https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89544
--- Comment #6 from Bernd Edlinger ---
This is half fixed now:
Since r274531 the original test case no longer generates wrong code,
but only slightly non-optimal code.
I had so far two test cases:
$ cat unaligned-argument-1.c
/* { dg-do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41861
--- Comment #18 from Mike Crowe ---
(In reply to Mike Crowe from comment #17)
> In https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2019-02/msg00637.html , I proposed
> the addition of the pthread_cond_clockwait function (among others) to glibc,
> and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91154
--- Comment #24 from Uroš Bizjak ---
It looks that the patch introduced a (small?) runtime regression of 5% in
SPEC2000 300.twolf on haswell [1]. Maybe worth looking at.
[1]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89544
--- Comment #7 from Bernd Edlinger ---
However while writing the patch "Sanitizing the middle-end interface
to the back-end for strict alignment":
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-08/msg01130.html
I discovered another wrong code bug,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91471
--- Comment #2 from Sameeran Joshi ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #1)
> I have a patch that prevents the ICE. Remove ICE-on-valid-code
> tag as the code is invalid.
It fails when a value is assigned to the allocated space:
program
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91473
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91390
Bug 91390 depends on bug 91443, which changed state.
Bug 91443 Summary: -Wargument-mismatch does not catch mismatch for global
procedure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91443
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91443
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91443
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Janne Blomqvist from comment #3)
> I'm seeing a failure in the testcase libgomp.fortran/appendix-a/a.28.5.f90
> which looks like it might(?) be caused by this:
>
> $ gfortran a.28.5.f90
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91473
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Aug 17 11:57:25 2019
New Revision: 274602
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274602=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-08-17 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/91473
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78719
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sat Aug 17 14:27:07 2019
New Revision: 274604
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274604=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-08-17 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/78719
* decl.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78719
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91458
--- Comment #6 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2019-08-15 10:47 a.m., danglin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Similar fail:
> FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dse-1.C scan-tree-dump-times dse1
> "MEM[(struct FixBuf *)& +
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40976
Bug 40976 depends on bug 91443, which changed state.
Bug 91443 Summary: -Wargument-mismatch does not catch mismatch for global
procedure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91443
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91347
--- Comment #11 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2019-08-16 8:17 a.m., John David Anglin wrote:
> On 2019-08-16 5:47 a.m., ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>> Created attachment 46721
>> -->
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78739
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sat Aug 17 14:39:51 2019
New Revision: 274605
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274605=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-08-17 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/78739
* match.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91471
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl ---
On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 08:04:23AM +, SameeranJayant.Joshi at amd dot com
wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91471
>
> --- Comment #2 from Sameeran Joshi ---
> (In reply to kargl from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91471
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sat Aug 17 14:23:10 2019
New Revision: 274603
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274603=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-08-17 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/91471
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91478
Bug ID: 91478
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/pr41893-1.c -gdwarf-2 -g1 (test for
excess errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
ution failed:
:6:40: note: mismatched types 'const U' and 'int'
6 | static void bar(int x) { bar(x); }
|
Output of "gcc -v":
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-snapshot/bin/g++
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-trunk-201908
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84877
--- Comment #20 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2019-07-08 6:04 a.m., amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Created attachment 46577
> --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46577=edit
> patch for aligned stack - but clamping
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90505
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
Test from 91479:
template struct foo
{
template
static void bar(const U&) {}
static void bar(int x) { bar(x); }
};
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91479
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90505
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmatthews at utexas dot edu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78739
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82992
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91471
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91480
Bug ID: 91480
Summary: Nonconforming definitions of standard library
feature-test macros
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64636
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||glaubitz at physik dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82992
--- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sat Aug 17 17:15:42 2019
New Revision: 274608
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274608=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-08-17 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/82992
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82992
--- Comment #8 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sat Aug 17 18:08:21 2019
New Revision: 274609
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274609=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-08-17 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/82992
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78719
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sat Aug 17 18:11:58 2019
New Revision: 274610
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274610=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-08-17 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/78719
* decl.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78739
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sat Aug 17 18:14:26 2019
New Revision: 274611
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274611=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-08-17 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/78739
* match.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82173
Bug 82173 depends on bug 89413, which changed state.
Bug 89413 Summary: [PDT] ICE in resolve_fl_derived, at fortran/resolve.c:14392
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89413
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89413
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78719
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91471
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sat Aug 17 18:16:51 2019
New Revision: 274612
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274612=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-08-17 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/91471
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91426
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Having had occasion to look at a few hundred multi-line error messages
today, I have now changed my mind on what I would consider best :-)
I now think different colors for primary and secondary error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49706
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18487
--- Comment #19 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Dávid Bolvanský from comment #18)
> a.c
>
> int foo(void) __attribute__((const));
>
>
> int main(void) {
> return foo();
> }
>
> b.c
>
> #include
>
> int foo(void) {
>
40 matches
Mail list logo
