[Bug gcov-profile/89577] In the manual, replace -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage by the simpler --coverage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89577 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Wed Mar 6 10:01:16 2019 New Revision: 269415 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269415=gcc=rev Log: Use --coverage instead of -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage in documentation (PR

[Bug gcov-profile/89577] In the manual, replace -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage by the simpler --coverage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89577 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/89551] [9 regression] Test case gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_b.c fails after r269302

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89551 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Mar 6 10:13:08 2019 New Revision: 269416 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269416=gcc=rev Log: 2019-03-06 Richard Biener PR testsuite/89551 *

[Bug middle-end/89551] [9 regression] Test case gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_b.c fails after r269302

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89551 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/89497] [8 Regression] ICE caused by Segmentation Fault when compiling cups 2.2.10 with LTO flags enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89497 Bug 89497 depends on bug 89551, which changed state. Bug 89551 Summary: [9 regression] Test case gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_b.c fails after r269302 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89551 What|Removed

[Bug middle-end/24639] [meta-bug] bug to track all Wuninitialized issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639 Bug 24639 depends on bug 89551, which changed state. Bug 89551 Summary: [9 regression] Test case gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_b.c fails after r269302 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89551 What|Removed

[Bug c++/89585] GCC 8.3: asm volatile no longer accepted at file scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89585 --- Comment #22 from Rolf Eike Beer --- I can confirm that with gcc 8.3 with the gcc8-patch Qt 5.12.1 builds fine.

[Bug libstdc++/85517] std::variant exception safety problems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85517 --- Comment #4 from ville at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ville Date: Wed Mar 6 12:56:05 2019 New Revision: 269422 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269422=gcc=rev Log: Rewrite variant, also PR libstdc++/85517 * include/std/variant

[Bug libstdc++/86655] std::assoc_legendre should not constrain the value of m

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86655 --- Comment #7 from emsr at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: emsr Date: Wed Mar 6 13:38:32 2019 New Revision: 269423 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269423=gcc=rev Log: 2019-03-06 Edward Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net> PR

[Bug target/86952] Avoid jump table for switch statement with -mindirect-branch=thunk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86952 --- Comment #21 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Daniel Borkmann from comment #20) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #19) > > Ok, I updated the benchmark and push it here: > > https://github.com/marxin/microbenchmark-1 > > > > And I

[Bug fortran/89603] unclassifiable statement error in code that is ok in compaq visual fortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89603 --- Comment #2 from Vladimir Yumashev --- Great !   Thanks a lot ! >Среда, 6 марта 2019, 12:04 +03:00 от steven at gcc dot gnu.org >: > >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89603 > >Steven Bosscher changed: > >   What

[Bug ipa/88235] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE: verify_cgraph_node failed (error: edge points to wrong declaration)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88235 --- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor --- I have proposed such patch on the mailing list: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-03/msg00262.html

[Bug c/88568] [7/8/9 Regression] 'dllimport' no longer implies 'extern' in C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88568 --- Comment #21 from Stephen Kitt --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #20) > Cross compilers don't bootstrap (build themselves multiple times), only > build. Sorry, I meant I did a library-less cross-build, followed by a MinGW-w64 build

[Bug c++/89585] GCC 8.3: asm volatile no longer accepted at file scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89585 --- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 45903 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45903=edit gcc9-pr89585.patch Untested patch for better diagnostics of this in GCC 9, for GCC 8 we could just not diagnose

[Bug target/89604] Type conversion from signed char to a wider integer generates wrong assembly for ARM,

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89604 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- In C, plain char can either be signed or unsigned; this is unlike int. Which of signed char or unsigned char has the same range, representation, and behavior as “plain” char (C90 6.1.2.5, C90 6.2.1.1, C99

[Bug target/89578] [9 Regression] 5% runtime regression for 481.wrf at -Ofast -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89578 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug sanitizer/88684] Please make SANITIZER_NON_UNIQUE_TYPEINFO a runtime flag (or always true)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88684 --- Comment #13 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Wed Mar 6 11:46:15 2019 New Revision: 269419 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269419=gcc=rev Log: Charry pick libsanitizer r355488 (PR sanitizer/88684). 2019-03-06 Martin Liska

[Bug c++/89605] A method cannot have two identical lambdas as default arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89605 --- Comment #2 from xavier at cremaschi dot fr --- rguenth are you sure for the 'link-failure' keyword ? It's truly a compilation error, triggered while compiling a given c++ file, it does NOT wait until linking to fail.

