[Bug ada/89349] raised STORAGE_ERROR : stack overflow or erroneous memory access when building GCC 8 branch with GCC master

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89349 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #8 from Eric

[Bug lto/89358] [7/8/9 Regression] Combining -std=c++14 and -std=c++17 objects gives ODR warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89358 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- This shows it has nothing to do with r243379 at all: template struct binary_function { typedef _Arg1 first_argument_type; typedef _Arg2 second_argument_type; typedef _Result result_type;

[Bug lto/89358] [7/8/9 Regression] Combining -std=c++14 and -std=c++17 objects gives ODR warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89358 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org Known to

[Bug rtl-optimization/66152] suboptimal load bytes to stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66152 --- Comment #4 from SztfG at yandex dot ru --- GCC from trunk doing this: .Ltext0: .LC0: .string "" .ascii "\001\002\003\004\005\006\007" bar: .LFB0: sub rsp, 24 mov rax, QWORD PTR .LC0[rip] lea rdi, [rsp+8] mov QWORD PTR [rsp+8],

[Bug rtl-optimization/66152] [9 Regression] suboptimal load bytes to stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66152 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/89350] [9 Regression] Wrong -Wstringop-overflow= warning since r261518

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89350 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 45728 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45728=edit gcc9-pr89350.patch Untested patch for the argc range stuff.

[Bug lto/89358] [7/8/9 Regression] Combining -std=c++14 and -std=c++17 objects gives ODR warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89358 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- It's true that the two bases are defined in different translation units, but that's irrelevant. What the C++ language requires is that the definitions consist of the same sequence of tokens, it doesn't

[Bug ada/89349] raised STORAGE_ERROR : stack overflow or erroneous memory access when building GCC 8 branch with GCC master

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89349 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška

[Bug rtl-optimization/66152] suboptimal load bytes to stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66152 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug tree-optimization/89350] [9 Regression] Wrong -Wstringop-overflow= warning since r261518

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89350 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 45727 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45727=edit original test-case

[Bug lto/88858] ICE in rtl_verify_fallthru, at cfgrtl.c:2930 in Firefox build with LTO and PGO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88858 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug lto/89358] [7/8/9 Regression] Combining -std=c++14 and -std=c++17 objects gives ODR warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89358 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- I see this warning even when compiling preprocessed source that was all produced using -std=c++14 (so the input source code is identical): g++ -E main.cpp -o main.ii g++ -E test.cpp -o test.ii g++ -flto

[Bug tree-optimization/89350] [9 Regression] Wrong -Wstringop-overflow= warning since r261518

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89350 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Note, e.g. C99 guarantees that: "If they are declared, the parameters to the main function shall obey the following constraints: — The value of argc shall be nonnegative." Similarly C++,

[Bug tree-optimization/89350] [9 Regression] Wrong -Wstringop-overflow= warning since r261518

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89350 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- > That said, I bet the original package code didn't have the warning in main > but somewhere else. Yes.

[Bug tree-optimization/89360] New: GCC doesn't emit movcc instruction in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89360 Bug ID: 89360 Summary: GCC doesn't emit movcc instruction in some cases Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal

[Bug lto/89358] [7/8/9 Regression] Combining -std=c++14 and -std=c++17 objects gives ODR warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89358 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- That change introduces some differences between C++98 and later modes, but the testcase use C++14 and C++17. There are no differences in the code. There's certainly no difference between std::less in the

[Bug tree-optimization/89350] [9 Regression] Wrong -Wstringop-overflow= warning since r261518

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89350 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug tree-optimization/89350] [9 Regression] Wrong -Wstringop-overflow= warning since r261518

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89350 --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška --- Thanks for analysis. > > The bogus warning can be avoided in the first case simply by punting on > offsets that could be in the negative range, but almost certainly not > without some false negatives.

