https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85574
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Ok, seems to be indeed STAGE1_CFLAGS="-O2" hiding the issue. So looking at
WPA inline dumps shows no difference but ltrans IPA inline dumps differ in
scope block numbers!? Note not all ltrans units show
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87759
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87359
--- Comment #47 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Dec 21 20:58:59 2018
New Revision: 267342
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267342=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-12-21 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/87359
* trans-array.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69121
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69121
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri Dec 21 21:09:17 2018
New Revision: 267343
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267343=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-12-21 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/69121
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88574
Bug ID: 88574
Summary: -Wmissing-attributes vs -Wattribute-alias=2 wrong for
noreturn
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88564
J-Donald Tournier changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88573
--- Comment #1 from Andi Kleen ---
Created attachment 45281
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45281=edit
test case (unminimized)
gcc-9 -O2 -S -flto arch/x86/events/intel/pt.i
/home/ak/lsrc/linux/arch/x86/events/intel/pt.c: In
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88571
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Fruzynski ---
I have checked svn head version (20181221), issue is still there.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88570
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Fruzynski ---
I have checked svn head version (20181221), issue is still there.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88548
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88248
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88248
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81824
Khem Raj changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||raj.khem at gmail dot com
--- Comment #16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88573
Bug ID: 88573
Summary: 9 regression: error: type mismatch in component
reference
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81824
--- Comment #17 from Martin Sebor ---
Making -Wattribute-alias a synonym for -Wattribute-alias=1 makes sense. I'll
take care of it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88169
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |kargl at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87034
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---
The warning in GCC 8 isn't bogus, it just reports the wrong number of bytes (it
counts characters, not bytes). That the warning is no longer issued is a
regression caused by c_strlen() giving up when the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87034
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
IMHO hardly a regression unless we want a bogus warning back?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86020
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87064
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I'm afraid I'm not familiar enough with the OpenACC reductions to fix this
myself.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85574
--- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka ---
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85574
>
> --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
> Hmm, IPA ICF dumps show differences like
>
> - false returned: 'references to virtual tables can not be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87304
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88563
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Seems to be a bug in my PR57251 changes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85574
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87768
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87763
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87770
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88522
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 45275
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45275=edit
gcc9-pr88522.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87125
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87480
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85574
--- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 21 Dec 2018, hubicka at ucw dot cz wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85574
>
> --- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka ---
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87327
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88547
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 21 10:37:11 2018
New Revision: 267322
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267322=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/88547
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_expand_int_sse_cmp):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87727
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88563
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 45276
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45276=edit
gcc9-pr88563.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88563
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #45276|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87750
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87761
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ra
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88046
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87996
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87064
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||openacc, wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87048
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25829
Bug 25829 depends on bug 87048, which changed state.
Bug 87048 Summary: [9 Regression] array_constructor_8.f90 failure on armeb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87048
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87030
--- Comment #15 from Iain Sandoe ---
FWIW I had a quick look the other day if there was an easy fix to this PR, and
didn't find a '5 minute' one.
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #14)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #13)
> > (In
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87545
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
HJ? Otherwise I'll simply make this change.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87513
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87748
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87893
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87871
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87988
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||compile-time-hog, deferred,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87305
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ra
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87554
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87125
--- Comment #3 from ensadc at mailnesia dot com ---
(In reply to ensadc from comment #2)
> Reduced:
>
> template struct ch {
> template constexpr ch(by) noexcept(br());
> };
> class ce : ch {
> using ch::ch;
> };
>
> void f() {
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87787
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87863
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||hsa
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87957
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #21 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85574
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Hmm, IPA ICF dumps show differences like
- false returned: 'references to virtual tables can not be merged'
(compare_referenced_symbol_properties:371)
+ false returned: 'references to virtual tables can
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87296
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Summary|[8/9 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87322
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87651
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87571
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87652
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87685
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87064
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85574
--- Comment #14 from Jan Hubicka ---
> Yeah. Note that the debug stmt differences _might_ be explained by
> ICF in case ICF ignores debug stmts when merging. But since the
> ICF dumps are ordered differently it's hard to see actual decision
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87935
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88074
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
--- Comment #25 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88107
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87125
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 21 12:11:57 2018
New Revision: 267324
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267324=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/87125
* g++.dg/cpp0x/pr87125.C: New test.
Added:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88134
--- Comment #22 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 21 Dec 2018, asolokha at gmx dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88134
>
> --- Comment #21 from Arseny Solokha ---
> (In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88450
--- Comment #7 from Bence Szabó ---
New info: when built with --enable-checking=yes, the selftests already produce
segfault in stage2 cc1 and cc1plus at the same point as the below cc1plus.
backtrace for cc1 with r266345.
Thread 1 received
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85574
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 45278
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45278=edit
patch for the ICF issue
Conveniently the congruence_classes have a UID. So the attached sorts after
that before
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88134
--- Comment #24 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 21 Dec 2018, asolokha at gmx dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88134
>
> --- Comment #23 from Arseny Solokha ---
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88147
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88256
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88293
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88419
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87863
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88548
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87863
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from Thomas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88193
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88556
--- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Fri Dec 21 13:30:58 2018
New Revision: 267325
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267325=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/88556
* internal-fn.def (COSH): New.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86315
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Those ten mails all seem to be old ones that were stuck in some queue for
months.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88450
--- Comment #11 from Bence Szabó ---
Created attachment 45279
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45279=edit
preprocessed c-parser, gimplify
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88140
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88130
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87064
--- Comment #10 from Bill Schmidt ---
Yes. See, for example,
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2018-12/msg02508.html.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87064
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88134
--- Comment #23 from Arseny Solokha ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #22)
> Where do the vars get created from? (backtrace from the
> gimple_add_tmp_var places?)
(gdb) where
#0 gimple_add_tmp_var (tmp=0x77fcf510)
at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88325
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88346
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87545
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> HJ? Otherwise I'll simply make this change.
Yes, please. Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88363
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88436
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88423
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88560
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization, ra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88450
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
And also preprocessed c-parser.ii and/or gimplify.ii + full command line
options when they are built with stage1 compiler, so that somebody can inspect
that with a cross-compiler.
Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87125
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87814
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
1 - 100 of 168 matches
Mail list logo