[Bug target/89602] Missing AVX512 intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89602 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug target/89578] [9 Regression] 5% runtime regression for 481.wrf at -Ofast -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89578 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- So it looks like the change from r269097 to r269098 is only 2.5% (I've included the followup fix ontop of r269098): 481.wrf 11170245 45.7 * 11170251 44.5 S 481.wrf

[Bug target/89592] FAIL: tmpdir-g++.dg-struct-layout-1/t025 cp_compat_x_alt.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute against GCC4.8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89592 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7) > It depends if the users can expect that they can actually access the > flexible array members or if it is like if they declare a new variable with > that type

[Bug c++/89605] New: A method cannot have two identical lambdas as default arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89605 Bug ID: 89605 Summary: A method cannot have two identical lambdas as default arguments Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/89585] GCC 8.3: asm volatile no longer accepted at file scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89585 --- Comment #20 from Harald van Dijk --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #19) > Created attachment 45903 [details] > gcc9-pr89585.patch Thanks. I'll test this on GCC 8, with trivial changes to accept asm volatile, when I get back home.

[Bug c++/89585] GCC 8.3: asm volatile no longer accepted at file scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89585 --- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 45904 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45904=edit gcc8-pr89585.patch The 8.x version would be like this.

[Bug target/89592] FAIL: tmpdir-g++.dg-struct-layout-1/t025 cp_compat_x_alt.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute against GCC4.8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89592 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- I think it only makes sense to pass aggregates with a flexarray member by reference and pass the return slot by reference as well. Only the caller can know the complete type used here. This means passing

[Bug c++/89605] A method cannot have two identical lambdas as default arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89605 --- Comment #1 from xavier at cremaschi dot fr --- FYI it also compiles if there is no class but just a free function : #include #include #include using namespace std; using ConverterFunction = function; void _foo( const

[Bug sanitizer/88684] Please make SANITIZER_NON_UNIQUE_TYPEINFO a runtime flag (or always true)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88684 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/89592] FAIL: tmpdir-g++.dg-struct-layout-1/t025 cp_compat_x_alt.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute against GCC4.8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89592 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- It depends if the users can expect that they can actually access the flexible array members or if it is like if they declare a new variable with that type without initializer and then copy it over. In the

[Bug target/89592] FAIL: tmpdir-g++.dg-struct-layout-1/t025 cp_compat_x_alt.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute against GCC4.8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89592 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- For the original testcase clang++ produces leaq16(%rbp), %rdx ... movq%rdx, -56(%rbp) # 8-byte Spill ... movq-56(%rbp), %rcx # 8-byte Reload movl

[Bug target/86952] Avoid jump table for switch statement with -mindirect-branch=thunk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86952 --- Comment #19 from Martin Liška --- Ok, I updated the benchmark and push it here: https://github.com/marxin/microbenchmark-1 And I see following on my Haswell machine: $ ./test.py normal retpolineretpo+no-JT

[Bug c++/89585] GCC 8.3: asm volatile no longer accepted at file scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89585 --- Comment #16 from Harald van Dijk --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #15) Please stop with the unnecessary and unhelpful insults. This is the second time I've had to ask you that.

[Bug c++/89585] GCC 8.3: asm volatile no longer accepted at file scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89585 --- Comment #18 from Rolf Eike Beer --- I would have expected something that is more like the error message in this case: class foo { static void bar() const; }; error: static member function ‘static void foo::bar()’ cannot have cv-qualifier

[Bug c++/89585] GCC 8.3: asm volatile no longer accepted at file scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89585 --- Comment #17 from Segher Boessenkool --- Hello Harald, Yes, that is what I would like you guys to do. But I'll stop working on this now, that is fine as well.

