdc++ is_lock_free instead of __atomic_is_lock_free

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54005 --- Comment #32 from Jonathan Wakely --- Comment on attachment 44851 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44851 patch as per directions That looks like sufficient variety of types tested. I would prefer a function template

[Bug c++/61414] enum class bitfield size-checking needs a separate warning flag controlling it

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61414 --- Comment #15 from Xavier B --- hi, Just a ping for this issue. Since it's about declarations and it is not possible to disable it, as soon as you have headers files using the feature you get flooded with thousands of warnings making it

[Bug bootstrap/87640] [9 regression] internal compiler error: in check, at tree-vrp.c:155

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87640 Zhendong Su changed: What|Removed |Added CC||su at cs dot ucdavis.edu --- Comment #3

[Bug c++/87634] CSE for dynamic_cast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87634 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug tree-optimization/87633] [9 Regression] ice in compare_range_wit h_value, at vr-values.c:1702

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87633 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code CC|

[Bug fortran/58618] Wrong code with character substring and ASSOCIATE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58618 --- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Thu Oct 18 10:33:25 2018 New Revision: 265263 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265263=gcc=rev Log: 2018-10-18 Paul Thomas PR fortran/58618 * trans-decl.c

[Bug libstdc++/85494] implementation of random_device on mingw is useless

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85494 --- Comment #6 from Dimitrij Mijoski --- I read the patch couple of times and seems completely OK. Can you push it to the repository (or to a fork)?

[Bug c++/87629] function template parameter deduction succeeds but parameter and deduced arg does not match.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87629 --- Comment #2 from Olivier Kannengieser --- This is not a bug, this bug report should be removed! The function call is undeduced context so the rule [temp.call.deduct]/4 is bypassed.

[Bug libstdc++/87642] New: Cannot handle fr_FR.UTF8 thousands separator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87642 Bug ID: 87642 Summary: Cannot handle fr_FR.UTF8 thousands separator Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug libstdc++/87642] Cannot handle fr_FR.UTF8 thousands separator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87642 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/85494] implementation of random_device on mingw is useless

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85494 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/87633] [9 Regression] ice in compare_range_wit h_value, at vr-values.c:1702

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87633 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/87640] [9 regression] internal compiler error: in check, at tree-vrp.c:155

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87640 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gcov-profile/87442] Add options to filter files we want to instrument for code coverage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87442 --- Comment #6 from calixte --- from IRC: calixte: I think -fprofile-filter-files -fprofile-exclude-files as Martin proposes looks OK to me.

[Bug rtl-optimization/87639] GCC fails to consider end of automatic object lifetime when determining sibcall eligibility

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87639 --- Comment #2 from Rich Felker --- While I'd love to see it fixed via shrink-wrappping, which would fix lots of other excessive stack usage issues too, like: if (last_recursion_level) { char buf[1000]; /* code that needs buf */ } else

[Bug c++/61414] enum class bitfield size-checking needs a separate warning flag controlling it

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61414 --- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely --- Sam, did you get a chance to implement the changes requested on the mailing list?

[Bug c++/87629] function template parameter deduction succeeds but parameter and deduced arg does not match.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87629 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/87639] GCC fails to consider end of automatic object lifetime when determining sibcall eligibility

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87639 --- Comment #3 from Rich Felker --- Note: presumably that information is already available somewhere for -fstack-reuse.

[Bug c++/87634] CSE for dynamic_cast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87634 --- Comment #2 from Simon Richter --- Well, I tried really hard to make a case that makes the second dynamic_cast return null after the first returned non-null. The most promising candidate uses a direct destructor call and placement new on a

  1   2   >