https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88189
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88236
Bug ID: 88236
Summary: [avr] Invalid code generated for __memx deference for
avr5 arch
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88231
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88240
Bug ID: 88240
Summary: Potential optimization bug: invalid pre-load of
floating-point value could cause SIGFPE-underflow if
value is integer
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88240
--- Comment #1 from Thomas De Schampheleire
---
Created attachment 45112
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45112=edit
gzipped source file, part 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85368
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Nov 28 11:08:58 2018
New Revision: 266552
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266552=gcc=rev
Log:
PR testsuite/85368
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/phi-opt-11.c: For branch_cost
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87937
--- Comment #11 from Tomáš Trnka ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #10)
> As I read that, or its equivalent in earlier standards, reallocation on
> assignment cannot occur for the likes of the testcase in comments #5 and #8.
Good catch,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88223
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88229
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88232
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88239
Bug ID: 88239
Summary: ./gcc.dg/torture/pr84929.c with -O3 -march=native
causes ubsan error
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78849
Jozef Lawrynowicz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jozef.l at mittosystems dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88203
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEW
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88206
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88216
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87476
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88223
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
extern void *memmove(void *, const void *, __SIZE_TYPE__);
extern void abort(void);
extern int
main(void)
{
char s[] = "12345";
memmove(s + 1, s, 4);
memmove(s + 1, s, 4);
memmove(s + 1, s, 4);
if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88140
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 45110
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45110=edit
attempt decaying to pointer
Failed attempt.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88215
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed on the trunk so far.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88215
--- Comment #4 from Orgad Shaneh ---
Thank you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88238
Bug ID: 88238
Summary: libphobos compile problems on Solaris 10
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88237
--- Comment #1 from Jozef Lawrynowicz ---
For C++ the errors are:
> g++ -S tester.c
>
> tester.c:11:10: error: variable or field 'foo' declared void
>11 | void foo (__extension__ int a);
> | ^
> tester.c:11:25: error:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88239
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rakdver at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88234
Vincent Lefèvre changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88215
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Nov 28 08:49:08 2018
New Revision: 266546
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266546=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/88215
* c-ubsan.c: Include langhooks.h.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79351
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87476
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Nov 28 08:50:53 2018
New Revision: 266547
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266547=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/87476
* typeck2.c (digest_init_r): Re-add handing of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88237
Bug ID: 88237
Summary: __extension__ in function declaration argument list
causes error
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88188
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78849
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88223
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Hmm, and with unions we can break the TBAA rule.
union U {
struct X { int a : 3; int b : 8; } a;
struct Y { int a : 4; int b : 8; } b;
};
union U u;
int __attribute__((noinline)) bar ()
{
int x =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88182
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 28 08:29:16 2018
New Revision: 266545
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266545=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-10-19 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/88182
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88235
Bug ID: 88235
Summary: [9 Regression] ICE: verify_cgraph_node failed (error:
edge points to wrong declaration)
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88140
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #5)
> > diff --git a/gcc/tree.c b/gcc/tree.c
> > index 39a92464414..a39e611292a 100644
> > --- a/gcc/tree.c
> > +++ b/gcc/tree.c
> > @@ -5201,6 +5201,15 @@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88189
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Nov 28 08:54:31 2018
New Revision: 266548
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266548=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/88189
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_expand_sse_movcc):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88235
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88234
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|sanitizer |target
--- Comment #2 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88229
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 28 10:59:12 2018
New Revision: 266550
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266550=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-11-28 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/88229
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88188
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #3)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> > trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/phi-opt-11.c
>
> Is this part of the commit intended?
>
> It's not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88217
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88221
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
IIRC I've seen a related report recently
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79351
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 28 11:01:06 2018
New Revision: 266551
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266551=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-11-28 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/79351
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85368
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Testcase actually changed in r266515, sorry for the inconvenience.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88223
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88209
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88223
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
OK, so the bug is in
/* If we reach a clobbering statement try to skip it and see if
we find a VN result with exactly the same value as the
possible clobber. In this case we can
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88234
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88235
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88217
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
OK, so for -fstrict-enums VRP uses TYPE_MIN/MAX_VALUE in some places but in
others it just uses the underlying precision. This breaks down in
vr_values::extract_range_from_phi_node where
/*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87750
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88256
Bug ID: 88256
Summary: [7/8/9 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in
make_ssa_name_fn)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88258
Bug ID: 88258
Summary: [9 Regression] Infinite loop emitting diagnostics in
the C++ front-end
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openmp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88257
Bug ID: 88257
Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in
linemap_position_for_line_and_column, at
libcpp/line-map.c:842
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87539
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Nov 29 07:42:52 2018
New Revision: 266611
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266611=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/87539
* g++.dg/cpp0x/pr87539.C: New test.
