https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66089
--- Comment #40 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Mar 16 14:03:00 2019
New Revision: 269725
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269725=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-03-16 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/66089
Backport from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66089
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89736
Bug ID: 89736
Summary: New test pr87532-mc.c fails on compiler not defaulting
to VSX
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89736
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc*-*-*
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80265
janisozaur+gcc at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janisozaur+gcc at gmail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89393
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89738
Bug ID: 89738
Summary: Warn for unused macro arguments
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77746
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Mar 16 13:24:40 2019
New Revision: 269723
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269723=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-03-16 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/66695
PR fortran/77746
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66695
--- Comment #13 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Mar 16 13:24:40 2019
New Revision: 269723
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269723=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-03-16 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/66695
PR fortran/77746
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79485
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Mar 16 13:24:40 2019
New Revision: 269723
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269723=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-03-16 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/66695
PR fortran/77746
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84174
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84174
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Mar 16 16:39:49 2019
New Revision: 269728
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269728=gcc=rev
Log:
PR testsuite/84174
* gcc.dg/Wattributes-6.c: Skip warning
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89735
--- Comment #6 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to John David Anglin from comment #5)
> There's also an unaligned accesses here:
>
> (gdb) bt
> #0 rt.minfo.ModuleGroup.sortCtors(immutable(char)[]) (this=...,
> cycleHandling=...) at
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80265
--- Comment #38 from Jonathan Wakely ---
char_traits now uses either __builtin_constant_p or
__builtin_is_constant_evaluated to avoid using wcslen in constant expressions.
If that isn't working with clang for some reason that's a separate issue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89735
--- Comment #7 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2019-03-16 1:10 p.m., ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org wrote:
> Still all related to the same ModuleInfo generated by gdc compiler.
I just did "make" after applying patch. Then, I rebuilt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89471
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89735
--- Comment #8 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to dave.anglin from comment #7)
> On 2019-03-16 1:10 p.m., ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org wrote:
> > Still all related to the same ModuleInfo generated by gdc compiler.
> I just did "make" after
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77746
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Mar 16 13:16:11 2019
New Revision: 269722
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269722=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-03-16 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/66695
PR fortran/77746
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79485
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Mar 16 13:16:11 2019
New Revision: 269722
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269722=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-03-16 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/66695
PR fortran/77746
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66695
--- Comment #12 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Mar 16 13:16:11 2019
New Revision: 269722
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269722=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-03-16 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/66695
PR fortran/77746
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66089
--- Comment #39 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Mar 16 13:52:19 2019
New Revision: 269724
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269724=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-03-16 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/66089
Backport from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89737
Bug ID: 89737
Summary: internal compiler error: Floating point exception
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89735
--- Comment #5 from John David Anglin ---
There's also an unaligned accesses here:
(gdb) bt
#0 rt.minfo.ModuleGroup.sortCtors(immutable(char)[]) (this=...,
cycleHandling=...) at ../../../../gcc/libphobos/libdruntime/rt/minfo.d:259
#1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89393
--- Comment #3 from John David Anglin ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Mar 16 18:10:31 2019
New Revision: 269732
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269732=gcc=rev
Log:
PR testsuite/89393
* g++.dg/abi/ref-temp1.C: Skip on 32-bit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84394
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Mar 16 11:50:03 2019
New Revision: 269721
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269721=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-03-16 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/84394
* symbol.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89667
--- Comment #5 from Rick Greer ---
OK, now I get it. The array of pointers is, indeed, static but the compiler is
trying to allocate the data that those pointers reference on the stack! I was
confused by the fact that C++ lets me do this:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86593
Domani Hannes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ssbssa at yahoo dot de
--- Comment #16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79485
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77746
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66695
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32630
Bug 32630 depends on bug 66695, which changed state.
Bug 66695 Summary: [7/8 Regression] [F03] ICE with binding-name equal to the
name of a use-associated procedure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66695
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89735
--- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2019-03-15 9:02 p.m., ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org wrote:
>> Might add that there are quite a few unaligned accesses:
> I guess that forcing the ModuleInfo type alignment to 1 is not helping
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78915
--- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #2)
> Possibly a dup of PR87209
Or vice versa.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83453
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83453
--- Comment #6 from John David Anglin ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Mar 16 15:44:25 2019
New Revision: 269727
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269727=gcc=rev
Log:
PR testsuite/83453
* c-c++-common/Wattributes.c: Skip a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39985
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Which is PR 89734, right?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84941
--- Comment #11 from John David Anglin ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Mar 16 17:31:30 2019
New Revision: 269730
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269730=gcc=rev
Log:
PR testsuite/84941
* gcc.dg/pr84941.c: Skip on hppa*-*-*.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26732
--- Comment #9 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Harald van Dijk from comment #8)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #7)
> > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
> > > Now we don't even error out at -O3.