[Bug c/88568] [7/8/9 Regression] 'dllimport' no longer implies 'extern' in C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88568 --- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Stephen Kitt from comment #17) > Thanks for the fix Jakub, I’ve verified it on Qt and Andre Heinecke has > verified it on Gpg4Win (see https://bugs.debian.org/923214 for details). Thanks. >

[Bug fortran/89601] [8/9 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in resolve_component)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89601 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/88530] [8 Regression] AArch64 Unsupported options passed to assemblers when it doesn't need to.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88530 --- Comment #9 from Tamar Christina --- Author: tnfchris Date: Wed Mar 6 09:49:00 2019 New Revision: 269413 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269413=gcc=rev Log: AArch64: Fix command line options canonicalization version. Commandline

[Bug c/89569] line number is not accurate on large file with more than UINT32_MAX actual lines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89569 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Why would 3 be the expected value? Line numbers are natural numbers, not uint32.

[Bug c/88568] [7/8/9 Regression] 'dllimport' no longer implies 'extern' in C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88568 --- Comment #17 from Stephen Kitt --- Thanks for the fix Jakub, I’ve verified it on Qt and Andre Heinecke has verified it on Gpg4Win (see https://bugs.debian.org/923214 for details). jon_y, you can have your weekend back ;-).

[Bug fortran/89603] unclassifiable statement error in code that is ok in compaq visual fortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89603 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/88530] [8 Regression] AArch64 Unsupported options passed to assemblers when it doesn't need to.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88530 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/89538] [8.3.0] GCC miscompiling LLVM because of wrong vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89538 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8

[Bug target/89604] Type conversion from signed char to a wider integer generates wrong assembly for ARM,

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89604 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Component|driver

[Bug tree-optimization/14721] jump optimization involving a sibling call within a jump table

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14721 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2006-03-05 03:52:08 |2019-3-6 CC|

[Bug c++/89585] GCC 8.3: asm volatile no longer accepted at file scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89585 --- Comment #15 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Rolf Eike Beer from comment #14) > The other thing is: given that 8.3 does not show a diagnostic message that > is at least remotely helpful this looks for any end user just like a >

[Bug go/89598] [9 Regression] go frontend fails to build against mpfr 2.4.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89598 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0

[Bug c++/89585] GCC 8.3: asm volatile no longer accepted at file scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89585 --- Comment #14 from Rolf Eike Beer --- See https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-74196 That's how I found this at all: the latest current releases don't build together. And I guess that most projects that somehow are descendants of KJS will be

[Bug target/24647] two copies of a constant in two different registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24647 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c/88568] [7/8/9 Regression] 'dllimport' no longer implies 'extern' in C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88568 --- Comment #19 from Stephen Kitt --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #18) > (In reply to Stephen Kitt from comment #17) > > jon_y, you can have your weekend back ;-). > > Well, it should be tested also with a GCC bootstrap/regtest,

[Bug driver/89604] New: Type conversion from signed char to a wider integer generates wrong assembly for ARM,

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89604 Bug ID: 89604 Summary: Type conversion from signed char to a wider integer generates wrong assembly for ARM, Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/89538] [8.3.0] GCC miscompiling LLVM because of wrong vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89538 --- Comment #9 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8) > (In reply to Taewook Oh from comment #7) > > I'm Sorry I was confused about our internal gcc version, and it turns out > > that the version was 8.3 not 7.3. > >

[Bug other/16996] [meta-bug] code size improvements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16996 Bug 16996 depends on bug 24647, which changed state. Bug 24647 Summary: two copies of a constant in two different registers https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24647 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/89603] New: unclassifiable statement error in code that is ok in compaq visual fortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89603 Bug ID: 89603 Summary: unclassifiable statement error in code that is ok in compaq visual fortran Product: gcc Version: 7.4.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c/88568] [7/8/9 Regression] 'dllimport' no longer implies 'extern' in C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88568 --- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Stephen Kitt from comment #19) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #18) > > (In reply to Stephen Kitt from comment #17) > > > jon_y, you can have your weekend back ;-). > > > > Well, it

[Bug middle-end/42972] Very bad bit field code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42972 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2012-03-18 12:45:53 |2019-3-6 --- Comment #7 from Steven