[Bug lto/45375] [meta-bug] Issues with building Mozilla (i.e. Firefox) with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375 Bug 45375 depends on bug 88858, which changed state. Bug 88858 Summary: ICE in rtl_verify_fallthru, at cfgrtl.c:2930 in Firefox build with LTO and PGO https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88858 What|Removed

[Bug middle-end/89337] Bogus "exceeds maximum object size" on unreachable code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89337 --- Comment #10 from Rafael Avila de Espindola --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #9) > The warning is very simple: it just looks for excessive sizes in calls > emitted in the optimized IL. When the call is there (either because it's in

[Bug c++/89367] New: Constexpr expression is not constexpr in template, but is constexpr in non-template.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89367 Bug ID: 89367 Summary: Constexpr expression is not constexpr in template, but is constexpr in non-template. Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug go/89368] New: [9 regression] ICE in go/gofrontend/expressions.cc:4669 after r268923

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89368 Bug ID: 89368 Summary: [9 regression] ICE in go/gofrontend/expressions.cc:4669 after r268923 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/89367] Constexpr expression is not constexpr in template, but is constexpr in non-template.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89367 --- Comment #1 from Frank Secilia --- Created attachment 45738 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45738=edit verbose compiler output

[Bug c++/88512] Too much STL in error output

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88512 --- Comment #8 from Jonny Grant --- Another example. 9 line file. Gives 48 lines of STL warnings... G++ only needs to say something clear: "error: std::string 'str' is const, and as such insert() method cannot be called" // g++ -Wall -c -o

[Bug go/89123] Too many go test failures on s390x-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89123 --- Comment #11 from rdapp at linux dot ibm.com --- Ping.

[Bug rtl-optimization/89242] ICE in verify_dominators, at dominance.c:1184 (error: dominator of 7 should be 5, not 2)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89242 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug ipa/89009] [7 Regression] Miscompilation (missing function call) with -fvisibility=hidden -fpic -O2 -fno-inline

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89009 --- Comment #17 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Fri Feb 15 10:58:49 2019 New Revision: 268937 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268937=gcc=rev Log: Backport r268762 2019-02-15 Martin Liska Backport from mainline

[Bug ipa/89009] Miscompilation (missing function call) with -fvisibility=hidden -fpic -O2 -fno-inline

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89009 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||7.4.0 Summary|[7 Regression]

[Bug ipa/89330] IPA inliner touches released cgraph_edges

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89330 --- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor --- Created attachment 45730 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45730=edit Untested fix I'm testing the attached fix.

[Bug rtl-optimization/88308] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2309

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88308 --- Comment #6 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: acsawdey Date: Fri Feb 15 15:41:25 2019 New Revision: 268942 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268942=gcc=rev Log: 2019-02-15 Aaron Sawdey PR rtl-optimization/88308

[Bug c++/89367] Constexpr expression is not constexpr in template, but is constexpr in non-template.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89367 --- Comment #2 from Frank Secilia --- I searched for existing bugs. I don't know the codebase, but I think it may be another repro case for https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53181.

[Bug rtl-optimization/88308] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2309

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88308 acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/85711] [8 regression] ICE in aarch64_classify_address, at config/aarch64/aarch64.c:5678

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85711 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ada/89349] raised STORAGE_ERROR : stack overflow or erroneous memory access when building GCC 8 branch with GCC master

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89349 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #9 from Martin Liška

[Bug lto/89358] [7/8/9 Regression] Combining -std=c++14 and -std=c++17 objects gives ODR warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89358 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug go/89123] Too many go test failures on s390x-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89123 --- Comment #12 from Ian Lance Taylor --- Sorry for the delay, will look at the patch now. You can test a single target libgo target by using make to build the /check target. For example, to test the bytes package, cd to the libgo build

[Bug tree-optimization/88835] overly aggressive -Werror=format-overflow for printf since r265648

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88835 --- Comment #14 from Mark Wielaard --- (In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #12) > (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #11) > > Ah, but you mentioned elfutilts, not binutils. I've now downloaded and > > built elfutils-0.175. It took a

[Bug lto/89358] [7/8/9 Regression] Combining -std=c++14 and -std=c++17 objects gives ODR warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89358 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug middle-end/82364] [7 Regression] Enormous memory usage when building for 32bit i386 with >= -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82364 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/89242] [7 Regression] ICE in verify_dominators, at dominance.c:1184 (error: dominator of 7 should be 5, not 2)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89242 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Fri Feb 15 10:59:02 2019 New Revision: 268938 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268938=gcc=rev Log: Backport r268873 2019-02-15 Martin Liska Backport from mainline

[Bug lto/89358] [7/8/9 Regression] Combining -std=c++14 and -std=c++17 objects gives ODR warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89358 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-reduction | --- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---

[Bug fortran/89366] New: Fails to compile BIND(C) interface with assumed-length character argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89366 Bug ID: 89366 Summary: Fails to compile BIND(C) interface with assumed-length character argument Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug go/89123] Too many go test failures on s390x-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89123 --- Comment #14 from Ian Lance Taylor --- OK, patch committed. Should we leave this bug report open?

