[Bug ada/87777] Let gnat tools call each other with an explicit target and version

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8 --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou --- > For this, I need you to tell me what "a Debian quirk" is. > Does some (non Debian) architecture > - use TARGET-gcc-VERSION with TARGET/=Sdefault.Target_Name? > - use TARGET-gcc-VERSION with

[Bug ada/87777] Let gnat tools call each other with an explicit target and version

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8 Arnaud Charlet changed: What|Removed |Added CC||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/87836] ICE in cc1 for gcc-6.5.0 with SPARC hardware

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87836 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/87873] New: [9 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: incompatible types in PHI argument 0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87873 Bug ID: 87873 Summary: [9 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: incompatible types in PHI argument 0) Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ada/25844] ICE on overloaded renames

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25844 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug sanitizer/87875] Address sanitizer doen't work with nested functions with enabled stack-use-after-return check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87875 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/87875] New: Address sanitizer doen't work with nested functions with enabled stack-use-after-return check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87875 Bug ID: 87875 Summary: Address sanitizer doen't work with nested functions with enabled stack-use-after-return check Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ada/87777] Let gnat tools call each other with an explicit target and version

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8 Nicolas Boulenguez changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #44913|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug rtl-optimization/87874] New: [8/9 Regression] ICE in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:6396

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87874 Bug ID: 87874 Summary: [8/9 Regression] ICE in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:6396 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug c/87877] New: dyld: Library not loaded

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87877 Bug ID: 87877 Summary: dyld: Library not loaded Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee:

[Bug c/87878] New: dyld: Library not loaded

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87878 Bug ID: 87878 Summary: dyld: Library not loaded Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee:

[Bug c/87806] Option -Wall should warn about unused structs, typdefs, enums, etc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87806 --- Comment #7 from Ulrich Windl --- (In reply to Tavian Barnes from comment #4) > Perhaps this is reasonable for types that are defined in the file itself, > not in an included header? That's what I was thinking about. However it seems the

[Bug middle-end/87813] sprintf pass calling evrp at -O0 and setting global ranges which affect strnlen expansion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87813 --- Comment #6 from Aldy Hernandez --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #5) > The sprintf pass doesn't do any optimization at -O0 but it still runs to > diagnose the subset of mistakes that are detectable even without > optimization. Yes,

[Bug target/87583] error: unrecognizable insn on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87583 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Any progress on that Segher?

[Bug gcov-profile/77698] Unrolled loop not considered hot after profiling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77698 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/87806] Option -Wall should warn about unused structs, typdefs, enums, etc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87806 --- Comment #8 from Ulrich Windl --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #6) > I don't think there are any, only for local typedefs. That's already enabled > by -Wall so I assumed this was a request to add a new warning *and* enable > it

[Bug c/87811] [9 Regression] ICE with __builtin_expect_with_probability

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87811 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Mon Nov 5 07:33:30 2018 New Revision: 265785 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265785=gcc=rev Log: Verify that last argument of __builtin_expect_with_probability is a real cst (PR

[Bug web/87829] Contradiction about -fReorder-Blocks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87829 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/87811] [9 Regression] ICE with __builtin_expect_with_probability

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87811 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug web/87829] Contradiction about -fReorder-Blocks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87829 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Mon Nov 5 07:33:58 2018 New Revision: 265786 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265786=gcc=rev Log: Remove options that are not disabled with -Os (PR web/87829). 2018-11-05 Martin

[Bug c++/60503] gcc looks for C++ attributes in the wrong place in a lambda-expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60503 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Nov 5 07:46:52 2018 New Revision: 265787 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265787=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/60503 - wrong lambda attribute syntax. This patch fixes two issues

[Bug tree-optimization/87873] [9 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: incompatible types in PHI argument 0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87873 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ada/87715] problems with asan and -O3 build of ada

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87715 --- Comment #4 from David Binderman --- Line is /home/dcb/gcc/working/./prev-gcc/xgcc -B/home/dcb/gcc/working/./prev-gcc/ -B/usr /local/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/usr/local/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/usr/loc al/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/lib/

[Bug c++/87469] [9 Regression] ice in record_estimate, at tree-ssa-loop-niter.c:3271

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87469 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added CC||asolokha at gmx dot com --- Comment #6

[Bug c/87877] dyld: Library not loaded

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87877 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 87878 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c/87878] dyld: Library not loaded

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87878 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/87877] dyld: Library not loaded

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87877 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/77698] Unrolled loop not considered hot after profiling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77698 --- Comment #9 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Mon Nov 5 07:32:48 2018 New Revision: 265784 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265784=gcc=rev Log: Fix setting of hotness in non-LTO mode (PR gcov-profile/77698). 2018-11-05 Martin