> >
> > Why would the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89739
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
PR 84101.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89740
--- Comment #2 from bert hubert ---
Created attachment 45982
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45982=edit
reproduction that actually shows the bug
This is the version of the reproduction that exhibits the problem. The other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85915
--- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Luke Dashjr from comment #13)
> I run Gentoo, so it compiled it for me (2.27)
You should report it to Gentoo.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89571
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89738
--- Comment #2 from Dávid Bolvanský ---
#define PARENT_NODE(x) ((id - 1) / 2)
int id = 0;
int idx = 1;
PARENT_NODE(idx); // macro contais id, but id is defined, warn?
But probably such analysis is not so easy...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89740
Bug ID: 89740
Summary: reading from cin & writing to cout
sync_with_stdio(false) has race conditions
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89742
Bug ID: 89742
Summary: Ada2020 target assignment in generic renders a type
invisible
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89724
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85915
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Luke Dashjr from comment #9)
> Is there a solution or workaround for this? I already rebuilt glibc more
> than once, but keep running into it... (GCC 8.2.0 on a system that was
> mostly built by
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89738
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |preprocessor
--- Comment #1 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89724
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Mar 16 21:18:49 2019
New Revision: 269734
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269734=gcc=rev
Log:
PR fortran/89724
* scanner.c (load_line): Remove linenum and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85915
Luke Dashjr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||luke-jr+gccbugs at utopios dot
org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89740
--- Comment #3 from bert hubert ---
Note that in
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/12605725/basic-thread-locking-in-c11/12608911#12608911
we read the calling flush() from two threads at the same time is not legal if
the streams are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89487
--- Comment #9 from bin cheng ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8)
> *** Bug 89731 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Hi Jakub, is this (and the duplication) fixed by the previous patches or the
issue is still there?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88724
--- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2019-03-15 12:48 p.m., ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org wrote:
> The system headers (stdlib.h, time.h, stdint.h, etc...) will need to be ported
> to druntime, are these available anywhere?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89735
--- Comment #9 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2019-03-16 1:51 p.m., ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org wrote:
> All modules would need rebuilding, so clean and rebuild the target libphobos
> library too.
After library rebuild, there are no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85915
--- Comment #11 from Luke Dashjr ---
Simply upgrading to GCC 8.2.0 failed due to the multiple-definition of
__x86_return_thunk, so I successfully built only the C compiler with the
non-thunking defaults; from there, I rebuilt glibc again without
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85915
--- Comment #13 from Luke Dashjr ---
I run Gentoo, so it compiled it for me (2.27)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78352
--- Comment #8 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #7)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #6)
> > (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #5)
> > > (In reply to René J.V. Bertin from comment #4)
> > > > Any news
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78352
--- Comment #9 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #8)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #7)
> > (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #6)
> > > (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #5)
> > > > (In reply to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89739
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64
Component|middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89739
Bug ID: 89739
Summary: pessimizing vectorization at -O3 to load two u64
objects
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89740
--- Comment #1 from bert hubert ---
Comment on attachment 45981
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45981
a small reproduction for this bug.
>#include
>#include
>#include
>#include
>
>using namespace std;
>
>void
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85915
--- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Luke Dashjr from comment #11)
> Simply upgrading to GCC 8.2.0 failed due to the multiple-definition of
> __x86_return_thunk, so I successfully built only the C compiler with the
> non-thunking
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80265
--- Comment #39 from Jonathan Wakely ---
It seems that clang doesn't support using __builtin_constant_p this way, so
using char_traits in constant expressions isn't going to work until
they implement is_constant_evaluated.
The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89741
Bug ID: 89741
Summary: [Regression] static_assert fires when template not
instantiated
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89743
Bug ID: 89743
Summary: [concepts] ICE when using decltype(requires-expr) as
type template parameter
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89734
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
66 matches
Mail list logo