[Bug lto/89358] [7/8/9 Regression] Combining -std=c++14 and -std=c++17 objects gives ODR warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89358 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | CC|

[Bug target/89361] [7/8/9 Regression] s390 broken without S390_USE_TARGET_ATTRIBUTE, likely since r257489

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89361 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug target/89361] New: [7/8/9 Regression] s390 broken without S390_USE_TARGET_ATTRIBUTE, likely since r257489

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89361 Bug ID: 89361 Summary: [7/8/9 Regression] s390 broken without S390_USE_TARGET_ATTRIBUTE, likely since r257489 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/89361] [7/8/9 Regression] s390 broken without S390_USE_TARGET_ATTRIBUTE, likely since r257489

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89361 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/84616] funsafe-math-optimizations leads to incorrect results for 4x4 matrix inversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84616 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug ipa/89330] IPA inliner touches released cgraph_edges

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89330 --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 45733 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45733=edit Follow up patch that releases memory Survives GCC LTO bootstrap and can build Inkscape with LTO.

[Bug fortran/89364] New: Assumed rank object with incorrect values for shape and bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89364 Bug ID: 89364 Summary: Assumed rank object with incorrect values for shape and bounds Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/89365] New: Inquiry functions for assumed rank objects fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89365 Bug ID: 89365 Summary: Inquiry functions for assumed rank objects fail Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/84616] funsafe-math-optimizations leads to incorrect results for 4x4 matrix inversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84616 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On February 15, 2019 2:37:25 PM GMT+01:00, "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84616 > >Martin Liška changed: > > What|Removed

[Bug lto/89358] [7/8/9 Regression] Combining -std=c++14 and -std=c++17 objects gives ODR warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89358 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- Taking just this code: template struct binary_function { typedef _Arg1 first_argument_type; typedef _Arg2 second_argument_type; typedef _Result result_type; }; template struct less :

[Bug lto/89358] [7/8/9 Regression] Combining -std=c++14 and -std=c++17 objects gives ODR warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89358 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection, |

[Bug libbacktrace/89362] New: [8/9 regression] zlib support breaks libbacktrace on strict-alignment platforms

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89362 Bug ID: 89362 Summary: [8/9 regression] zlib support breaks libbacktrace on strict-alignment platforms Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/89363] New: RANK incorrect for unallocated allocatable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89363 Bug ID: 89363 Summary: RANK incorrect for unallocated allocatable Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug go/89123] Too many go test failures on s390x-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89123 --- Comment #13 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ian Date: Fri Feb 15 14:51:10 2019 New Revision: 268941 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268941=gcc=rev Log: PR go/89123 internal/cpu, runtime: add S/390 CPU capability

[Bug target/89369] [9 Regression] pseudo-RNG miscompiled on s390x-linux with -O2 -march=zEC12 -mtune=z13 starting with r266203

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89369 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 45739 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45739=edit gcc9-pr89369.patch Untested fix. The recently added patterns want to do x |= (unsigned) ((reg:DI) >> cnt), and as the

[Bug c++/88512] Too much STL in error output

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88512 --- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely --- There's also Bug 53281

[Bug target/89372] New: Incorrect PMULHRSW

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89372 Bug ID: 89372 Summary: Incorrect PMULHRSW Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee:

[Bug middle-end/89371] missed vectorisation with "#pragma omp simd collapse(2)"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89371 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization, openmp

[Bug c++/89370] Output std::string in diagnostics instead of std::__cxx11::basic_string<_CharT, _Traits, _Alloc>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89370 Jonny Grant changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jg at jguk dot org --- Comment #1 from

[Bug c++/89367] Constexpr expression is not constexpr in template, but is constexpr in non-template.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89367 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/89369] New: [9 Regression] pseudo-RNG miscompiled on s390x-linux with -O2 -march=zEC12 -mtune=z13 starting with r266203

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89369 Bug ID: 89369 Summary: [9 Regression] pseudo-RNG miscompiled on s390x-linux with -O2 -march=zEC12 -mtune=z13 starting with r266203 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status:

[Bug target/89369] [9 Regression] pseudo-RNG miscompiled on s390x-linux with -O2 -march=zEC12 -mtune=z13 starting with r266203

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89369 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/89370] New: Output std::string in diagnostics instead of std::__cxx11::basic_string<_CharT, _Traits, _Alloc>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89370 Bug ID: 89370 Summary: Output std::string in diagnostics instead of std::__cxx11::basic_string<_CharT, _Traits, _Alloc> Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug lto/87525] [7/8/9 Regression] infinite loop generated for fread() if enabling -flto and -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87525 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/88512] Too much STL in error output

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88512 --- Comment #12 from Jonny Grant --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #9) > It's easy for you to say that after looking at the reason it failed and > knowing what the code is trying to do (obviously "insert" modifies the > string, so it

[Bug c/88944] Suggested alternative C stdbool.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88944 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ada/89349] raised STORAGE_ERROR : stack overflow or erroneous memory access when building GCC 8 branch with GCC master

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89349 --- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou --- > Building gcc 8 with gcc 8 is fine. OK, thanks. > Can you please Eric try to reproduce that locally? Sure, as soon as the compiler builds again for me...

[Bug rtl-optimization/66152] [9 Regression] suboptimal load bytes to stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66152 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c/87210] [RFE] introduce build time options to zero initialize automatic stack variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87210 --- Comment #3 from P J P --- Similar options under review for LLVM -> https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2018-November/060172.html

[Bug middle-end/82364] [7 Regression] Enormous memory usage when building for 32bit i386 with >= -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82364 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---

[Bug ipa/89330] IPA inliner touches released cgraph_edges

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89330 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org |jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug go/89123] Too many go test failures on s390x-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89123 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||doko at debian dot org --- Comment

[Bug go/89277] [9 Regression] libgo memory hogs in libgo testsuite (at least on s390x-linux-gnu)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89277 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug go/89171] FAIL: go/build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89171 --- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor --- I don't know what is happening here and I don't have access to a riscv64 machine to test on (there doesn't seem to be one in the compile farm). The errors are incorrect in that these are not expected

[Bug sanitizer/80953] Support libsanitizer on Solaris

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80953 --- Comment #35 from Eric Botcazou --- > Right: 64-bit Solaris/SPARC uses the full 64-bit address space: > > https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E37838_01/html/E66175/advanced-2. > html#SSFDGadvanced-5 > > The gap between the low and high parts cannot

[Bug go/89368] [9 regression] ICE in go/gofrontend/expressions.cc:4669 after r268923

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89368 --- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ian Date: Fri Feb 15 21:04:58 2019 New Revision: 268948 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268948=gcc=rev Log: PR go/89368 compiler: write barrier check nil-check policy tweak

[Bug c++/84916] Tweaks to template type elision

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84916 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |10.0 --- Comment #4 from David Malcolm

[Bug c++/88512] Too much STL in error output

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88512 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- It's easy for you to say that after looking at the reason it failed and knowing what the code is trying to do (obviously "insert" modifies the string, so it can't be const). But the compiler has to try

[Bug middle-end/89371] New: missed vectorisation with "#pragma omp simd collapse(2)"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89371 Bug ID: 89371 Summary: missed vectorisation with "#pragma omp simd collapse(2)" Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/60920] Crash on double template header due to default template parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60920 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/88512] Too much STL in error output

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88512 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely --- I've created bug 89370 to request showing the type as std::string.

[Bug c++/84536] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE with non-type template parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84536 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P4 |P3 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/89077] ICE using * as len specifier for character parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89077 --- Comment #17 from Harald Anlauf --- (In reply to Harald Anlauf from comment #16) > Regarding the unwanted padding with \0, the following patch seems to > solve the issue with transfer. Regtested cleanly and submitted here:

[Bug tree-optimization/89350] [9 Regression] Wrong -Wstringop-overflow= warning since r261518

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89350 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug go/89368] [9 regression] ICE in go/gofrontend/expressions.cc:4669 after r268923

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89368 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/89373] New: macro expansion not counting braces correctly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89373 Bug ID: 89373 Summary: macro expansion not counting braces correctly Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug preprocessor/89373] macro expansion not counting braces correctly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89373 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Component|c