[Bug rtl-optimization/87874] [8/9 Regression] ICE in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:6396

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87874 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug d/87865] gdc doesn't build unless assert is marked noreturn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87865 --- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #3 from Iain Buclaw --- > (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #2) >> > --- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw --- >> > This is part of the dmd frontend which

[Bug d/87876] New: Mac failing: conversion from longdouble to long int is ambiguous

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87876 Bug ID: 87876 Summary: Mac failing: conversion from longdouble to long int is ambiguous Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/87836] ICE in cc1 for gcc-6.5.0 with SPARC hardware

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87836 --- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou --- > I don't see anything in the various FLAGS that might cause this ICE. CFLAGS='-g -O2' LDFLAGS=-m32

[Bug fortran/70260] ICE: gimplification failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70260 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug d/87865] gdc doesn't build unless assert is marked noreturn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87865 --- Comment #5 from Iain Buclaw --- (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #4) > Given that Solaris 10 support will be removed in GCC 10 and Solaris 11 > has no problem here, I guess dealing with this isn't worth the trouble: >

[Bug tree-optimization/86572] unsafe strlen folding of const arguments with non-const offset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86572 --- Comment #3 from Bernd Edlinger --- Author: edlinger Date: Sun Nov 4 19:51:09 2018 New Revision: 265778 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265778=gcc=rev Log: gcc: 2018-11-04 Bernd Edlinger PR tree-optimization/86572 *

[Bug tree-optimization/86572] unsafe strlen folding of const arguments with non-const offset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86572 Bernd Edlinger changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/83819] [meta-bug] missing strlen optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83819 Bug 83819 depends on bug 86572, which changed state. Bug 86572 Summary: unsafe strlen folding of const arguments with non-const offset https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86572 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/87672] [9 regression] 81512c36 causes ICE in bootstrap stage 3 using "-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2" (invalid operand in unary operation, incorrect sharing of tree nodes, verify_gimple

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87672 --- Comment #13 from Bernd Edlinger --- Author: edlinger Date: Sun Nov 4 19:46:08 2018 New Revision: 265777 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265777=gcc=rev Log: gcc: 2018-11-04 Bernd Edlinger PR tree-optimization/87672

[Bug c++/58372] internal compiler error: ix86_compute_frame_layout

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58372 --- Comment #41 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Sun Nov 4 19:22:50 2018 New Revision: 265776 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265776=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/58372 * cfgexpand.c (pass_expand::execute):

[Bug tree-optimization/87672] [9 regression] 81512c36 causes ICE in bootstrap stage 3 using "-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2" (invalid operand in unary operation, incorrect sharing of tree nodes, verify_gimple

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87672 Bernd Edlinger changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/79191] potentially truncating unsigned conversion defeats range propagation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79191 --- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager --- Where exactly in the compiler is this optimization supposed to be done and who's the maintainer of that file?

[Bug middle-end/79221] missing -Wstringop-overflow= on a strcat overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79221 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug libstdc++/87872] debug list::splice should not call _M_transfer_from_if on self-splices

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87872 --- Comment #3 from John Bytheway --- Created attachment 44955 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44955=edit Proposed patch Sure, here's a proposed patch. Tested in the sense that I have compiled and run a program against the

[Bug d/87865] gdc doesn't build unless assert is marked noreturn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87865 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug d/87866] gdc fails to compile minimal test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87866 --- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw --- I backported a fix from the D sources so it should no longer segfault at least. From what I can see, it should pick up the object.d source correctly. -nostdinc -I

[Bug middle-end/87836] ICE in cc1 for gcc-6.5.0 with SPARC hardware

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87836 --- Comment #4 from Gary Mills --- sparcv7 is a file path component. It implies that this is a 32-bit executable running on a 64-bit kernel. That's normal behavior on OI and Solaris builds. Generally there are both 32 and 64-bit builds. The

[Bug d/87876] Mac failing: conversion from longdouble to long int is ambiguous

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87876 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug bootstrap/87788] [9 Regression] Bootstrap fails for x86_64-apple-darwin* with default languages selection after D addition.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87788 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mcccs at gmx dot com --- Comment #15

[Bug d/87865] gdc doesn't build unless assert is marked noreturn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87865 --- Comment #6 from ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ibuclaw Date: Sun Nov 4 23:34:44 2018 New Revision: 265780 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265780=gcc=rev Log: Merge dmd upstream 6243fa6d2 This introduces a new header that pulls