https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71157
--- Comment #14 from Martin Sebor ---
At -O1, GCC 8 as well as trunk print:
pr71157.i: In function ‘TeX_commands’:
pr71157.i:8469:44: warning: ‘TEX_clgrp’ may be used uninitialized in this
function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
8469 | while (*p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87671
Bug ID: 87671
Summary: Incorrect debugging information for unique_ptr passed
to a constructor
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87672
Bug ID: 87672
Summary: [9 regression] 81512c36 causes ICE in bootstrap stage
3 using "-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2" (invalid operand in
unary operation, incorrect sharing of tree nodes,
on Ubuntu 18.10 (with gfortran 8.2.0-7ubuntu1 and 9.0.0 20181020
(r265341)) and macOS Mojave (with Homebrew GCC 8.2.0):
Program Devtest
Type dvtype(k)
Integer, Kind :: k
Real(k) :: a, b, c
End Type dvtype
type(dvtype(8)) :: dv
dv%a = 1; dv%b = 2; dv%c = 3
call dvtype_print(dv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87670
Bug ID: 87670
Summary: [9 Regression] CPU2006 401.bzip2 failed to build
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87672
--- Comment #2 from jamespharvey20 at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 44869
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44869=edit
[Part 2] i386.ii
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87672
--- Comment #5 from jamespharvey20 at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 44872
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44872=edit
[Part 5] i386.ii
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87672
--- Comment #4 from jamespharvey20 at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 44871
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44871=edit
[Part 4] i386.ii
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87672
--- Comment #3 from jamespharvey20 at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 44870
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44870=edit
[Part 3] i386.ii
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87672
--- Comment #1 from jamespharvey20 at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 44868
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44868=edit
[Part 1] i386.ii
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71157
--- Comment #13 from Martin Sebor ---
In GCC 9 the warning has disappeared with r263981.
At -O1, GCC 8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87664
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68942
Justin Bassett changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jbassett271 at gmail dot com
---
with: ../gcc_trunk/configure --prefix=/bla/gcc_trunk_install
--program-suffix=-head --disable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 9.0.0 20181020 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71009
--- Comment #13 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Ryan Schmidt from comment #12)
> How would I do that?
Add -save-temps to the compile command and then attach the lj_cconv.i file that
is produced
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87647
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Oct 20 08:58:00 2018
New Revision: 265341
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265341=gcc=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/87647
* varasm.c (decode_addr_const): Handle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87665
Bug ID: 87665
Summary: gcc HEAD (svn: 265340) breaks elements on resize
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87663
--- Comment #1 from Lukas Mosimann ---
By the way: I could drop parameter `Z` from `C` and `D`. I forgot to remove
that when I was experimenting with extensions like `f_n = f_{n-1} + f_{n-2} +
f_{n-3}`.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87664
Bug ID: 87664
Summary: invariant in loop after optimization
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87661
Bug ID: 87661
Summary: [9 Regression] libgo bootstrap failure on
arm-linux-gnueabihf (redefinition of constants)
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87663
Bug ID: 87663
Summary: Exorbitant compile times
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87598
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
rs6000.c print_operand_address does not like (const_int 0) or any other
const_int. Power *can* actually have constant numbers as data addresses,
but only for instructions that have some D form; and GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87666
Bug ID: 87666
Summary: Memory access errors when using c++ 17 filesystem
library and "-mcpu=cortex-a53"
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86172
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool ---
At least some of what? I don't follow. _Is_ there anything that prevents
us from enabling -Wnull-dereference at -Wextra or -Wall or even by default?
Does it have false positives?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87667
Bug ID: 87667
Summary: -Wformat + typed enum class - difference with clang
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87625
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84539
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87666
--- Comment #1 from Christian Hoff ---
Output from "gcc -v":
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabihf/8/lto-wrapper
Target: arm-linux-gnueabihf
Configured with: ../src/configure -v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87038
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87665
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87665
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> The behaviour changed with r255268
Which doesn't make sense as the bug seems to be target-independent.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87662
Bug ID: 87662
Summary: Missing AVX512VL intrinsics
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86172
--- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #4)
> At least some of what? I don't follow.
The bugs that this one depends upon.
> _Is_ there anything that prevents us from enabling -Wnull-dereference at
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72782
--- Comment #6 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Sat Oct 20 20:41:10 2018
New Revision: 265345
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265345=gcc=rev
Log:
i386: Enable AVX512 memory broadcast for FP div
Many AVX512 vector
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87664
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87668
Bug ID: 87668
Summary: [OpenMP] Complains about loop bound variable not being
shared, even though unused in the loop
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86172
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87598
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
GCC 7 fails for me like the rest, and according to history it should have
failed since day 1, over 28 years ago. Is that "works with 7.3.1" for
aarch64 only?
38 matches
Mail list logo