Added:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88254
Bug ID: 88254
Summary: Support construct name for CHANGE TEAM & END TEAM
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88255
Bug ID: 88255
Summary: Thumb-1: GCC too aggressive on mul->lsl/sub/add
optimization
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85899
--- Comment #1 from Arseny Solokha ---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-4.c does not need autopar:
% powerpc-e300c3-linux-gnu-gcc-9.0.0-alpha20181125 -O1 -fschedule-insns
-fsel-sched-pipelining -fsel-sched-pipelining-outer-loops
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88242
Bug ID: 88242
Summary: static_assertion only fires when class is templated
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88236
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88199
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80953
--- Comment #17 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #15 from Eric Botcazou ---
>> I only have:
[...]
>> as execution test failures, but I have a bunch of output pattern test
>> failures.
>
> Rainer, do you also have a slew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88234
--- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse ---
#define vec_add(a,b) ((a)+(b))
IIRC that only fails for __vector bool, but I think the ppc people didn't like
this approach.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88237
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88245
Bug ID: 88245
Summary: Wrong location for "explicitly defaulted here"
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86910
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88152
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 45114
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45114=edit
gcc9-pr88152.patch
Untested patch to do similar comparison transformations we do for comparisons
against INTEGER_CSTs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88246
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||s390x-redhat-linux
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87988
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka ---
We still have:
/* When not generating debug info we can eliminate info on unused
variables. */
else if (!flag_auto_profile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88220
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88240
--- Comment #4 from Thomas De Schampheleire
---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #2)
> (In reply to Thomas De Schampheleire from comment #0)
> > gcc 7.3.0 optimizes below code in a way that may cause a floating-point
> > underflow (SIGFPE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83306
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83306
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Nov 28 15:27:11 2018
New Revision: 266565
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266565=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/83306 make filesystem_error no-throw copyable
The class API provides
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87695
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||avr at gjlay dot de,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88246
Bug ID: 88246
Summary: Abort signal terminated program collect2 -
munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87959
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88152
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64132
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88240
Florian Weimer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fw at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82918
--- Comment #4 from Antony Polukhin ---
Still rereads the value2.data[0] value in this sample:
struct array {
int data[3];
};
void foo2(array& value, const array& value2) {
value.data[1] = value2.data[0];
value.data[0] =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83511
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Nov 28 16:53:35 2018
New Revision: 266568
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266568=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/83511 add default argument to basic_string_view::substr
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88240
--- Comment #6 from Thomas De Schampheleire
---
(In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #5)
> (In reply to Thomas De Schampheleire from comment #4)
> > When analyzing this problem with gdb, we looked at the floating-point status
> > register
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86756
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Thinking further about this, I think should always be installed,
but it should only define the portable parts.
The enumeration types, filesystem::path, filesystem::filesystem_error and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87214
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88223
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
The C standard is unclear here (C18, 6.2.6.1/7).
union { struct X { int i; int j; } x; struct Y { int i; int j; } y; } u;
u.x.i = 1;
u.y.j = 1;
after the second store does u.y.i have unspecified value?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54700
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54700
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #4)
> __v4su
> f (__v4su a, __v4su b, __v4su c)
> {
> return a > INT_MAX ? b : c;
> }
We should be folding that to (__v4si) a < 0, don't we do that already? At
least
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85368
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88229
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79351
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 28 12:13:04 2018
New Revision: 266554
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266554=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-11-28 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/79351
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88241
Bug ID: 88241
Summary: Optimize vector signed integral comparison against 0
followed by blend
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88237
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79351
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 28 12:57:58 2018
New Revision: 266556
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266556=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-11-28 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/79351
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79351
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88241
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54700
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
*** Bug 88241 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88234
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The problem is that the builtin has __vector signed int arguments:
V4SI
size
unit-size
align:128 warn_if_not_align:0 symtab:0 alias-set -1 canonical-type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54700
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> I'm not really sure if we can optimize v<0 for floating point v even with
> -fno-signed-zeros, isn't that option about allowing to optimize away x+0.0
> and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88229
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 28 12:11:07 2018
New Revision: 266553
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266553=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-11-28 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/88229
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80953
--- Comment #15 from Eric Botcazou ---
> I only have:
>
> c-c++-common/asan/pointer-compare-1.c
> c-c++-common/asan/pointer-compare-2.c
> c-c++-common/asan/pointer-subtract-1.c
> c-c++-common/asan/pointer-subtract-2.c
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88240
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
1 - 100 of 161 matches
Mail list logo
