https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90813
--- Comment #27 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #26)
> The odd thing is that for the Fortran example even the tree oracle claims
> the store doesn't alias the load...
>
> Because they are different variables!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85746
--- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse ---
The problematic file seems to be tree-dfa.o, and the only difference I see in
the .original dump is the use of __builtin_constant_p in wi::lshift (3
occurrences because of templates)
- if (precision
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91068
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Sun Jul 7 09:49:24 2019
New Revision: 273175
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273175=gcc=rev
Log:
PR91068: Fix MIPS fallout from IRA matched operand changes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91100
--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2019-07-07 4:10 a.m., ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Let's just disable the test on HP-UX as it is on Solaris.
Okay. The pass/fail seems inconsistent.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91077
--- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Jul 7 14:50:53 2019
New Revision: 273178
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273178=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-07-07 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/91077
* trans-array.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91077
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Jul 7 10:53:37 2019
New Revision: 273176
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273176=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-07-07 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/91077
* trans-array.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91102
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #2)
> 91102.c: In function 'foo':
> 91102.c:7:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function
> [-Wreturn-type]
> 7 | }
> | ^
>
> so
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90813
--- Comment #28 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On July 7, 2019 2:59:29 PM GMT+02:00, "tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org"
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90813
>
>--- Comment #27 from Thomas Koenig ---
>(In reply to Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84877
--- Comment #11 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2019-07-06 3:39 p.m., amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Since the esirisc port is not in the FSF tree, it doesn't really count for
> testing; also, the behaviour will vary depending on
-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc/configure --enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-lto
--disable-bootstrap : (reconfigured) ../gcc/configure --enable-lto
--disable-bootstrap --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --no-create --no-recursion
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91107
Bug ID: 91107
Summary: __attribute__((pure)) to function with non-const
pointers
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91090
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Sun Jul 7 18:42:45 2019
New Revision: 273184
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273184=gcc=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/91090
* tree-ssa-dom.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91060
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
hmm, armeb-linux doesn't use newlib. awkward to set up a cross :/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84877
--- Comment #12 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke from comment #10)
> Created attachment 46567 [details]
> Fix for targets that pass the argument by invisible reference
Thanks for your efforts. This *may* have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90813
--- Comment #26 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #25)
> At expand time, the assignment is
>
>
> ;; c_ = c;
>
> (insn 35 34 36 (set (reg/f:DI 140)
> (unspec:DI [
> (symbol_ref:DI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91104
Bug ID: 91104
Summary: auto... in lambda expression reorders parameters
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91077
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91068
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85746
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91060
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
O compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 10.0.0 20190707 (experimental) (GCC)
-COMMAND LINE USED FOR COMPILATION-
~/pull-martin-compiler/build/gcc/xgcc -B ~/pull-martin-compiler/build/gcc/ -O0
crash2.i -w
during RTL pass: final
crash2.c: In function ‘func_1’:
c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91077
--- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Jul 7 14:32:53 2019
New Revision: 273177
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273177=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-07-07 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/91077
* trans-array.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91090
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61339
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #58 from EML ---
32 Bit:
Second Test Program (derived from a crashing conftest)
#include
int
main ()
{
int j = 0;
j = islower(0);
printf("j is: %d\n", j);
return 0;
}
[.LCFI2:]
mov r35 = r1
.body
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84877
--- Comment #15 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke ---
Created attachment 46574
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46574=edit
patch for the case that the stack is sufficiently aligned
(In reply to dave.anglin from comment #11)
> $sp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87274
--- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #4)
> (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> > (In reply to Patrick J. LoPresti from comment #0)
> > > Note that my code does not use any quad-precision
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91030
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jb at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #36
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #59 from EML ---
Created attachment 46575
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46575=edit
islower 32 bit test assembler
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77510
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mfortune at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80518
--- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Arnaud Desitter from comment #2)
> Interesting. Shame that there is no rationale.
>
> I suppose that "-Wsuggest-override=2" could warn about "override" missing
> for destructor.
I'd just like
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91102
--- Comment #5 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
>
> Vlad, could you please have a look?
The culprit patch is actually
https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision=265942
Prohibiting reload for any user
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44566
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #57 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2019-07-05 7:57 p.m., elowe at elowe dot com wrote:
> Doing some more testing on my "gprel unfixed fix" 32-bit gcc, I found out that
> it seems to be missing the 32-bit pointer swizzling
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84877
--- Comment #14 from John David Anglin ---
Created attachment 46573
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46573=edit
Preproccessed source for pr84877.c
I don't believe there are any new failures or ICEs on hppa-linux with your
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91030
--- Comment #37 from Janne Blomqvist ---
One thing we could do would be to switch to pread and pwrite instead of using
lseek. That would avoid a few syscalls when updating the record length marker.
Though I guess the issue with GPFS isn't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84877
--- Comment #13 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #12)
> (In reply to Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke from comment #10)
> > Created attachment 46567 [details]
> > Fix for targets that pass the argument by
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84877
--- Comment #16 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke from comment #13)
> I tried if I could reproduce this with a cross-compiler built for
> --target=hppa-linux-gnu;
My target of concern is cris-elf, just as in my
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90756
--- Comment #19 from Mike Hommey ---
Applying the patch from PR90139 and this one works fixes the ICEs on this file
with both GCC 7 and 8.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91100
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
40 matches
Mail list logo