[Bug tree-optimization/14721] jump optimization involving a sibling call within a jump table

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14721 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Steven Bosscher from comment #3) > Maybe something for tree-switch-conversion? Yes, would be possible to implement, but I'm not fully convinced it's a common pattern that happens in switch

[Bug target/86952] Avoid jump table for switch statement with -mindirect-branch=thunk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86952 --- Comment #20 from Daniel Borkmann --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #19) > Ok, I updated the benchmark and push it here: > https://github.com/marxin/microbenchmark-1 > > And I see following on my Haswell machine: Thanks for working

[Bug target/88530] [8 Regression] AArch64 Unsupported options passed to assemblers when it doesn't need to.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88530 --- Comment #8 from Tamar Christina --- Author: tnfchris Date: Wed Mar 6 09:34:04 2019 New Revision: 269412 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269412=gcc=rev Log: AArch64: Have empty HWCAPs string ignored during native feature detection.

[Bug c++/29040] missing access control checks in subclasses for nested types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29040 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2006-09-12 20:59:08 |2019-3-6 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan

[Bug c++/87378] False -Wredundant-move (derived vs. base)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87378 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Wed Mar 6 15:34:50 2019 New Revision: 269427 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269427=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/87378 - bogus -Wredundant-move warning. * typeck.c

[Bug target/89592] FAIL: tmpdir-g++.dg-struct-layout-1/t025 cp_compat_x_alt.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute against GCC4.8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89592 --- Comment #10 from Martin Sebor --- The standard is clear that flexible array members are not copied but ignored: In most situations, the flexible array member is ignored. In particular, the size of the structure is as if the flexible array

[Bug target/89606] New: Extra mov after structure load instructions on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89606 Bug ID: 89606 Summary: Extra mov after structure load instructions on aarch64 Product: gcc Version: 8.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/89602] Missing AVX512 intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89602 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 45905 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45905=edit gcc9-pr89602-wip.patch Untested patch without testsuite.

[Bug c++/87378] False -Wredundant-move (derived vs. base)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87378 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/88845] ICE in lra_set_insn_recog_data, at lra.c:1010

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88845 --- Comment #4 from Peter Bergner --- Author: bergner Date: Wed Mar 6 15:36:43 2019 New Revision: 269428 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269428=gcc=rev Log: gcc/ PR rtl-optimization/88845 * config/rs6000/rs6000.c

[Bug go/89598] [9 Regression] go frontend fails to build against mpfr 2.4.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89598 --- Comment #6 from David Malcolm --- (In reply to Ian Lance Taylor from comment #5) > This time for sure. Indeed: r269411 did fix the build against mpfr 2.4.2 for my test config. Thanks.

[Bug other/29842] [meta-bug] outstanding patches / issues from STMicroelectronics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29842 Bug 29842 depends on bug 29843, which changed state. Bug 29843 Summary: [meta-bug] C++98 standard conformance issues https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29843 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/29843] [meta-bug] C++98 standard conformance issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29843 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/86655] std::assoc_legendre should not constrain the value of m

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86655 emsr at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/89605] A method cannot have two identical lambdas as default arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89605 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- The code *does* compile, but GCC outputs duplicate symbols, so it doesn't assemble (or link).

[Bug target/89607] New: Missing optimization for store of multiple registers on arm and aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89607 Bug ID: 89607 Summary: Missing optimization for store of multiple registers on arm and aarch64 Product: gcc Version: 8.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/89605] A method cannot have two identical lambdas as default arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89605 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug libstdc++/89608] New: Undetected iterator invalidations on unordered containers in debug mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89608 Bug ID: 89608 Summary: Undetected iterator invalidations on unordered containers in debug mode Product: gcc Version: 8.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/88845] ICE in lra_set_insn_recog_data, at lra.c:1010

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88845 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED URL|

[Bug libstdc++/89608] Undetected iterator invalidations on unordered containers in debug mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89608 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ada/89609] New: bug box caused by access to function as a record component via a limited with

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89609 Bug ID: 89609 Summary: bug box caused by access to function as a record component via a limited with Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/89611] New: Compilation ok with 'class', but ko with 'struct'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89611 Bug ID: 89611 Summary: Compilation ok with 'class', but ko with 'struct' Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/89585] GCC 8.3: asm volatile no longer accepted at file scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89585 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #45903|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/88820] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in in C++2a mode for code which is able to be compiled in C++17 mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88820 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|mpolacek at gcc

[Bug c++/89611] Compilation ok with 'class', but ko with 'struct'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89611 --- Comment #1 from xavier at cremaschi dot fr --- I forgot that default inheritance is private. My bad. This is NOT a bug.

[Bug c++/89612] internal compiler error: in push_access_scope, at cp/pt.c:237

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89612 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Reduced (invalid): template bool b; template struct C { template friend int foo() noexcept(b<1>); }; template int foo() noexcept(b<1>); auto a = C();

[Bug c++/89612] internal compiler error: in push_access_scope, at cp/pt.c:237

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89612 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/89576] [8/9 Regression] constexpr not working if implicitly captured in a lambda in a function template (gcc 8.3+)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89576 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Mar 6 18:39:24 2019 New Revision: 269433 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269433=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/89576 - if constexpr of lambda capture. Now that we're doing

[Bug c++/89612] internal compiler error: in push_access_scope, at cp/pt.c:237

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89612 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #2) > Reduced (invalid): > > template bool b; > > template > struct C { > template friend int foo() noexcept(b<1>); > }; > > template int foo()

[Bug c++/87148] [7/8/9 Regression] backward compatibility issue to take char [] as incomplete type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87148 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Mar 6 18:46:32 2019 New Revision: 269434 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269434=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/87148 * init.c (build_value_init_noctor): Ignore flexible

[Bug c++/89381] [7/8/9 Regression] Implicit copy constructor cannot be generated after unrelated class definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89381 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/89604] Type conversion from signed char to a wider integer generates wrong assembly for ARM,

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89604 --- Comment #3 from christopher békési --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > In C, plain char can either be signed or unsigned; this is unlike int. > > Which of signed char or unsigned char has the same range, representation, > and

[Bug fortran/89601] [8/9 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in resolve_component)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89601 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/78511] ICE on using concept name as a "requires" parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78511 Arthur O'Dwyer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/89576] [8 Regression] constexpr not working if implicitly captured in a lambda in a function template (gcc 8.3+)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89576 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9 Regression] constexpr |[8 Regression] constexpr

[Bug fortran/89603] unclassifiable statement error in code that is ok in compaq visual fortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89603 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Your code is not standard-conforming. Do this: ... You can also use -fdec, but it's better to fix the code.

[Bug fortran/66089] [7/8/9 Regression] elemental dependency mishandling when class array are involved

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66089 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/89612] New: internal compiler error: in push_access_scope, at cp/pt.c:237

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89612 Bug ID: 89612 Summary: internal compiler error: in push_access_scope, at cp/pt.c:237 Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/89602] Missing AVX512 intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89602 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/89585] GCC 8.3: asm volatile no longer accepted at file scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89585 --- Comment #24 from Harald van Dijk --- Created attachment 45910 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45910=edit gcc-8-pr89585-warn.patch (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #21) > Created attachment 45904 [details] >

[Bug c++/82768] ICE in synthesize_implicit_template_parm, at cp/parser.c:39338

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82768 Arthur O'Dwyer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot com ---

[Bug libstdc++/89610] New: Move-assigning a pmr container sometimes copies the elements instead of moving them

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89610 Bug ID: 89610 Summary: Move-assigning a pmr container sometimes copies the elements instead of moving them Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/89550] [8/9 Regression] Spurious array-bounds warning when using __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ as a string_view

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89550 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/89604] Type conversion from signed char to a wider integer generates wrong assembly for ARM,

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89604 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to christopher békési from comment #3) > How come that it was decided to make the char on ARM unsigned whereas on x86 > platforms it's signed by default? I don't know, you are going to have to ask

[Bug c++/89611] Compilation ok with 'class', but ko with 'struct'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89611 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/89607] Missing optimization for store of multiple registers on arm and aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89607 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- I think this should be filed as two seperate issues. For aarch64, this might have been fixed already for 9.0.

  1   2   >